I know

Probably their definition of "dangerous" in a sense that you can more easily "conceal" your shot. This is basically the same thing that happened with the Striker-12 despite being functionally no different than any other semi-auto shotty that already existed.

My nuts are dangerous

I don’t think they know what there talking about

Yea idk people pretend they know things

Or they're paid off by gun makers to recommend easily by-passable safety modifications to their fellow politicians.

Wooster if that were true then those laws wouldn’t exist in the first place. Gun manufactures would stand to gain far more profit from an absence of gun laws.

@@samuelmajka4804 Businesses often lobby to change the language used in documents such as this, I expect that is what he meant.

I never understood this "dicking around" with cosmetic features. Any Semi-automatic gun can be easily converted to full-auto with stuff like a drill, crank, electric motor, bump stock, wind-up spring or whatever. The only way to restrict the potential firepower, is to ban all semi-auto rifles (max barrel length + caliber) . ...like seriously the "non removable mag" is probably just one little plastic pin you would have to file off

Should they ban the function rather than structure?

They gonna take your guns

@@milkyyanks765 good thing I don’t live in California

@@milkyyanks765 never ---- shall not be infringed

@@ironyinc3453 Texas is the most free state

@@thespiralgamer5374 tell me something I don’t know

Look up the Striker 12. That’s exactly what happened.

If that's the case wouldn't drug queens be banned?

Ah those csgo or pubg skins will proven usefull

Funny, the gov hasn't banned my mother in law 😳😂

But wait a minute if it's illegal in California what the f*** do the police need them for if it's illegal then it's illegal in the police should not be having them game wardens prison guards especially in California because those guard towers they definitely need more rounds because when there's a fight in the yard somebody going to get shot in the car is going to need more than one round they don't give out warning shots when the fight break out

Effect*

Erich Averette or how gun maker give the finger to California

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Literally

Shaloam Nenja • 12 years ago No. incorrect. Spencer Lane’s correction was good. An “Effect” is a noun for a change. When he says it “wouldn’t have an effect,” he’s saying it won’t make a difference, or it won’t make a change. Affect is almost exclusively used as a verb.

They forgot to mention that the perpetrators were muslim extremists also

@nrawayne im offended as a left wing extremist I want everyone to have guns. Left wing does not equate to dem or liberal

James Kirkpatrick well if you want everybody to have guns yet vote left then you’re a hypocrite, I’m sorry to say.

@@ctgslayer who said anything about voting? 🤔

James Kirkpatrick if you don’t vote then you’re not really trying to protect anybody’s rights anyway.

This is why I am willing to pay so much for a rifle. That R&D is top notch lol. If only the guys making these loopholes were in charge of making actual weapons of war for the DoD. My Marine career would be so much more fun lol.

Exactly. Who says American ingenuity is dead?

Look up ar-maglock lol it will blow your mind. The effort put in for a simple reload

"Ridiculous gun laws that helps no one." It helps out the criminals by making it harder for law-abiding citizens to defend themselves! But I agree, it's awesome that these manufacturers just design around it 😄.

@@aauwhatitdo1582 I mean, they already are. Who do you think makes weapons for the DoD? Colt, H&K, FN, SIG, etc.

Car drivers found they could simply drive one MPH BELOW the speed limit and get around the speed limit law. Lawmakers tried to close this loophole by dropping the speed limit another 10 MPH, because surely nobody would be able to drive cars then, right?

double speak !

That's exactly my thought...I fear that worse is about to come.

This!

"Law-MONGERS" is more like it.

Cannot take American rights away it is part of the constitution besides we the people decide what we want or not want because the constitution if for the people and by the people, do not let them tell you other wise!

Just ban all guns Just like in Europe and every sane country

@Unknown Orrer corporations already do you shitlord. You are a corporate slave.

@@world-traveler880 Nope, Many countries in Europe allow civilian own guns as same as American like AR-15, handguns but with firearm permit.​

rainy-day-blues yeah you’re right just ban them and nobody will have them look how well that worked with drugs

@@PutinOnTheRitz no open carry, they aren't idiots over there

its just that

Good point haha.

Ca: Dog sh*ts on sidewalk and leaves with it's owner. CaGov: let's ban another gun part. 🖊️ 📜

It’s a repeated cycle

@Mariooo Oh no! How can i shoot at this CROWD of people when i can't make out their faces clearly! Whatever shall i do!

Ban index fingers

CAgov: *Bans guns entirely* CA: proceeds to use knives

First 10 seconds. The bottom rifle is considered an assault weapon in California, illegal to sell (pistol grip).

@@uclajd Thats incorrect, you obviously dont know what you're talking about either.

@@aesthetics1255 Yes I do know what I am talking about: oag.ca.gov/firearms/regs/genchar2

Iced not wrong in California that is an illegal weapon because of the piston grip, go to any gun store in California and you will see they have flaps on the grips so they won’t be consider pistol grips.

@@Shadowslayer347 it's only illegal if you don't have a fixed magazine. Later in the video, that same rifle is shown as having the Hellfighter kit installed. Meaning it has a fixed magazine.

Words of wisdom.

If you showed this comment to a gun grabber they would fall on the ground and flail like a dying robot

No it’s so the DOJ doesn’t shoot your dog, children, and wife, then ruin your entire life by making you a felon and draining your bank account with legal fees, all for exercising your 2A right.

hmm... funny... the very same law but indeed did stop killing from gun use in australia... very interesting indeed

@@s.sterling6685 the crime rates were going down at a near identical rate plus there was a spike in crime right after the law was passed

Tom W. Yeah this title is horrifically biased lol

It's like trying to slap someone from 20 feet away then going "Stop dodging!"

@@TheGoodCrusader Don't buy cheap guns. You get what you pay for.

@SicSemperEvelloMortemTyrannis TyrannyEnder The AR-15 my dad got for 350 bucks ran better than some people who bought S&W ones and nice ones. The one we got functions reliably and perfectly. I love it.

Tom W. Complying in CA would’ve had me registering my AR as an AW. Changing my configuration is not complying.

So true it hurts

Alternative title "how gun companies bend the knee and dont stand up for the second amendment"

Tyrannical*

Banning Semi automatic rifle and removing from shops saves life as no one will purchase it.

Yes please. I'm in this hellhole. My battle rifle is an SKS for christ sake!

@@deaddad6310 RIP, I'd just leave that communist country

Obie Sunstreak Supreme Court needs to slap Commiefornia a new one! Totally unconstitutional!

@@deaddad6310 I am here aswell let us join forces to holt the communists

@@deaddad6310 Honestly I'd just move to a better state. But while you live in California, I live in Canada. You better believe I'm moving

@@noegmad what if the deaf person is turned around...... its over?

@@lukez597 sucks to be them

@@PorWik thats why these bans suck. Hurt majority

@@noegmad cant tell if thats a joke or if you were just a special ed kid

@@noegmad I live in California and sadly I could see a California politician using your joke as their actual logic lol.

And even then it is him trying to spin points made by people who think the gun laws are stupidity as somehow trying to show how 'guns are bad'.

He doesn't realize you can have a bolt action rifle in .223/5.56 and a 20in barrel that will fire even faster.

@@Flu_Tang_Clan yeah bit it doesnt look as spwooky scawy tactical

He’s saying that the current gun restrictions are pointless in reducing how deadly a firearm is. It’s not just some vague statement about how guns work or something.

Do you know what else is going just as fast… cars… They’ve done nothing about the “car death epidemic” no one’s talking about it, even though it kills more people… because people like their cars.

creaTe CHanNEl 117 I had forgot about that

And the fork, knife and spoon set. We should ban Swiss Army knives next

Lancer from Gears of War when? If I could legally own one, I would. It would be cool.

If only the lancer from gow was real.

A mountable 'ripper' in place of a bayonet would be funny. Heavy and hideously impractical though.

cxreyk not most. Virtually every modern gun of this day

Andrew Nwokocha fr😂

Except for revolvers, repeaters, pump action shotguns etc.

@@TacticalSavages There are pump actions with magazines.............

@@TacticalSavages repeaters can have detachable box mags, and the cylinder in a revolver can be detachable essentially making it a detachable magazine

Well barrel length would affect ballistics

... He's literally just making a statement that the gun is still functionally the same

@@mightyslime4120 anything over 3 inches, changes in velocity are dismal at best. Accuracy increases with barrel length

@@ethanphilpot7643 functionally the same as any other semi auto gun. Why is this a problem? He talks as if we should modify it to slow the bullets down..

@@highwayxj9397 maybe use this (honestly rather neutral) information to argue against assault weapons bans instead of immediately assuming ill intent? Because that sentence right there is salient and says a lot more about how ineffective the bans are rather than the guns themselves

Almost sounds like they are pushing some kind of agenda haha

@@joedoug3647almost, but they would never right? Right?

amen brother

Oh,no, think of the children

The only part that they highlighted that's the same is the trigger. The barrel has a different sight, different thickness, different length, and the pistol grip on the bottom rifle is notched near the center.

Ikr, it's scary how similar they are to the m1 abrahms.

and is the AR-15 an M16 or actually an AR-15

@@flavioxaviernavarroguerra8619 all m16s are Ar15s but not all Ar15s are m16s

They make 'em look scary and tactical so the lawmakers think that they are somehow deadlier than a rifle with a solid wooden stock

Flash hiders are features of military-style weapons. To politicians whose knowledge of guns goes only as far as what they’ve seen in movies and on TV, anything that looks like a military weapon is scary and dangerous, more dangerous than benign looking (i.e. familiar) hunting rifles. These politicians think that if they can ban scary looking guns, they will be perceived as making the public safer, and thus be reëlected.

Honestly flash hiders serve a purpose more for the shooter and not a human target. They’re meant to reduce the muzzle flash in a night time scenario so the shooter doesn’t jeopardize his vision. This is especially important for home invasions when visibility is poor and the eyes natural night vision are relied upon.

It eliminates muzzle flash and recoil, makes your rifle completely silent, increases damage by 10x and auto heat seek onto targets when you deploy the shoulder thing that goes up

Or make a video about how evil and crime will forever be present in a world that has never been perfect and how people need a tool for protection and self preservation. This would be an interesting and logical approach to WSJ's journalism.

I read a lot of great comments here, but this is my favorite one.

Erth Mann it’s complying with the letter not the spirit of the law.

Rochyan you don’t have to comply with the spirit of the law. “Assault rifle” laws don’t stop anything

@@Fireclaws10 What exactly was the "spirit of the law" Rochyan, please inform us? Was it a ridiculous attempt to ban the manufacture of Americas most popular sporting rifle? To do that the left would have to ban all semiautomatic rifles, the type that have been in common use for well over 80 years of which there are tens of millions long in circulation. To outlaw purely cosmetic features like a "pistol grip" or a "flash suppressor" claiming them to be more deadly or unsafe proves only that these lawmakers are not only laughable but totally unqualified to be tampering with our constitutional rights.

Michal Nazareth That’s a load of bull.

@Michal Nazareth And I'm sure you also believe that "silencers" work like they do in movies where if I'm using one, you can't even hear it, right? Because the Flash of the gun is the last thing I'm going to be paying attention to. If I'm face-to-face with the shooter I'm going to be using my eyes to pay attention of my surroundings and if I'm not I'm going to be using my ears to pay attention to the direction of the shots. Your concern about miniscule details like the flash of a weapon making it harder for someone to see is about as effective as turning on your headlights in the middle of broad daylight while in a car.

"Law-MONGERS" is more like it.

💯

You get what you voted for 👏🏻 👏🏻

Yeah, I always thought it was a bit odd that a weapon built on the AR15 platform was a "weapon of war" when it never has, and isn't currently, been used in a war anywhere in the world and/or that no military in the world has ever or is currently using them. Politicians have been whittling away the law abiding citizen's 2nd amendment rights for almost 100 years. Soon it won't exist.

@@Paul-ur5kc A Remington 700 has seen more conflict than an AR-15.

The true reason they've got a hard-on for ARs is sinister. What other 'scary looking' gun is more widely owned in the US? If they can ban this gun, they know they can ban any.

CommissarKozlov yep! They will call them evil sniper rifles next.

I say don’t sugarcoat it. Ar15’s are an effective weapon which can defend or offensive with great or devastating results and it should be 100% legal for a law abiding citizen to own with no need to justify to anyone why they own it.... I’m not fond of the argument of “it’s not as deadly as a full auto” just tell it like it is unapologetically ☺️

Assault weapon is not even an actual gun term. It's made up nonsense.

@@Yugetubes Sorry to break it to you, the German's in WWII coined the term and it stuck in English (Assault Rifle). The German's created the Sturmgewehr 44 (STG 44, Assault Rifle 44 in English) which some say Kalashnikov copied...

@@on2wheels378 Sorry to break it to you. Select fire rifles are commonly referred to as assault rifles. Assault weapon is a made up term used by people who don't know anything about firearms.

@@Yugetubes Sorry man, I misread your comment... I was on the train and you know that is. I thought you wrote 'assault rfile' wasn't a made up term. But we who know what they are and you're right about 'assault style' term... My bad...

Im just glad we all see what they are doing. Sucks it feels like no amount of voting can stop both of these parties from pushing us into a fascist dictatorship. The left means no harm throwing around the term "socialism", but in a big way its dumb. It scares right wingers and certain types of thinkers. They then respond by putting in the opposite. A dictator. The dictator comes because the people want a strongman to save them from a system aiming to control them, but strongmen are selfish. He wont give the guns back. He will then use our powerlessness against us while he reigns terror on the world. And thats how both parties are destroying Earth. What have we allowed......

Bc somebody's mommy said so.

I want to know it too

Flash gives a shooter's position away and thus makes it easier for the cops to hit them. Forward grip gives extra stability and improves accuracy, which translates into more innocents being gunned down.

@@odolwa099 A pistol grip is not the same as a forward grip.

Odolwa Aztec you obliviously don’t know how weapons work or the purpose for their “features”. Take a weapons safety course. Educate yourself.

There is no reason to ban any type of rifle.

@@Yugetubes yes there is, Safe act compliant or California compliant rifles should be banned. There should be no ban on features and if you have monster man grip or a fin grip you should be laughed at.

Daniel Harvey IV there is no reason to baby anything because by banning them does not mean they will go away. There are to many in the whole USA to make them go away and there are over hundreds of thousands being manufactured every single day .

They both have spooky military style pistol grips and evil flash suppressors that "make the gun particularly dangerous"

You can aim more accurately and shoot a greater distance with a rifle compared to a handgun.

@@youlikethat7119 And??? 90% of shootings happen with handguns....

@@youlikethat7119 but you can't move as comfortably in close quarters areas like narrow hallways. All guns are tools for the same purpose, and sometimes they simply work better in different circumstances. Comparing rifles and pistols is like comparing hammers and screw-drivers.

You Like That! Yeah but most shootings happen at a pretty close range, even with a pistol grip, shooting at range is ineffective and will get them kills.

Lol I laughed way to hard at this.

It's completely bogus. A firearm is a firearm. A weapon is anything that can be used to inflict bodily harm. An assault weapon is anything that can be used to attack someone with the intention of inflicting bodily harm. What turns something into an assault weapon is how it is being wielded, not the object itself.

Amen

@@doomtomb3 preach

Food for thought: aren't Nuclear weapons firearms? Laser rifles? I'm finding lots of commies here thinking the 2nd amendment doesn't protect nukes. USA = FREEDOM.

Do you sell mayonnaise?

They are politicians... truth and facts have never been their strong suit... Nor intellectual thought for that matter either. They just want votes.

They tried doing that and of course it failed because no one followed the law. Same thing needs to happen here except it is to late because it has been going on for far to long.

Technically, we do regulate how much alcohol people consume, just not *all* people in all situations or locations. We regulate people under 21 consuming alcohol, and drivers, mandatory closing times for bars, laws against public drunkenness or drinking in public, dry counties, and other blue laws, etc. Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending those regulations, except when it comes to drunk driving, but we do *selectively* regulate alcohol consumption.

Right on

Happening up here too (Canada) Justin Trudeau is trying to ban all firearms for civilian ownership. First it was "assault style", then it was handguns. DO NOT LET THE GOVERNMENT TAKE YOUR RIGHTS TO PERSONAL SELF-DEFENCE.

What is so funny about proper terms

@@redneck96100 I don't really know what's proper about it

@@louisryan5815 AR-15 style rifle is a rifle based on the AR-15 design, but is not made by Colt.

​@@redneck96100 when they say style it sounds like cosmetic which is said to be 100% legal from the modifications list which also contradicts itself cuz it can't be an "any other weapon" which just means it Has To Look Like a Firearm, Ar-15 based sounds more proper but it's like saying Toyota Supra cars should be banned cuz they are fast but I6 engines are not exclusive to the toyota brand or model it is just a logo or band to existing designs every gun maker can achieve but in better or worse means. & really a lot of militaries around the world don't even use the AR-15 based pattern & up to its full capabilities cuz it really sucks Americans are so old school that we hold on to dated tech it is only mentioned as the worst gun cuz it is popular only in the U.S. & people do attention grabbing things w/ it which is what they want! don't give them what they want! ever since that mass shooting happened in that one high school where the shooter made a doom map of the school that same school has been getting shot up since cuz people see the news & than they want to be famous (infamous) they look up to the shooters now, one killed his dad & shot up the same school. people need help

redneck96100 the funny thing about that is you just said “but not made by colt” which I find hilarious because the ar-15 wasn’t made by colt. More proof that the people making these “laws” have no clue what they are talking about.

The receiver looks like it doesn't have the "fun" switch. So that is most likely a picture of an AR15.

@@Immortalkalashnikov correct it's a Colt model 601 AR-15 which is identical to the M16A1

More people are struck by lightning in California than are killed by all types of rifles combined.

We should find ways to make it harder and if possible for criminals to not get their hands on guns

@@Notsofunnyman217. Without affecting the civilian market.

@@conch.7232 of course

@@Notsofunnyman217 how you gonna stop that if before the crime there's no Criminal?

@@neimi_ramg I said we gotta find ways and so far I got nothing good

No, its a video complaining about gun manufacturers complying with feature restrictions. That you consider what they're doing to be a 'ban that people are evading' says a lot about your mindset when it comes to the law.