Puppets of American and western foreigners! Pathetic!

Taiwan's democracy is fake and a farce! In fact, most of the Western world and their cronies are fake, self-declared democracies. Such as the USA calling itself a democracy when in fact it is a plutocracy. How can you tell the difference between genuine and fake democracies? Simple, we just need go back to the terminology of the word: the rule of the common people. The rule of the common people, not some capitalist, special interest groups, oligarchs or elites. Sure elites can be leaders and govern over a people, but not rulers (like mainland China or Singapore); leadership and governance does not equate rulership. In theory, autocracy means he rule of the autocrat (a monarch like a king or dictator). In reality however, as many times in history, we see kings that aren't genuine rulers of their kingdoms. Such kings are called puppet-kings, where genuine power were seized by puppeteers, such as Cao Cao making Emperor Xian of Han his puppet, or Empress Dowager Cixi making Emperor Guangxu of Qing her puppet, or Princess Sophia making Tsar Peter I her puppet (until she was disposed by Peter I eventually), hence just because it is an autocracy by definition doesn't make it a true autocracy in reality. Likewise, a democracy is the rule of the common people by definition, ie. the people serves collectively as the ruler, the king. But this king made out of the collective common people could also become a puppet to puppeteer(s). Such puppeteers are the plutocrats, oligarchs, capitalists, special interest groups, etc. You might say that the people can still vote, but results of elections can be manipulated, controlled and predetermined by the puppeteer(s) through many means including demagoguery, gerrymandering, media control, financial control, vote rigging, etc. Hence voting does not necessarily equate democracy. In fact, ancient Greece had more sortition (where candidates are sorted and picked via lottery) than election as the fairest form of choosing public servants. Voting/election is not the root of rulership. The root of rulership is political power backed by 2 essential factors: wealth (the richer you are, the more powerful you are) and means of violence (Mao Zedong: "Power grows out from the barrel of the gun"). A true democracy is one where all the common people are wealthy, ie. common prosperity (Singapore and to a lesser extent mainland China). A society where the wealthy disparity is high and not having any signs of improving is no real democracy. And a nation where the armed forces are from the people, for the people and by the people is a truer democracy (the PLA is from the people and for the people. Although it may not be by the people since it is under the CPC, but given that the CPC upholds the People's Democratic Dictatorship, the PLA is still indirectly by the the people.) A nation/region/society where the bulk of its wealth and means of violence are held by the minority and not the majority (such as USA, and of course China's renegade region of Taiwan) is no real democracy!

Let me put it to you bluntly: Taiwan's democracy is fake and a farce! In fact, most of the Western world and their cronies are fake, self-declared democracies. Such as the USA calling itself a democracy when in fact it is a plutocracy. How can you tell the difference between genuine and fake democracies? Simple, we just need go back to the terminology of the word: the rule of the common people. The rule of the common people, not some capitalist, special interest groups, oligarchs or elites. Sure elites can be leaders and govern over a people, but not rulers (like mainland China or Singapore); leadership and governance does not equate rulership. In theory, autocracy means he rule of the autocrat (a monarch like a king or dictator). In reality however, as many times in history, we see kings that aren't genuine rulers of their kingdoms. Such kings are called puppet-kings, where genuine power were seized by puppeteers, such as Cao Cao making Emperor Xian of Han his puppet, or Empress Dowager Cixi making Emperor Guangxu of Qing her puppet, or Princess Sophia making Tsar Peter I her puppet (until she was disposed by Peter I eventually), hence just because it is an autocracy by definition doesn't make it a true autocracy in reality. Likewise, a democracy is the rule of the common people by definition, ie. the people serves collectively as the ruler, the king. But this king made out of the collective common people could also become a puppet to puppeteer(s). Such puppeteers are the plutocrats, oligarchs, capitalists, special interest groups, etc. You might say that the people can still vote, but results of elections can be manipulated, controlled and predetermined by the puppeteer(s) through many means including demagoguery, gerrymandering, media control, financial control, vote rigging, etc. Hence voting does not necessarily equate democracy. In fact, ancient Greece had more sortition (where candidates are sorted and picked via lottery) than election as the fairest form of choosing public servants. Voting/election is not the root of rulership. The root of rulership is political power backed by 2 essential factors: wealth (the richer you are, the more powerful you are) and means of violence (Mao Zedong: "Power grows out from the barrel of the gun"). A true democracy is one where all the common people are wealthy, ie. common prosperity (Singapore and to a lesser extent mainland China). A society where the wealthy disparity is high and not having any signs of improving is no real democracy. And a nation where the armed forces are from the people, for the people and by the people is a truer democracy (the PLA is from the people and for the people. Although it may not be by the people since it is under the CPC, but given that the CPC upholds the People's Democratic Dictatorship, the PLA is still indirectly by the the people.) A nation/region/society where the bulk of its wealth and means of violence are held by the minority and not the majority (such as USA, and of course China's renegade region of Taiwan) is no real democracy!

Since when do all countries in the world have to follow US and European standards? Why can't Asia create its own standards and way of life? 😂

Taiwan's democracy is fake and a farce! In fact, most of the Western world and their cronies are fake, self-declared democracies. Such as the USA calling itself a democracy when in fact it is a plutocracy. How can you tell the difference between genuine and fake democracies? Simple, we just need go back to the terminology of the word: the rule of the common people. The rule of the common people, not some capitalist, special interest groups, oligarchs or elites. Sure elites can be leaders and govern over a people, but not rulers (like mainland China or Singapore); leadership and governance does not equate rulership. In theory, autocracy means he rule of the autocrat (a monarch like a king or dictator). In reality however, as many times in history, we see kings that aren't genuine rulers of their kingdoms. Such kings are called puppet-kings, where genuine power were seized by puppeteers, such as Cao Cao making Emperor Xian of Han his puppet, or Empress Dowager Cixi making Emperor Guangxu of Qing her puppet, or Princess Sophia making Tsar Peter I her puppet (until she was disposed by Peter I eventually), hence just because it is an autocracy by definition doesn't make it a true autocracy in reality. Likewise, a democracy is the rule of the common people by definition, ie. the people serves collectively as the ruler, the king. But this king made out of the collective common people could also become a puppet to puppeteer(s). Such puppeteers are the plutocrats, oligarchs, capitalists, special interest groups, etc. You might say that the people can still vote, but results of elections can be manipulated, controlled and predetermined by the puppeteer(s) through many means including demagoguery, gerrymandering, media control, financial control, vote rigging, etc. Hence voting does not necessarily equate democracy. In fact, ancient Greece had more sortition (where candidates are sorted and picked via lottery) than election as the fairest form of choosing public servants. Voting/election is not the root of rulership. The root of rulership is political power backed by 2 essential factors: wealth (the richer you are, the more powerful you are) and means of violence (Mao Zedong: "Power grows out from the barrel of the gun"). A true democracy is one where all the common people are wealthy, ie. common prosperity (Singapore and to a lesser extent mainland China). A society where the wealthy disparity is high and not having any signs of improving is no real democracy. And a nation where the armed forces are from the people, for the people and by the people is a truer democracy (the PLA is from the people and for the people. Although it may not be by the people since it is under the CPC, but given that the CPC upholds the People's Democratic Dictatorship, the PLA is still indirectly by the the people.) A nation/region/society where the bulk of its wealth and means of violence are held by the minority and not the majority (such as USA, and of course China's renegade region of Taiwan) is no real democracy!

TW has every right to exist as an independent, sovereign island state. There is no question on it's legitimacy. Too long a stretch of time have muddied relations when the conflict "ended" during the civil war. And they thought some future leader will clean up to "settle" the outstanding problem.

@@skaijuice3714 That right is a fallacy since no international law recognizes Taiwan as an independent country. On the contrary, international law such as the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations clearly states that Taiwan is a part of China!

On 24th May 2024, Stephane Dujarric, chief spokesman for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, states that UN Resolution means that "Taiwan is a province of China." So are you challenging the legitimacy of the UN?

@@user-fd3ld9qc7d yes that's right, as The Republic of China.

On 18 Nov 23 the Sinophobic bot farm bot “Ahmetetc” posted that it would have me permanently banned. On 28 Nov 23 it asked if I had received its warning. I am still here. It consistently supports the Sinophobic bots and trolls who post lies about China. There are many bots and trolls who will post any form of mendacity against China, even to the extent of comment on China when that country is not the subject of the video. Time for it to use the “sorry for your low Chinese self-esteem” spam. And ask if I am working for a Front Organisation. Or that my “mother” works in a massage parlour in Shanghai and my “father” works in a scam call centre in North Myanmar. And that being Sinophobic is good for “truth” & “freedom”. Say hello to your Sinophobic bot farm bots for me.

@@buymecola1 Well hello again Sinophobic bot farm bot.

Puppets of American and western foreigners! Pathetic!

What year, month and date did Taiwan became an independent country?

@@user-fd3ld9qc7d It has always been since day 1. Never been ruled and administered by CCP ever, not even for 1 day. Which cave do you live in?

@@user-fd3ld9qc7d Always! It never belonged to China.

​@@user-fd3ld9qc7dit. Doesn't matter what the exact date...... What matter mostly if China will fall. Soon.... Chinas greediness will destroy their own country.... Remember China has Lots of enemies...

did you pass your history test?

不承認中華民國，但承認台灣。啾咪

@@user-xk3ff5ld3m 那赶紧让金门马祖独立啦

Are you talking about your American dad? Have you forgotten that the United States and the West invaded and colonized the whole world?

​@@CNTikTokNo, the US is to keep peace and international order.

Let me say this bluntly to you: Taiwan's democracy is fake and a farce! In fact, most of the Western world and their cronies are fake, self-declared democracies. Such as the USA calling itself a democracy when in fact it is a plutocracy. How can you tell the difference between genuine and fake democracies? Simple, we just need go back to the terminology of the word: the rule of the common people. The rule of the common people, not some capitalist, special interest groups, oligarchs or elites. Sure elites can be leaders and govern over a people, but not rulers (like mainland China or Singapore); leadership and governance does not equate rulership. In theory, autocracy means he rule of the autocrat (a monarch like a king or dictator). In reality however, as many times in history, we see kings that aren't genuine rulers of their kingdoms. Such kings are called puppet-kings, where genuine power were seized by puppeteers, such as Cao Cao making Emperor Xian of Han his puppet, or Empress Dowager Cixi making Emperor Guangxu of Qing her puppet, or Princess Sophia making Tsar Peter I her puppet (until she was disposed by Peter I eventually), hence just because it is an autocracy by definition doesn't make it a true autocracy in reality. Likewise, a democracy is the rule of the common people by definition, ie. the people serves collectively as the ruler, the king. But this king made out of the collective common people could also become a puppet to puppeteer(s). Such puppeteers are the plutocrats, oligarchs, capitalists, special interest groups, etc. You might say that the people can still vote, but results of elections can be manipulated, controlled and predetermined by the puppeteer(s) through many means including demagoguery, gerrymandering, media control, financial control, vote rigging, etc. Hence voting does not necessarily equate democracy. In fact, ancient Greece had more sortition (where candidates are sorted and picked via lottery) than election as the fairest form of choosing public servants. Voting/election is not the root of rulership. The root of rulership is political power backed by 2 essential factors: wealth (the richer you are, the more powerful you are) and means of violence (Mao Zedong: "Power grows out from the barrel of the gun"). A true democracy is one where all the common people are wealthy, ie. common prosperity (Singapore and to a lesser extent mainland China). A society where the wealthy disparity is high and not having any signs of improving is no real democracy. And a nation where the armed forces are from the people, for the people and by the people is a truer democracy (the PLA is from the people and for the people. Although it may not be by the people since it is under the CPC, but given that the CPC upholds the People's Democratic Dictatorship, the PLA is still indirectly by the the people.) A nation/region/society where the bulk of its wealth and means of violence are held by the minority and not the majority (such as USA, and of course China's renegade region of Taiwan) is no real democracy!

​@@AhmetTekin101do you mean keep the genocide still exist in Middle East, Palestine, and North Africa? 😂

Mainland is tottaly poor country in the past, but now they become a giant. Advanced in technology and military. Their GDP are still low arround usd15k, but their price are cheap too 😂 their PPP is the biggest in the entire world tho

👎👎👎👎

Yes. of course the Capital of Legitimate China will return to Nanjing from Taipei one day. China are strong and peaceful under the Three Principles of People.

Yes the rebellious 75 year old child will return to the family of the 113 year old father.

It is not possible, United States of America will watch.

Xi lie about Lai.

Xi Jin Ping has a small dick.