@@CharlieSolly I'm quite certain most people use WPA2 and it isn't as easy.

​@TheRealDr.Mabuse it is already WPA2, he wrote it on the screen when he said WPA. He also already explained on another short that this is on WPA2 networks, even though the tool shows WPA.

Never ever unless custom password I have charter communications default dictionary the use stuff like major theory 150

The network is configured with WPA2. Wifite shows WPA even when WPA2 is used. This attack was against a captured WPA2 handshake.

​@@davidbombal What about WPA3?

Tbh most hacks look exactly like that

You Just Insulted My Entire Race Of People, but yes.

​@@raghavawasthi9593 He insulted you too?

Any of you know how i can protect from this?

When the guy who knows nothing about hacking tries to make fun of what hacking actually looks like 🤡

Superman is slow and weak, when it comes to navigating the world wide web.

In my other KZfaq short (using a rooted Android phone with Kali NetHunter), I do the same thing with a superman wifi network. We need to find a more secure superhero it seems 😂

There's always rainbow tables...

Aquaman?

​@@davidbombal 😂

Completely disagree, Android and iphones aren't lacking, Pinephone just adds a lot more functionality that a typical smartphone will never ever have the need of.

@@keanencorning5094 there are type c docks that allow passthrough charge while using

​@@shubhankurkumar so theyre lacking... for anyone that knows hoe to actually use a phone

​@@shubhankurkumarsooooo.... Doesnt it mean they are lacking? 🤔

They lack a lot of the extra functionality provided by Linux. Therefore are lacking. Case closed.

True but some people think in that way maybe because Android is not GNU

yes, but it is also heavily modified. it's like saying that macbooks run UNIX: technically correct, but not entirely true

@@the_null_man they kinda do tho

@@PushTheLimitsHCR3 so does Android "run on Linux"

Not really the execution of the hack but keeping your footprint untraceable is what is the prime factor in question, when comparing linux with android/ios

​@@deepesh1995lol macchanger 😂🤡

​​@@deepesh1995 and how you do that?

can you install android apps on it or it supports only Linux apps?

Wtf is that?

That’s great What are u using for that ?

Not rly effective if you got kids and kids got friends every night lol

If this phone can do this, I'm sure it can get around that.

@@emilydiaz8886 I enable the guest network whenever I have guests over. That separates them from my main network and it's without password. Once they leave, I disable it

@@SonoftheWars blocking the device means blocking their MAC address. The device will need to change that if it wants to get around it, only to be blocked again

By people I’ll assume you mean devices. Most people have lots of devices logged into the WiFi even when they are not around. Wireless cameras, Apple TVs, thermostats, alarm systems, WiFi repeaters, appliances, solar controller, lighting controllers, pool controller equipment and many more devices. All should try to reestablish a Wi-Fi connection when knock off the Wi-Fi.

But we can use fakeauth and force it to generate packets and then capture a handshake. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

😂

same catching a handshake is easy but cracking that hash is hard.

I assume it just does a large dictionary attack then if that doesn't work it just says it can't do it

If it couldn’t find the dictionary it says It didn’t find it If it’s bruteforceing you will be staying their for a little while buddy

@@ko-Daegu Thanks for the answer!

@@ko-Daegu You mean he will stay there until the cell phone/laptop battery runs out and that won't help him either. There is nothing like a text document if you have a huge vocabulary and good luck

​@@supernoob2542 I was jk by saying little while super computers takes years to be able to brute force them (something like 3,000 years maybe given or take depends on the Bruteforce method the computer in hand the algo used the implementation the characters ..etc etc ) for extra info lookup PBKDF2, it will explain many things as the key is derived from it and in the IEEE specs it shows you that a password needs to be 8 to 63 characters which explains why it says 8 char min btw. when you create a new password for your AP (Access Point) the key derived from this function will b used in the 4-way handshake as the PSK/PWK (pair-wise master key) and it generates what called "Message Integrity Code" (MIC). in the 4-way handshake we will check the MIC and the SSID to make sure that client get's auth correctly. the tool in the video captures this handshake checks the info and puts it in the PBKDF2 with an arbitrary password and checks the output if it matches the MIC that was captured means we got the password. this is how it works in simple terms for both WPA (in the vid) and also WPA2 not WPA3 thus being said bruteforce and dictionary attacks are not the only thing - WPA2 is vul (and in this case he's using WPA which's even worse) to many attacks - WPA3 is also discovered to be vul to a series of vul dubbed Dragonblood, while in theory bruteforce don't work against WPA3. why? remember the whole MIC from PSK which's from PBKDF2, doesn't exists here as we use something else called password element (PE) derived from H2E (instead PSK/PWK derived from PBKDF2) now you might say wow big deal new fancy words what's the difference i will bruteforce the password element (PE) offline just like we did with WPA/WPA2 will honey here the thing is that: - each client got own PE. - the SAE (Simultaneous Authentication of Equals ) dubbed in WPA3 as DragonFLy protocol, the sys we use here to to work as exchange the keys (which doesn't really it makes both client and AP reach an agreement without exchanging keys) is actually and example of EEC and Zero-knowdlage proof in other fancy terms we don't actually share the PE both Client and AP reach to a commitment that they are using the same correct PE without actually sharing hence you won't be able to actually capture it this might seems like it doesn't make sense so the only thing here go watch a vid about zero knowledge proof

🤔🤔🤔....🤣🤣🤣

Show me yer trucker clock!

Would u mind explaining why they would be? The emojis being indestructible(if they were allowed to be used in passwords)?

And if possible (to use an emoji) in your Pssword then couldn’t you like make a specific nft emoji and use just that as your password? Wouldn’t that like be super freakin hard to crack? Sorry for all the q’s been tryna get back into things

Android is linux

Any old wifi has wps bud, don't be scare though you can only verify connect at spesific time when wps button is pressed

You just lock it to individual Mac addresses and don't broadcast. Boom done

can you send me a specific link - the normal google search does not yield good results for me in this case

Everyone is on the same network anyway

Arent we all? I mean I am not a tech savvy but I probably forget more things than u'll ever even know about cyber security. Like where tf do I put my keys, or why I only have $10 in my bank account.

Ah, the Masonic 2.0 protocol.

Offmyproptee!!!

Perfectly working with Termux, also I have increased wifi range xpose module

Good old times

The network is configured with WPA2. Wifite shows WPA even when WPA2 is used. This attack was against a captured WPA2 handshake.

@@davidbombal it was just a joke abt the good old times of backtrack with aircrack, handshakes and so on

watching this on a linux phone feels good, my unix mates are close too

Feels like budget phone , not for heavy use and definitely not good for daily use , their targets is really different , not for high performance or camera , if you really want Linux than dual boot your phone or Use VNC remote to use Linux.

@@xninja2369 I'll wait until someone makes a decent distro for some decent phone. Something tells me it's not going up be much longer.

how

It doesn't; it runs a heavily modified version of the Linux kernel with a bunch of Google software. That is not the same as running on top of GNU/Linux.