Yes. Turkey is full of buildings that dont meet the safety criteria and are built on soft structures. The earthquakes also took place in cities with lots of poverty which is a reason why so many buildings collapsed

And of course, corruption is the biggest factor. Anyhow those buildings were approved in terms of earthquake regulations. Most of the people from the East of Turkey have bought graveyard for themselves.

Help. Me escape syria

But in any building people make internal changes which change properties of building so...even if this is build some joe will drill though a wall to make open space dinning room

@@stxrmyrl509 On the contrary, people were left alive because there were single-storey buildings in poor areas. a site that was advertised as the strongest buildings in the city completely collapsed. Unfortunately, the state does not impose a standard on the contractors in this regard, they steal materials as it suits them, if it continues like this, a much more terrible Istanbul earthquake awaits us..

I've always found the experience a little unsettling, but interesting and curious. But I've only experience 3-4 scale earthquakes, which are extremely minor, and leave me wishing I'd paid more attention while they were happening (they catch you off guard, of course). I can imagine anything over a 5 or 6 would be quite a horrible feeling.

i tried 7.5 and 6.5 only this month in syria😢

I experienced up to 7. During 2005 in Pakistan. Experience is very frightening. It's always better to DROP YOURSELF, GET COVER, AND HOLD ON.

i've experienced turkey earthquake forget about shaking that adrenaline bump goes off but what doesn't go off is when u see collapsed buildings with people in it everywhere you go collapsed if u live in country like turkey everywhere is thief contractor imagine buying a house with 3 million turkish liras and it collapses in seconds and u are with your family in it even 1 week after that earthquake streets smell like corpses you can imagine the rest of it

Meanwhile, us experiencing earthquakes 2-3 times every 3 weeks. It isn't really much of a surprise. We've become used to it already that we can identify the intensity (not specifically of course, just the general scale) of the earthquake through feeling itself just by how strong the ground shakes and the lateral movements of the buildings. Perks of living within the Pacific Rim of Fire. Scale 5-6 are strong but not that much destructive than 7 and above

Could easily withstand it. 1,5 minutes is nothing compared to magnitude 8.5-9.0 quakes that lasts 5-8 minutes in Chile, Alaska and Japan. BUILD BETTER BUILDINGS!

nie ingilicce konusuonuz lan

@@TheKampocyamuzu assdfghjklş

@@ozzX92 ce cutremur ai auzit tu sa tina 5 minute?

@@ozzX92 not only the magnitude tells how strong the earthquake is. Get your facts right dude

Good thing wood has some flexibility to it and won't crack like cement.

@@ChiliCheeseD0g It is about resonance frequency. Any material has it. Unfortunately earthquake generated frequency often match building frequency. Any material cracks when the wave matches its frequency.

@@ChiliCheeseD0g Concrete. Every time you mix up concrete with cement, a civil engineer's calculator runs out of batteries.

@@ChiliCheeseD0g what about fire?

@@bestopinion9257 not in tokyo tho lol

Let Sweden join NATO first.

@@sergiobastos4274 Wow i never thought someone with enough brain to text would make a correlation between the earthquake and nato. Thanks for surprising me.

@@sergiobastos4274 Oh a peterson fan, his fanbase is very consistent with the amount of intellectual power they put on their comments which is near zero.

i know

Ikr

It is supposed to otherwise it would just collapse

@@namitajimmy6737 Yeah, like a tree, it has to bend or it’d tip on MY HOUSE- I have a huge tree in my front yard and in storms I am always scared that it’s gonna fall on my house!

Imagine

whats its max strength, any idea? can it shake to like 13 on the richter scale?

@@deepakchermakani7542 Not sure. I believe it has been used to test up to magnitude 9.

@@douro20 thanks for the info

ok but how fun is it to ride

Japan my ass that was in Colorado

Hi Nathan, Thanks for stopping by and watching it! We're glad you enjoyed our video.

@@strongtie hi man how are you doing

Yea especially when you are in turkey or syria

​@@mohammadal-kamsha4020 LMAO

On top of budget and all that I think having any machine carry and shake the tons and tons of steel and concrete is probably impossible to build today.

And people 😆

@@GameDevAraz Probably weight of people too. And it is not funny at all.

Really? 1:44

This test was modeled on the Loma Prieta earthquake which lasted 15 seconds and resulted in 63 deaths and 3,757 injuries.

you still have to pay him/her though. Might as well as let them do their job.

If you look close the walls do have drywall on them. They just aren't painted. I see your point though.

sorry to tell you but it's too late.

It was so LOUD in the Earth Science building at Stanford. We were all noticeably deafened afterwards.

2 separate earth quake together were 120 second long

@@lazorplayz4556 Does it matter? There is only 9 hours between two earthquakes.

@@canerongoren k

the problem in Turkey is the ground . I also saw people remove columns because of their store just because to have more space in the 1st floor which is such a huge mistake . I have family in Izmir , and most of the buildings are up in the hills which requires really really good solid and stable structure . But as we saw last year same thing happened. If it is a flat ground alright but up in the hills the structure must be planned more seriously . It sad that those architectures tried to get away from the country when everything happened . For them the important thing is only the money

@@denissadak2521 I totally agree and there is no monitoring, there is this government that takes bribes.

this is a retrofit, a quick solution for already built wooden houses, Turkey should try something which is basically copying the Chilean code of building

@@olekatoska1901 The new building code in Turkey (uptaded in 2018) is way more disiplined than Japan. But the problem is in bad execution, lack of control and corruption on old houses. I really envy Mexico and Chile. The absolute solution is to build two story houses like in US and Europe.

@@denissadak2521 We have already forgotten old earthquakes that happened back in history and built concrate houses on plains and alluvium grounds. Most collapses happened on that kind of terrains. All we need is to follow new building codes carefully and control it on progress.

yeah, those people as opposed to our people who attack their own capitol.

Relax. It's just a demonstration. And you ever heard of Google? Go look up how long they last

you could just search tokyo 2011 earthquake, no buildings collapsed.

@@jamesfranko1568 ya only a few 150+ year old roofs collapsed, and a few fancy ceilings/lights in expensive restaurants and such. there's a video of skyscrapers swaying in tokyo that i found astonishing. the only harm i'm aware of was mainly from hoarders who had their stuff fall onto them.

@@ayaanyani5521 japan earthquakes come from 500 km from down icra ..turkey earthquake happend 18 km to surface..so it is many times bigger then japan earthquakes because it is in surface.. although japan seen 9 magneitute..7.9 and 7.5 turkey earthquake much more deadly..japan will have smililar results if same happend in surface although they claim best in building engineering at leart in turkey people dont live in caves too..New buildings collapesed too

​@@sforza1903 you are partially correct. The earthquake in Turkey was closer to the surface. However, saying that Japan would have similar results is objectively wrong. The problem in Turkey is the poor build quality/corrupt inspections, which does not exist in Japan to the same level.

In the case of gas, it is dangerous, so the system we have now is to shut off the gas supply as soon as a strong tremor is detected. This system is located throughout each house and in the middle of pipes, minimizing the impact if a pipe breaks.

who did you find the 0.1? lol

Tell me you ve never seen an earthquake, the 7.8 one in Turkey looked far more scarier than this

Imagine if that were over 9000.0 magnitude. Imagine if earth were real.

@@ramdas363 seriously bro the earth 🌎 will not be seen. It can't handle a huge earthquake

A 10.0 is the equivalent of 2 times the entire world's Nuclear Arsenal, or 1 million Hiroshima Nuclear Bombs. It would be nearly 6 times more powerful than the 1960 Valdivia earthquake (Most powerful earthquake on record) and was felt/detected 6000 miles away from the epicenter. It would be 22 times more powerful than the 2004 Boxing Day earthquake/tsunami that killed 280,000 people. It would be nearly 2,000 times more powerful than the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake that killed 3,000 people and destroyed 80% of San Francisco. And 89,000 times more powerful than the 1994 Northridge (Los Angeles) Earthquake that caused an estimated 100 billion in damage

Yeah

This thing only shook for like 5 seconds, do two of these earthquakes for a minute each then we can see if it really is strong

I think it is possible to build structures in a way where the 'design itself' can keep it from collapsing. Putting extra material into the construction to brace it more to me is just more added weight, and as you suggested - more cost. For instance why hasn't anyone thought of designing a frame that is flexible enough to have a backup system designed into it in the event (let's say) a joint beam comes apart from another joint beam? Why can't both of those loose ends fall into another part of the frame design to keep it from coming apart? Physics would have to be played with and included into such a test. How about adding cables in with the frames, cables to keep the structure from coming apart? Maybe some kind of puzzle design? Joints that can catch onto something else to keep it in the general place its supposed to be? In my view it is the frame that holds up the structure and so it should be the frame that should have designs within it that keeps it all from coming apart? This concept can be tested just by itself alone to see how it would work, make improvements on the design and then build the finish on it and see how the theory works out as a full unit? Everyone keeps building things with a cookie cutter concept. Think outside of the box and make it fun to design. These videos can offer a lot of information if people study them a lot more to understand the physics more.

7.5

Aynen. Soğumaktan ziyade psikolojim bozuldu..

true, I've seen it to.

Help me escape syria

tokyo had 9.0 magnitude in 2011 and zero modern buildings and skyscrapers collapsed

@@jamesfranko1568 Yes, because they are build with that in mind, out of concrete :P

depends on whether it's anti-seismic or not

Wood structures age? As long as the wood is kept dry it lasts for lifetimes. The main reason some areas around the world use wood vs concrete is just based on availability of resources.

Do you not see trees that last for a thousand year exists lol

Все равно выглядит прочнее того хлама который настроили в Турции. В Японии в 11-м таких разрушений и близко не было при магнитуде в 9.

You do make a good point though. This structure is indeed tons lighter. If all of the added materials were on it, in it then it might make a difference. Brick? Heavy furniture? People, it all adds up.

Hmmmm, interesting. I wonder what people would look like standing on that shaker?

For what i heard, it was a 7,5 Ritcher scale, but there is anoher one with a concrete buidling with 9.0 ritcher scale simulation.

This is from the inside of the building which you see from the outside earlier in the clip.

@@mitkoogrozev First one has windows open, this one has windows covered up. Looks lie under ground somewhere

ask the Japanese they have mastered this building technique which even resisted 9.1 in 2011

@@JMian that was off-shore quake

@@JMian what?

@@gabrielc6252 epicenter was 80 km offshore. but land shook at 9R

Bekle daha bebek. Sende kader ne olduğunu er ya da geç öğreneceksin

Some people don't believe in science

​@@darvinmilevic7418 Some people is stupid..

@@Jaecht88 hayırdır birader tehdit mi ediyorsun

@@redlaser2340 tehdit değil tavsiye

Hello, thanks for watching. The magnitude it represented was 7.5 earthquake. Check out our blog post to learn more about this video. seblog.strongtie.com/2019/07/designing-resilience-neeswood-capstone-a-decade-later/

@@strongtie ty so much! It is certainly innovative technology.

This was one of five tests modeled on the 1994 Northridge earthquake ground motions recorded at Canoga Park. That quake only lasted 10-20 seconds. According to wikipedia: "The death toll was 57, with more than 9,000 injured. In addition, property damage was estimated to be $13-50 billion (equivalent to $24-93 billion in 2021), making it one of the costliest natural disasters in U.S. history." seblog.strongtie.com/2019/07/designing-resilience-neeswood-capstone-a-decade-later/

Hocam zemin falan da önemli. Ayrıca videodaki olay sadece ahşap evlere yapılıyormuş.