Come in india

Goes hand on hand!

You would have if she hadn't botched the interview with her green agenda.

Same

Eddie Hartzog ya me too

5 years into the future thanking you for saving from watching the video

She must have gotten chased off for asking these questions. Like a vegan going to a slaughter house. "Do you think the cows suffer"?

@@alvaro93364 you know she went off script trying to grandstand in front of the cameras- push their luck and shut down the show.

You did not see the rest of the reaction. I am sure it was something like , "get off our property we are not going to take a hit piece."

Nessy Bomber I feel like that guy just runs the place 9-5 and they should go to some higher ups for answers like that

Yeah, burying your head in the sand isn't a great adaptation strategy.

Putting aside the truth of the matter, a better PR response would be "It's a complicated subject, not something that lends itself to sound bites."

before there was fungus etc. that could eat wood. it just lasted forever (check out the evolution of coal ) and was washed into Canyons KMs. thick. timber/trees flooded in ocean 100s kms of wide i think for 25m years .that much stored carbon dioxide was starving almost all vegetation

It’s 80’. So thick they shoot then 10’ coal seem above it to get to the big one, then load it out with 2800s. May be thick but it’s almost worthless because of its BTU value.

It's not rude to ask questions they're not prepared to answer. Rude would be a question like, "How do you feel knowing you're murdering people?"

What are ur thoughts on climate change

@@zovcuu we cant stop it so just live with it

I thought the same thing.

@@zovcuu go get mad at China and India, they are the worst polluters

@@zovcuu my thoughts are I feed my family with the coal industry so I honestly could care less

Smoke and mirrors, she’s selling climate change

Oxygen bonds with the carbon in the coal when it is burned, therefore the total weight after combustion is higher than just the coal itslef.

@@Henriburger1 And what about the water vapor that is also produced? Is that accounted for separately?

@@michaelpost7352 Water vapor doesn't produce carbon dioxide nor does releasing it contribute to climate change. We cannot significantly increase or decrease the humidity in the air because if it goes lower more water evaporates, and if it goes higher, it just rains.

@@Henriburger1 Wasn't thinking of the climate change angle, just wondering about the weight balance. One ton of coal makes 3700lbs of CO2, plus x pounds of H2O.

True, the industry itself isn't what's rotten. The economic system as a whole incentivizing profit no matter the consequence is the problem.

@@Jake-rs9nq We dont have a country or an economy without consequences!

@@5rings16 The question is, what consequences should be deemed acceptable?

You like the power your house has? Don't like coal turn off your lights!

@@TravBauer exactly!

What about the millions of bison in America doing the same before 1850. Never hear about that Wasn't that all part of the natural 'eco-system'

is coal edible ?

I like STEAK!

And doctors in jobs looking after Black Lung cases.

What machinery all that they showed is climate change

@@bradenrutledge3321 I guess he means that big shovel. It is impressive.

she's american

Trees emit co2 during night cycles.

Trees emit CO2 at night and whe trees die they release all the captured CO2

Look up the full photosynthesis cycle; plants emit CO2 during the dark phase.

She's rite. Theres entire islands of particular plants n trees that emit co2. Its jus not talkd about. N for the cow statement, they create methane but we can account for most of it by tallying the amount of feed to livestock. More feeding mor methane. She shouldve elaborated

better go easy on the barbeque.

what a pretty low point of comparison, literal caveman, without the artistic talent.

@ Mike 1:37 she says 1 ton (2000 pounds) produces 3700 pounds of CO2 ..... seems counterintuitive until u throw chemistry into the mix (Carbon with atomic weight of 12, combines with oxygen (atomic weight 16) to form CO and CO2) So, yes even if the entire carbon is not burnt off, we can still have a higher mass of CO2 than the C (coal/coke) it came from

You won't hear many people calling out lithium battery production for a Prius.

Not Carbon, Carbon Dioxide which is CO2, where one atom of Carbon (weighing 12u) binds with it two atoms of oxygen (16u each). So theoretically from pure elemental carbon you can get 7300lbs of CO2 from 2000 lbs of it Of course not every bit of it is burned, slightly CO is produced and so on.

Hahaha how the heck is that possible?

12g of carbon combine with 16 g of oxygen to form 44g of CO2 similarly plants absorb 44g of CO2 to form 12g of carbon (wood) and 16g of oxygen

​@@SaintNjuguna It doesn't Add up, 16+12=28 There are two oxygens in atom, so for 12g of carbon you need 32g (16x2) of oxygen to get 44g of CO2. Combining 12g C and 16g O will get you 28g (not 44) of Carbon Monoxide (not dioxide) ...So I get what you're trying to say, but in current form it's wrong

No, you're just using Minnesota public school chemistry. It's okay, the Vikings will make the playoffs.

Texas has some coal plants - the trouble as I understand it was that they weren’t on line with plenty of steam when the grid went down . Peak demand gas generation doesn’t work when there isn’t enough gas to make steam . Problem is no gas is stored at those plants for production . Coal fired plants are REQUIRED to have at least a 60 day supply of stored energy ( coal pile ) . Any problem with the natural gas pipeline system ( like sudden huge demand ) and the peak plants go cold . It’s all about steam to spin those generators.

@@marclauzon1882 Nuke power is the answer!

@@carlinshowalter1806 not a fan - Fukushima Diachi is currently poisoning the Pacific Ocean

"Ok you're dying from starvation because of climate change, but at least you are energy independent ! yay sovereignty !"

Not by a long shot.

I thought everything is powered by unicorn shit

Coal only account for a little over 30% of US power generations, so that means this video would not have been possible with all the other generation sources.

Coal is fading... if you don't believe it stop by the Gillette unemployment office... and watch the Wyoming news. Wyoming, who has always gotten all thier tax revenue from fossil fuels is broke! They are currently trying to figure out how to tax every car driving through the state to make up the difference.

reading this from France is very funny.

"You can't criticize society, you live in it!" -Zach B

would you speak out against your employer, oh yeah you don't have an employer

What's your point?

@@forbaldo1 There are other answers that can be given. For example: "Well, we *are* in the business of mining coal. We can have all the positions in the world about climate change, but I think we both know we're going to keep mining coal until mining coal is either unprofitable or illegal. I don't think either of those will happen soon."

We're due for an ice age now, but temps are rising quicker than ever. & the co2 is what's suppose to absorb heat & warm the atmosphere

I loved that she thought trees put out carbon gases.

And then there’s the nuclear WASTE that we have no place to safely store and can stay radioactive for hundreds of years. It’s not even remotely “environmentally” friendly. Nevermind the land destruction necessary to mine the uranium for it. That stuff doesn’t exactly grow on trees.

Put the nuke waste in the abandoned coal mines,win/win!

Didn't work out to well in Chernobyl or Fukoshima though did it

this is just propoganda I live in the town that houses the coal miners that work at that mine that mine and all the others don't m as ke our snow black our air is clean as day this is just propoganda

Told it here twice, will do it again... Because sure some people don't remember chemistry Carbon Dioxide is one atom of Carbon (weighing 12u) binded with it two atoms of oxygen (16u each). So theoretically from pure elemental carbon you can get 7300lbs of CO2 from 2000 lbs of C it if burned perfectly. The rest of it comes from atmospheric oxygen. Of course not every bit of it is burned, slightly CO is produced you have ashes and so on, so the number is much lower

Carbon Dioxide is one atom of Carbon (weighing 12u) binded with it two atoms of oxygen (16u each). So theoretically from pure elemental carbon you can get 7300lbs of CO2 from 2000 lbs of C it if burned perfectly. The rest of it comes from atmospheric oxygen. ...might wanna check your chemistry

+darkmath100 very funny comment, one is grinning away happily here ;=)

+darkmath100 I would prefer uranium, thorium, and hydropower.

No we should use solar and wind power.

FruitGod220 Derpy Squid Dipshit, that's impossible. You'd have to cover the entire surface of the Earth with solar panels and wind-mills. Not to mention doing that is insanely expensive and no one can afford it. They just cancelled a Wind Farm near where I live because it was going to raise everyone's electric rates BECAUSE ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IS REALLY FUCKING EXPENSIVE.

+darkmath100 No, study's show the alternative power producers are becoming cheaper to build and man.

if the ppl live without current it is possible mr.

It's been 3 years and barely anyone has seen this comment.

true

this doesn't make any sense, especially the conclusion. deforestation is often directly tied to coal mining.

boycott electricity if you want coal free world

@@vodkaboy did you know that Charmin is the global leader in deforestation for TP, where do you think the Amazon rain forest is going to

Coal industry is harmful to environment

@@sentientarugula2884 Where would we be without it? Our only other option to supply the needs of humanity right now is nuclear. Someday technology will make coal obsolete. When that day comes you will have your solution. Fact is that solar, wind and hydro together cannot replace the need for coal at this point. These are facts.

@@watchnlearn1001 those are not facts at all. solar wind and hydro can support energy needs.

You are totally and completely wrong, ignorant and clueless if you believe solar, wind and hydro can supply our energy needs.

They do it for money dude, not for you or anybody else

Loren Thomas the you hate electricity running water?????

What? How? Carbon itself is bad for the atmosphere. It's atoms trap heat. Carbon is going to slowly dissappear. Maybe not 100% but it will one day to miniscule.

@@alvaro93364 yeahh 👍

@@alvaro93364 Ever hear of carbon capture ? Almost all of the contaminates from coal can be captured and used in other industries. You probably won't hear about it from mainstream media.

@Terry Rose but not everyone cares enough to do that. Why we don't have nuclear powered cars. People are too lazy or careless to take the proper precautions and proper disposal.

@@alvaro93364 Nuclear power will see it's day again. Several countries are on the verge of building a different type of reactor that is much safer than any of the older types. But in the meantime, we must have a reliable supply of fuel for energy production that can power our homes and industry. Coal and natural gas can meet those demands in the short term. We don't want the whole nation to endure what Texas went through because we put too much reliance on Green Energy.

EXACTLY!!! Isn't it funny how only America has to shut down everything??? These lowlife politicians have a evil agenda and it's not for us!!!

did you realize the report is from 2014?

Most of the electricity in China is produced in coal fired plants

same

Jay Rose tell you dad thank you for keeping our lights on.

Is it boring ?

Does he still have a job?

Tell that to equatorial regions where it's already too hot. Tell that to farmers that rely on rivers fed by snow melting off of mountains whose crops will die of thirst. Also, it won't just simply be warmer. If you think hurricanes and tornadoes are problematic, now, wait fifty years. We'll have to come up with new categories of severity. Cities like New Orleans will disappear beneath the waves.

It's no stanger planet is changing. The problem is that these changes are happening orders of magnitude faster than before industrial revolution. Environment struggles to adapt that fast and we might struggle too at some point

What did anyone expect, that he would actually do something about it? The guy has accomplished zero.

Justin Cook To be fair the guy before him didn't do anything either.

No surprise, trying to ween us off fossil fuel is like trying to take heroin off an addict. We need to break through that pain and face the facts, we are the prime cause of present day climate change and the cost will have to be paid eventually.

Piak Prongkarp​ since when did this have anything to do with "the guy before him"? I love how when people go after Obama the spinsters flip it right to "the other guy". You guys need to knock it off. Obama made many more promises he's renigged on compared to any of his predecessors.

Justin Cook Wow didn't mean to offend you. Please pardon me for my rudeness. Can we at least agree that both are useless?

It only doubles the price of electricity and it breaks down a lot.

Except that we keep bulldozing the green to make more urban sprawl or cattle ranches. Or we turn it into paper and houses. Also, this "added green" is often taking the form of algal blooms, which harm the ecosystems they occur in.

it's an open cast mine

In this day and age, quarry is really only used to stone mining operations. Besides that, MSHA has specific training for open pit coal & metal/nonmetal operations and that varies from the quarry safety training. MSHA really cracked down on having specific safety standards for each different type of mining operation because of all the fatalities, and thus open pit coal mines & metal/nonmetal mines were distinguished.

+jephers29 I noticed that also, not sure how that works. Maybe the same math they use to make their climate models?

+jephers29 When Coal is burned, oxygen is added to the carbon. Hence, the combustion products mass more than the input fuel. CO2 is 1 atom of carbon, and 2 atoms of oxygen. The oxygen wasn't in the coal originally.

Add power plants to the 77,600 dams which don't have any; build 300 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactors; and add 130 gigawatts of geothermal power and we would be fine.

@@Jemalacane0 where is the money coming from

WE do if we want it cheap!

+Spencer Gaunt From the atmosphere. When coal burns, the carbon joins with the oxygen in the atmosphere to form CO2 molecules. The oxygen in the atmosphere can add mass.

Thats what I was thinking.

Lol, very funny that we disagree on the exact opposite things with the Guardian , worst constalation. What do you think is lied about Islam and Migration? Yes, you're right the market will have a good supply which will drive the prices down , but if coal-energy conversion can be bettered the demand might increase , adnvanced tech is used in coal mining already and with less effort and more quantity brought up the less likely it is that companies will abondan that ressource, CJTaylor 87

CJTaylor 87 The Guardian has a leftist agenda, if a leftist agenda is clearly spotted then there is no need to wonder that nomatter who contradicts that agenda will be put into bad lights we don't know anything else from those established media outlets. We must not seek for anything idealistic and abstract, far away from our desires and needs, if we do we will fail and the effort is wasted. First of all you need to convince all the people who are against this green energy agenda, you need the proof for them that climate change is heavly influenced by us, if you can't they will never follow and if you want to enforce that on them it will backlash. You don't stick with coal to hold people employed, work isn't there for work, work is there for satisfieng demands and needs, coal mines are owned by individuals who have a right of ownership they have their personal needs and wishes and have property rights to use that coal which is only mined because someone else has a demand on it. Tesla is good and Elon Musk is a genuis and has a good attitude and intends, but the cars are not yet there to replace mustangs,lambos etc. I love the tesla s maybe I prefer it before a mustang maybe not but that is just my personal feeling, demands are subjective you can't decide what someone loves.