Deseninizi '" Ö

(im sorry for the reply) In my opinion rally finland is the best part of the wrc and the best rally Edit: Greetings from Germany

I’ve watched Rally Finland and I agree. Hello from the US.

Thank you! Glad you liked it!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Had to get some vetomies also!

Thanks! It takes some time, my 19 video just hit 10 million...

​@@TorAndreBrresen congrats Tor, ai Wish you the best also with this one

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks! You from the Ruuhimäki jump?

@@TorAndreBrresen yupp!! Amazing video bro! 🤘👍

Not sure, but thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks!

nahhh....i watched it on WRC+ too, that was on a straight road before approaching flying finish..

@@icebox9093 It was actually that spot, just watched it on WRC+, this is 600m before the finish

@@TorAndreBrresen ohhh..i see....i thought it was on a straight road...thx for clearing that out.👍

Yes that was a group of us! 😃He recognised the t-shirts as he had a chat with us in service on Thursday. Excellent video as always Tor, we are getting used to being in them after singing for you last year 😆

Totat agree 60 fps is absolute enjoyment for eyes!

Thanks! I've only done 50fps once at RX Nordic in 2019, always done 24 or like now 25 since it gives you more better speed sensation and less visible shaking.

@@TorAndreBrresen I totally disagree...24hz in fast sport video its a crime...the video seems laggy when is 24hz...

@@lambrosh4072 action film but real :)

Thanks!

Thanks! I think 50fps looks weird, many people complain that it looks speed up because you can see the shaking better

Thanks! i do 25fps as 50/60 looks a bit weird, have a look at my RX Nordic 2019 video

I see so many complain that 50/60 looks speed up, my RX Nordic 2019 video also looks a bit weird, many movies are still filmed at 25 like Mission Impossible, gives you a better sensation of speed. I have not heard that they did that, my views are pretty good at 7-10 million a year i feel like?

@@TorAndreBrresen yes, your average views on your channel as a whole are good, but that's only due to your old videos, where you had 50fps. Take your video on rally finland 2019 for an example, there you had a good relation between video quality (fps) and pixel quality, this made KZfaq recommend your video. These are the videos that are making your channel views high, not your recent (except sweden 2022).

@@beamed5382 I never used 50fps before except that one rallycross video so that doesn't make sense, always used 24/25fps and 1080p/i. Reason why 19 did so good is because of the Ogier jump, camera was struggling with focus also so not the best video actually with all the dust also. Finland 21 has almost 3 mill views and exactly the same settings and camera as this video. New place for Sweden this year didn't have the most interesting stages so that's why that's got no more than 400.000

@@TorAndreBrresen well, my fps monitor measures 50 fps on the finland 2019 video, maybe you meant to upload it to 24 but it's actually 50, check it out yourself with a monitor. Now yes, your 2021 finland video did very good, you were lucky. But, the correlation between fps and pixel quality is still the fundamental part in KZfaq's recommendations, so I recommend you to have that in mind. Oh and also to move from the subject a bit, I thought most stages in Sweden were amazing! Sure, not like Torsby but, except for the arena stage and maybe two others, the rest, including the power stage were amazing in my opinion! Oh and finally, if you want to, you should re-upload the video to get the recommendations going so that this video can blow up, would be really good to see!

@@beamed5382 That'a strange, both the original file and the stats for nerds (right click) shows 25 for me. That may be so, filming smaller national events like I've been doing lately that don't get loads of views is probably more damaging, i noticed a huge growth in views when i didn't to much of that around 17-19. Sweden in Umeå had very little jumps and special places