Ryt 😎bro

@Just Dab I'm sure nothing is more expensive than a human life.

Mandir kon banayega bc

Us behan ke lund ko murtiyan banane se fursat ho to banega na delhi mein.

India needs these for air pollution. But what can be done about the poop and water pollution over there ?

Nahi mandir aur diya jaroori hai😊

@@MandeepSingh-wo7yn 🤣so true

Not every

@@MandeepSingh-wo7yn jaruri to masjid bhi nhi hai

@@MandeepSingh-wo7yn ha humate liye h, tu masjid k maulvi ka Lauda lele

1)Switch to vaping your weed 2)Get this www.mi.com/global/mi-air-purifier-3H/

HELENO HENZO No kiddin so does Salt Lake City, Utah in the winter time too

lol

Fuck them gujjus. Nikalo behan ke lodo ko desh se

LMAO!

This is why India has a bad reputation for being racist you know that right?

@@Mohak_16 when & where ppl like you talking about racism ???

@@rohansharma4385 Lol blaming a particular community entirely is considered as racism you don't know that? This is why India is considered the most racist country in the world. So please refrain yourself from such behavior. Black people are scared to come to India because of this.

If US companies didn’t use china for cheap manufacturing then this wouldn’t be a problem

@@jorgedominguez7259if china didn’t sell its soul to the U.S. china wouldn’t have such a big issue with pollution

😂😂😂

Ooo you have toilet.....

What are you talking about? Yeah it is you have good air. Park city has great air quality

David Goans u get what u pay for

@N Vannote it's a air purifier, so it does not deal with plastic or any solid material. I meant air pollution due to burning if fossil fuel and construction and wind blowing up dust matter can't be avoided, this type of innovation will definitely help. Thank you.

First of all, NO!

Does the dust sit on the leafs? Yep and the tree dosnt do damn about it so... here you go. But trees are definitely good idea for new air.

Hope they can reuse about 5 times

Exactly.

teipkep at least they are doing stuff to change what they have done. the earth is practically ruined so the only thing we can do left is try

@@jelliefisheds I think giving up on saving the planet isnt the right thing either. So it's ok now because nothing to do about it? I think there is something to do about it, only that people, specially americans, doesn't like changes in their everyday, and omg buhu if they cant eat their chickenwings while watching their netflix shit. Yes meet mass production is ruining the planet too btw.

Throw away device you are watching this on right now then Oh, and also go join some Amishes to do that

I don't think any of ous are the ones to talk maybe you should try helping rather than saying i am sure that your activities also cause pollution

So it cleans the air and then filters it's own byproduct, nice

Yes .

Exactly, but at least china puts in more effort than india or usa

@@kiyoponnn I’ve lived in large industrial cities in the USA it never gets this bad. I did not even know what smog was until the wildfires cuz companies are forced to filter the waste and to prevent it , even my church got a huge fine cuz the parking lot drainage was dirty and contaminating the wastewater.

@@felixxdenolo6793 China manufactures the majority of the world's goods and has double the population of america. usa produces more ghg emissions per capita than china. It's not just about the pollution that you can observe. epi.yale.edu/epi-results/2020/component/ghp

planting trees doesn't remove particulates in the air

@@gekos7155 Trees also remove particulate matter from the atmosphere, particularly small particles which are a major health hazard in air pollution do your research

@@chriscoleman007 they may clean up some PMs but they cant get all of them (only around 50%) the leaves trap the PMs within their ultra structures, man made filters will do the same job much more efficiently and it can be done in a carbon neutral way like by using solar power so it doesn't put PMs back into the air . Also trees are limited in range, if the winds are carrying PMs above a tree canopy it will never even reach the trees. in a lot of cites the layout of buildings funnel the air upwards away from the ground . also scale, a lot of polluted cites have very limited building spaces, planting trees takes up a lot of space. I am not saying you are wrong, just saying there are flaws in using trees to passively filter air compared to a powered and active man made filter. but ideally trees would be preferable in less polluted cites (most cites in china have awful air pollution) and are much more pleasing to the eye. I had to do a project at school on a similar issue, so I have some understanding of this I can give you sources if you want. but really this is just a youtube comment section :)

This is only filtering the suspended particle from air which are formed by burning of coal, petroleum etc. The greenhouse gases which increases the temperature of the earth are still out in the air. For trapping the major greenhouse gas CO2 we have a magic machine called tree.

It's not that easy if you think the cons

@@Charles-hy6gp the cons would be economic which trumps anything regarding the environment and efficiency in any political case

that is very counter productive we would be using more fossil fuels and coal to power these which is the main issue in the first place

@@Blue.lock. I'm pretty sure it's solar powered

China has also planted over a billion trees as well. We need everything to help reduce pollution in our world.

Problem is that only works on rural areas