So am I... same here...

I realize it's quite randomly asking but do anyone know a good site to stream new movies online ?

@Archie Tripp i use flixzone. You can find it on google =)

I remember watching Kung fu movies Saturday morning after the cartoons went off. Good ol days

@@gailannesquires3979 km

Eee3

So you are saying you have watched like 2 or 3 movies in your life time. Classic sounds. Yeah

Totally agree. The sound of breaking bones.

... .....

@@FIVE-0-APOCALYPTO bro, I’ve seen madd King-Fu movies, the fact you want to jab at me 2 years ago is crazy. It’s January 2023 and no cap EVEN in my youth I watched King-Fu movies almost every Saturday after cartoons. And I’m not talking Bruce Lee movies either. Here’s my list: Snake in Eagle’s Shadow Iron Maiden(above movie) Shaolin vs WuTang Invincible Armor Black Mask 36th Chamber 5 Deadly Venoms Drunken Monkey and others. The movies that the Shaw Brothers made and the sound effects they used were iconic! Why you’re skeptic of me and my history with Kung-Fu cinema is a hating mystery to me. But hope you have a good new year. Peace

@@piercingpencils_art .... How old are you? Kung Fu theater after cartoons? I don't know exactly what makes one a more official fan or diplomat or expert, BUT, I'm sure I can win a debate in which my argument and therefore case, proves your claim of "classic sound effects" in this movie you speak of (claim in a previous comment) apparently 3 years ago, is, not only incorrect, but by default, disqualifies you from any expertise or authority on which you claim by expertise of your own admission and movie list with no chronological starting point of origin. Yes, that simple statement of yours legitimately opens up a door in which your claim is wrong but irregardless it's just your opinion because even from what you say once again if a Bruce Lee movie admirer called those sound effects of that particular character and genre as "classic", then that's his opinion. The problem with your defense is your argument, is one from a standpoint in which I myself in disagreement and extra curricular verbal activity that you don't like, is in your opinion, ....a outside third party interloper. Were you addressing somebody else in private or the public? Am I not allowed to opinion the same as you? Am I the same as you when it comes to public opinion, realizes others no matter what, we'll find disagreements and it is only I who will now choose whether or not I wish to defend my position with facts and ideas and all you have presented, ...is what? Nothing but claims with no references that backup or defend your position anymore or less than your original point of origin which is still a mystery, but telling at the same time. In fact, yours is a replie in which it is simply nothing but a egocentric trap. You know like, if I were to even begin to mention my beginnings in the world of kung fu movies or Kung Fu theater as I like to call it as you yourself expressed as well as a categorical genre TYPICALLY associated with Kung Fu movies mainly and extensively from China officially as a genre but not officially as a category, that started in the very late '60s and peaked in the late 70's and slowly faded out toward the mid 80s.... In whose views is that or would that be true when it comes to categorical genre, VS, categorial fact? I think my words are clear enough because my original argument is sound effects and your reply in defense is one of experience and authority, where, It changes nothing and certainly does not lend (despite being null and void and therefore a non-starter) any credibility whatsoever in relative or relevant debate and or claim. I repeat, you are wrong when you label this movie as, "classic" in movie genre sound effects. Sound effects = sounds one hears during fight scene typical of the Kung Fu movie genre. Yes? NOT, voice over actors or characters behind the scenes with a separate audio voice English dub. Obviously your claim of classic sounds I would think are specific to and only two fighting scenes and or whatever unrelated examples within a movie where a student can meet a teachers blow in defense or counter, and, still produce the sound effect typical with a meeting delivery of a blow in a now official fight scene as part of any Kung Fu theater movie where pretty much from the beginning you can easily distinguish what sound effects are going to be used from beginning to end because I myself have never seen a movie such as this one for example where clearly from the beginning it has a particular sound effect of kung fu Fighting that as the movie progresses, so does the sound effect as a result ...changes. I've never seen it or heard about it and for all practical purposes, this movie is just like any other one where it's safe to say there is no kung fu movies of the Kung Fu theater genre that's from start to finish do not have the same series or examples of a particular sound effect that is part of the movie from beginning to end. Stick with the argument sir because I say you're wrong and so far you are defending your position based on the theory of a supposed man with the most money in a given room is in fact the smartest man. Just like a bridge toll bill I received the other day in the mail in which I called their 1-877 number to speak to a representative in which it is in fact a standard billing and therefore a invoice that they themselves title a "toll violation". She assured me that it is a bill, based on credit and I said why do you call a credit when I myself has never officially begged your agency or department or whatever it is officially, for any benefit and or credit? She chuckled and assured me in polite social type dynamics, I understand this, that credit itself in this usage has nothing to do with penalty because of VIOLATION and I said, "okay now tell that to the bank"...and or judge. She laughed and said, "that's true"... she sees my point. The invoice billing statement if that's what one wants to call it says in capital bold black letters.. "toll violation." I pretty much know exactly why they do that in usage. It's because, it makes me or one look stupid, for pointing out something that is already going on the attack NOW for what is buffered and of no concern, to what will hopefully be buffered and if not in the future, then it is you who in the past was in agreement of violation; YOU PAID IN FULL ....fool Because they're not calling me a fool now but I am only to find out they going to say DATS RITE in the future and all I got is the truth in claim and a tiny dab of Vaseline to jack off with is night and day more valuable than what is the Truth in the future if they happen to lose jurisdiction for what was supposedly not true even though they are buffered from jurisdiction in light of nobody in the private and or public as an entity or agency and or legion has in any way shape or form past present and or future reality when it comes to language itself as a rudimentary constant of mathematical valuation versus theoretical evaluation of what is an effect a tyrannical corporate state in which you do not need a driver's license in order for you to use a car, only in commercial and or reasons of official commerce is one in need of what is known as licensing in order to be legal in what in other usage would be lawful. You walking into a department of motor vehicles and testing and paying for a driver's license is a contractual agreement in ambiguity and therefore legally binding in violation of you yourself signing on the dotted line in agreement of violation in what would there for normally be lawful. You ain't going to make no damn fool out of me by YOU DUH FOO because it's clear that you're the fool. I already learned that lesson at a gas station perhaps even before you were born. "SAY MANE WUTS WRONG WITH THIS FOOL HERE" .... Who are you calling a fool, you're the fool.. "YEAH DATS RITE!!" ...lol, yeah that's RIGHT.

Thank you for your wonderful comment. We really appreciate your feedback. Please visit our FREE App: www.thewutangcollection.com

It's not all that

@@WuTangCollectionDope ini yuk

77u7uuuuuuuuu77uuuuuju

Don't say Chinese movies is better than Hollywood each have their own still

@@mariecjones2254 agree

There should be a part 2 to this movie, it didn't end good so i'm not quick to say it's a classic it looks unfinished.

Yes you are right. As I have said also in my comment. Good point !

@@janeaustin399 a0⁰p.o moo

@@janeaustin399 se

She's so FINE!!!

Il

@@bendawadnadh4521 ¹

不美女

$ 6

U to

josé aparecido

josé appreciation

Verdade

Back in the 70's endings made no sense in many Hong Kong movies.

Marsha = brain damaged

Andrea Edison ហវវរ

martial art

luigi VERITà

Have no idea... sorry to say I am not a fan of him at all...

Yeah. you notice that too.he is just a normal Kung Fu fighter...

WTF?