Philippine government distant to this issue because sabah is a private matters.. Even when Malaysian Prime Minister visited philippines they dont talk sabah too much

The UK is at fault why the Sabah issue is so hard to resolve peacefully, same case to any territorial disputes in most parts of the world.

I'm Filipino but taking this territory will result in another useless armed conflict which is bad for all. This will only benefit a few. The juice is not worth the squeeze . Better keep it as it is. The ccp is the real threat. We should focus on what really matters.

No matter what, we Filipinos love our southeast asian neighbors. 🇵🇭🇲🇾🇮🇩🇧🇳🇻🇳🇹🇭🇸🇬🇰🇭🇱🇦🇲🇲 ✌️

As a Filipino, no we will not And many citizens share the same thought with this issue: a waste of time

As Malay Moslem, we don't want to fight our brothers & sisters in Philippine. Never. And we always support Philippines fight against western colonialism

The Philippines claims Sabah on the basis that Sabah was said to be once under Sulu Sultanate. Descendants of former Sultan of Sulu claim that Sabah belonged to Sulu Sultanate because Sabah was given by Brunei the original owner to Sulu as a gift for purportedly helping Brunei to fight rebels. But Brunei refuted this claim and denied ever having given Sabah to Sulu. There was NO DOCUMENT regarding the transfer of ownership of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans. In fact on 29 December 1877, the Sultan of Brunei ceded the whole of Sabah to BNBC/British and concurrently appointed Baron Von Overback, the co-owner of BNBC as Maharajah of Sabah and Rajah of Sandakan and Gaya. This cession agreement was documented. When BNBC went to Sabah to begin their business, Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu. BNBC agreed to enter a "pajak" agreement with Sulu after they were advised by their fellow businessmen in Hong Kong who advised that Sulu would attack them if they didn't have a deal with Sulu. This "pajak'' agreement was signed on 22 January 1878. BNBC understood that this "pajak" was a "cession", so did early generation of Sulu Sultan accepted it as "cession". Only later generation of descendants of former Sultan of Sulu claimed that the "pajak" agreement was meant to be "rent" or "lease''. Still there was NO DOCUMENT regarding the transfer of ownership of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans. The two above events led to an overlapping issue on Sabah. What ever it was, the above agreement and overlapping issue were superceded by later event. On 22 July 1878, the then Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory. In 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. As new owner of Sabah Britain had full control and sovereignty over Sabah and they could do what ever they wanted. Sulu could not claim anything because they had already relinquished the sovereignty of Sabah to Spain and Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. What ever happened to Sabah after that was under British jurisdiction. Even though British had full control and sovereignty of Sabah, they still honoured the annual "cession money" payment stipulated in the "pajak'' agreement as consolation for the Sulu Sultan. So did Malaysia when formed in 1963, still honoured the annual "cession money" payment as consolation for the Sulu Sultan. The term "cession money" was used because to use the term "consolation" was felt to be too degrading. Thus the term "cession money" was continually used as used before by the British. Even the argument about the word "pajak" and it's meaning in the "pajak" agreement still favoured the British. The "pajak" agreement was written in classical Malay, in jawi script (Arabic alphabet). Malay is the national language of Malaysia and Brunei, and mother tongue of majority Malaysians and Brunei. In those days, Malay was also used by people of Sulu because Malay was the "lingua franca" of this region including the present Philippines. That was why the agreement was written in Malay. But over the years Sulu people had lost their Malay language (standard Malay) because of several reasons like colonisation by different European. This made Sulu relied on translation of the agreement. Things got worse when they translated it to Sulu's local language, be it Tagalog or Tausug, which was rather translation of another translation, that they translated it to their favour. The word "pajak" carried several meanings depending on the contact used in the sentence or passage. It could mean "tax, rent, pawn, lease, or cession". In the agreement between BNBC/ British and Sulu, the word "pajak" was used together with the phrase "selama-lamanya" which meant "forever". When "pajak" was used together with the phrase"selama-lamanya", in this contact the word "pajak" meant "cession". Cession means "the formal giving up of rights, property or territory by a state". When Sulu "pajak" Sabah to BNBC it meant Sulu ceded Sabah and it meant Sabah no longer belonged to Sulu. This was further clarified. There was a second agreement which was a supplementary to the first agreement known as "Confirmation of Cession of Certain Islands Agreement". It was regarding certain islands between Sabah and Sulu which they were not sure whether they were included in the first agreement or not. In this second agreement, the word "pajak" was no longer used because they thought it might lead to misunderstanding by later generation. Instead the word "menyerahkan" which meant "surrender" was used, and the annual payment was increased from 5,000 dollars to 5,300 dollars due to certain islands included. Another example where the Philippines generally or Sulu in particular misunderstood due to wrong translation or translation to their favour, was about the clause that the territory could not be transfered to another party. Yes, there was a clause that Sabah could not be transfered to another party "... without the consent of 'Duli Queen'...". The British translated "Duli Queen" as "Her Britannic Majesty", even though it was not correct literally but it was correct in the meaning. The "... Queen" was referring to Queen Victoria, the ruler of England / Britain at that time. But Sulu translated "Duli Queen" (or rather translated from a translation) as "Their Majesties' Government". This led to an understanding that "Duli Queen" was the ruler of Sulu. The question was since when Sulu as a Muslim state had a female as their ruler (Sultanah or Queen)? The above showed that North Borneo (Sabah) had indeed been ceded to Britain, that was why it could not be transfered to another party without the consent of 'Duli Queen' (Queen Victoria), the ruler of England/ Britain at that time. And further it was stated that any dispute about the agreement had to be referred to the "Consul General" being the Queen's representative in Borneo to be resolved. It meant that outside Arbitrator had no jurisdiction over the agreement. This fact became the main reason of judgement by Paris Court of Appeal in setting aside and annulling the Paris Court (lower court) ruling awarding the heirs of the defunct Sulu Sultanate. On 31 August 1963 Britain gave independence to Sabah and before that on 22 July 1963 Sarawak was given independence. The people of Sabah and Sarawak had exercised self determination to form Malaysia together with Malaya and Singapore. The sovereignty of Sabah and Sarawak as component states of Malaysia is intact and recognized internationally and recognized by the UN. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the United Nations Malaysia Mission Report "Final Conclusion of the Secretary-General", 14 September 1963. The last sentence of the report says: "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfillment as component states of Malaysia". Full text of the report can even be accessed from the Philippines Government Gazette website. About the arbitration award by Paris Court to Sulu of US$14.92B, it had since been set aside and annulled by Paris Court of Appeal. Here is the latest situation. Latest as in June 2023: 1. June 6th - Paris Court of Appeal had set aside and annulled the previous Paris Court (lower court) ruling awarding the heirs of the defunct Sulu Sultanate. 2. June 27th - Dutch Court of Appeal in The Haque had dismissed a bid by eight descendants of former Sultan of Sulu to enforce the arbitration award by Paris Court (lower court) ruling, and dismissed an attempt to seize Malaysian assets following the Paris Court of Appeal decision. 3. Paris Court of Appeal also imposed on Sulu €100,000.00 (Euro currency) to be paid to Malaysia as legal cost. 4. Mean while in Luxembourg, a second attempt to seize Malaysian Petronas assets had been filed in Luxembourg Court due for hearing in September 2023 after the first attempt was dismissed. This will likely be dismissed too following the Paris Court of Appeal decision. Now is already November 2023, no news about Sulu's claim proceeding in Luxembourg Court. It looked like they withdrew their case when they acknowledged the Paris Court of Appeal decision. Malaysia had spent around RM32m, equivalent to about US$6.6m to deal with these Sulu claim cases in various European courts, in Madrid, Paris, Luxembourg and Netherlands. Apart from the €100,000.00 Sulu has to pay to Malaysia as legal cost, Malaysia is planning to sue Sulu for compensation for the loss of RM32m spent.

great respect for the countries of Sabah, Sarawak, Brunei and the Philippines respect from Indonesian

Filipino here. As much as I'd love to have sabah as part of our country again, I know that it won't flourish under our rule. I don't know if it's prospering under malaysia but the philippine's economy and political climate is much shittier than Malaysia so I guess it's much better for sabah to stay in Malaysia. The second reason is that the people of Sabah are largely muslims, just by knowing that, you'd know that they will feel much much closer to Malaysians since Malaysia is dominated by the muslims unlike my country the philippines which is dominated by the catholics. Overall, Sabah would be better under the Malaysian rule than the Filipinos. The history between the Filipinos and Malaysians go way back before the muslim and catholic missionaries came into our homelands so risking all of that just for this conflict won't benefit the both of us. I just hope that this conflict will be resolved peacefully. We're all brothers. The real enemy is in the east asia. You know, the one that's so delusional that they drew up an imaginary 9 dash dumb dumb line.

SABAH may not be worth the potential consequences of engaging in war for the Philippines. The decision to prioritize nationalistic pride over peaceful resolutions could be seen as misguided and detrimental.

Phillipines and Malaysia had already settled this long ago. There are bigger threats than that

I’m Sabahan i choose Malaysia rather than Philippines. Titik!

This channel is a hidden gem 💎

I don't know about you guys but me as a Filipino, I don't want war between our lovely neighbours especially with our SEA nations. We are one. Sana maayos sa mabuting usapan ang lahat. We all just want to live in peace. #NOTOWAR 🇵🇭🇲🇾 WE ARE ONE

As a Filipino. It does not mean bigger lands, successful economy,. Just maximize the resources we have now then we can be a great country again.

As a Filipino i just want everyone to get along but that is hard when reality is in the way

As Malaysian we see Philiphines as brothers..they look exactly like us..maybe we are from diff background, but still we believe we carried same blood

just came back from sabah few days ago. such a beautiful malaysian state 🤩

Wow. That's Great Idea to make another video. > Toronto, Canada

The Philippines will never invade or go to war with any ASEAN nation / nations for it is against the constitutional republic of the Philippines to declare war over any sovereign country. But the Philippines will support the Independence of Sabah or Sarawak from West Malaya if they request to be part of ASEAN as new member states.

Never fight sabah no matter what 🇵🇭❤🇲🇾 i am filipino

The Philippines will never go to war over Sabah. Sabah is an issue between Malaysian government and private Filipino citizens. Going to war to resolve a territorial dispute is against UN laws and ASEAN laws that the Philippines have signed and sworn to uphold. Philippines will probably receive heavy sanctions from fellow ASEAN members and Western countries. Ordinary Filipinos will pay the price of such war. It's not the Filipinos that are living in Sabah, only few, so there's no emergency case that can force the Philippines to go to war against Malaysia. Most Filipinos doesn't even care about Sabah. Not on the priority list and not even talked about much in political issues.

I see some Indos and some Pinoys in here kept saying that Malaysia is the culprit, when it's a fact that Sabahan themselves have voted to be in Malaysia. Say what, I have a better idea, why don't the UN conduct similar polls at Mindanao, provinces in Sumatera, provinces in Kalimantan, Batam, Kepri, Natuna and ask them if they would like to be Indonesian, Malaysian or Phillipines. Only those who can prove that they are really local and can trace their ancestors in that place can vote. Any results from this polls must be taken seriously even if it'll change the countries and shall be respected by everyone. It'll be interesting to see the results.

Hi @Hindisight, we would like you to make Part. 2 !!

I dont understand why filipino wants sabah that doesnt belong to them and wants a fight which they cant win, i am a sabahan and trust me we sabahan feel even disgusted to call ourselves part of the filiphinos, even the video said a un survey stated a majority of sabahan choose Malaysia. Do average filiphinos and muslim rebels in the south philip think we sabahan would put down our malaysia flag without a fight,they will be chaos, rebelions and outrages from the local sabahans, we see the sulu sultanate as desperate poor man who wants title and wealth not as a leader or saviour

As a Filipino, ever since this issue was taught to us in school, I was a contrarian. I always felt that the people of Sabah should decide for themselves what government they want. I very much doubt that being part of the Philippines is a majority would want. I think the claim should be dropped and let's move on, but its near political suicide to say so. So the claim is just that an empty claim, but no Filipino President will ever actually go to war for it.

As a Filipino .. I don't want war .. Beacuse we are all ASIAN brothers and sisters ❤❤ no war just love ❤❤

As a filipino we don't want to go to war against our brothers&sisters ❤

As a Malaysian residing in Sabah, I really hope this wont happen.

As a Filipino. I'll keep our friendship to our Malaysian siblings ❤ Take Sabah, it's yours! ❤ We'll just visit ❤

We Indonesian🇮🇩support our Austronesian brother🇵🇭🤝🏼

Nice and very informative video. But still has a lot of missing information. I hope you can create an updated and more thorough discussion of this topic. You should also include the plight of the Suluks who were removed from Sabah even though they were born there and the status of other Stateless people in that part of the Island. Also please include discussion on historical maps from neighboring nations (old maps not from Philippines, Britain, nor Malaysia) indicating that Northeast Sabah bears the Sulu name in the old times.

We are Brothers 🇲🇾❤️🇵🇭

we filipinos are being aggressive here in the comment section when, in fact, we don't even have the budget to go to any war, and the government doesn't even have any plans

You have to make it in 10 series, please please please 😂 This is the pinnacle of comedy 😂

The commentary war between the Philippines and Malaysia begins 🎉

🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾 sabah, malaysia.. from sabahan people.. 😊

🇵🇭❤️🇲🇾 peace brother ✌️

Please do the video on Moro conflict,I'm Malaysian and I would love to know more

Part 2!

The Philippines invading a country is like seeing your high school friend who's been bullied for the entire semester tell you not to come to school tomorrow.

As a Filipino I would let the people of Sabah Decide. We don't need war, we need trust & cooperation towards our respective countries prosperity.

Issues like this is never really forgotten, it is ingrained in the national psche of both nation.. It will pester on but it will eventually boil over..

Please make the video on Malaysia's role in the insurrecion of various moro groups in Mindanao

As a Filipino, sabah isn't really important as the Mindanao region is still unstable. And if sabah will be part of the Philippines it will just be a complicated mess

Southeast Asian & the Malay-Austronesian people know it’s useless to fight over a conflict that the Western colonizers started. Even President Marcos & PM Ibrahim agree that it’s best to settle peacefully. ASEAN is better when we are united 👍

I see the Channel and the topic is provoking ..

Any Filipino and Sulu supporters would point to the 1878 agreement and claim that Sabah was lease to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). But there are numerous evidence to point that Sulu did not previously own Sabah as the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs would suggest, the claim that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu as a gift can be disputed and debunked by the following evidence: - 1877 Agreement Prior to the 1878 Agreement which was signed between the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) and the Sultanate of Sulu, there was an agreement that was signed in 1877 between the Sultanate of Brunei and the British North Borneo Company. Within this agreement, the word “grant” has been used numerous times. It’s also stated within the agreement that the entirety of North Borneo (Sabah) will be ceded to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) for 15,000 Mexican gold coins . With these statements, it’s clear that the Sulu Sultanate did not own North Borneo (Sabah) and that the 1878 agreement is redundant. I would also like to point out that within the 1878 agreement, the word “pajak” was meant to be stated a “grant and cede”, and within the receipts of the so-called “rent payments” are listed as cession payment. Cession means to give something away. With that this proves that the 1878 Agreement wasn’t a lease agreement but rather a cession agreement. But let’s say for the sake of argument that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu and that the Sultanate of Sulu did indeed own Sabah and that the 1878 agreement was a lease agreement. Yet the Sultanate of Sulu has signed many agreements which relinquishes their rights over Sabah. These are the following: - 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement This agreement highlights the Sultanate of Sulu’s surrender of sovereignty to Spain. This means that anything happens whether internal or external affairs is under Spanish jurisdiction. - Article III of the Madrid Protocol of 1885 The Madrid Protocol of 1885 was an agreement between the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain to recognise Spain’s rule over the Sulu Archipelago. There is a particular statement within Article III which states that Spain will relinquish all of their claims on Borneo. This alongside with the 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement as stated previously shows that the Sultanate of Sulu now no longer have any jurisdiction over North Borneo (Sabah). This also means that North Borneo (Sabah) is now under complete British jurisdiction. - 1903 Confirmation of Cession This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) in which it states that the Sultanate of Sulu will grant and cede North Borneo (Sabah) as well as additional islands which is how the payment of 5,000 Mexican gold coins which at this point has switched entirely to the Malayan dollar increased to 5,300 Malayan dollars. - 1915 Carpenter Agreement This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the United States. Within this agreement it states that any power that the Sultan of Sulu has over his land has been given to the Philippines which is under American-rule. -1930 Anglo-US Border Convention This agreement was signed between the United States and the United Kingdom. This agrement also define the border of North Borneo (Sabah) and the Philippines with the agreement being that North Borneo (Sabah) will remain under British jurisdiction and the Philippines being under American jurisdiction. -1963 Malaysia Agreement Finally this agreement was signed between the United Kingdom, Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, and North Borneo (Sabah) to form a new country now known as Malaysia. Now that North Borneo (Sabah) has gained it’s independence from the UK, they opted to join this agreement and with the previous agreements signed, it means that North Borneo (Sabah) now have self-determination. And with the UK approving this agreement under the Malaysia Act of 1963 which has been passed in the British Parliament. This agreement has also been recognised by the United Nations and agreed on by the UN General Assembly and the UN Secretary-General himself. This means that Sabah is now rightful Malaysian territory. With all of these facts in place, it’s clear that Sabah rightfully belongs to Malaysia and neither the Philippines nor Sulu have any legal claims over Sabah.

UK created the middle east issue and also this wow 😮

We only have lots of keyboard warriors, but in reality, Philippines wouldn't fight for Sabah. It's a "lost cause" as President Aquino said before. Panay kayabangan lang, pero di naman nagsasaliksik talaga yung iba sa kababayan natin. Besides, our claim doesn't really hold much water, when did the last time Sabah was "part" of the Philippines? Back in 1800s when Sulu Sultanate became a tributary state of Spanish Empire. It was never under the direct control of Spanish East Indies, nor it was ever part of the Philippine Republic.

@HindsightYT Oh please make a video about the Jabidah Massacre! Many do not know about this!

Weird enough... Sulu only have 1878 agreement. Yet no grant deed that official brunei have given them north borneo. Mind you, overbeck agreement have two version. 1 version is from brunei 1877 and another 1878 with sulu..

The Philippines cannot use their past documents or claims to assert ownership over Sabah. This is a foolish act that could lead to serious consequences. For example, China could use the same method to claim that Philippine islands belonged to China thousands of years ago, or to assert that historically Taiwan has always been part of China. This is an unacceptable and foolish behavior. The decision about Sabah should be made by its own people through a vote, whether they want to remain with Malaysia, become part of the Philippines, or even become independent. It is not up to the Filipinos to decide.

Sabah was historically and legally owned by Sultanate of Sulu, respectively a part of Philippine archipelago but unfortunately Malaysian government is greedy. Yes, people there in Sabah are majority Malaysians, but the land was not a part of Malaysia. JUSTICE for the Sulu Sultanate especially the Kiram Family.

Please give us the info and video of the Moro conflict and the events that followed.

Sabah is, and always be, a part of Malaysia ( plus it will be in good hands under malaysia )

1:59 correction This is where the issue begins. The Sultan of Brunei never hand over the North part of Sabah to the Sultan of Sulu and still denied it until today. All because the Sultan of Brunei at the time whom has won the war insisted that the Sultan of Sulu had never send army as promised. And claimed they won the war without any involvement of the Sulu state. This is the truth as the Sultan of Sulu younger brother who lead the army (through the sea) lied to his brother the Sultan insisted that he fight the war... That's why the Sultan of Sulu still until now claims Sabah 😎

Sabahan would prefer RM over pesos 😂

As a filipino we will not fight our brother malaysia just for a land that they said in Philippines in the past we support each other

I am a Filipino, and I don't see the necessity for conflict as long as my fellow Filipinos in Sabah live in peace and harmony with the Malaysians. We ought to put the theological disagreement aside. If we communicate politely, patiently, and with respect, there is no problem we can't resolve.

We Stand our own Sabah, Philippines 🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭

Let History be history, Sabah is now Malaysia, move on

Malaysia being a British Client State supplied then the MNLF through the British with arms ang training and the cover story is about the Sabah claims. Malaysia has boots in Mindanao as part of the observation group along with Japan Australia and Indonesia. Its really all about the oil deposits around Sabah and probably the Sulu Sultanate knew about it and they ask for an increase in the rent. It was reported Malaysia stopped payments and the family now focused on PETRONAS. Why is it in any part of the world when UK is involved it caused problems in that part of the world.

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, after the second point above, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

As a Filipino, I am willing to let Sabah be part of Malaysia just to keep the peace in the region and have a formal agreement with Malaysian government about it. As it turns out, we must focus our attention towards China in the West Philippine Sea.

TLDR: No, we won't. We're busy just trying to survive. Have you seen the price of onions? 🤣

I suport phillipines.

As pilipino I'm love 🇲🇾.. respect them

Imagine if the war start 😶 Philippines military have skills in fighting, they face so many battles and they are ready to any battles that comes.

Make video about rebels group in Philippine

I heard the story of the ghost soldiers task to take Sabah to a brutal fight but the soldiers refused after finding out about the secret operation.

Not War - we are promoting peace, whatever it is, they talk in a diplomatic way

The British Empire should be Blamed for land dispute between the Philippines and Malaysia for they made..if their fault....

Honestly, any Filipino wanting war over Sabah should really re-think their life decisions. Supporting this type of campaign shows how irrational someone could be, even when the document is presented in front of them. The Philippines should abandon its "claims" on Sabah, as they do not represent the Sulu Sultanate, but the Filipino people themselves. This dispute is seriously the most idiotic thing ever in Southeast Asia, and has the same vibes as China claiming the SCS because "historical pretext". Sabah never belonged to the Philippines. End of story.

Maybe before it was a really heated issue for both parties however today if engaging in a armed conflicts direct or indirect could bring more problems than merit after all losing people to it means losing valuable manpower, tax payer and a human being, no matter who wins on it the cost is to much for the not worth it outcome. In the end Diplomatic relation and peace will prevail that brings a more meaningful results.

On 4th August 1977, former President Marcos Sr declared he will take steps to drop the claim on Sabah during the 2nd ASEAN Summit Meeting in Kuala Lumpur. An agreement or undertaking made orally between two states is as valid as a written treaty with reference to Article 67 of the Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties 1969 as at that time President Marcos was the Head of a State.

Malaysia should just keep Sabah. If Sabah was sent back to the Philippines, it’s just going to be in mismanaged.

A leader will someday rise up and claim the lands.

Bolehkah cerita ini diterjemahkan bahasa melayu?

The Philippine cannot legally invade Malaysia even if they wanted to. The Manila Accord signed by both Parties, made sure of that.

Sabah is one of richest and developed state in Malaysia compared to the sulu Government under Philippines Government. How do you expect Sabah people want to become Filipino

Malaysia already win against sulu at belanda court, no more chance for sulu

Please do a video on moro conflict

So basically and secretively, Malaysia and the Philippines were at war. Not in the major war but supporting each other's rebels to achieve their goal destroying which is destroying each other's government

Im from sabah.. have plenty filipino friends they are cool.. theres no need for war. We can fight over beers and karaoke haha..

We-kami-kita like-❤-respect to Mlys-Phlpn , Indo-Mlys-Phlpn not just close as neigbour its 3 beautiful landscape nature archipelago country , same race-ethnic n similliar culture too (3 biggest archipelago country)

UN recognizes the people of Sabah's decision to self-determine, and the world respects its choice.

Who is strong power and wise is winner .

not this time . but soon .a year is belong to my lovely country ,🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭

If Sabah belongs to Philippines, so it means sabahan are now citizen of the USA?

As an Indonesian i just wanna say countries should better focus to the betterment of territories theyre already owned.

Y3s please i wanna watch more about this issue

bring it on.we ready for it..pag pag will be destroyed

I think the real owner of Sabah is Brunei

Bring it on

Would the Philippines go to War over Sabah? I don't know, let's check our savings account... Yep... Nothing in there. Maybe next year.

Spanish and America not claimed Sabah. Only abolished sultanate want claim Sabah.

Please make about bangsa moro rebellion,, its related to silent camp for invade sabah, but also indonesia comes tp resolve this issue.. so much triangle sabah - sulu - konfontrasi, then moro - philipine - indonesia.

Full support to the Philippines 🇵🇭 ✝️

War is a cowardly escape from the problem of peace ~Thomas man