85% government funded rocket.

Why is this the *very* beginning and not all the previous rocket tests and flights? What separates this from, say, Saturn V?

Elon did it on purpose🤷🏼‍♂️ He loves DRAMA 😃

Traveling to different planets, but not with this type of engine and technology.

@@tapio_m6861 Its the end 🤷🏼‍♂️ And Mars is a dead end street for man-not-so-kind 😁

Yep! me too Very awesome

😂 you gave up on your standup career far too soon

Yep....

@@eyeteyteras1717 ok

Not really. That would be for the first rocket ever launched.

crazy that it held together through all those spins

It truly was an amazing sight to watch and see. I don't feel the gen pop understands just hoe mamazing what they're watching actually is...I don't get many opportunities to use this term but man that sure was AWESOME!!

Good point, I hadn’t even thought of that.

Nothing about this was impressive

A lot of data was collected because of it.

Well it was stuck together right?

lol, yeah and the explosion demonstrated how reliable the self destruction system was.

@Jaquan Kelsor 3 to 7 decades is better than never. Humanity NEEDS to spread out to other planets. Earth isn't fragile, but our continued living on it is. Asteroids, nuclear war, climate change, zombies, there's many reasons to have a backup plan, and as soon as possible. If ASAP means many, many decades, so be it. Plus, Starship isn't only good for colonizing. Many things you can do with 150+ tons to space, or 150+ tons to, maybe anywhere on Earth in under 45 minutes?

@@kelsormjaquan. It will hold mostly only middle class people. You think people who work in space are rich?

Failure puts you on the road to success.

You can take risks if you can afford to take risks

That's because this was a planned explosion. Other than what the misleading title of this video seems to imply. The test was to launch this vehicle beyond all the usual points of failure. The mission was a success, stage separation and reaching space/orbit were just bonus objectives.

​@@NeonGen2000can I read somwhere about what you said here?

@@SpandanChatterjee2904 Read about the FTS system onboard, it is there to detonate the rocket.

That’s because it’s another step in the right direction we got it to a stage that we never have b4 and that’s progress, failure is the path that leads to success!

@@NeonGen2000 thanks for the explanation. I was also wondering why there were cheers after the explosion.

did they say near end it wasnt spinning?

​@@PostUp_Time it wasnt spinning around its axis, but it did fly in circle when it lost control, so it did endure some nasty Gs i guess

No stress as there's no gravity in space

@@dopatonin it wasnt in space lol

The only stress is what they're putting that CG processor through! People are soooo dumb!

😂😂

I'm glad im not the only one who seen that...

Because the explosion was expected and a planned test of the self destruction system... The launch was a success. They were testing the launch. After it shot into the sky everything else was a bonus. The explosion was expected because they planned for it to blow up. There was no way this would have been a complete success. There was no man on board to control the starship so not sure what more anyone expected to happen lol.

Have faith in Jesus alone to be saved.

You’re smart, tell elon he will never get pass that either.

You should volunteer to man the next launch mission.

@@nopenope9118 This was more than they hoped for. It s actually amazing for this launch.

@@eyeteyteras1717 not a disappointment because this was the first test flight. SpaceX’s got 2-3 more of these to work with so they can afford to fail on this one

@@eyeteyteras1717 nasa didnt get every rocket to space either

It was epic fail and this makes me happy. SpaceZ goes bankrupt soon.🤭

Rocket explodes and GenZ say "Success" 😂 ohh man how embarrassing are these kids

@@bigduphusaj162are you on the spectrum?

@@bigduphusaj162 success is determined by the objectives of a mission. They intended to destroy this rocket at some point during the test flight. SpaceX own objectives had specifically said anything past getting off the Launchpad was a success and giving them valuable data for future iterations. Testing a machine until failure is a basic part of developing new technology

@@bigduphusaj162 Stupid people think they're very smart when they call other people stupid.

@@bigduphusaj162 You Africans can never understand how things evolve, you can't progress without failure.

Stop kissing elon bro

@@MUSLIMSCOMMITWARCRIMES other then destroying the lunch pad and blowing up a minute later everything was fine

The launchpad was destroyed because they were to lazy to put in flame routing and a sound suppression system. Probably the same reason why the rocket ended up shaking. This was partly about power but majorly about stupidity.

@@zer5236 than*

@@zer5236 can’t spell basic 4 letter words. Exudes smug arrogance when someone is has their literal rocket science wrong.

Noooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!

It did better than we thought. Until it didn't

It didn't survive 😂😂😂

lol, yeah and the explosion demonstrated how reliable the self destruction system was.

i welcome you to the physics of COLD STEEL

Yeah the structural strength of the rocket was crazy

@@truthurts123 china can’t produce the biggest rocket ever created

​@@truthurts123 Ain't that the truth

Ikr, most of the time you see them explode once they go parallel, but it managed to hold itself together quite well.

Kind of surprised fans of space exploration are so gleeful about this. I guarantee NASA doesn't feel that way. They've been collaborating with each other a while now. Ya know, in the spirit of exploration. This event may help NASA down the line.

Oh dang... I thought it was an utter failure. I was shocked and didn't understand why people were laughing. I was very sad lol. That's good though, I didn't take that into account. I like SpaceX and want to see them succeed

It’s just like Twitter.. sometimes you just gotta fail miserably over and over and over to maybe not fail someday.

Ok Elon apologist

Well, it's time they quit stealing our tax dollars for this nonsense. Oh and for stupid Wars as well.

@@Dukerdjerrbs I like SpaceX too. They might fail more often than NASA, and they might hoard the technology that they develop instead of sharing new technologies like NASA, but at least they use up public subsidies like NASA.. oh wait, socializing risks/expenses & privatizing profits is actually a bad thing.. the third thing was supposed to be good.. oh well.

It's not real

Destroying OUR PLANET for his advantage in Space? Are you guys NUTS?

@@peteruhl8181 How did you pack so much stupid into such a short comment?!

Elon’s haters have no life

@@peteruhl8181 you don’t deserve pictures of deep space and much more. Get a life.

Spending billions of dollars of continuous failed launches. We won’t ever reach other planets with manned missions in our lifetime. It’s a pipe dream. Those billions of dollars should be used to fund… you know… hunger around the planet we live on now

Yea it exploded because it did something no rocket needs to do. Because it was a failure. Boom.

How did Elon taste?

lol

tell me more elon?

SpaceX engineers need to learn from Russia. Still long way to go.

Not first attempt. Not for them or mankind in general. Just elon throwing money at other peoples' ideas as usual.

@@tugboat6940 u weird

@@tugboat6940 A more accurate statement would be that Elon is throwing money at his own ideas... which would still be incorrect, because he's also the chief engineer of SpaceX, not just an investor. I'm not saying that everything that went Starship was done by Elon, of course, but he's more than an investor.

The vehicle was already about 30km up, ao there was very little air resistance left. Awesome stunt anyway!

Why did it flip so many times? Was that intended?

Yeah very advanced tech, flipping without breaking up 😛

@@profounddamas Try flipping something as big as a skyscraper

@@twocyclediesel1280 But why does it need to be as big as a skyscraper? Oh yeah rockets, so 60s.

Wow! That’s gonna cost a lot of money to repair this rocket.

I believe NASA and the Congress working on a plan to send all the homeless to live on the moon

Like the producers of agent orange or cigarette companies, or the Ford Pinto, Asbestos makers and countless bankrupt airlines... Your statement is a great business model and slogan.

Whenever you can print money and pour into it.

@@ge2623 Comparing this to cigarettes, Asian orange etc. is absurd. Apples vs oranges. “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Go to school and learn some science

Using stockholder funds to pay settlements so that the CEO can impregnate his employees is most certainly not ahead of the pack. I

2 minute papers

Hello

Where did the Debris land

🇳🇴I’ve been to Brownsville - my father was an exchange student there. Is the economy being affected positively because of the proximity to space X launch pad etc?

@@diegoleal4943 in the Gulf of Mexico

interesting theory

​@@JimLovell-np4pvHe's not far wrong, to be fair. There was an intentionally slow startup procedure on the pad, giving the engines a few extra seconds to pulverize the ground.

Polluting spi one rocket at a time

Cope.

hahhaahaahahahah

Real quick question idk where to ask this I’m not really educated on rockets and space stuff but where there people in the rocket if you know or if that info has been released to the public? I’m sorry if this was confusing

Smoking that copium lol.

Haaaa

Mission failed successfully!

I know I did until I watched it all.

Good job nobody was on board 😬tho

cope harder kid

The N1 sure failed a lot and I’m sure not seeing any red flags on the moon

Exactly. There are some cynical A-holes in this world that guffaw at SpaceX "failures" because they have zero clue about the iterative process required to build and launch these rockets.

oh, totally cope city out here

@@cl8804 look out folks….we have an engineering genius in the KZfaq comment section..

What a joke. As it starts to curve straight to the ocean, like every other rocket that supposedly went to outer space. Ain’t nobody getting through God Almighty’s dome firmament!

Yeah, like something out of science fiction, the future is truly here :)

For like ten seconds I thought that was a watermark/logo on the video 😂

@@StickHits They should use it as a logo actually :D

Definitely

Amennn.

Thank you for your explanation! 👍🏻

We all seen the important data it exploded

There is much cheaper ways of getting the data at Starships current level of readiness. There were lot of people familiar with launch pad design who said water deluge system and flame diversion trench is a must, yet they blew tons of concrete into surrounding air, raining down on homes miles away, just to see the obvious. Same with stupid tin can design etc etc. Starship has nothing to do with advancing space tech, it is fan service at its worst.

@@AG-ig8uf They thought they did not need the water deluge system based off of the static fire test. They thought the launch pad would survive the test flight then install the water deluge system for the next flight. At least they know that they can't cut corners like that. For Starship not advancing space tech, there are things that you won’t see by just looking at it. For example, SpaceX is planning on making the thrusters gimbal using electricity instead of hydraulics. Thanks for sharing your opinion about the test flight.

If getting data is the only goal then why didnt they just mimic the strategy of the apollo 11 cause basicaly they reach higher than what this rocket did. BUT THATS IF THE APOLLO 11s avhievement is TRUE..😅

ahahhaahahahahahha

@@mikeletterst9882 weirdo 😂

Okay Elon. This isn't a Space X stockholders meeting.

Tesla is is down 8% and falling you Musk fanboys are really something else. If this was the plan it was a bad plan.

@@freedomisntfree_44 Why are you unhappy about learning something?

?

@@jimmcfarland3446 It was a successful launch. They weren't even sure it would make it out of first couple stages of launch with a failure. The full explosion was unfortunate but it actually traveled farther in the trajectory of the test then they might have hoped...

​@@ajs8738they were not planning to launch the rocket to space anyway, this is just a test launch to gather data 😂 the explosion is really expected

@@ajs8738 Normies be like: 'It didn't reach Sag A! Utter failure!'

​@@benjaminroe311ify failed!

Not to disagree with a job well done, but its just not true to say complexity increases exponentially when you just replicate a single component in parallel. The whole point is that it doesn't increase complexity and has fewer critical point sof failure.

@@RRedcraftRR but it still should have impart of reliability, no? more moving components after all.

@@AlexLebed any real rocket have thousands of moving parts in multiple sub-assemblies and somehow only spacex routinely gathers data by blowing them up, its kinda sad that after all that time and testing it just spins out of control

The complexity doesn't necessarily increase ecponentially because half of the point of the gimbal engines and sheer number of them is to act as redundancy in the case of some of the engines failing.

20% engine failure is not good at all

No it’s not it considered billions of dollars burnt but more power to them, they probably learnt a lot form the testing

No? They couldn’t do a stage seperation, and all they learned is that they have to be able to make a stage seperation.

@@daviant8942 your thinking is so tiny unfortunately:/

​@@nork7045 The company that routinely launches self landing rockets into space isn't capable of stage separation? Do you people like you even have thoughts in that empty head of yours?

Your delusional is scary remember moon landing rockets, and now NASA is saying they lost the tech no it's bad.

*China* - Celebrates 15 astronauts completing the fourth and final spacewalk of their six-month-long mission from the successful TianGong space station. *America* - Celebrates a rocket exploding after four minutes. The USA's days are over.

lol

​@@TonyEnglandUK lol, China's first space walk after decades. US and Russia already done it several times.

Its a HOAX

@@TonyEnglandUK You don't seem to know much about the space industry. Shame.

First off this comment format makes my eyes bleed and second it was a successful failure. IE they want to find problems now instead of later.

The era of the participant trophy.

Not even close! They've had 9 launches with 5 being total failures and 2 being partial failures!

@@randallmarsh1187 No. This is the first flight of starship and the 33 engine booster together.

@@randallmarsh1187 stop spreading disinformation

@@randallmarsh1187 only an idiots call this a "success"

@@randallmarsh1187 even they fail 100 times still it impressive .

So what exactly is it?

@Sciptopia the biggest reason starship is so exciting is that it is the biggest, most powerful rocket EVER, and is going to be fully reusable

😂

stop over hyping. SLS beat this to a moon orbit and everyone said super heavy would launch years before SLS ever did

Still, it looks the same as those launched in the 1950s. By now, we should have flying saucers.

that's like saying: "if the patient hadn't died of a heart attack, he'd still be alive"

Pretty sure it only even exploded when they told it to self destruct. At that point, it's no longer on profile and needs to be taken out before it can stray from the protected air and sea space

@@ndrenckhahn4411 yup, pretty impressive!

Perhaps air density at that altitude is was minimal so it could not damage the vehicle. More interesiting is why they haven't even try to jettison Starship and try to stabilize it under own power.

I agree. Considering it was travelling at 1200mph thats insane structural integrity

But, failure

Cause n a s a got bigger fish to fry don't take it personal or anything.

What happens to that explosion gas??

@@joeryan1160like what?

@@davidmorris6278 the development of science and tech is a waste to you? I can grantee you are not below the age of 30

​@@abdimalikelmi729 what does age have to do with anything? Antibiotics and MRI were invented on Earth, not on Mars.

@@EUpatriot1 That's pretty shortsighted and inaccurate. But nice try.

@@EUpatriot1 there is a need of advancement in technology. The phone/computer you are using currently didn't help anybody around the world during its beginning stages, but now it is used everywhere by almost everybody. Similarly, this might not be useful/helpful for most of the people out there, but later might be one of the best human creations.

@@EUpatriot1 and many people thought the same thing about the Apollo program…. yet it’s the reason I can write this comment on my electronic device, eating my food, who’s standard was updated to those from the Apollo Program, in a building using post-Apollo manufacturing technology and can purchase and eat way more food than normal because the satellites built on the technology of the Apollo program can tell me the weather, and can determine when crops should be harvested for maximum yields. So yes, space is expensive. Yet the space program has managed to pretty much revolutionize our lives. And based on the trend, that’s not going to stop.

Meanwhile the actual planet we live on is a boiling hellscape with acid oceans.

@@cm9241 And mr.keyboard warrior is doing what exactly to help that?

Yeah. Typical clickbaiting pieces of ___. And from the Wall Street Journal.

Get hold of yourself Chief, the ship is sinking.....

You should have seen it live 😜

​@@mikebuck8846 what ship? Spacex or starship? Both are doing truly astounding things with reusable rockets in collaboration with nasa so Im genuinely curious what program you think is failing?

Exactly, you noticed too. Most media want to frame this as if Elon has had erectile dysfunction or something. This was a truly impressive demonstration.

🤔👊😂🔥✌

Not likely, as a preliminary test , their results were surprisingly good. Not a fan of Elon, but they will note the results and move on to improve, just like they did in the past with rocket testing.

Friends who work there. It's a terrible place to work laden with inadequacy at every step. Every person involved knew the rocket would explode, they only gave it an 80% chance to leave the launch pad

@@tacotimmer8288 That's because engineers are usually smart enough to expect it to blow up the first time. It's incredibly hard to debug giant projects like this since you have such limited opportunities for testing. There's no way to know in advance everything that could go wrong. There's no way it could be any different.

@@sean63b they could have not launched an object into space that they knew wasn't ready to not explode

​@@lulu4882 it was a test, done by a private space agency, it was also the biggest rocket ever launched with almost twice the weight of Saturn V, it's amazing it even lifted off

This place sucks to work at. Low pay long hours and terrible management

Because it was the very first TEST flight. Nobody really expected it to make it past the tower and the fact it flew for so long means that they gained a lot of insights into how the design is currently going and where to make changes to make it better. It’s called iterative design for a reason. The rocket also held up much better than anyone expected. The vehicle had two flight termination bombs detonated on the side and did multiple end over end flips without failing. No other rocket would be able to hold up to that or be expected to. Most people expected it wouldn’t even hold up to the launch. Hence the fact they prefixed the flight by saying “excitement guaranteed”

It would be nice to see anything surpassing what we did back then, yes we have wonderful new tech and materials to make it easier, but even now this is so far behind what we were doing 50 years ago.

@@DavidStrchld As a kid living through the and seeing Mercury, Gemini and Apollo launches. Then the Moon landings! It was a feeling beyond a sense of pride! Not just for America but the entire World. At that age I had no doubt I would be able to travel in outer space at the age I am now? Especially at the rate NASA's space technology was advancing? Plus with what is now considered obsolete technology? Most people don't remember how advanced America's Space program really was? It wasn't until the Soviets and American docked at the space station only to realize the Soviets were still using analog tube technology as guidance systems! They hadn't perfected the transistor for solid state technology? It was a great time to be alive!

No body has been on the moon! Wake up 🐑🐑

​@@DavidStrchld wake up 🐑 no body has been on the moon!

@@christianmagno984 "The mind is designed to design reality", What is the basic concept of the reality you created to live in in regards to the space program? For me it was a moment of national pride which was ultimately undone by the world praying and hoping for the safe return of the A-13 astronauts, something that changed the path of the cold war from one possibly weaponization of space to international cooperation, with the ISS as the symbol of it, all due to God listening to and acting on the requests and the prayers of the people of the world for their safe return. And on this point no one is going to change my mind, that it was actually impossible for the Apollo astronauts to safely return, but due to the prayers God changed that which allowed the return, God made a way when there was no way, and the engineers discovered it. This is a deeply help discovery of my faith and walk with God, God was always with the space program. But as one era passes another begins and nothing new is under the sun, we are once again given hope for a better future or a period of darkness with our space program. This time instead of nations, we sort of have a mad man heading it, at least in its fledgling stage. But their are other space programs coming up, including the possibility of a lunar orbit space station as a gateway to the moon. Time will tell. So without insulting others (which does no one any good) please by not calling them sheep, please let me know how you perceive the space program?

And the Titanic performed well until it hit an iceberg. BTW it didn't look as if the rocket handled the stress, it fell apart,

The Titanic wasn't an unmanned test vehicle

What amazing was seeing how strong the firmament is 😉

@@Staydispline i really hope that wink at the end means you're joking...

@@NaliTikva not joking 🙃

Wow thats where all our bitcoin money exploded...haha... Now i kinda doubt 1969 people landed on mooon....what a bunch of liars...we humans are not made ti live in space. Keep believing guys keep investing in Tesla X...you will become rich

​@@yanikivanov We landed on the moon in 1969. Deal with it. Starship is very different from the Saturn V and this says absolutely nothing about the mountains of proof that we went.

​@yanik ivanov what about the space station that you can see with even a cheap telescope? Is that a continuous projection since the 60s? ...

In 5 years we will be really fighting against the climate change crisis, that is the real fight, not anything related to going to space. The only solution is to save the Earth and after that then maybe going to space, but believe me the next 15 years if nothing is done about climate, we will perish

@@yanikivanov eu tenho mesma visão que vc! Não acho que dúvidar que o homen foi para lua esteja errado, baseado em todas tentativas de apenas lançar um foguete tripulado para ir a lua nos dias atuais! Eu não acredito

With "150 tonnes" of carrying capacity 🚀

Did you have fun copying from Wikipedia?

@@lolzlolz102 do i have to rewrite it all?

Very cool space performence

Cool SpaceX

I think it wass a comand they gave the ship, so that would make it RPD¿??

​@@TheErkTube 😂 yeah mate good one.

​@@TheErkTube what is meaning of rpd?

Funny!!!😊😊

These ships are detonated mid flight on purpose if they fail, self destruct...its better than exploding on ground

It was done 50 years ago successfully… so yeah… whatever

@Doug L Yeah nah bruh i ain’t ever heard of a 120m rocket that weighs 11 million pounds and has 16 million pounds of thrust launching 50 years ago. What nihilistic delusion are you living in fam.

@@dougl945 There was a major explosion in 86 too

@@Cuppachoccy Hey buddy, do you know what a completely destroyed launchpad and launch base means? Do you know what "being forced to clean up the adjacent nature habitat (literally) by hand" means? Do you know what losing your launch license means? Do you know what a disastrous launch from the moment the engines were turned on means? I can go on. Please look at this objectively and compare it to actual tests that have been done the last 60 years.

@@dendikke3 Hey I'm out of the loop on the Starship launch clusterf*ck (the way you make it sound) and subsequent aftermath, can you share a source/ link that cites all these things you mention?

LOL

Can't pass through the firmament dome.. The earth is flat

Just blower up the biggest rocket in our atmosphere and you calling this a great job? You shouldn't save on your education.

@@peteruhl8181 I'm an engineer. I did work on the Atlas V. This was a spectacularly successful test. EDIT (explanation): The purpose of the test was to learn as much as possible. If the sensors throughout the vehicle were streaming all the data back to SpaceX (where it can be analyzed), it will have been a successful test. That data will be used to improve the system.

@@peteruhl8181 it is one of most complicated engineering projects in the world. Those engineers will figure out quickly in next few months. I can not help them but I can encourage them to do better’s

LOL it blew up

@@stevemadak6255 it just needs to be “pointy-er”

@@stevemadak6255 no it was a self termination

@@stevemadak6255 It was terminated by flight control. The launch itself was spectacular, even with 3 failing engines and more to fail throughout the first minute. For the very first launch of this rocket, its mighty impressive. How many rockets have you seen explode on the pad without lifting an inch?

@@stevemadak6255 you expecting to get it perfect on your first attempt? That’s a hole in 1? Come on man🫣😂😂😂 you want extra salt with those fries

Fisheye lens holistic Braungart !

Yes becauee there were multiple engines that failed right after liftoff, if you look closely you can see huge chunks of concrete getting launched vertically by the booster... There could be chunks that hit the engines making them fail.

Karman*

and almost 1/4 to the Mars :D

​@@arturgajewskiphotog eh?

​@@arturgajewskiphotog odkleiło ci się coś

​@Artur Gajewski Seriously? Lol this thing is NEVER getting to Mars.

😂😂😂I mean the amount of work,and time put in

😂😂😂😂 I get you! Best comment!

It was on purpose it was a launch test

6 engines didn't light, 1 or 2 were sputtering, the booster never operated correctly

@@VoltLover00 okay? how many engines worked?

Long way to go.

it's clear that Starship SN11 experienced a pogo oscillation failure (31 -33 ) raptor engines firing at once vs (SLS) Artemis 1 rocket which has a total of four engines. this and its apparent Disposable launch pad will be a huge hurdle for SpaceX as Multi-engine rockets are much more susceptible to pogo oscillation phenomenon than single-engine rockets. it took Nasa many years of R&D and is the reason why SlS Artemis 1 chose to use tried and true rocket "boring" technology Pogo was in fact the main cause of the soviets (30 ) engine N-1 rocket failure Pogo oscillation is a phenomenon that occurs when there is a feedback loop between the combustion process of the rocket engines and the rocket structure. The vibration caused by the combustion process can cause structural oscillations in the rocket, which in turn can feed back into the combustion process, leading to a potentially dangerous cycle of vibrations. In multi-engine rockets, there are more engines that can contribute to the vibration, which increases the likelihood of pogo oscillation occurring. Don't be so Salty Spacex fanboys! its ok! lol Cheers from Park City Utah!

Also called catching the wife cheating.

🤣🤣

LOL!

It's called Tesla reliability Issues 😂

Oh yea. They would have applauded in every scenario, believe me.

​@@ELSAHACK that's called morale, if you don't have that you won't get anywhere.

@@mrsmile5009 absolutely

It was.

Failures get terminated, not success!

@@johnblecha7434 And yet, here you are.

I was just thinking the same thing

@@WookieWoman chill... i think you killed him. :(

Hopefully not by old age waiting for that to happen because there are bigger problems that will be coming that will turn the hands of mankind forever mark these words my friend....and if not congratulations on your laid-back life your about to live....

DUDE ARE YOU WATCHING THE ROCKET VIDEO OR STROKING YOUR SELF?

The “meta verse” and “crypto currency” are dying and won’t see the end of the decade

Has it? What actually changed?

​@@jtgd Yep. It kinda did.

@@jtgd The largest, most powerful rocket ever just proved its viability. This rocket was created by a private company, built in a completely new way, and for a fraction of the cost of traditional rockets. Also both stages of the rocket are built to be reusable, I'd say that's a pretty big change.

@@BravestDawg101 viability? it blew up?

🤣