@tfs2O3 the only scenario I see them being used is if Russia or China does something that triggers a world war gets pushed back into their borders and nukes the invading armies in a desperate bid for survival other than that maybe another Japan situation where a country is so costly to invade we just nuke em Iran or North Korea comes to mind especially since we know NK will nuke us in any invasion anyways

@@bootymane9907 Idk that sounds kinda Belkan

@tfs2O3 They would have also to destroy their pure running wild capitalism which destroys them, us, and the whole planet ...

@tfs2O3 Excuse me for my bad english. I am partisan of a mixed regime where the things too important for the society to be let to the law of maximum profit, as roads, public transports, strategic industries, national education or public health would be state owned or at least straightly controlled by him, and that the usual consumation goods like food, suits etc... would be given to the capitalist law of market for that concurrency ameliorates their quality; it was the regime that ruled France under de Gaulle, or G-B in his time; not the paradise, but at least an efficient and bearable regime. But since the fall of the soviet so-called "communism", free capitalism has no more opponents to moderate its jurassic mechanical and ferocious avidity, and it pillates and destroys the planet, wasting more and more ressources in the only aim to make more and more money for the riches, which leads humanity to a global catastrophe and wars, even civil wars, for the next generations... And I do not like that.

There is no winner, there is only survivor

That's good I'm using that in a joke cheers

Did you take that from Wombles video?

No pulling out at the last second, and not allowing you to claim child benefit is a 'hard brexit'.

Still not hard enough for farage, I'm certain. Not until there is a hammer and sickle in Whitehall will he be satisfied.

Doesn't always work like that

Wanna play chess?

That's the idea.

I see you are a man of culture too.

Nop. Germany would be under atomic clouds... But French and British people would try to quit theirs homeland. And Canada would be able to gain a lot of population. Canada would only to avoid a civil war...

@@Baddy187 If that war occurs and millions of people goes in both parts of the Canada a civil war is practically unavoidable. Otherwise, the Canadian prime Minister can be a peace nobel prize.

Radioactive fallouts will turn germans into real ubermensch.

Europe dominated by mutant Germans is worse than by non-mutant Germans.

The only nuclear weapons Germany has had were held by NATO it had no nuclear weapons of its own so best of luck with that idea!

Tardigrades too

@Adam Beasley no no them gopniks will rule

The british ofc Just like the british won all the other wars against the french

@@lionel66cajppppp0 You seriously think people will take you serious or you try to trigger the French ?

@Miguel Melchior Which part of what I said is incorrect?

Elsaß

Alsace & Lorraine are French since Louis XIV, way before germany was existed.

I actually think poland could hold its own

@@studentfitness5954 they wouldn't

@@drumond5027 against the Bundeswehr? They’d be fine Must suck to be a German soldier now adays, a tradition and legacy of military excellence reduced to...the bundeswehr

The UK just increased its warhead stocks to 260, so they are both equally dead now.

keegan773 I don’t know. In this situation where France is pretty much scoured off the planet that seems like a big win for the rest of the world

@@cadetkidkilla lul

@@cadetkidkilla bitter about something ?

@@popkhorne5372 Escargot

@@cadetkidkilla you're a little bit sour, missed your tea and crumpets this morning?

As an American, I beg to differ. We've already won one nuclear war.

@@costakeith9048 against a country that was struggling to get back up after midway, yep, won a nuclear war against a country that would've surrendered anyway sometime in the near future

@@_rk553 And we proved Billy Mitchell's theory that war can be won from the air alone. We just needed bigger bombs and nukes are clearly the ticket.

Yes nukes are political weapon not military weapon

@@ey6713 so they useless

France bombs London... Rest of UK cheers and celebrates.

@@ryanxyz13 yea, maybe you would if it wasn't important to english heritage.

Hahaha well said

Obihugzenobi England lost 2-1 to Iceland and Croatia loool😂😂

Obihugzenobi Even Gary Lineker said “Football is a simple game; 22 men chase a ball for 90 minutes and at the end, the Germans win.”

stephane gouverneur but dude what do you mean wales or Scotland would win it

No, Ireland would win forever...

And the French would say oh please don't and roll over like the gutless nation they ar!

Bruh the video is about France and England and there are still people who manage to argue about Alsace Lorraine lol

Yes, but just wait until radioactivity diminish drastically...

@@shihtzu291 France fought all the countries around it for 2000 years and went from a small country to the biggest one in EU, don't even try saying shit about France as they surely kicked your country ass multiples times

@@ommsterlitz1805 - It ain't nice is it but France is always having a go at my country for this and that and now that we've left the EU they are being really bad to us and it pisses me off because we're supposed to be naigbours and we've done some great stuff together like concord and the channel tunnel but then they always try to cause trouble for us and come across ungrateful for the lives lost helping them in two world wars, when ever you get these types of videos the French run us down in the comments section and any other time they can.

Fr / UK nuke war. France don't send nuke to scotland (Auld alliance). Scotland demand independance. England refuse independance of the lone part of the union to don't be radioactive. Edimburgh become the capital city of the island.

@@himlingpatrice tbh most English want you gone, it's the government that's dragging their heels. we don't want see or hear Kranky the sturgeon ever again.. Just being honest. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🥇

@@davidthomas6566 And we don’t want Boris the Clown or Jacob double barrelled freak either. You keep ‘em 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇫🇷🇪🇺

Nicola only speaks for Glasgow and Edinburgh, not Scotland.

@@davidthomas6566 Aren't the French/Russian more related to you than the Scottish, just curious to know ?

Inter Continental Ballistic Missle missle?

@@mac2857 Inter Continental Ballistic Missile, yeah ur right (I'm assuming ur saying that in another language)

We know that. The warhead is called Holbrook but it was classified until recently. Warhead numbers are increasing to 260 but from now on all data will be made classified again (2021).

Except for switzerland they got bunkers in every house

amen

What ?! Somebody not raging in the comments of a Binkov video ?! Impossibru !

👼 💀 wins

switzerland would win

He talked about blowing them up, they may be safe, but not bomb safe

Errr, wind and solar would like a word. I get that coal, oil, and gas are horrendous, though.

I'm pretty sure blowing them up may have some negative effects....

The folks at Chernobyl and Fukushima might disagree with you on that.

@AngloSaxon. I'm detecting some slight bias

@@b_scuit Slight? He thinks Britain can nuke America hahaha

@@burgereagle9310 Gotta love those retarded nationalists plus im british but i love america

@AngloSaxon. 🇬🇧and🇫🇷 nuke each:other. So their economy will be 0. In this case GERMANY will have a Golden Chance to dominate EUrope. By the way, Germany is dominating EUrope in this time too.

@@belgium6552 Germany already dominate Europe

Imagine assuming that a 100 year old alliance is a permanent thing especially considering the previous thousand years of enemy status.

@@conors4430 Dude gimme a fucking break. There is literally no way possible they'd get to any conflict, especially nuclear like wtf? It's a fun little hypothetical I guess but holy shit it's like just so ridiculous in my head.

Says a lot more about you being a backstabbing rat than anything else.

Oof

@@burgereagle9310 do you not know what a joke is?

Agreed

Honestly, it is quite frightening sometimes

Although there is a lot of competition. To be fair though I think most of the commenters are under twelve. Or have the mental age of.

Totally agree

that's really only true in *mutual* nuclear war. In a one sided war there is a very clear winner.

@@SomeGuy-ty7kr I mean, the earth might highly disagree with that statement. Weird how it doesn't particularly care for radioactive elements getting spewed about as if they were confetti chips.

@@mastoner20 funny that you don't seem to understand how fallout works. Stop getting your understand of the world from overly dramatized video games. It's not magical devil dust or whatever your seem to think it is, and most of it would be contained to the place that has much bigger problems already. Specifically they just got blown up.

@@SomeGuy-ty7kr i mean. I get my understanding of Fallout from a college education. But thank you for letting me know video games aren't highly accurate on the subject matter. I'd have never guessed.

@@mastoner20 wow, college educated yet still clueless, must be an American.

Why do you call us that? Its not like roast beef is an english exclusive unlike frogs legs or snails which while not technically french exclusive jump straight to your mind when someone says "french food"

@@anguswaterhouse9255 I believe it comes from ww1... UK soldier relied mostly on roast beef caned food... French soldiers saw that and Thus nicknamed them roast beef. This is the story I have heared

@@h.richard7312 oh cool

Taking out Paris would be the best gift from the UK and the rest of France would be pleased.

Lol, but true.

Agreed

forget london, nuking birmingham would be the best thing france has ever done for the UK

The Brotherhood of steel. Hold my Nuke!

@Anti Mapping No, not it was not 2 Nuclear bombs where used at the very end of it. That doesn't make it a Nuclear war.

Pointlessness is the whole point of it.

@@neilwilson5785 Good point.

No true, if the nuclear war doesn't have MAD, you can wipe your enemy off the map. permanently.

@@himedo1512 That's assuming they don't have the same idea.

@@oneofmanyparadoxfans5447 What? that doesn't even make sense. A U.S. vs U.K. nuclear war doesn't have MAD, but they sure as hell are firing nukes at each other.

I like your planning, if this happens I will try that

User Name oh, I'm not saying the US wouldn't be devestated, although France wouldn't be able to use nearly as many warheads against the US as they could the UK, their ICBM and SLBMs would work fine but their short range nukes wouldn't be of much use, just that the breakdown if numbers would be staggeringly lopsided.

@@johnpatz8395 Well we have a Military base in French Guyana, even if a war between France and US is super unlikely

@User Name Ahah those two 😂😂 One time they are best friends, the next day they are enemies

Hahahaah😂😂😂😂👍👍

Wrong!

There is a mistake my brave, it's *Tactical baguette ! I N C O M I N G !*

@@Pantsugrenadiere Bruh ,Thx

@@pewpewman._.3415 you're welcome bruh

Exactly! We All Die!!

Yeah london and Paris.

@@kordellswoffer1520 i was thinking more along the lines of sheffield but that works too

Destruction of Paris for London could be the greatest deal in the history of deals

​@@x-a- No. It wouldn't just stay in London and Paris We all dead

@@hannahdyson7129 We are all marching towards death, since the moment we were born.

Emus, but with rabbits allies !

The scary part is 16 nukes is enough to cripple a large country like Russia

@@crystxlzx6442 eu's nuke are american. Only france now have their own nuclear capability without an american officer saying no

@@maverickwildwolf3871 good point there "UK bombs" are american made . they need US autorisation for launch national industry garanty your indepandance neither F35 or brexit do enjoy your chloro chiken dear pround english nationalist for all other english freinds love from france and be strong

@@martialg9425 i was refering to germany, belgium etc... i'm not sure for the UK's nuke but if i recall it's american tech that was bought. So you only need have the brits that decide for a strike. Meanwhile germany can initiate a strike but if the american says no they can't engage any strike

@@maverickwildwolf3871 Germany can't decide for a strike (just like Italy) because the nukes are in American bases and controlled directly by the Americans, the nukes are only in other countries. It would be interesting to see if an eventual war between the UK and France escalate in a USA+UK-EU war. What will happen to the American bases in Europe and the nuclear warheads in EU territory? Would them be deployed immediately after an attempt of the EU to conquer the bases? Would the US leave it to the Europeans to limit the deaths?

Welll carry on with the recent behaviour of France and some of the other EU countries it might just happen all over again.there is real anger in the uk over the way france in particular are behaving after we left the EU.

Ignore the other guy, much love from the UK. Ignoring current political angst, we'll always be there for eachother when push comes to shove ❤️

​@@martinrye712 Nobody forced you guys to leave the EU. Imagine having a large continental alliance and leaving it based on a fake claim written on a big red bus and blaming all others in the process because of one PM's incompetence. Yeah of course France isn't glad about it. The UK is just as arrogant as France, so really, you guys should stop acting like everyone's mad at you because that's precisely what's annoying people. Then again, this is politics, and I dare say most real-life people just don't care and are very glad to think we all are friends because, in the end, we have broadly the same goals.

To be honest im french and i still think they would win.

Where are you from?

@@ash4583 south america

@@gtgbrb8694 nice

But no one win's didn't you listen carefully?

In a nuclear war the survivors are the loosers. The hospitals were destroyed because they were in the cities. Now you need to rebuild from the stone age while dealing with radiation related illnesses and injuries.

A BETTER FUTURE.... UNDERGROUND 😁😁😁😁

Le Grande Baguette du frappe icbm

Im ernst jetzt Eigentlich waren die Hohenzollern mit den Briten verwandt ....

Eigentlich war jede Adelsfamilie und Könige mit jedem irgendwie Verwandt😂

@@hnk2460 Die Koenigin von England und die hohenzollern ist mit den prophet Muhammed verwandt

@@nilswettlin2012 Toll

You couldnt do it when you controlled France directly, what makes you think you can beat us now?

usa is a france ally too ...

Im not sure the UK has more allies actually.

@@flamingoxe5984 Both France and U.K are of course allies of the USA. However, at the moment, I have to wonder who Trump would decide to help (his friend Boris or Macron whom he has had differences with)

@@M1l1nos_tv I know, but Britain is a greater ally to the us than France

@@another_internet_guy America would not have independence without France, their oldest ally.

That is, undeniably true sir, however, surely that shouldn't stop anyone from trying :) although I do understand exactly what you are saying. :)

Make love not war...

True but in this case where it's a full nuclear war these weapons would be used like shown

false doctrine change with Chirac

@@yberai what's the false doctrine because one of France nuclear strategy is using a nuclear cruise missile as a warning shot

True. But, when not if WW3 does start that theory will be tested.

lol the Royal Navy would have a massive advantage in that type 23s anti submarine warfare is significantly better than the French, GCHQ are known to be only equalled by NSA in offensive and defensive subset weaponry, joint british and American made Cyber weapons targeted Iranian air defence missiles and stopped them working, when you can eliminate communications, radar and air defence equipment it is a major advantage and the the big elephant in the room is the U.K. have 5th generation aircraft whereas France does not.. f35 can strike and kill Rafael before Rafael can do shit, type 45 can kill Rafael as soon as it launches.. U.K. missiles trident - U.K. lease the missiles from America but manufacture it’s own warheads some of which are 400kt each unlike binkovs usual bullshit of them being 100kt, indeed it’s a mixed bag. U.K. cruise missiles tomahawk are also able to be fitted with nuclear warheads hence the larger interoperability with America and U.K... f35 can indeed fire nuclear missiles so if doomsday ever came, there would be no coincidence that the UKs mainstay is high level weaponry can fire and accommodate nuclear weapons. Faslane naval base is incredibly hard to penetrate and Royal Navy submarines can dock and load underneath a mountainous bunker designed to operate even when bombed, how would French planes reach Scotland without being downed by the raf or Royal Navy? U.K. has more and better nuclear attack submarines astute is 7 and France have 6 Lastly, U.K. now has land ceptor and sea ceptor which the first replaced rapier and is from the same family of missiles, the aster class. Summary, U.K. has a better defensive position geographically, it has better situated military bases including naval and air bases. U.K. has better aircraft such as typhoon and f35 vs only rafale. U.K. has more nuclear submarines, U.K. trident missiles have longer range and can carry more warheads than the French, U.K. has better anti submarine warfare and better cyber offensive and defensive capability to interrupt stop and disable French military communications and equipment..

@@jbx- You are higth F-35 is a flying brick whith unresolved vital problems. And stealth is bulshit , tey are not so invisible. March 1999, the OTH radar NOSTRADAMUS was said to have detected two Northrop B2 Spirit flying to Kosovo. It entered service for the French army in 2005, and is still in development. It is based on a star-shaped antenna field, used for emission and reception (monostatic), and can detect aircraft at a range of more than 2,000 kilometers, in a 360-degree arc. The frequency range used is from 6 to 30 MHz. Launched officially in 2009, the French STRADIVARIUS research project developed a new over-the-horizon radar (High Frequency Surface Wave Radar - HFSWR) capable of monitoring maritime traffic up to 200 nautical miles offshore. A demonstration site is operational since January 2015 on the French Mediterranean coast to showcase the 24/7 capabilities of the system that is now offered for sale by DIGINEXT. France is the thrid arm exporter (1,768) UK the 8th ( 741) and French weapons are pretty good . Rafale even if it's not the best is prety reliable F 22 was superior in terms of air combat to F 35 it's a fact. F 22 had lossed against Rafale in 2009 in mock combat nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/one-americas-top-allies-proved-f-22-can-be-killed-combat-57422 medium.com/war-is-boring/the-french-shot-down-u-s-stealth-fighter-f59db16282ca an F-22 was defeated by a Mirage 2000 flown by an Emirati aviator. Mirage 2000 is also a french plane used by France Typhoon was beaten by rafale in mock combat Assute vs Rubis -> Ok Assute as an advantage but Rubis class already sunk an US aircraft carrier in mock combat, And rubis carry exocets ( proved effective against brits.) Assute vs Suffren -> Suffren is more modern than Assute

I doubt nukes will ever be used in Europe proper, but if the french are so much more powerful than they were in WW2.....why are they still waving the white flag to germany when it comes to refugees, immigration, social unrest, and the value of the Euro? The EU was a noble experiment that failed uttlerly, and the UK is the only nation thus far that recognizes that. France "could" step forward as a force for influence and change for regional security, but they've regressed to the pre WW2 society of fops and victims who would rather sit back and sip their wine while foreign powers dictate their way of life. The difference is that this time, they have the power to stop it and actively choose not to. Sad.

Underated...

@@benb6274 what do you know about France that is actually accurate beside what you read on the news ?

@AngloSaxon. Excuse me? "idiot"? I know they are the United Kingdom but they are still different countries. In a fictional nuclear war I was jokingly saying they would be like "wait a minute, we're out of here". By the way, nice manners, you must be so popular.

@@LemonLimeFizzleWizzle Don't argue with him. He is just too stupid to understand your joke.

Auld Alliance forever

@@dimachan200 Its what hes been programmed to say by Alexa 😆

@AngloSaxon. Before england should to demand the us agreement x)

Tanguy Godeau and British people still like the French

century* Only the German behemoth spawning in 1870 made us "allies", well reluctantly The mutual distrust led to lots of fuck ups, the battle of France in 1940 being the pinacle of poor military cooperation Mers El Kebir immediatly after showed that old habits die hard. Dying together in the trenches did not change that Today we're partners and also kinda pals who love to hate each other really