is it appropriate for the controller to tell the plane taking off to abort? they may not be able to.

if you watch the full video, ATC clearly says "cleared for take off" then after readback ATC says "traffic 2 mile final". not the controllers fault.

@@xisotopex yes absolutely, part of the job. if pilots are unable to abort they need to report that as their reply, then the controller has to react accordingly, for example by turning the plane that is going around

@@qtrg5794 really? what if the controller cant see the plane and they are at v1? even if the controller can see the plane, they are not necessarily going to be able to know the speed? so in that case you think the FAA just lets them figure it out, that there is no SOP for a situation like this? "just do whatever you like"

@@xisotopex This applies to basically any ATC instruction/clearance, be it a climb to a certain level, specific rate of climb or speed. The controller uses their experience and knowledge to estimate the performance and capabilities of the aircraft and crew theyre talking to, and issues instructions that they expect to be within those capabilities. If the crew disagree, they will speak up as its their responsibility to operate the aircraft safely. If the controller needs assurance before implementing a plan, they can ask beforehand if the crew are able to follow a specific instruction. In the case of a take-off abort, the controller has to weigh the safety benefit of keeping the plane on the ground against the risk of braking from ever-increasing speed. No sensible controller will therefore instruct a take-off abort anywhere near V1 except in extremely critical cases. Still, every situation is different and being able to do "whatever you like" (within legal limits,) is a two-way street called responsibility.

+1, came here to say that

You got no clue. You are not a pilot are you

@@TheLukaszpg I'm not, no. But please tell me how I'm wrong. I'm not being sarcastic, I want to learn.

​@@asdf3568 a 2-mile final is pretty short and the UPS should have realized that meant to get going immediately

​@@TheLukaszpg Don't correct someone if you're not going to offer the answer.

I think it was only 14.99 feet.

Looked to me it wasn’t a correction, I think the wind picked his wing up

I think it was a remarkable and controlled landing

Yeah, I remarked to myself "he's landing that thing just like I land a C-172 in a crosswind." Once took my brother for a flight shortly after my license ink was dry and after a little 25 minute flight we came back and I made a picture perfect strong crosswind landing--nose up, wing low, lined up, didn't even feel the bump as the first rear wheel touched. He remarks "well, other than landing on one wheel I guess that didn't suck".

I like the way you give plenty of time to read the sub titles, us older folks don't read and comprehend very quickly. Thank you for 3 M. O. A. 😂

There’s no point, it’s hardly rocket science

O que houve ?

Grassway? Fairway? Slip-n-slide?

I was thinking the same thing. It's a field, plane and simple. Lol

That's probably Jimbo Burgess in that Cresco on the grass strip. He has some good vids on youtube flying agplanes on NZ South Island.

Almost like something from an old James Bond movie!

Or Jimmy Doolittle’s squadron of B24’s that have never taken off an aircraft carrier, risking taking off the USS Hornet what was designated as, and eventually was, a suicide mission to give a glimmer of hope for the US that we aren’t going to have to learn how to speak Japanese in order to get some rice to stay alive in 1941.

@@enigmawyoming5201 B-25*

@ti haha wasnt that scene also a reference to flight of the phoenix(2004)? Search "Flight of the phoenix (5/5) movie clip"

That's a hell of a machine.

does it just shoot out pressurized hot water?

How can de-icing be cool ? If anything it's hot.

@@andy99ish Hardy Har Har Har.

Keep up the great work!

@@3MinutesofAviation thanks you too

you should see Golden eye opening scene.......really beautiful

Would be great if they also serve chicken balti too.

Smh 🤦

@@FozzyZ28 lol! :)

@@applejacks971 😁😁😁😁😁😁👍👍

No,.. Extra 13 seconds😅

😄

lol

Thanks bombardierAirbus

but apparently 220 is noisy

A comment of a 13 year old

@@dr.jillalicecooper2587 who asked lol

Feast or famine 😁

​@@DavidLim2319 Since when others need your permission to comment little boi? Grow up kid

​@@dr.jillalicecooper2587 A comment of the life and soul of every party.

I got to watch this go around from the UPS gateway! It was very cool to see, been working for UPS at gateways a while and never got to see a brown on brown action lol

@@timothylaible8823 No kiddin huh? That’s actually really cool. I’ve seen go-arounds in the past but nothing that ultimately made the rounds in the aviation community

I‘m glad to hear!

Great airport for spotting!

Not when you live on its flight path. They change down a gear ( you can tell I know nothing about flying 😅) over my house and it always worries me. I think they use Leibstadt power station as a marker.

@@irenepeter-lyons350 yea no that's not how it works but i still feel what u mean

Correct - not "windshear" - I wonder if the poster really knows what windshear is.

Eh it’s like a minute and a half

Which one

😂🎉😢😮😅

😊🎉😢😂

Riveting

They should use giant flamethrowers.

Sounds like an Emirates landing. Directional control seems to be an issue over there. That and taking off. And going around.

@@lbowsk Cathay Pacific Hong Kong International 2010 Summer. HKG is known to have microburst, especially for morning landing

Well kiwis were the first to fly....

@Mark Ashford ?? I'm confused. I didn't say anything about salmon, juvenile or otherwise.

@@iamme453 your just a moron. The end