I used your Cal relic mono program when it first came out. Machine’s evolve and what worked a year ago may not be what works as well today. I appreciate anyone that takes time to share their experience. Thanks CD
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
That is awesome!
@beachclub117 ай бұрын
Totaly agree I’m new to this hobby and my Deus 2 on the beach down here in SW Florida using beach mode and dive mode has found coins that have obviously been overlooked by all the other hunters. The Deus 2 is so impressive that I’m becoming addicted to the hobby/sport . Not to mention I’m not bored at the beach anymore. I fly RC planes, ride bikes/ bicycles. Sail my Hobie Tandem and Island hop with my 23’ Hurricane I work on hi tech commercial restaurant equipment and love mechanical/electrical fusion. So when it comes to pure “simple fun” …..Metal Detecting is the new it ! I watch your videos I can really Appreciate your passion and I must say You taught me a lot. Thank You CD. God Bless 🇺🇸⭐️🇺🇸⭐️🇺🇸⭐️
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@NCRelicHunter2237 ай бұрын
That multi has an advantage for sure on the small and cut coins for sure. Especially the hammered ones. Thanks for sharing this info, buddy 👍
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@Diggindurt7 ай бұрын
Nice demo, you said it was set up off of fast, were those stock settings and what version? Ive tried mono just a few times and i didnt really care for it but thats probably just bc of lack of experience with mono. Multi freq seems the way to go for sure with the D2. Thanks for the food for thought.
@charlieschemmel1227 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing!!!!!
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
You bet
@Aswaguespack7 ай бұрын
I brought an apple for the teacher but I was hungry and had it for breakfast. Good “Lesson” Calabash.
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@Susan_HunTer7 ай бұрын
In medieval field I prefect fast and just fast programm, Small coins of one gram/2 grams in both silver and copper feel better, I live in Italy
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Thanks for the information!
@anthonyperkins63647 ай бұрын
Great info !! What Audio are you using in the video?? a stock setting for fast or is it adjusted to give a higher tone??
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Pitch in both..PWM
@twentedigger7 ай бұрын
That’s amazing!! Not what I was expecting Now this stuff is why i watch your channel!! Thank you very much for sharing this info GL&HH
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@twentedigger7 ай бұрын
@@calabashphotography1234you’re welcome, i bin a subscriber for years and I think this is the best channel!! Again I thank you for these kind of vids, keep them coming Greetings from the Netherlands
@flyrock27 ай бұрын
I would love to see a similar test like this buried in the ground at 4". All my stuff is 2"-4" plus deep. This test is a great starting point for sure and prob will represent a lot of situations for some people.
@cwhunter71277 ай бұрын
Great info Cal. How does Sensitive Full tones do on relics? My biggest question is on audio, I have used pitch a lot even on D1. Would the square or high square give you better tonal nuances being that pitch is only signal strength based or am I off on this theory? Would love to know. I have used pitch a while and kinda reluctant to change and try others. Some of my sites are fields and only have a small window to hunt, with that being said I don’t want to waste time or using something just to find out later it was not the best route. Thanks again for all the time and info you share with us.
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@oldpelon76237 ай бұрын
Great demonstration
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@dewey_digginnc49467 ай бұрын
Good stuff.. im ready to see some relic hunting video's of that 3k acres you where talking about a couple of weeks.. shoot im ready for deer hunting season to end so i can go
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Hope to head that way so....
@stevenxindaris14777 ай бұрын
I would like to see you do the same test again but change the frequency on the single frequency machine to 5.5 kh and leave everything else the same. I don’t have a multi frequency to check it myself but I am curious if the reason it is picking up the silver is because the multi frequency machine is using a low frequency along with the high frequency. It will be interesting to see if the lower frequency on the single frequency machine hits on the silver.
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
I might do you a video on that topic..
@funiguy87797 ай бұрын
Would like to see the same test but with the mono frequency changed to various lower frequencies. Thanks for the video.
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
40 KH is the best unmasking freq in Mono..
@Buttondigger7 ай бұрын
Nice. What I seek and find.
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Excellent!
@lancemcilwainoutcastmetald53987 ай бұрын
Good job calabash
@MD-NWWI7 ай бұрын
Multi is best for unmasking.
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Looks like it..on the odd shape coins for sure..
@mwdjr31587 ай бұрын
Thanks Calabash!
@tedyoh73947 ай бұрын
I would think the best way to run that test would be to change the frequency from multi to single in the Fast Program only.....comparing multi vs single in 2 different programs not the best way because of filter differences and other things that I'm sure you're already aware of😊
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
You not change fast to a single freq......
@tedyoh73947 ай бұрын
@calabashdiggerscubadivinga8523 Yes indeed...I'm not awake yet....mixed up the options on the D2 vs Nox....maybe try that test with the Nox
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Will be a bigger gap in performance with the Nox...been there done that..Multi winning..
@tedyoh73947 ай бұрын
@calabashdiggerscubadivinga8523 I noticed on the Nox that single (4khz) had an ever so slight advantage in the audio response of a masked coin...is it because 4khz was "smacking" it harder or was it separating better, IDK but I agree not worth losing multi frequency advantages...(plus I rarely use my NOX anymore anyway)
@johnsmalldridge63567 ай бұрын
Most of your tests involve Deus fast. It would be nice if you explored some of the other programs capabilities.
@calabashphotography12347 ай бұрын
Why do you think I use Deus II fast ? For relics?
@proudlyamerican27647 ай бұрын
Fast typically is superior to the other programs in dirt on relic sites or dirt in general if the ground is polluted/co mingled targets. It's deep too so no worries,if you hunt sites like this other programs are less then! Cal is right for sure
@johnsmalldridge63567 ай бұрын
@@proudlyamerican2764 is it? Any proof of your statements you want to point me too?
@johnsmalldridge63567 ай бұрын
@@calabashphotography1234 yes I understand using fast in iron polluted sites and I know you’re a relic hunter but you seem to be trying to reach a wider audience and exploring some of the Deus 2 programs might help accomplish that. Not being critical just encouraging.
@James.Bizzell7 ай бұрын
Even before you showed this test. I knew which mode was going to br better. Multi frequency has the edge over single frequency. Period.