"I have not tried this product but yes it is really good"... that's not how it works?

@@elliotw.888 they're saying it's worth it even just to support new color film technologies, regardless of how good the film is.

But it's not new stock. You aren't supporting anything other than their business of taking already existing products and upping the price. They are nothing but a middle-man. If you want to support the film industry, you should see if any local stores are re-spooling and developing ECN-2 process Kodak 250D (what this film is)

@@autumnkeys Exactly.

@@SAGGING_GUT It's new in that they are creating something readily available for people to shoot. Oh yes, that "local" shop would respools ECN-2 process Kodak 250D, that doesn't exist or cost way more. It's about making film stock more accessible to everyone, while offering something different. You can argue the semantics of "new" or "different" all you want, but you miss the bigger picture.

Just a heads up, if you like those subtle halations, Tilden has made an offshoot of their diffusion filters called GlitterGlass that is spot on at strength level 1. Not that you asked lol

@@AbsintheMindedV2 do you mean Tiffen and not Tilden? Also, pretty sure it is glimmer glass and not Glitter Glass? if you provide info, please ,make sure it is at least accurate

I mean they might pretty much get all their film that way now. They have had their own edge markings done by Kodak for a while, so it would be strange if that would not go in hand with Kodak just omitting the remjet application as well.

Willem mentions in the video it's not Kodak Vision3 250D, and I'd have to agree. It doesn't look like 250D colors that I've seen.

Hard disagree on it beating Portra.

It’s not a Kodak film. Nor is it close to Portra.

I agree, even if the look is not that similar, behaves like a 250D. Knowing that EVERY (maybe almost) Cinestill item is a rebranded product from another company, I don’t have doubts that is Kodak

Someone is already doing that kind of experiments, it's called Attic Darkroom

That's pretty much what they do for motion picture film in 35mm and 65mm

I’m not sure if you mean duplicating a digital image (some form of light box display?) or film on film. If the latter some of us have been doing that for decades! Either to have back ups before the digital age (I used to send duplicates to the Image Libraries that I sold to:through way back when) , to increase contrast and saturation and to change tonality etc by copying, say Ektachrome onto Velvia.

@@kronkite1530 didn't know that

@@fliprider562 don't they scan the filme then color grade it and then trasnform it back to film?

I like it, picasso

All that I’m allowed to say is that is incorrect ;)

Makes me want to try 250D *with* remjet. Not a fan of these highlights

@@WillemVerb Now that's intriguing!🤔

@@mynewcolour If you can deal with the remjet, it's a wonderful film. Tons of latitude and punchy colours. Kinda like a cross between Ektar and Portra. I like it a lot!

@@WillemVerb Really happy to hear that. I am still sort of upset this has halations. I think it's a misstep. Halations are a defect, and 400D is supposed to be a professional film. Its especially disappointing because CineStill says, "400D is specifically designed for still photography." Still photography film has antihalation layers built in that clear in bleach. To be clear, I love 50D and 800T, but Halations are not something I always want.

I barely did any editing! Just slight contrast adjustments.

the big downside of theses stocks is the ecn2 process .

@@twuuwttwu use c41 if you like. i prefer it on the movie film.

Good tip

MP has a built in meter.

@@MLUdrea ain’t true

@@JulianWildner MP has a meter, M-A is the model which doesn’t

@@slothsarecool M4-P neither

@@hollywoodheiner6028 this

Good question. Wondered the same.

he's white.. of course not

@@bakir3120 hahahaha

@@bakir3120 Exactly.. he's walking around with 3 other white dudes and they don't look like a threat. So he can get away with literally FILMING and taking pictures of peoples homes. This style of photography is so fuckin over-hyped and so overdone its crazy lol. This is the shit that gets the likes and comments though... and don't get wrong I don't mind this style of photography every once and a while, but some people have made this their entire photography catalog. I just don't understand the appeal of taking pictures of peoples homes lol. And what's crazy is these same photographers label us street photographers as weird. Anyhow it does infuriate me when I see these white dudes posting these videos of them in random neighborhoods walking around taking pictures and it hurts knowing I can't do that as a black man but he can do this and nobody bats an eye lol. I can't tell you how many times I've seen a neighborhood I've wanted to photograph or seen a nice quiet scene some place while driving but because of my skin color I don't have the luxury of being able to just get out and walk around. I might get the cops called on me and of course we all know how that could end. But anyways that's america for ya.

@@bringo4392 heard u

He sends his rolls to a lab that scans them with a noritsu scanner

You must be new in these parts, welcome

Ok. I'll bite. I don't believe that processing this film will screw up chemicals. I work at a lab and when this starts showing up in masse, I'll run many control strips to see if there is any visible difference. I doubt we'll see it. Especially with proper replenishment you are replacing a large amount of developer in short order. 40ml/roll if memory serves and my machine runs 7x35mm per rack. We already process a lot of 50D and 800T. Especially last month with the Color film shortage. There was a time a good 40% of our developed film was 50D or 800T and we didn't see any densitometry shifts on our control strips. Nothing outside the margin of error, or something that couldn't be explained by another process issue, which we are constantly fine tuning.

@@GregoryVeizades With proper relenishment and constant check of control strips sure it will not be a huge enough difference to be visible to customer side, but realistically not all labs are doing those. My point is that processing these motion picture fims in c41 will always be less ideal than ecn2. Unless someone is using those as art fims.

It’s to flat. Like ungraded video.

Dang it