lol i was thinking the same thing

IMO anything above 120Hz is a gimmick. Maybe 144Hz feel better but that it. That's the boundary we can perceive and mid and lower GPU can hardly reach 144Hz. So, 500Hz is ... !!

Exactly the same thing. I was thinking. Marketing bastards. Ain't none got the horse power (GPU) to run at 500hz with good detail at 1080p

Thought this from the thumbnail 🥲

Exactly my thoughts

and 700ping...

Devices can increase skill but multiplying by zero results zero

Fax

@@JavaJumper And Multiplying by 1 then Zero and to the power of 15 - 1 +1 then multiplied by 0 and multiplied by 1 results...zero

Kazah power and ping crimson

same. but let's be honest it's not like we're gonna be albe to afford one

Me : cries in 60 hz 1080p monitor

@thawne7993 sadly i dont have job but considering my gpu is gtx 1060 6gb how rich do you think i am

@thawne7993 im looking for a job i know stuff about computers like installing windows, drivers swamping parts like gpu cpu cooler ram hdd ssd and some basic diagnostics to fix computers

@thawne7993 i repair my computers at home i nearly always manage to fix ptoblems

I was like you; ignorant of the truth, blind to the buttery smoothness of 144hz. Ever since the day I got a 144hz monitor, I notice the choppiness of my 60hz. I would save some money and get a cheapo 144hz tn panel if you have to. Just make sure to set the refresh rate to 144hz

you dont need the best of the best but u should invest in getting 144hz monitor. acc worth

Or 30

@@brianlam5847 Ignorant to the truth? I have 75Hz monitor. They told me 75(it was that or 60) feels better than 30. Never again shall I listen to the advices of others when it comes to that and multiple other PC related things. Never I see no difference. These slow mo animations are useless to me. They are cool , but useless. In full motion 30 looks natural to me.

@@GameslordXY I would suggest that you get your eyes checked because lacking the ability to tell the difference between 30Hz and 60Hz is not normal. Also higher refresh rates not only look smoother, they feel much smoother, and respond to your inputs faster.

You're right. I remember this when they first introduced the 144hz.

Yeap, we ain't stupid. It's easily recognizable. 144 seems good enough, no need to overkill in everything

Yeah, I'm fairly sure I saw videos showing 60Hz is choppy and 144Hz being completely smooth. Now they are trying to tell me even 240Hz is choppy?

they just changed the Hz

Not really, this must be 2 to 5 times slower than those showcases

as they happen, not displaying what just happened & having to adapt to it too late when 2 rounds always left their weapon

i have 59 hz 💀

@@Whiteebearrr 45

@@N4zunA. bro uses a 1985 TV

@@Ali_Al-Nasir actually 1700 😎

@@N4zunA. *DAMN* your rocking the _WinchesterElectronic_

😂😂😂

😂

Future monitors: 480fps 720fps 1080fps 2160fps

Ya, and it‘ll also give you a -10000 Ping

🤣🤣

And, I made the 10th like. Facts 😆

I Made the 60th like 😆

True

and id still be broke to even buy a 144 hz one

and the 4090 would become the new GTX cards or the worst RTX cards

need a pair of eyes aswell

And that is where the 4090 and I9-13900k combo comes in. Yes a 4090 will surely be cpu bottlenecked at 1080p, but you can still get 500 fps at medium or even low settings.

@@luukherfst1209 Here on Brazil these components are out of our reality. :( We need to work hard during months just to but a GTX 1050ti. To get a 4090, we'll need to work during years y'know, that's sad bro

@@jaderoliveira1870 Depende muito das decisões que uma pessoa toma na vida. Boa parte dos meus amigos viveram uma vida inteira de festas, baladas, churrasquinho e sexo promíscuo e agora estão todos pagando pensão e cheios de problemas nas costas. Uma pessoa jamais deveria se contentar em receber um salário mínimo, devemos sempre ter ambição e desejar melhorar nossa qualidade de vida. Pensamento de abundância e não de escassez, aprender sobre como administrar melhor nosso dinheiro, fazer investimentos, quantos brasileiros leem livros? Ou sequer se importam em ler e aprender? Pois o mesmo vale para a galera lá de fora, eles também tem que trabalhar duro para comprar as coisas que eles desejam, larga mão desse pensamento de vitima.

@@kthxpls A maioria dos brasileiros querem tudo facil, mal sabem eles que você tem que lutar para conquistar.

Na you would just see really close to reality

Aaaaah noo!!! 144hz is still very good. You really don’t need anything better than 144hz, endless your an elite esports player. Going from 144hz to 240hz is noticeable, but not noticeable enough to pay the extra in my opinion.

@@bretttanton328 ur cute

@@beary3067 no he's just being smart

I still have 60 hz monitor

@@theoutherplanes7928 i meant HES cute, in general.

I'm more interested in the upcoming 4k 240hz displays!

Ya that's the one I'm waiting for too

all need is a cpu and gpu to make it worth it

beyond 150hz your wasting your money esp if your over 25...

@@SouthpawPablo Braindead comment

if you have that kind of setup your house will literally get on fire

"is not the plane, is the pilot"

@@ZeroChoices not with my liquid nitrogen cooler

@@prophet6722 Nitrogen won't unmelt power cables

@@anonymousx6651Bruh...why would I use LN2 after it melts? Of course I'll use it before that, duh

Lmao facts

Because someone with better biological hardware will win. If you took two players with the same skill, then the computer hardware would matter more, IMO. The one carrying on 60hz probably has great tracking, switching, and flicking aim. This video shows advantages at like, what, 20ms? That isn't going to help someone play against someone who can accurately flick you at 250ms if it takes you 600ms. Having a monitor that improves your gameplay by even 100ms isn't going to help.

I know it's a joke, but iirc a 1030 runs Fortnite at 72p lowest settings hardly above 200FPS lmao

Well arma 3 at 4k i was getting 63fps (1070 blew chunks has to deal with a 1030 for ages now im on a 3090) So in some games it most certainly would be able to However its not a CRT so it will look awful if you go much below 960x540

@@DelaryHap 72p lmao u can literally count the squares on the screen

@@martinivanov1319 Yep! It's really worth a look, that's the future of gaming

GT 1030 is so old and also entry level GPU.

IKR

Or maybe just because 500hz is almost a even double of 240 to make it simple? Ever considered using some common sense before?

@@ThisIsExile91 That doesn't really sound like common sense to me... They should have used the previous flagship (360hz or 390hz) to compare rather than 240hz, which has already been around for some time... I think 240hz is a good representation, but the fact that they didn't even give us a glimpse of 360hz vs 500hz is kind of a red flag

bruh fr

@@howled0 How the fuck is it a red flag they don’t even sell monitors. They’re just showing off the software/drivers they developed to even make it possible lmfao

Probably for competitive players on tournaments

I can hear r/pcmasterrace screaming from here

Law of diminishing return

brain left the chat. nvidia is just too strong

when you're playing fast paced fps games... it is absolutely noticeable. you can even notice the refresh rate when you move your mouse cursor too fast in windows... the choppier / disjointed the mouse looks during fast motion the less fps you have.

On 99% of the games I play, don't notice fluidity improvement above 90fps with165Hz G-sync. But it is great that technology is improving!

This. Nvidia circlejerks about something so useless it's ridiculous

You know you fucked up when even the brony is speaking facts

@@Xperto_ Hahahahahahahaha

Creating better technology that is more responsive, minimizing perceived blur is always better. I don't get the negative reaction.

On some point they said even for movies in cinema it is no difference if the movie runs in more then 24fps because the eyes can't see it faster^^

They could just use footage and calculate then apply the difference in FPS. The original footage might just be 60 fps slowed down accordingly to look like 60/144/240?

@@ags911 you can't slow down 60fps and have it look smooth

It's the same comparison. They are scamming

only a 5060 lmao brokie

the 6000 series was ass so your good with your 5060

I was like you; ignorant of the truth, blind to the buttery smoothness of 1500hz. Ever since the day I got a 1500hz monitor, I notice the choppiness of my 390hz. I would save some money and get a cheapo 1500hz tn panel if you have to. Just make sure to set the refresh rate to 1500hz

I came here to say the rtx 50 series is being released this year 2024

Well. There is always classic Doom and Quake. They run at least 1000 frames.

Nvidia 40xx will be released soon xD

It's ok having no clue on what DLSS is, or the statements by Nvidia about the next generation. Considering that 240hz is even 300hz+ is achievable, a 100% performance gain would make 500hz viable. There are at least 3 viable resolutions, it makes sense that multiple cards can max a 500hz monitor.

"and that is why we have bult 4090: for the discerning gamer who wants to play 1080p at maximum clarity"

This is clearly aimed at esports users. They even show Valorant in the video, which easily runs at 500fps even in a mid-range PC.

That's cuz it's slowed down more

@@johnmallqui4600 exactly

Man the 144 is getting older xd

@@johnmallqui4600 no they start flickering.

Yeah I agree I feel like that made the 144 and 240 look bad just to make the 500 look better

lol

Is like 1000x what human eyes can see. I don't even understand why we have 30hz monitor in the first place

@@laos85 What? the human eye doesn’t even see in hertz. Theoretically we could see an infinite number of frames.

As somebody who got 240hz screen just for bhop and felt a HUGE difference, I can't wait for 1000.

@@laos85 this idea of "the human brain can only see [amount] fps" still exsits? We don't see in fps, we see in a constant flow As long as there is visible light going into our eyes, we see it

@@laos85 What the fuck? You think humans see in 1fps?

You don’t really need a monitor above 144 hz 165 hz at most or 240hz if ur really competitive

People are asking for 240hz 4k screens when they can barely push 90fps let alone 60 in modern games.

@@malazan6004 People really be hungry for dem frames, huh, it's like a drug

@@Krcun774 lol yeah it's kinda crazy as 4k 120hz is still considered premium tech especially OLEDs but people just want more. Little do they know a 4k 240hz OLED would not be reasonably priced.

@@malazan6004 I have a 4K 120Hz OLED tv and a 4K 144Hz IPS monitor. I don't plan on upgrading to a 4K 240H monitor until GPUs are powerful enough to handle games at that quality without having to tank all the settings to low

The fuck you talkin about we aint reaching even those fps

@@pepega3211 Maybe not broke kids like yourself.. i'm getting 700fps on avaerage in cs. By the time those 700-1000hz monitors are out, cpu,s/gpus will easily be able to run it. These companies work hand in hand together.

@@bmlaforge stop acting like a npc mf calling someone poor why should i get a 1000 hz when i get in cod 170 fps

@Pepega lol the real question is why the fuck are you playing that terrible game 😂 but yeah no one is gonna be able to get 500+fps in cod. Maybe cs and Valorant..etc

@@bmlaforge so you wanna say you gonna buy a monitor for 2 specific games 1 is a shit game and one is a good one yeaaahhh no if you going for Pro League go ahead but i buiild my pc to play different games and a 165 hz monitor is perfect for that

you not alone my friend lets hug

@@angaralhafz0675 🫂

60 hz brothers!!!

i play at 2k 60fps can't go back at 1080p whatever the cost in frames.

??????

well these 500hz monitor are made for those pros/youtuber/streamers who are earning a living through gaming and can afford them to gain an edge towards their opponents. So every millisecond matters.

@@ChillieGaming Nooot really actually

@@E55666 if u can afford them Go for it . Btw 240hz are cheap nowadays as well.

@@ChillieGaming cheap?

Plus an rtx 9090

U forgot to mention Curved, 1000 nits, reflex analyzer, extra super ultrawide, 20k resolution, and new 24 million colors than the standard 16.4

So whats the matter with the HDR anyways? I got 1400nits capable screen, and either I am setting it incorrectly, or the HDR just does not make it look all that much better than my standard IPS panel. Am I alone in this one?

@@Lbebe nope Its 10 billion colors True 10 bits🤣

@@ZheikoNileth This might mean you will have to recalibrate your display and see your gpu vendor's hdr setting

Only the 4090 with the best of the best cpu would pump out 500 fps and even then only in not that many games

Yup. But gpu advancement is a joke. All I see is price increase not performance

@@laos85 Rofl what? Turing to Ampere was average around %60, next gen is rumored to be %100.

@@Navhkrin YUP, next-gen is for sure +%100 when you see a lot of the leaks and DUAL GPU cards. 4K 240Hz is pretty much very capable for triple a titles, not all but for sure couple will be.

@@laos85 That would've been a fair argument when Turing dropped in 2018. However, you simply look ignorant saying that after the massive performance improvements ampere made over Turing.

@@Navhkrin Yeah but people still have bills to pay. imo they should focus more on efficiency

*far

@@sopcannon thanks for the heads up on the typo

Funny thing is that this uses TN panels which is the oldest LCD technology. What you're observing is pretty much just engineers overclocking panels as far as they can go while figuring out how to get rid of side-effects.

well, when it comes to refresh rate, they have beaten any CRT, but motion smoothness, yeah, thats a whole diferent beast

Jokes aside, top-tier LCDs and OLEDs are actually far better than the best CRTs in terms of both smoothness and refresh rate (resolution and scaling have been solved long ago as well-take any modern smartphone and try to compare the smallest font size that remains legible on it with one rendered on a CRT). There's an oft-overlooked fact that CRTs as a technology is fundamentally susceptible to ghosting because that's one of its core principles. It's easy to demonstrate with a simple experiment: turn the lights off, put on a black background and move a white square over it. Enjoy your ugly long-ass trails! The reason why you even see the picture on CRTs as a picture rather than an invisible burst of energy every time the electron beam crosses over your pupil is that phosphors illuminated by the beam glow for a little bit before they fade back to black. There is a physical limit to this phenomenon since they need a certain amount of time to "cool down", this process can't be accelerated and hence can't be solved with higher refresh rates, but the length of the trail is proportional to the contrast between the two objects, so it's not always noticeable. Technologies like OLED can potentially eradicate the issue completely since every pixel is illuminated individually so there's very nearly no "crosstalk" between then, but they're still too expensive to compete with LCD. Not to mention any high-end LCD panel is expensive itself.

It's a gimmick

@XDScythe trust me, you don't wanna do that

@XDScythe smooth screens are more pleasant to interact with

@XDScythe No. 60 fps is perfectly functional, but high refresh rate monitors are healthier for your eyes and more pleasant to use since you make less effort on simulating movement when there are more images being shown, which makes these monitors useful for people who spend a lot of time looking at screens

you mean fps, hz is dependent on the monitor

Well theoretically for any semi-realistic game to do 500fps you would need a beefy CPU over GPU. Even an overclocked i9 I would doubt could get 500fps in anything aside from csgo and maybe Valorant, and obviously you would need a 3080 at the least .

Yep monitor technology is always ahead of what most computers can provide on game wide average. Hence the esports oriented marketing. It’s always been used to showcase the next big upgrade. Give it 5 years 1440p 240hz will be standard around US/EU. And most people will have RTX 20/30 series gpus lying around. The 1060 had been most popular since it’s release and still is, according to steam statistics.

@@benjamin9120 I have a 3060 with a 5600 and I get 500fps easily in fortnite.

Recent gpus can do 500hz Tho achieving 500fps in games is a different matter entirely

master race

Ah progress. But you have to ask, is that progress truly necessary?

@@olsirmonkey it is, CRTs from the 1990s are faster than our monitors.

i can only see 240hz at the moment

@Muhammad Ehtasam we cant see pixels

I can only see 1fps

OLED without burn in.

For real. If you got a 240hz monitor you wont need a upgrade for maaany years

@@Monsizr or ever unless you won't to change the monitor panel to QD OLED or mini LED

to be fair this is meant for games like valorant and CS where getting consistent 500 fps isn't hard.

@@aminyapussi4740 most of the pros dont get a 500 fps consistent but thats not thing like idk if they would switch in the first place because they still preferred 240 hz to 360 hz even though it existed i dont exactly know the reason to that tho dont ask

with valorant its not hard to maintain 500fps+

i9-9900k@5.1Ghz with 1080ti low setting 4x MSAA on VALORANT stable 500-600 FPS (with proper pc tuning)

@@godanihc And only 1-3% of the computer owners even have this type of setup

@@godanihc yeah, on 1080p

@@N1C0YA That’s not bad for esports m8

@@GhettoPCbuilds yeah I can see this for esports, but for the regular Joe schmoe this isn't even worth it.

lol

a few years?

Bra!! 90% of gamers don’t need anything higher than 144hz. Consoles can only go up to 120hz, and that’s plenty for most.

after 90 fps, it's all eye candy, been playing with a rtx 3060 and a 165 hz ips 1ms display for at least a month now and after 90 fps you can hardly detect if u are getting 100 or 165 fps. (playing without any measure tool as afterburner)

144 hz is not blurry at all, your getting scammed by nvidia once again

@@ardasevmis7583 I'm not saying it is blurry, I'm saying they are trying to make look like it's blurry. Just as they did when they wanted us to go from 60 Hz monitors to 120 Hz.

lol, just upgraded from 60 to 144

lol 144hz is just the best option imo

nah 120hz is

Should be because 60hz is already ancient that it should be illegal to sell one like Akaline batteries.

@@laos85 what about 4k? 144 hz is still very expensive at that resolution

now its 1440p 360hz

Yes and also upgrade the performance

Nah its going to feel the same as 120hz to 240hz

Same dude. Only “ELITE” Esports players should think about getting a 500hz panel lol.

Valorant

Rainbow Six Siege

You're missing the point.

@@Desiderium lol

kid named eSport title

Oled? They are near perfect

Bring back CRT's!

@@dafarii nah i would take oled over any crt. Crts are outdated

@@csch92 I wouldn't call oled widespread among PC screens.

@@incomingz44 but they are getting closer to it more and more people are using oled also many youtubers

Maybe they got zowie contracts? Can’t trust anyone these days

U know this is the same 240 TN pannel but upgraded by 60% in pixel response. They arent ips monitors they are like the zowie and every single player at pinnacle csgo event uses the 500hz rn. 100% of all players in the tournament

But thats probably sponsored too maybe they have to use the 500 lol

You can't trust what the "PRO's" use. They use shitty Razer,Hyper X,Logitech,Steel Series etc headsets but they run IEM's under them for actual communication and sound and the headsets are just there for blocking outside noise and filling those sponserships. They probably don't care about what contractor gives them what monitor as long as they don't change it often.

@@sinaalami4148 they play csgo, they dont fucking need good sounding headphones they just need to hear information

You can definitely tell the difference, it's just that 240 to 360 really wast big enough of a jump. 500 on the other hand… That being said, you are right, it depends on the panel being used.

only noobs cant tell the difference between refresh rates lol

@@soml0t how is cs not aim heavy

Response times, color accuracy/saturation and contrast is more important for me than to increase refresh rate above a certain point.

@@PD-ws4td lmao, pretty sure noone can tell the difference above like 144 fps.

I still treat it as luxury for me

I’d expect tournaments to still use only 144Hz because any higher isn’t worth it. Plus the hardware needed to get over 144FPS for minimum/lows is quite expensive.

@@CoolJosh3k I see pros using 240hz mostly at tournaments... And ofc they have the best hardware which easily pushes 240hz lows.

@@froznfire9531 I guess for a few select games, like CS:GO.

@@CoolJosh3k Yeah sure, only for eSports, thats what they play at tournaments :) 500hz is only aimed at those light to run games since nothing else runs close to that which really makes it useful for pros or wannabe's ^^

@@CoolJosh3k Tournaments uses 240hz monitors as a standard and 144 fps is not as hard anymore to hit in competative games like CSGO, Valorant, Overwatch and Fortnite. You can pretty much use the cheapest i5 or Ryzen 5 5000 series processor with a budget graphics card like a GTX 1650 or 1060 and get atleast 170 avg fps on the more GPU heavy games like Overwatch. On CSGO you can easily get over 200 avg fps with these processors

Have you ever heard of slow motion?

sarcasm, ..not possible in reality