Definitely. The Eastern front was insane

@GeorgeGeorge-by2lf Ultimately it matters who win the war, not how bad or good their planning was. We see history repeated again in Ukraine...

Yeaa

@a1kira858 Yeah crazy how people want accuracy in a non-fantasy movie, crazy eh. I seriously don't understand this brain dead cult of "oh it not a document that why hitler is getting his cheek claps by gnome, the japan emperor is giving atomoic a french kiss and Stalin is giving the horse a stroke, and looks at here the american is riding tank barrel to give it excitement that how they defeat the japan, by ridding barrel HAH"

Or a petrol bottle blowing up a panzer?

@Titus Pullo Desperation 100

LOL

where you find this "500 kg", firstly ?

@@nocturnalrecluse1216 this named the proverbial "Molotov's cocktail"'. And it wasn't a "petrol". Special flame liquid. It curious - but all Nazy tanks had got a petrolic engines... :> with the expected results. Not like Soviet tanks, these had diesel engines :>

The name of the weapon doesn't matter, what matters is the effectiveness of the weapon.

they originited from the Spanish Civil War.

exactly but that have before WW2.

@@marceldavis5600 maybe İrish war.

Ironically, it changed the meaning of the word "Molotov" entirely, at least in the English speaking world. Iirc, it meant something like "Hammer", as a blacksmith would use. Now, to the English speaking world, at least, it means flame.

Tbf Panzer Mark 2s, 3s and 4s were still basic in design in 41 and would have been filled with shells and explosives. So heat and sparks inside would be a death sentence even without a big explosion.

this named the proverbial "Molotov's cocktail"'. And it wasn't a "petrol". Special flame liquid. It curious - but all Nazy tanks had got a petrolic engines... :> with the expected results. Not like Soviet tanks, these had diesel engines :>

It's possible. From an extract of a British officer's time in Stalingrad, he would describe a 'hero' charging towards a tank holding nothing but a bottle, setting afire himself and the tank in the process.

indo ?

@@osman-ri8us iya bang

Not really, the german tanks wouldn't have waited for the Infantry, there would have been Panzergrenadiere and Half tracks instead of normal infantry. And the Soviets are fighting too loyal. I'm sorry to say but at the beginning of the war many Soviet soldier instead capitulated or just walked to the germans because tgey weren't really fanatical, they didn't like Stalin and hoped the Germans would be better (which wasn't tze case but anyway). I' ve heard a story of a german soldier who had to lead 3 POWs back to his own lines and when he arrived there he had 120 POWs. One soldier with 120 POWs, all just walked over. But the uniforms and the Weapons are realistic, that's right.

@@kingstar0084 what you said about Soviet prisoners is completely wrong. There Germans were surprised by how long they did fight on the beginning. They didn't walk to German lines. Most of the pows we're from mass encirclements

Hey haha you are here!You are also interested about ww2?Its me from the byzantine empire group renren..

@@connorsteffey5898 you repeat communist BS. Germans were surprised with the number POW they took (3,5 mln in 1941 alone)

You'd better keep closer to your delusion

Yeah, those were some pretty shitty, pretty slow firing mg42s

That's your country.

@@mynamejeff785 Because it's a MG 34, the 42 stands for 1942 and the movie plays 1941

Meh

That movie is hard to watch

“Published May 19, 2020”. That’s really vital information, isn’t it?

Днепровский Рубеж - Dnieper Defense Line

Ramayana?

Bjir perang Ramayana

Si pitoeng

Total ww2 was horror...but horrors for Soviet union was horrible

Commie..they are such liars.

Americans also does this.

German war films are good. Nothing with glory and hereos only the reality of war.

@@spaseman6343 American movies are way worse than this when it comes to propaganda

@@bbaydogdu not saying there better lol

Rest In Hell To 100% Of The Nazis Dead.

Dnieper line

Dnieper line

Rubiez dniepr

they were just prepared to charge at any time i guess

I think its pretty old xD probably from the 90s

Dneprovskiy rubezh (2009) / Dniepr Line

The name of this movie is "Dneprovsk frontier" (Днепровский рубеж) about of Siege of Mogilev.

@@nosk0330 Spasiba....

dnieper line

Dneprovskiy rubezh (2009) / Dniepr Line

Dneprovskiy rubezh (2009) / Dniepr Line

Dneprovskiy rubezh (2009) / Dniepr Line

Dneprovskiy rubezh (2009) / Dniepr Line

Dneprovskiy rubezh (2009) / Dniepr Line

They're tired

Look if you want historically correct films watch a documentary . It is a movie ie fiction designed to entertain and as it was done for a Russian audience then yes it will be a little bias . ( American films are not?) . FURY. For a bit of relaxation after a hard days work I don’t want reality I want a film that Entertains and if Russian films don’t do that for you then I suggest you go on Amazon and do a little research.

@@martinbeaumont5002 in other words Russian film is disgusting

Martin Beaumont movies aren't all fiction but they do want to entertain. Do docos not do this too?

there are best ww2 dramas like Come and See what is awarded as most accurate and best ww2 movie and also there are new movies like Panfilovs 28 and T34 !.. and ofcourse nazi fanboys dont like it hahahahah .!.

@@TheBorg01 All the same, the best films about the war were shot in the 50-70s

Lol. This is not a Russian film

@@jangrosek4334 ??? I don't wrote, that it is an russian film. I wrote, that's russian propaganda... 😒

They never did💀

А вот и нет. Это белорусский фильм.

@@jangrosek4334 не далеко ушли, разница ни о чем))

Dnieper Line

"How Not To Make A War Film"?