I keep looking at the background, it's beautiful. Is that a green screen?

@@dustman96 In early Q & As it's the real view outside his 'barn' window. But I think since he has started to use video illustrations he is using a green screen.

It's green screen with terrible video editing

@@dustman96 used to be real, but its green-screen since last two live sessions.

@@timewalker6654 He doesn't want us to see his barn that's in desperate need of a pressure wash LOL (the REAL Green screen)

They're good

I always end up waking up to them somehow.

brian green .consciousness is an illusion ,that being the case so are his theories ,and believes must be equally illusory

@@chrisbennett6260 The nature of consciousness may be other than it "feels" to us, but that us not to say it's an illusion (in the sense we generally use that term) ... consciousness appears to be a generated reality of the brain (mind) that is partly created by the senses, but exists even in those born deaf and blind, and it apparently ends when we die, but hey, who knows? The idea that consciousness is a wider function of matter and the universe is not disproved.

@@walshamite Brian Green is full of it and i mean full of it if its an illusion so are his danm beliefs and conceptions also Green or you can say what the hell you want whatever man

@@chrisbennett6260You told us all about you

@@danielpaulson8838 cut your crap nonsense

Thank you for string theory as well...

Don't worry he doesn't comprehend what he's saying either. It's all a part of the materialist act. He has no idea how anything in reality works at all and is very confused. Facts The things he's talking about don't need to be comprehended most of the time. And when they do it's only because he's so far from the truth. This is why science is become like a religion. Following fools liek this guy who thinks he's smart. Without consciousness your intelligence can go in the toilet as far as im concerned.

My “guess” is that your idea would enhance what is a baseline, wonderful experience. I think that Brian is a fantastic host, adding a guest, in my view, is a force multiplier- fantastic^2 🥂😎🤵🙇‍♂️ 0030 hr.s CST Regards, -J

@@Bibibosh 🤣 (a sandwich 🥪 in Planck-time at a Planck-length upon the Wavefunction collapse lest the potential banana split emerges, adding to my newly emerging corpulence).😂😉🐬

I'd LOVE to have a debate with him on quantum anything.

@@Bibibosh well it's not but you can't have morons trying descrive how reality works and the universe, when they really have no fucking idea wahtsoever and just pulling shit out their ass. Consciousness is only understood from a spiritual persons experience.

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.

the only reason you cant understand things he says is because he doesnt understand and he's WRONG, and he's just using words to sound intelligent and all of you must be fools to think he's wise. Wisdom is exactly what he's lacking.

with all the experience you have is never to late to teach the world live via internet.

Ira is

The bible says nothing about movement because the Earth doesn't move, revolve or rotate. It's perfectly still. We inhabit a motionless realm covered by an impenetrable dome. We use gas pressure to debunk space that directly represents the heliocentric model. Space is a direct violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Using science to disprove the heliocentric model is the best way to get people to learn the truth.

​@murlidharkhatkale5208

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.

Dr Albert was more in line with reality, we are children, and have a long way to go before arriving at any worthy cemented views or opinions...

Maybe augmented hair might be a solution on the problems with the software that keep adjusting the real hair. Maybe they might even try augmented punk hair, which would look cool on both tbh :)

I came looking for just such a post. That hair thing is fa-reeeaky looking.

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.

He is even better, as Sagan was more of a populariser, Brian is actually a professor of maths and physics, so is waaaaaaay more qualified than Sagan.

@@yaserthe1 so you can't think listening to someone is easier if their not as "qualified" as someone else? I enjoy Sir David Attenborough more then Steve Erwin but he had a zoo so that make him more qualified to talk about animals and their habitats? Making my opinion wrong? And Sagan is just as qualified as anyone if not more who else has their work flying to another star and could potentially be our first and only physical thing to find someone out there telling them we existed and they're not alone. That's pretty freaking important and not just some dude that popularized stuff would get to do ya would have to be a little qualified to get NASA to trust your abilities. Don't ya think? Or you can just have fun being the opinion police 😜✌️

I’m

@@adumberfling9959 you need to put a picture of yourself on your profile. But keep the name because it definitely fits

@@rsk5197 ha I know right you should put your mom's pic and her address on yours

Any more conversations with Sean Carroll? And can you have one with Elon Musk!!!! TY.

LOL. yeah no Off to church for you

Hi, you have my attention. I ask if you may send me a free book ?

@@foxjerseycol4433 Sorry, have no means to send free stuff to people right now. Kindle versions cost 3 gbp or around 5 or 6 dollars anyway. And I don't send word or pdf formats as then the book ends up for free all over the place.

@Ethernos Grace It is true and it will be proven. Relax.

@@foxjerseycol4433 All right! I decided to share one of my books with the world fro free. It is about the True Essence of Vacuum. Do you still want it? I only will need to do some light changes to it and it will take at least a week as I am working right now. If you want it, we will have to figure out how to send it to you.

@Ethernos Grace Would you also want my book about the True Essence of Vacuum?

Dr. Greene, just a great 3 hours. Dialogue with Adam Reiss was education as well as a great mind exercise. You are so very VALUABLE to many many for some sanity and reality and it’s beauty and shortcomings. Thanks again

Brian Greene???

Lmao

adam riess and his amazing disappearing hair!!

Its a Wave until you observe it ! ! LOL

@@Scorp7867 to po for a girl o o o o o l l l p o o o n p i o o o l o o o o o p o o p o o l o l o o o o o l l p i oooooooooo9ooooo9oooooo9

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support .

Think harder if you have -3 times -3...... Of course it is plus

Multiplication with plus numbers is addition but if you have -3 times -3 you are not adding to the minus number....

3 x -3 = -9 Adding.... -3 x -3 is not adding for minus