かか

FOAM WILL PUT OUT FASTER

😭🏎🚘🚑🖍​@@disdis4976

😎

Inc

😍

One hand line? Lots of hose on the ground? Hydrant?

バイクが燃えているように見えますので、ガソリンがタンクから漏れ続けているのではないかと思います。

ナゼにガソリン火災なのに、 泡消火剤を活用しないのだろうか？ 一番員も延焼防止で壁を狙うのも分かるが… アッチふらふらコッチふらふら… マズは火点制圧を主眼に置くのが正しい様な…

@@asdfghqwert1810 延焼防止対策、経費削減これ等を考慮すれば泡より水と現場指揮が判断したのでは？ それにガソリン火災=泡消火ってのも強ち間違いでは無いですが、現場式の判断かと、、、 もしこれにこれ以上疑問点があるなら貴方が指揮隊になれば良いのでは？ そもそも泡消火の有効な代表的な火災は油の量が何リッター超えだった気が、、、 本事案には当はまらないから消火及び延焼防止での消火活動を指示したのかと、、、 まぁプロじゃないから自信も根拠も無いので絶対そうとは言えませんがただ１つ 文句を言うならば貴方がやれば？笑

@@asdfghqwert1810 初心者が何言ってんの？

ここはパーキングチケットで停められる場所なんです。

🤗

0:28

勉強になりました

🤩

少年法撤廃と刑法特区設定で全員火あぶりの刑にすべき。

@@douga9996 少年法があるから駄目なんだよ。

誰が通報したのだろ

@@douga9996子供って一時期火を付けることに興味持つんですよ。親が小さい頃に火の怖さを教えないと。実際に火炙りされるの見た事ありますか⁇あまり迂闊な事言わない方がいいですよ。

@@user-lo1kf9qo2v 子供の火遊びを擁護して将来の火付けを育成するのですか？　社会に不安を与えるようなことをいうことこそ法整備で予防拘禁の制度が必要です。

@mohjan85 Not sure what you are getting at, a response in my rural area can take upwards of 15 minutes. Based on what I see of that fire that could have been less than 5 minute response plus the setup time for hoses. That is a good response time. I think in the USA response times in a city is close to 3 to 5 minutes.

At least 15 men and only one hose in action after 5 minutes of hassling. Very poor fire brigade there.

It's very easy to judge an edited video, average response times in my rural area are usually above 10 minutes. Looks to me like less than 30 minutes to put out that fire with mostly 1 hose doing the job. Most of the damage was most likely done within the first 5 minutes of the fire starting. After that, it is exposure control with the nearest building being the biggest target.@@TamppoSilakka

@@TamppoSilakka could have been that they didnt have a fire hydrant and could only work with 1 hose and keep the fire under control so its doesnt spread. hence the use of only 1 hose, so that the water in the tank doesnt go empty too quick.

｢出場｣と言ってるのは東消だけではなく、他の消防機関でも言ってるところが有るようです。因みに私の地元の消防機関でも｢出場｣と言ってるようです。

バイクの持ち主かわいそう😢

​@@TMN7Nemuroそれな

何人の大人が動いてどれだけのお金がかかってるのか理解しててほしい

犯人は　放火学会かも・・

@@ssl3020 そう言う発言は注意しろよー 法的措置取られるとかなりキツいよーーー

@@The-HERNIA たとえばどんなところ？

@@ssl3020 K明党が怒るぞ。 Y口なっちゃんマジギレかも⁉️

@@user-Yoh.I なぜ?

テレビベビーベット朝🌄お風呂入れる

火を消すってよりも火が燃え移るのを防ぐのがメインだからね

燃料なので水だと弾かれて消えにくくなります(・ω・)

泡の消火剤まかないと消えないよ。

火は生き物。

火を消すってよりも火が燃え移るのを防ぐのがメインだからね

No, he didn't. He planted his feet and never hit the burning material. That was Fountain Statue water squirting.

@@JB91710 You clearly don't know what the hell you're talking about. He put out 80% of the fire.

I suspect that they put the second line in place but didn't charge it until they had a hydrant supply. Looks to me like the second arriving engine stretched a supply line (the yellow one). First crew probably decided to park as close to the fire and quickly attack with what they had in the tank until help arrived.

@@stryker214 yep, agree that it was a water issue, at the end the yellow line shows that. towards the end we aslo see more people putting down lines @JB91710 yea, bc shooting 1 hose of water towards a bunch of scooters with a mixture of plastic, battery and other flammable stuff will surely put it out. what the dude was doing, was keeping the fire under control, so that it doesnt spread anywhere else, mainly the building next to it. u can see that in multiple instances, were he shoots water upwards or goes to the side to spray the walls

..... maybe they dont know what "foam" is...😅😅😅

@@w-peterI’m certain that they do. They probably pronounce it differently…

(眼鏡ｸｲｯ)君のような勘の良い視聴者は嫌いだよ。

んじゃもうこの団地に住んでる人ごと滅ぼしちゃお！☆ この団地に住んでるやつらが転居したらまた転居先で火事起こすかもしれないからね！ 先に火種(人)を56して火事を未然に防ぐ！

今も外壁は黒いままだよね。賠償問題が落ち着かないと塗装工事もできないのかな。

소방관 여러분 수고하세요

수고 많으십니다. ^^ 근데 이런식으로 화재를 진압하는게 맞는건가요? 건물로 화재가 번지는걸 방지 하기위해 벽에 물을 뿌린걸까요? 그리고 호스는 왜 1개만 운용한걸까요?

고생많으십니다

殺すか拷問死だな

@@user-ju7qd1sf9e 来世もだな

火遊びしたのかもしんないな

多分遊び感覚の悪ふざけやろね

それ本当なら保護者 大変ですな～😓

これでも時間は短いほうですよ。幸い近くに消火栓がありましたからね。 ふだんなら、まず消火栓までポンプ車が行って、それからホースを伸ばししっかり接続部分を確認してそれから水を送り出すのですからね。

I love the Japanese mini-pumpers. They are well suited to the narrow roads in Japanese towns. But I'm having trouble accepting your point that the pump can only support one hose line. Japanese engineers do amazing things and get impressive results with small mechanics. Surely their pump can supply more than one line? I've seen several fire videos from Japan on KZfaq and, unfortunately, what I see again and again looks like too much discussion, planning and coordination and not enough firefighters taking action with any sense of urgency. I wonder if Japanese firefighters are trained to precisely follow very detailed procedures for each little task they do and this impedes them when faced with a real world, dynamic situation. 🤔

@@squirrel3190 The thing is no matter how amazing Japanese engineer are the size of the tank is fix which means the amount of water and pressure generated will be limited. There's no way a small engine can't compete with the big engine. Yes maybe it can support two line but the pressure will no doubt drop as well

In Denmark, the city of Odense has one of the world's fastest fire departments. They are out of the garage for a maximum of 1 minute around the clock when the alarm sounds. They have water on the fire hoses about 15-20 seconds after they arrive at the fire. They have a minimum of 6000-8000 liters of water with them and can get 10000 liters of water more in 15 minutes.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gpx5oc6H1bGupIk.html 多分これですね

ありましたね、リプ欄にリンクがあります！

どうせロクな人間には成らない。

I was thinking the same thing, both protecting the exposures and simultaneously knock down the fire from the fuel source.

@@scottmcgowan4813 , but a firefighter with second line kept standing without any actions. I'd charge the second line if they have water supply connected. Also, leaked gasoline is better to extinguish with foam - that's much more quicker and efficient. Greeting from russian firefighter!

@@YusDyr You have to fight fires with resources you have at hand. I'm sure if they had Foam they would have used it. RECEO Rescue, Exposures, Containment, Extinguish, Overhaul. Greeting from an Australian Firefighter.

@@scottmcgowan4813 They should have foam on hand otherwise they are ill equipped and not as effective as a fire dept should be. As in this case where the fire kept re-lighting under the motor scooter.

@@YusDyr - Yes, foam will be best for electrical and fuel fires!

и

東消管内でマンション火災となったら出場台数は多いです。 車輌台数が豊富な東消は数をもって迅速に制圧するので。 まだ一線しかないのは、水槽付きポンプ車で直近部署して積載している水を使って放水しているからです(吸水管を使っていない) これから他のポンプ車が水利部署して増えていきます。

わたしもいつも一人で消化してます。ほめて

Calling this demonstration "Effective" is a stretch.

@@CraigLumpyLemke Admittedly, rolling out the second line takes ages

@@Bozzyplays Most every American engine would have 3 lines going before they got their second one going.

fire trucks cost a lot even without being big, unfortunately all the technology and government red tape makes the price go high. Not just anyone can make a fire truck... Plus how do you know they have not spent a lot of money of those trucks? Did you compare the average cost of a truck in japan to that of the USA? Also, there is a time and place for a tool, in this video they are in a city with access to a lot of water supply via hydrants, their trucks are smaller in nature because of their small streets and narrow passages all around.

Do you mean around 1:15 where they're waiting to contain the fire? I don't know much about firefighters but it does look slow. But I think that was actually the "special" attack line since you see dozens of larger trucks arriving AFTER the fire is put out. This being Japan, I imagine there were a dozen documents they need to fill in before they're allowed to spray anything. You know, because you might get a complaint that their scooter was soaked in water or something.

@@MartinMatsumoto Yes, that was around 1:15, but I am not sure too, of course, I understand that they have other procedures than us in Europe, also,these Japanese firefighters are known to be very efficient and professional around the world

I'm thinking the same.. First hose is pretty fast but from 1:40 to several minutes ahead they are pulling hoses like crazy, but not getting more water on the fire.. We would have had two high pressure reels out and on it as the very first thing - the lone firefighter in this vid is really fighting a hard to win battle

@@SkibbyDenmark the problem is they have no water because the Fe is too small, they had to get water from sources further away which explains the delay. And as to why they don't use bigger Fe that can hold more water, Japanese street are so narrow your American or European size fire truck will never get through. This unfortunately meant that they are only able to deploy one line to attack. They were actually pretty fast in deploying the second hose but I thinking the problem was getting to the water source, either because there's no fire hydrant nearby or water truck is still otw

@@PB-hr3hy Thanks a lot for the clarification - bad water supply sucks big time