香港國安法:前民主派議員湯家驊解構國安法,與BBC主持舌劍唇槍- BBC News 中文 |

  Рет қаралды 165,574

BBC News 中文

BBC News 中文

3 жыл бұрын

香港人正在適應一個新現實,中國在沒有進行有效諮詢的情況下, 在香港實施極為嚴荷的國家安全法。民主派運動人士稱其為「一國兩制之死」。BBC《HARDtalk》請來前民主派議員、現成為親北京人士的香港行政會議成員湯家驊接受訪問。
中國是否正在掐死香港的特別待遇地位?
BBC News 中文: www.bbc.com/zhongwen
訂閱BBC News 中文 KZfaq:bit.ly/1wkHh5T
BBC News 中文 Facebook - / bbcchinese
BBC News 中文 Twitter - / bbcchinese
BBC News 中文 Instagram - / bbcchinese

Пікірлер: 1 900
@Dibbe20
@Dibbe20 3 жыл бұрын
睇完Nathan Law,再睇Ronny Tong,真係高下立見。
@Dibbe20
@Dibbe20 3 жыл бұрын
@@miamipa44 only Nathan Law can reply the questions clearly with confidence. So proud of Nathan Law. If he is not so great, the 50 cents won't gather here. Lol
@waiyeekam7898
@waiyeekam7898 3 жыл бұрын
對於滿口謊這的戰狼,湯狗是表現上上了﹗羅生只有良心直說,難度輕許多﹗香港人必讀的兩片。誰是小丑,大家心有數
@mag454
@mag454 3 жыл бұрын
姓羅高調地冇恥、高調地說謊。姓湯在無禮及惡意的主持人質問下反擊正常不過。
@miamipa44
@miamipa44 3 жыл бұрын
Dibbe20 Demons are also confident about themselves.
@chingtungchan115
@chingtungchan115 3 жыл бұрын
@@miamipa44 Talking about Xitler?
@user-sv5fl4vu1f
@user-sv5fl4vu1f 3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to Hong Kong. This is Hong Kong type “Communication”. They would like to say what they want to say only.
@marcopang3141
@marcopang3141 3 жыл бұрын
it show to world what kind of Gov we every day face to and why we walk on street
@kuchoi6204
@kuchoi6204 3 жыл бұрын
This is Pro-Beijing people type “Communication” , they always say they had already communication with you , this kind of communication.
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/osh7ppWerL7epJc.html
@davidyu530
@davidyu530 3 жыл бұрын
@andy tai you just another 黄C
@davidyu530
@davidyu530 3 жыл бұрын
all your just a bunch of hypocrite, never did any good in your life time
@Gogogo-ec1dd
@Gogogo-ec1dd 3 жыл бұрын
Ronney is more confident to talk with underage girl
@unicornspilot
@unicornspilot 3 жыл бұрын
It's Ronny. Romney would be Mitt Romney
@Albion101
@Albion101 3 жыл бұрын
民主到底 革命无罪 有什麼JB 毛病?
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai , salty and wetty. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otiUiM2Tu9qRpZs.html
@ww3icing476
@ww3icing476 3 жыл бұрын
​@Henry Tse There does not exist outdated knoweledge background.Only "lead to improvement" or "lead to suffing" .And obviously if people in china only depend on ccp,people strave to dead. Chinese people basely keep their lives depend on the knowledge create by western.Even though ,under the ccp regin ,Still have collage student strave to dead 貴州. That is a horrible fact that those powerful men in CCP China have thousand of billion in Switzerland bank. Base on what you said ,i know you is nothing more than a ”識字文盲“,have not logic ,knowledge. if ccp is so ”INdate“,such a trend in the world ,Why not regin their country by themselves from the beginning?why depend on thing like science, technology,enconmic,finacial that gave brith by the logic and knowledge you so call outdated. Things that closer to the true harder to fade. There does not exist a concept “out or in”date with universal true.That isn‘t sth fashion. There is not specfic detail to define “Endanger national security”.It just like you sentance a man to jail on”He disrepected woman“,but not ”rape“ ”sexual harassmentenry Tse There does not exist outdated knoweledge background.Only "lead to improvement" or "lead to suffing" .And obviously if people in china only depend on ccp,people strave to dead. Chinese people basely keep their lives depend on the knowledge create by western.Even though ,under the ccp regin ,Still have collage student strave to dead 貴州. That is a horrible fact that those powerful men in CCP China have thousand of billion in Switzerland bank. Base on what you said ,i know you is nothing more than a ”識字文盲“,have not logic ,knowledge. if ccp is so ”INdate“,such a trend in the world ,Why not regin their country by themselves from the beginning?why depend on thing like science, technology,enconmic,finacial that gave brith by the logic and knowledge you so call outdated. Things that closer to the true harder to fade. There does not exist a concept “out or in”date with universal true.That isn‘t sth fashion. There is not specfic detail to define “Endanger national security”.It just like you sentance a man to jail on”He disrepected woman“,but not ”rape“ ”sexual harassment“with concrete Henry Tse There does not exist outdated knoweledge background.Only "lead to improvement" or "lead to suffing" .And obviously if people in china only depend on ccp,people strave to dead. Chinese people basely keep their lives depend on the knowledge create by western.Even though ,under the ccp regin ,Still have collage student strave to dead 貴州. That is a horrible fact that those powerful men in CCP China have thousand of billion in Switzerland bank. Base on what you said ,i know you is nothing more than a ”識字文盲“,have not logic ,knowledge. if ccp is so ”INdate“,such a trend in the world ,Why not regin their country by themselves from the beginning?why depend on thing like science, technology,enconmic,finacial that gave brith by the logic and knowledge you so call outdated. Things that closer to the true harder to fade. There does not exist a concept “out or in”date with universal true.That isn‘t sth fashion. There is not specfic detail to define “Endanger national security”.It just like you sentance a man to jail on”He disrepected woman“,but not ”rape“ ”sexual harassmentenry Tse There does not exist outdated knoweledge background.Only "lead to improvement" or "lead to suffing" .And obviously if people in china only depend on ccp,people strave to dead. Chinese people basely keep their lives depend on the knowledge create by western.Even though ,under the ccp regin ,Still have collage student strave to dead 貴州. That is a horrible fact that those powerful men in CCP China have thousand of billion in Switzerland bank. Base on what you said ,i know you is nothing more than a ”識字文盲“,have not logic ,knowledge. if ccp is so ”INdate“,such a trend in the world ,Why not regin their country by themselves from the beginning?why depend on thing like science, technology,enconmic,finacial that gave brith by the logic and knowledge you so call outdated. Things that closer to the true harder to fade. There does not exist a concept “out or in”date with universal true.That isn‘t sth fashion. There is not specfic detail to define “Endanger national security”.It just like you sentance a man to jail on”He disrepected woman“,but not ”rape“ ”sexual harassment“with concrete evidence that provided his action did violation a woman. If a man is judged to rape a woman. It means that He inset his ”thing“ inside the woman,not he ”disrepect woman'“. I know you actually a Chinese ,you make me feel disguting that whem you enjoy the benefic of western civilization ,get away from the hell of strave.Get to use internat,get to have enough food,get to learn the science,but praise the ccp for doing thing for their own interest,for getting more power to subjest Chinese people. What a fp person you are. I bet you get 2 cent for talking nonsence thing like "konwledge background like fasion,can be outdated. I only know that "old" knowledge always to be the foundation of the "newest",and obviously you believe in those has no foundation,made up by ccp primitive “I like to take away human right to bulid up the power of myself“ mindset. I cannot believe there are still people thing slave other people is ”indate“,are you really living in the modern world for god sake?Or you enjoy to be salaved ?
@ww3icing476
@ww3icing476 3 жыл бұрын
​@民主到底 革命无罪 沙比革命無罪,給你兩毛。六億人口赤貧的政府還好意思秀優越感?流氓總是喜歡把他人的剋制看作自己的”有理“,確不知道你能另2毛,還要多謝他們,最好就是先進國家從一開始就不干預中國發展,讓你們這些腦殘繼續吃糠繼續餓死。等ccp把中國玩死了在佔領。 把其他國家的善意看作”洋屁“。你認真的嗎?
@anguskk47
@anguskk47 3 жыл бұрын
十一哥真係好好笑 LUL
@marcoyip7738
@marcoyip7738 3 жыл бұрын
17:00 主持人:羅冠聰已離開香港,不可在境內進行政治活動 湯家驊:這只是一個政治策略,沒有人拘捕他,他可以隨時回來 結果不到兩星期 「香港警察以涉嫌違反《港區國安法》,通緝6名流亡海外港人,包括前眾志創黨主席羅冠聰」 這真的有夠諷刺
@PM-zo9gx
@PM-zo9gx 3 жыл бұрын
这说明他确实威胁国家安全了不是吗?
@yonghan904
@yonghan904 3 жыл бұрын
人家说这话的时候,确实没有啊。 没毛病!
@marcoyip7738
@marcoyip7738 3 жыл бұрын
@@yonghan904 那羅冠聰在甚麼時候干犯了國安法?如果是因為他一直以來的政治主張干犯了國安法,那就代表國安法是在針對他。 既然如此,為甚麼湯家驊還要說羅冠聰可以隨時回來香港?批評對方只是因政治策略而離港? 如果連湯家驊這樣的資深大律師都不清楚在國安法下甚麼人會被檢控,那又如何說服別人國安法不影響香港人的自由?
@marcoyip7738
@marcoyip7738 3 жыл бұрын
@@PM-zo9gx 甚麼是國家安全?罵官員罵共產黨算嗎?分享政治文章出版政治書籍算嗎?國家安全=共產黨政權穩定嗎?
@user-ee7tc5vb6e
@user-ee7tc5vb6e 3 жыл бұрын
@@marcoyip7738 因为他在脸书尝试和美国联系制裁香港,你说这违不违反国安法
@phoenixstream6950
@phoenixstream6950 3 жыл бұрын
As a Hong Kong citizen, I have to say that Ronny Tong, a law professional Not trusted by the mass public due to his past behaviours, was simply ignoring the key concerns about the controversial articles in the national security law that would destroy the integrity of "one country two systems" and assured freedom of the citizens. Many parts of the security law are in conflict with the basic law rights and existing regulations and protections, and the Beijing authority and its delegates have the power to decide whom would be sent to China for jurisdiction, which in fact creates tremendous fear among normal Hong Kong ppl and uncertainties about the future of the city's autonomy.
@enoch1087
@enoch1087 2 жыл бұрын
You are a logical man. I think many HK people like us know how bad is the National Law.
@neowang3716
@neowang3716 3 жыл бұрын
我想知道为什么美国可以根据美国安全法逮捕世界上任何地方的人,而香港在中国一国两制的前提下,在香港政府无法处理问题时候却不能介入其中,两制的前提是一国不是吗?
@shaodong1775
@shaodong1775 3 жыл бұрын
双标
@user-ml2vn6xx8q
@user-ml2vn6xx8q 3 жыл бұрын
美英等國最雙標,宇宙馳名雙標😂
@user-wb5bp4rs7t
@user-wb5bp4rs7t 3 жыл бұрын
因为不听美国的话就得死,看看萨达姆,再看看伊朗被炸死那个高官。之前拿了钱的香港汉奸,已经没得选了,只能一条路走到黑,时代弃子。
@renshen6821
@renshen6821 3 жыл бұрын
美国自由就是警察压死黑人,真的自由凌驾于别人生命之上
@whsam-mh1qq
@whsam-mh1qq 3 жыл бұрын
因为现阶段美国说一欧洲小国没人敢说二,欧洲所有国家领袖被监听都无所谓,可想而知。
@humbledo
@humbledo 3 жыл бұрын
Shame on Ronny Tong. Stephen has made all his questions clear and Ronny is the one who twisting the concept.
@hangao1419
@hangao1419 3 жыл бұрын
when you see what and how Nathan answered the question, you will know what the real twisting the concept is.
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/osh7ppWerL7epJc.html
@skinhk
@skinhk 3 жыл бұрын
待我為你地唱支歌 有一個大狀叫十一哥
@lamotre
@lamotre 3 жыл бұрын
It is a hard talk for 十一哥, haha
@danng898
@danng898 3 жыл бұрын
湯先生又名「十一哥」,佢以前從民主派忽然轉投建制派,因為衰十…… 你會發現佢徒弟都同佢經歷好似……
@fqmok2450
@fqmok2450 3 жыл бұрын
湯是明白。香港民主必須跟隨著中國的底線走。 不是按英美的要求爭取。你識條鐵乜!
@ringowong007
@ringowong007 3 жыл бұрын
@@fqmok2450 湯係搞幼女被中共影低罪證 淚灑雪廠街 從此一生為共奴
@LDfight
@LDfight 3 жыл бұрын
@@ringowong007 冇尻错!
@saikitli3954
@saikitli3954 3 жыл бұрын
雖然佢搶咗你女朋友之後又唔要你都唔使咁詆毀人格㗎 冇出息
@saikitli3954
@saikitli3954 3 жыл бұрын
@@ringowong007 你老母做天使嗰陣 慰勞啲手足夠畀英國人影咗相做證據啦
@star24ize
@star24ize 3 жыл бұрын
睇完羅冠聰再翻黎 十一哥柒到XD
@yido258
@yido258 3 жыл бұрын
睇晒成條片,你真係覺得湯先生,真係唔死都無用。利申:我只是一個好普通的香港市民
@user-cv5mb2cg9y
@user-cv5mb2cg9y 3 жыл бұрын
你应该去当英国人
@LeonMeraki
@LeonMeraki 3 жыл бұрын
That moment you realised that foreigners aren’t as dumb as some of the locals that can be fooled by your unclear words. “STOP BULLYING ME”, “LET ME FINISH”, “THIS IS RIDICULOUS” bruh
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/osh7ppWerL7epJc.html
@LeonMeraki
@LeonMeraki 3 жыл бұрын
Amazon Narita ?😅
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
@@LeonMeraki nothing can be worser then this Mr. Eleven, he is Salty and Wet , here another youtube for you (for all HKers) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otiUiM2Tu9qRpZs.html wish HKers happy and stay alive
@LeonMeraki
@LeonMeraki 3 жыл бұрын
@@amazonnarita363 lol you mean Ronny Tong is horny to underage child girl? XD btw the videos you sent seem a bit awkward.. no offence
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
@@LeonMeraki no worries, not for everyone. i just do not want to copy manga and disney or sanrio. just something very much an expression. O, i got another one, see if you like it: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n8p-hNWpq9jVf5s.html
@adammeng96
@adammeng96 3 жыл бұрын
很可笑,最开始BBC发这个视频的时候,下面的评论无一例外啥职责这个采访者不能让对方把观点讲完,一直在无理由的打断对方。 然后BBC重发了几次这个视频,我不知道这个视频中是否重新进行了剪辑,但是重发之后的视频里面的评论就截然不同,充斥着被采访人的反对者。 有意思
@shenzhenzhong
@shenzhenzhong 3 жыл бұрын
BBC也很鸡贼,比英文版加了前面一段主持人的自白(洗脑)
@adammeng96
@adammeng96 3 жыл бұрын
@@shenzhenzhong 屁股歪 没办法
@renshen6821
@renshen6821 3 жыл бұрын
中国世界第二大经济体,他们曾经的骄傲都没了当然急了
@xX11068Xx
@xX11068Xx 3 жыл бұрын
全片重點:I have not finished! Let me finish it!
@mhvo3279
@mhvo3279 3 жыл бұрын
同孽瘤一樣😂😂
@jongunkim6297
@jongunkim6297 3 жыл бұрын
To me, I think it's, Is that a question? Is that a question?
@alexfung9097
@alexfung9097 2 жыл бұрын
11哥is finished!
@katychan9613
@katychan9613 3 жыл бұрын
Reminds me our dear Regina Ip except his English sounds a bit more eloquent
@marylee1467
@marylee1467 3 жыл бұрын
Agree with you. I have watched the interview of Regina Ip too. Both just raised their voice to dominate the interview. Keep repeating “Let me finish” or “I haven’t finish”. Ridiculous!
@maggiechen2148
@maggiechen2148 3 жыл бұрын
now I will like see HARDtalk interview Ronny Tong again,thank you
@muzixman2011
@muzixman2011 3 жыл бұрын
what is the difference between Hong Kong National Security Law and Mainland China National Security Law?
@dianslife6010
@dianslife6010 3 жыл бұрын
...ronny is being so rude just like Mr. Ho in RTHK's interview. Is that all pro-ccp people so mean at all?
@jeridmessa2555
@jeridmessa2555 3 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@john101eng
@john101eng 3 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@ryanso3685
@ryanso3685 3 жыл бұрын
Yes,definitely
@chansophia6751
@chansophia6751 3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@amandahalee
@amandahalee 3 жыл бұрын
After living in Hk, I can confirm it’s the local attitude here, more so the lower socioeco you go
@skippykevin
@skippykevin 3 жыл бұрын
Rooney Tong should be ashamed by what he is doing.
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai , salty and wetty. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otiUiM2Tu9qRpZs.html
@maxko7403
@maxko7403 3 жыл бұрын
He aint answering the questions at all. Just keepp looping his scripy
@mhvo3279
@mhvo3279 3 жыл бұрын
Because he is not able to answer the questions
@852forever4
@852forever4 3 жыл бұрын
Not possible to discuss with this kind of 'thing'. R. Tong is so ridiculous lol.
@k5400
@k5400 3 жыл бұрын
I think he did explain why he did not answer the questions directly.This talk is more like a argument but not a interview.The host should have been more neutral.
@sincecilove
@sincecilove 3 жыл бұрын
Disagreement is not accepted and they are not ashamed of lying. . If you find it hard to finish listening to what the pro bj puppy says, you know what we have been suffering for decades.
@GoG__XD
@GoG__XD 3 жыл бұрын
About this guys. Many years ago, he was arrested for sexually assaulting a minor girl, and since then he must praise China.
@GoG__XD
@GoG__XD 3 жыл бұрын
In hongkong, we call his name (11 ge).
@michaeljojosama4972
@michaeljojosama4972 3 жыл бұрын
顺我者昌,逆我者嫖娼
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai , salty and wetty. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otiUiM2Tu9qRpZs.html
@chichungyu8689
@chichungyu8689 3 жыл бұрын
Ronny(11 dude): let me finished
@deltazeta4297
@deltazeta4297 3 жыл бұрын
I have not finished!!! XDDD~~
@laolianlao4502
@laolianlao4502 3 жыл бұрын
湯家驊好樣的!這主持人憑藉手中掌握的麥克風,恃強凌弱慣了,遇上湯先生這樣的好漢,叮叮噹噹的銅豌豆,顯然無計可施。雖依然“色厲”(這是此人的看家本領,其實明眼人一眼就可以看穿,沒其他本事,就剩下一張嘴了,連英文都占不了湯先生的上風),但其實是“色厲內荏”,基本上已經招架不住了。樓下損湯先生的,碰洋大人臭腳的,請捫心自問,在湯先生這樣的中國人面前,你們算什麼?順便再加一句,在主持人眼裡,湯先生是個可敬可畏的對手,而你們這些沒脊梁骨的,只是些雖低三下四,諂媚相十足,但根本可以忽略不計的可憐蟲,可鄙視蟲。
@useemenow1295
@useemenow1295 3 жыл бұрын
個樣心虛到 笑死
@philaychan6128
@philaychan6128 3 жыл бұрын
Romney has made a mistake in his position of this interview. He's being testified not as a barrister to testify somebody.
@user-fs2eq6di9q
@user-fs2eq6di9q 3 жыл бұрын
Mr.Tong = 👎
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai , salty and wetty. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otiUiM2Tu9qRpZs.html
@leecarpenter9757
@leecarpenter9757 2 жыл бұрын
多謝你們的服務, 努力和旁述
@feizhang5215
@feizhang5215 3 жыл бұрын
我是中国大陆人,总结一下这次对话吧。主持人抛出问题,被采访者几乎是在绕圈子,说了一些美化国安法的话,但是对法律中存在的潜在漏洞,缺少逻辑层面的推理,对漏洞避而不谈。并没有清楚地解释旁观者心中的疑虑,作为一名律师,他的确很擅长辩论和扬长避短,但是思维中的逻辑性我是一点儿没看到,甚至我看到他的言论是反智的。
@user-hc1sc1cs4u
@user-hc1sc1cs4u 3 жыл бұрын
那我也总结一下吧,主持人也只是在想问自己想得到的答案,任何国安法的优点马上被否定或转移,任何国安法的缺点马上放大深挖,目的显而易见
@user-dq6zr2tn5m
@user-dq6zr2tn5m 3 жыл бұрын
那作为一个中国人我也总结一下吧,主持人在错误的前提下提出一些错误的话题,被采访者就应该从根本上否定主持人的错误前提,不然这问题让人如何回答?被采访者极力纠正他的错误认识和问题,主持人却不愿意听,一直在打断被采访者,请问主持人一直打断被采访者的发言,那还叫访谈吗?是不是主持人直接对着摄像机自己说更好?主持人的信息完全是没有去过香港的发言,说有十个人被逮捕,很有可能就是西方新闻只会报道有十个人被抓,不说原因,以此来抹黑香港执法机关,其实原因就是拿刀袭警和骑摩托车冲撞警察。请问这种情况在哪个国家犯罪嫌疑人不会被抓。偏见➕傲慢➕心术不正的阻碍中国崛起,给中国设置障碍,怎么就没有对阻碍中国崛起的言论就行批判的,难道这种想法就是正确的,你们的所谓的天赋人权和平等哪去了?我们就不应该生活的更好吗?
@peterng20091115
@peterng20091115 3 жыл бұрын
上面兩位真是臉皮厚,明顯也是邏輯不過關的
@madqing1172
@madqing1172 3 жыл бұрын
为啥要把大陆人三个字摆出来呢?因为你自己也知道自己的言论有黄尸嫌疑,所有拿个大陆人当挡箭牌
@madqing1172
@madqing1172 3 жыл бұрын
@@peterng20091115 黄尸不要脸,也没有脸,脸皮厚度=零,自然觉得别人脸皮厚!哈哈哈哈哈哈
@saybelebala
@saybelebala 3 жыл бұрын
AR AR AR !! LET ME FINISH !!! I HAVEN’T FINISH !!!!🤣🤣
@KKS0128
@KKS0128 3 жыл бұрын
Ronny are doing trash talk?
@zhangyizhe2142
@zhangyizhe2142 3 жыл бұрын
Proud of Ronny
@Marco-hm1vh
@Marco-hm1vh 3 жыл бұрын
好想看看没剪之前的版本
@TC-0400am
@TC-0400am 3 жыл бұрын
睇得好尷尬,十一哥氣急敗壞老羞成怒,俾主持吊起來打...
@user-wq4fb7zt8y
@user-wq4fb7zt8y 3 жыл бұрын
我看了标题,成语用错,再看这个评论,成语也用错,我懂了,一群文盲在谈笑风生,指点江山
@renshen6821
@renshen6821 3 жыл бұрын
标题可以改为,我们在谈言论自由你可以闭嘴了,哈哈哈哈哈,好一个言论自由!
@aaronlin3823
@aaronlin3823 3 жыл бұрын
你的成语才真的是看得我好尴尬。
@tomchan1216
@tomchan1216 3 жыл бұрын
This is absolutely a trash talk I have seen so far
@chanfranc
@chanfranc 3 жыл бұрын
No! It is a good show. It clearly resembles the way CCP officers respond to challenging questions from the west. The CCP officers just refute the questions with non-substantiated bullshit !
@viviany1862
@viviany1862 3 жыл бұрын
This BBC hosts did such a great job to totally demonstrate the British style hypocrisy and nasty demeanor with absolutely no reservations! That is wonderful! Let the world see true inner nature of your culture! It's pathetic that the UK is still not able to accept the fact of their "gone were the good old days"...too bad so sad... There is none of your business in Hong Kong or China. Just spend your time and energy to take care of your own country.
@jianxu7688
@jianxu7688 2 жыл бұрын
The host looks like a clown.
@dyahere9183
@dyahere9183 2 жыл бұрын
true
@iskandarhamzah4850
@iskandarhamzah4850 Жыл бұрын
True
@wongbingo9523
@wongbingo9523 3 жыл бұрын
How ironic it is to watch this after what just happened yesterday in HK?
@dwhe01
@dwhe01 3 жыл бұрын
这嘉宾回答问题大段大段的朗读法律条文,任何主持人都应该打断……毕竟这节目的观众不需要是法律界的专业人生。这和尊重无关,主持人的职责就是避免这种情况。抱怨主持人打断嘉宾的人乐意听大段的法律条文和大量专业术语吗?当然不。自欺欺人罢了
@user-ds8be2lw1z
@user-ds8be2lw1z 3 жыл бұрын
既要谈国安法,又不让提法律条文。法律条文才是最底层的基石,逻辑严密,表达清晰。tong很好地利用法律视角回答了主持人的问题,主持人提了问题还预设问题,真是看着都尴尬,而且不专业。
@dwhe01
@dwhe01 3 жыл бұрын
@@user-ds8be2lw1z 你认真的?法律是基石,那也得政府自己守法才行。tong首先就避而不谈中国政府是否守法的问题。比如中国法律规定可以游行,但从来不批准。中国法律规定不因言获罪,但给你一个寻衅滋事或者嫖娼的罪名。这样的话看法律条文有屁用?其次就是tong完全不会用外行听得懂的话来解释法律问题,这说明他自己很可能没有理解透彻法律条文的含义。
@user-ds8be2lw1z
@user-ds8be2lw1z 3 жыл бұрын
@@dwhe01 关于政府治理,不相信法律请问你相信什么?
@lubanshutters1928
@lubanshutters1928 3 жыл бұрын
万先武 当然要相信法律 但请不要偷换概念 你提的法律非民主法治体系下的法律 法律不是基石 民主法治才是基石 基于制定法律者乃民主选举产生的公民代言者 基于执行法律者乃民主监督下的公民服务者 如果你具有基本的科学逻辑思维能力 可能才会理解你说的 请注意 我这里提到的逻辑非汤委员的逻辑 谢谢
@digosja1234
@digosja1234 3 жыл бұрын
@@user-ds8be2lw1z 那請你先答答 當人民提出問題 為甚麼往往是人民被解決被封口?
@peterxi1720
@peterxi1720 3 жыл бұрын
其實中央的底線很清楚,就是要抹消香港人的自由,繼續在香港洗黑錢,籍國家安全之名繼續維持共產黨員的利益,所以湯不能違背中央底線,只能一直說一些平行時空之類的話,這導致雙方根本無法交談
@user-rh5fh1pt5e
@user-rh5fh1pt5e 3 жыл бұрын
我靠,你怎么知道的怎么多。。人才啊,你这吹牛逼大忽悠的水平,不去讲相声可惜了
@user-bs2lq3fk3d
@user-bs2lq3fk3d 3 жыл бұрын
@@user-rh5fh1pt5e 他这智商能去美国当总统了都
@hhhh-bj9bf
@hhhh-bj9bf 3 жыл бұрын
抬举你一下, 没有证据的指责都是满嘴喷粪, 川普,蓬佩奥, 主持人, 你
@user-wu5rd6zu4j
@user-wu5rd6zu4j 4 ай бұрын
你本事你独立。看你自由不自由。
@zishanzen
@zishanzen Ай бұрын
英国侵略别国的时候也没有什么沟通哦,这个主持人是出了名的我只能说你,说不过就打断的哦,对付这个主持人就要强硬
@dannyhowood563
@dannyhowood563 3 жыл бұрын
There is no place better than Hong Kong ....Cheers
@alainxie5665
@alainxie5665 3 жыл бұрын
他急了他急了他急了他急了
@hko2006
@hko2006 3 жыл бұрын
睇羅冠聰個hard talk 好過 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n559kreVlaurh6M.html
@hko2006
@hko2006 3 жыл бұрын
@@davidm1451 Very convincing. 湯家驊是中共的條狗, yay
@mag454
@mag454 3 жыл бұрын
條友一派胡言,颠倒是非,冇恥到令我甘拜下風
@digosja1234
@digosja1234 3 жыл бұрын
@@mag454 話人廢話前 你自己都講緊廢話 冇論點可言既留言
@digosja1234
@digosja1234 3 жыл бұрын
@@davidm1451 反駁不了就人身攻擊 強國質素
@mag454
@mag454 3 жыл бұрын
@@digosja1234 哈哈,你都認為佢廢呢,我說他胡言,你給他補上廢話,絕! 胡言同廢話是有分别的,他訪問之談是否廢話先不說,但一定是胡說八道,顛倒黑分是非,企圖向大眾混淆視聽的言論,當然他廢人講廢話是必然的。 胡言: 與事實不符或不合理的話 廢話: 無意義的話、邏輯上有矛盾的話 算把啦,你質素係咁上下,物以類聚……
@gladyslau1699
@gladyslau1699 3 жыл бұрын
Let me finished🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️
@tonyl4911
@tonyl4911 3 жыл бұрын
People can see how rude Ronny is to the host during the interview as he didn’t address the questions clearly.
@blacksanred
@blacksanred 3 жыл бұрын
this situation is also applicable to the hk government and hongkongers.
@lswww
@lswww 3 жыл бұрын
That's the quality of pro China supporters
@bigocean9524
@bigocean9524 3 жыл бұрын
With your English standard, I doubt if you understand what the discussion is about..... That British interviewer was basically irrational, didn't listen to Tong's reply, manipulated the dialogue. It is a like talking to the yellow wanker rationally, ask them why vandalize, why arson.... and they just reply it is because the government doesn't follow what we ask.
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai , salty and wetty. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otiUiM2Tu9qRpZs.html
@chrisjiang8600
@chrisjiang8600 3 жыл бұрын
@@bigocean9524 totally agree with you mate, don't think these days the so called 'hong kongers' on the net has any English literacy, it's shocking. I don't think these people even listened to the full 24 mins footage. even more shockingly, these people have no independent thinking and patience.
@mi391ip2
@mi391ip2 3 жыл бұрын
when the host said HK's special status your finance hub status is under threat, then this Mr.Tong said "so be it". WTF!
@mi391ip2
@mi391ip2 3 жыл бұрын
@张嘴就说 you are damn right! Without support from China, HKers will be starving, living in the street, everyday lived in the fantasy like the Emperor's New Clothes.
@hintang3647
@hintang3647 3 жыл бұрын
笑死 接受訪問又唔答問題 咁你一開始就收皮蹬
@andychen6608
@andychen6608 3 жыл бұрын
Hin Tang .你收皮啪。汉奸!
@chiaxie1687
@chiaxie1687 3 жыл бұрын
主持人根本就没有等汤律师回答完 就继续问下一个问题这是很不尊重的行为
@hintang3647
@hintang3647 3 жыл бұрын
@民主到底 革命无罪 人生攻擊不能收到五毛喔親
@javla6863
@javla6863 3 жыл бұрын
Andy Chen 漢奸?
@renshen6821
@renshen6821 3 жыл бұрын
英国世界第几大经济体啊,也不知道谁给主持人的勇气来那么高傲的
@forum1029384756
@forum1029384756 3 жыл бұрын
Actually Ronny Tong has already dominated 80% of air time, yet he claims that the host does not give him the chance to answer. This is exactly how CCP diplomacy works. Lol
@jumpking2333
@jumpking2333 3 жыл бұрын
访谈节目你让主持人占用80%的时间吗?干脆去演讲好咯?果然是麦卡锡的论调
@zivcheung6594
@zivcheung6594 3 жыл бұрын
​@@jumpking2333 That's why he said Ronny Tong got more than enough time to express his point of views already. What are you talking about?
@hn3731
@hn3731 3 жыл бұрын
细嗅蔷薇呐 mainland Chinese has a fucked up logic, not giving Ronny Tong 80% of air time doesn’t mean you have to give the host 80% of airtime
@jumpking2333
@jumpking2333 3 жыл бұрын
@@zivcheung6594 当你在阐述观点的时候别人一直试图打断你,这就是你所谓的“给了足够的时间”?你是认真的吗?
@zivcheung6594
@zivcheung6594 3 жыл бұрын
@@jumpking2333 如果受訪者的回答偏離題目或根本在遊花園,主持人有責任跟義務去提醒受訪者,這有甚麼稀奇? 你看主持人問幾次 湯的回答都是把條文照讀一遍 這不是在回答問題 是在浪費時間
@user-bg9ft2zv7c
@user-bg9ft2zv7c 3 жыл бұрын
这个视频通过bbc三番四次的修改剪辑,现在评论区终于达到了bbc想要的效果了,果然很bbc
@L.k.586
@L.k.586 3 жыл бұрын
Don’t know why they have to continue the conversation. Definitely they are on two ways.
@peterwu9611
@peterwu9611 3 жыл бұрын
好好
@yahaman2022
@yahaman2022 3 жыл бұрын
Many people are comparing his talk with Nathan Law's on how they performed, which is not fair. One is simply laying out the factual truths and the other has to lie so hard on how good the HK gov is doing, they are just on different leagues.
@keithchun1111
@keithchun1111 3 жыл бұрын
Shame on Ronny Tong. Feel sorry for the interviewer to interview such a rude person....it is an interview but not court debate, Ronny just keep talking by himself, not listening and answering the question at all....it is torture to watch the whole interview by seeing someone to be that rude to the host.
@peterzhang8298
@peterzhang8298 3 жыл бұрын
Shame on the interviewer.
@anngoh9129
@anngoh9129 3 жыл бұрын
It's interesting to listen again today.
@fed4460
@fed4460 3 жыл бұрын
12:52 Gold
@user-ky6sw9ff8s
@user-ky6sw9ff8s 3 жыл бұрын
中國共產黨的奮鬥目標,不是超越美國,中國共產黨的奮鬥目標是十四億中國人的幸福生活🇨🇳🇨🇳👍👍👏👏
@billloong359
@billloong359 3 жыл бұрын
Ronny Tong is being slayed from tip to toe.
@milleryusuf9802
@milleryusuf9802 2 жыл бұрын
instablaster
@chanman5600
@chanman5600 3 жыл бұрын
Very entertaining
@forum1029384756
@forum1029384756 3 жыл бұрын
Being unable to read the actual text before enactment even by the CE of HK is exactly what no meaningful consultation means.
@jameszhou3362
@jameszhou3362 2 жыл бұрын
忍无可忍,我看了同样这个主持对羅冠聰(Nathan Law)的访问,我感觉挺问题挺专业,节奏控制的也好,哪怕在我看来罗的回答也是避重就轻的政治术语,但是起码在主持人能把握采访节奏。 这边不知道干嘛,主持疯狂打断别人发言是个什么鬼?汤好几次说“ let me finish"了,这是正常专业的采访行为?
@Alex-ug7cz
@Alex-ug7cz 3 жыл бұрын
湯十一的邏輯: 法例寫它是專重兩制和自由的 它的實行就必然是這樣 ????
@user-me3sk5vq9x
@user-me3sk5vq9x 3 жыл бұрын
???過去20年中共管了你們什麼?你們打劫放火了大半年,自由了半年多才立法搞你們,你們還不自由?
@kennysun2944
@kennysun2944 3 жыл бұрын
If you don’t believe the law is going to be enforced according to what it has stipulated, how would you tell any law is justified or not in the first place?
@qosubi6992
@qosubi6992 3 жыл бұрын
@@user-me3sk5vq9x ?
@micozhou9665
@micozhou9665 3 жыл бұрын
去英国吧,反正英国向你们招手了。祝你们移民成功,别在香港当韭菜了。
@mhvo3279
@mhvo3279 3 жыл бұрын
最後の鳥 同你講自由就如教太監洞房
@liqiangwu7566
@liqiangwu7566 3 жыл бұрын
@kenloyk
@kenloyk 3 жыл бұрын
Mr Tong is good at playing paradox theory
@petdaily
@petdaily 3 жыл бұрын
十一哥同政府一樣 答非所問
@qosubi6992
@qosubi6992 3 жыл бұрын
已經是我黨之人
@user-mm1om8wd9z
@user-mm1om8wd9z 3 жыл бұрын
這個敗類!
@zhongkaizhu490
@zhongkaizhu490 3 жыл бұрын
总结一下这个主持人除了使用的一些low到爆的采访技巧:1. 大段引用煽动性未经事实检验的评论 2. 不停打断嘉宾说话 3. 对嘉宾进行毫无营养的侮辱性的评论,然后马上进入下一个话题防止被反击。4. 将事实性内容偷换概念往“言论自由”“民主”这些空泛的手套箱概念上套。听完整个评论,你找不到这个主持人没有提出任何实质性的、逻辑上的质疑,甚至练抓住嘉宾说话的一些漏洞的能力都没有(虽然这样也只是吹毛求疵而已)。就一个这样毫无准备、毫无能力、毫无公正的主持人还hard talk,笑死,主持八卦节目还差不多
@johnwang3010
@johnwang3010 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, such as Orland people ask for indepdent from England
@kuchoi6204
@kuchoi6204 3 жыл бұрын
This is Pro-Beijing people type “Communication” , they always say they had already communication with you , this kind of communication.
@kuchoi6204
@kuchoi6204 3 жыл бұрын
民主到底 革命无罪 #Chinese #ChineseStyle #ChinaStyle #ProBeijing
@bluetime7732
@bluetime7732 3 жыл бұрын
得了吧,香港国安法真的得人心,也不会在人大会上硬通过了,就是香港本土立法过不了,才在人大会上硬过
@bluetime7732
@bluetime7732 3 жыл бұрын
@Yuhao Zhou 关键是中英联合声明说了,不能干扰香港司法,这是中共当时自己同意的。英国说香港国安法违反中英联合声明,中共说中英联合声明是历史文件,不具有法律效力。英国说那我就给300万香港人英国人身份,让他们移民英国,结果中共说英国的做法违反中英联合声明,你说可笑不可笑?
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai. we all know. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/osh7ppWerL7epJc.html
@user-cv5mb2cg9y
@user-cv5mb2cg9y 3 жыл бұрын
@@bluetime7732 问题是英国正在干预香港司法独立,不需要举例吧?看看香港的大法官有多少是英国籍的。
@bluetime7732
@bluetime7732 3 жыл бұрын
@@user-cv5mb2cg9y 你扯淡吧,还英国干扰香港司法独立,你懂不懂什么叫三权分立啊,英国本身就是一个司法独立国家,整天就知道胡扯
@user-cv5mb2cg9y
@user-cv5mb2cg9y 3 жыл бұрын
@@bluetime7732 为什么英国要往香港派法官?请解释!
@simon1223hk
@simon1223hk 3 жыл бұрын
I love how he decided to accept the interview and then performed in it poorly to demonstrate which side of the opinions is actually the right one. Thanks man
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai. we all know. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/osh7ppWerL7epJc.html
@kelt3965
@kelt3965 3 жыл бұрын
Hello, how's going? 11哥 !
@MrMCFM888
@MrMCFM888 3 жыл бұрын
BBC you are turning this interview into a slanging match. shameful behaviour , this is not the BBC standard.
@Ada_Wong520
@Ada_Wong520 3 жыл бұрын
It is a shame Ronny Leung arguing with the host without actual answering any questions. What a shame to Hong Kongers.
@kennysun2944
@kennysun2944 3 жыл бұрын
The interviewer didn’t seem to give the chance for him to finish his sentence even. That’s the basic respect that Ronny has not been given throughout the whole session. Rewind and watch for yourself for how many times Ronny had interrupted the interviewer. It’s disgraceful and totally rude for interviewer.
@innokoma
@innokoma 3 жыл бұрын
Ronny Tong is a joke in HK, lack of reasons, lack of EQ
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/osh7ppWerL7epJc.html
@atheist7356
@atheist7356 3 жыл бұрын
你放你妈的洋屁呢,一个记采访连话都不让人讲完,没有任何的礼貌和尊重,我看you are lack of IQ
@jenniferzhou7124
@jenniferzhou7124 3 жыл бұрын
BBC Host, you are asking questions, but please give time to your guests answer your questions. please respect of your guests time.
@norman5897
@norman5897 3 жыл бұрын
Why is this reporter always interrupting? What is he worried about?
@roychu480
@roychu480 3 жыл бұрын
又删了一遍继续发?
@forum1029384756
@forum1029384756 3 жыл бұрын
Is Ronnie Tong trying to take his part as another wolf warrior? Lol
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai , salty and wetty. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otiUiM2Tu9qRpZs.html
@wyw781
@wyw781 3 жыл бұрын
Regards Anthony
@claybevenselvink1124
@claybevenselvink1124 3 жыл бұрын
One country two systems will not be defined by the west,simple answer.
@MWan0227
@MWan0227 3 жыл бұрын
it is logic which CCP did not allow people to have.
@claybevenselvink1124
@claybevenselvink1124 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah,everything baddie is CCP's fault even those imagined ones,perfect logic.Totally on ur side & support & so on,hooray dude.
@user-ps7bw5dg2l
@user-ps7bw5dg2l 3 жыл бұрын
亳無原則的強詞奪理
@ruihaowan6995
@ruihaowan6995 3 жыл бұрын
提问者问了三个方面的问题 1.如何看待国安法实际上违反了香港自治原则 2.如何看待香港人民对国安法实施的反应 3.如何看待世界其他国家对国安法实施的反应 对于第一个问题,双方的争执点在于北京有多大权利干涉香港的自治,对于采访者给出的案例 1. 法律55条 - 受访者回答只有在涉及国家安全问题的时候才会介入 2. 逮捕10人 - 受访者回答逮捕者涉及袭警并且未被国安法起诉 这绝对是有力的回答,但是被提问者无视并被强行掩饰为受访者不礼貌与转移话题,这是对受访者的不尊敬与提问者的不专业。 对于第二个问题,提问者的问题根基不足,因为他的援引全部来自于反对北京的声音,而且没有实际数据,这一点受访者也提出来了,但提问者反而指责受访者没有正面回答。对此假设我去采访这个主持人,说在youtube上有很多人骂他傻逼,问他如何看待,希望他也能给我正面回复证明他不是傻逼。 对于第三个问题,提问者的问题纯粹扯淡,美中正处于贸易战环境,而日本本身则是美国盟友,所以美国对香港的制裁或者日本政客的说辞不能说明国际环境对香港态度的任何转变。这一点同样被受访者指出,也同样被无视。 综上,提问者的问题不但愚蠢,而且不尊重答案。汤先生作为一个有身份的法官,对这种不尊重表达不满完全可以理解。任何一个有脑子的人看了这个采访都不会出现高赞的回答。
@sbmwam9552
@sbmwam9552 Жыл бұрын
完全赞同你的总结,水平真的非常高!
@alfong8279
@alfong8279 3 жыл бұрын
The interviewer keeps mentioning the "problems" of Hong Kong, but most stock market indexes in the Hong Kong stock market have gone up by more than 20 percent since the passing of the new security laws!
@aarmirrahim
@aarmirrahim 3 жыл бұрын
Interviewer ask him a question, he answer a book..... That is the Hong Kong old man political atmosphere
@antidinosaur
@antidinosaur 3 жыл бұрын
The interviewee was INVITED to answer. He is not a criminal. He has the HUMAN RIGHT to answer in the way he prefers. Thank you.
@poweredgearac
@poweredgearac 3 жыл бұрын
湯家驊充分表現了甚麼叫盡信書不如無書,只會以書本上的死知識去解決問題
@chinagod1
@chinagod1 Жыл бұрын
1、你犯罪后,也可以跟法官这样说,看看他是听你的,还是听法律这本书的。 2、提到解决问题,很明显《香港国安法》之后,黑暴绝迹,重回安定。谁更懂解决问题?
@kunpeng768
@kunpeng768 Жыл бұрын
@@chinagod1 願你們永遠封城
@chinagod1
@chinagod1 Жыл бұрын
@@kunpeng768 1、并没有什么地方再永远封城 2、台湾每天上百例的死亡倒是一天不少
@kunpeng768
@kunpeng768 Жыл бұрын
@@chinagod1 韭菜不可語真
@chinagod1
@chinagod1 Жыл бұрын
@@kunpeng768 一个靠诈骗为生的地方,有什么真。
@jingyuanxue9701
@jingyuanxue9701 3 жыл бұрын
This is third time bbc posted this video
@luyushan6342
@luyushan6342 3 жыл бұрын
Mr Tong has already made this talk clear at the end
@MWan0227
@MWan0227 3 жыл бұрын
Do you know English? He kept talking the same thing without answering the question. Shame on you.
@lxu5148
@lxu5148 2 жыл бұрын
@@MWan0227 Do you hear things? Apparently questions are answered but the statements are ignored. Can't believe how can people like you don't understant what is 'question'.
@sheunyuenlam5937
@sheunyuenlam5937 3 жыл бұрын
How can a gentleman bully a rogue
@user-jiaoshougao
@user-jiaoshougao 3 жыл бұрын
汤最后几句说的真好
@hanren2225
@hanren2225 3 жыл бұрын
The host was too rude, too disrespectful.
@chikintam7976
@chikintam7976 3 жыл бұрын
let me finish :)))))))))))
@tonychan6593
@tonychan6593 2 жыл бұрын
Most of the HK people know, they try to occupied the time to promote, but not try to answer your questions. And you should do a follow up of what he said 1+ year ago.
@vinechen7056
@vinechen7056 3 жыл бұрын
香港外交部发言人,问这答那,精髓!!!!
@user-td8if7tt5y
@user-td8if7tt5y 3 жыл бұрын
让苏格兰、北爱尔兰都独立吧!
@peterzhang8298
@peterzhang8298 3 жыл бұрын
支持曼彻斯特,约克郡,威尔士,伦敦纷纷独立
@user-mm1om8wd9z
@user-mm1om8wd9z 3 жыл бұрын
支持中华民国独立!
@weinixiong395
@weinixiong395 3 жыл бұрын
支持苏格兰爱尔兰独立!支持台湾独立!
@peterwong8401
@peterwong8401 2 жыл бұрын
Interesting to see it again today
@boyeightyz
@boyeightyz 3 жыл бұрын
well done Roni
@kkarson8
@kkarson8 3 жыл бұрын
What a shame for a person who are educated in common law can say this kind of garbage in a interview. Shame on you 十一哥
@amazonnarita363
@amazonnarita363 3 жыл бұрын
tong is a pokai , salty and wetty. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otiUiM2Tu9qRpZs.html
@hko2006
@hko2006 3 жыл бұрын
10:54 「朝鮮民主主義人民共和國」, 一不「民主」二不「共和」 , 跟中共國憲法「保護言論自由」一樣, 都是笑話一則
@mrsyip18
@mrsyip18 3 жыл бұрын
還有民建聯,民主建港聯盟,都是大笑話一個!
@mrsyip18
@mrsyip18 3 жыл бұрын
@民主到底 革命无罪 我媽因為反共,所以長命百歲,也因為反共,有百靈扶助,站得好穩妥,唔使你擔心。小心你自己啦共狗,做咁多衰嘢,好快落地獄永不超生,永遠受苦呀!
@shenshu3955
@shenshu3955 3 жыл бұрын
你笑话都谈不上,就一弱智
@user-gc2xr6ve4l
@user-gc2xr6ve4l 3 жыл бұрын
@@mrsyip18 他的名字就能代表他的立场。我也是内地主张民主改革的人。不过香港的问题。。只能呵呵。。自己搞臭自己,甩锅内地,这才是大笑话。。现在疫情又起来了?不反思疫情的管控情况,还在甩锅内地,这样的香港,没得救
@pengpeng4965
@pengpeng4965 3 жыл бұрын
@@mrsyip18 蛙蛙蛙,你妈是百鬼缠身吧
@chining9795
@chining9795 3 жыл бұрын
BBC is 👍👍👍👍👍
@user-zt3td9vy1w
@user-zt3td9vy1w 3 жыл бұрын
粗魯的老外根本不讓人回答問題,採訪啥?
@gordonwong_vh-oeg
@gordonwong_vh-oeg 3 жыл бұрын
Sir, this is hardtalk, not a press conference 🤣
@Luikuen
@Luikuen 3 жыл бұрын
@sevinvin www 映衰我地香港人,漢奸走狗賣國賊
@PM-zo9gx
@PM-zo9gx 3 жыл бұрын
@sevinvin www 不知道你为什么叫我们大陆,而不是内地。别忘了,香港跟台湾不一样,土地是连着的。
Зу-зу Күлпәш. Стоп. (1-бөлім)
52:33
ASTANATV Movie
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
когда одна дома // EVA mash
00:51
EVA mash
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Glow Stick Secret (part 2) 😱 #shorts
00:33
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 51 МЛН
BBC紀錄片:香港,離開與留下- BBC News 中文
23:03
BBC News 中文
Рет қаралды 976 М.
5/18【美中对标】吹拉弹唱的美式“文艺兵”
21:45
美国之音中文网
Рет қаралды 48 М.
Зу-зу Күлпәш. Стоп. (1-бөлім)
52:33
ASTANATV Movie
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН