XPENG AEROHT Innovative Multi-Parachute Safety System

Рет қаралды 72,278

7 ай бұрын

XPENG AEROHT's innovative multi-parachute safety system, tested successfully at an ultra-low 50-meter altitude, marks a significant leap in flying car safety. 🪂🚀
#XPENGAEROHT #FlyingCar #Tech #SafetyFirst

Пікірлер: 74

@jmsaltzman 7 ай бұрын

This is a key technology, excellent! Would prefer to see unedited shots from start to finish: the different angles and jumps do not show the actual landing nor confirm that this landing corresponds to the earlier deployment.

@cokimi1301 7 ай бұрын

very nicely edited so you dont really see how hard that landing is.. It looks like it is still going at a pretty fast speed though.

@Myllypelle 7 ай бұрын

Yeah it's called last resort ballistic parachute system for a reason

@mikelbrenn111 6 ай бұрын

Maybe do an airbag on the bottom as well to further cushion the landing.

@Dr.W.Krueger 6 ай бұрын

No big deal. 5.2 meters/second is within the 5.5m/s / 18ft/s limit for emergency parachutes.

@gccchc2449 6 ай бұрын

Progress needs to be celebrated. Good luck with safety from under 30m. I am thinknig air bags and crumple zones are part of the engineering options for below 30m.

@joiasalbuquerque 7 ай бұрын

The test needs to be considered with the vehicle at its maximum speed. To see if the strings will break.

@mikelbrenn111 6 ай бұрын

This is a controlled test and it is done as safe altitude and no movement and no wind.

@joshpit2003 7 ай бұрын

Show the landing. Even if it is "fast", anyone purchasing one of these things knows it's still infinitely better than no parachutes at all.

@roybal1975 6 ай бұрын

OKAY WHY HAVE'NT YOU MADE A FULL DOCUMENTRY VIDEO YET THEY ARE ALL REALLY SHORT CLIPS?

@pr0n3 7 ай бұрын

That nose dip and rebound looked crazy rough after parachute deployment. Would have liked to see an unedited version. Better than dying I guess ..if u are seatbelted in.

@ScarlettM 7 ай бұрын

This looks suspicious. Why did you cut away so much? Why not show the moment of landing? Is it that bad? There are times when it's better to not show something, than show something not fully done and ruin the first impression.

@coloneljpgaming 6 ай бұрын

Cry

@mikelbrenn111 6 ай бұрын

It's marketing, they only have to show the good parts. All manufacturers are perfect in their own right.

@mikelbrenn111 6 ай бұрын

Also the vehicle is not moving forward to allow balance deployment of the parachute? Either way the hover parachute test is still good.

@bondbond1977 2 ай бұрын

That would be great that you can send out the whole clip , special how it landing on the ground and internal situation !

@shararham81ify 7 ай бұрын

The fact that they failed to show the landing, tells me that is not safe yet.

@no_rubbernecking 7 ай бұрын

Very, very impressive

@reagan812 3 ай бұрын

At least, they had thought of those 4 parachutes. I believe they will innovate with something better later. Normal helicopters have nothing like those parachutes, isnt that much better?

@ibsn87 7 ай бұрын

Imagine landing on the edge of a sky scraper.

@okaydudejm 6 ай бұрын

I believe it needs counter explosions at the bottom when the power shoot is ejected from the top it pushes the vehicle down.

@StyleArsen 6 ай бұрын

Touchdown speed: 5.2 meters per second = 18.72 kilometers per hour = 11.6321 miles per hour

@NightHawkNH-2 6 ай бұрын

That is actually a little slower descent speed than a paratrooper using the old T-10 parachute at 22-24 feet per second. Not bad at all, particularly if the seats/skids/suspension have any shock absorption at all, which I am certain they do.

@zlm001 6 ай бұрын

I’m a little suspicious of the speed they published, but overall it looked like a positive result even if the impact was at a higher speed. I guess the parachutes are designed to instantaneously deploy anytime enough motors fail so they don’t have to test it after free fall. If they could get enough of a crumple zone underneath it could cover off critical injuries below the minimum parachute deployment altitude. I also think the results would change a lot with the weight of one or two people. I don’t think I’d ever take something like this above 10 feet anyways.

@hughjassstudios9688 5 ай бұрын

Equivalent free fall height of 1.38m or 54inches or 4' 6". You'd better be reclined for that or you'll be hurting

@petevenuti7355 6 ай бұрын

Any way to get a prototype for an affordable price?

@elisianosousadasilva1992 7 ай бұрын

Quando eu ganhar na Mega-Sena compra um desse.

@SecretAgentBartFargo Ай бұрын

great, so now I get to experience these things "gently" falling on my home

@geivam 7 ай бұрын

Eu aqui sem entender nada do assunto , me perguntando o porquê os aviões e os helicóptero lls não tem um sistema de paraquedas similar .... 🤔🤔🤔🤔

@user-wp5jc3jd3n 6 ай бұрын

Chân trợ lực phao hơi khi tiếp đất an toàn thực sự

@enworld8852 7 ай бұрын

I don't understand why they put out a video that went wrong! This vehicle is still not safe!

@Lightning---K. Ай бұрын

In 10 meters height there is no help from parachutes in case of an engine failure .. free fall speed ---> 10meters / second ... that crash will cause severe injuries ! The vehicle here in this video reached 50 meters height and spent almost half of the height for parachute opening and recovery. Crashspeed had 5,2 meters / second .... which also was NOT shown ! ( cut out sequence minute 0:13 !!! )

@Telencephelon 7 ай бұрын

Why stop the propellers? I don't get it. (see Autogyro)

@hOZish7 7 ай бұрын

I'm not sure you'd build up enough momentum in the props to be able to create much lift. Especially with this height and speed combo. It might also be that in a situation like this it's likely something is wrong with one of the motors, props, or motor controllers so you wouldn't be able to control one of your corners, limiting how much slowing you'd be able to achieve without tipping over.

@Telencephelon 7 ай бұрын

@@hOZish7 Nope. This is not how physics works. The answer is simple though and obvious.. They had to test the worst case scenario and the forces applied to feed back into simulations. The worst case scenario would be that there are no propellers

@hOZish7 7 ай бұрын

@@Telencephelon If you have the time I would appreciate an explanation of how the physics works. I have a PhD in it so hopefully I'll understand.

@Telencephelon 7 ай бұрын

@@hOZish7 Yeah. I haven't met a human, Phd or not who can outperform GPT4 in real time. Emotions like pride are part of why human performance sucks

@hOZish7 7 ай бұрын

@@Telencephelon What are you on about? This isn't about pride, I'm very willing to listen and learn. GPT4 is great sometimes, but it definitely isn't at a human expert replacing level yet. There are many examples of it making mistakes, I'd be happy to reference some if you don't believe me. And my references will be real, not some hallucinated nonsense ;)

@ygahn6804 5 ай бұрын

Among Chinese drone videos, I have never seen a scene with a person sitting in a seat from beginning to end.

@sergiychupryna2952 7 ай бұрын

Good safety system!

@tulangsamanantulang 7 ай бұрын

Salam kenal 🙏🙏🙏🇮🇩

@in4merATP 7 ай бұрын

Let's see it deploy after control is lost.

@akk9196 7 ай бұрын

Why would the parachute deployment be manual?

@in4merATP 7 ай бұрын

@@akk9196 Who said it would be manual? Catastrophic failure of some portion of the airframe is not impossible, nor outside interference of some kind. Assuming that the planform will be oriented vertically with no roll, pitch or yaw is fine for evaluation of a prototype in a test flight, but next you iterate on establishing and/or improving the performance envelope based on plausible scenarios likely to be encountered in normal operations.

@Rathoresid7 6 ай бұрын

We already have such flying cars 😂 they are called helicopters!

@TaskSwitcherify 7 ай бұрын

You've got a problem. If only 1 rotor / motor fails, the vehicle will no longer be balanced -- there will be uncontrollable sideways (or random) motion, possibly shredding the parachute. And it may not be safe to crash-land while rotors are still spinning and there are people or cars underneath. You'd have to kill the power to all motors to prevent that, it would seem.

@zasanafesenov8119 7 ай бұрын

Rotors just stop when power is cut. Maybe all motors shut down when parachute deploys.

@TaskSwitcherify 7 ай бұрын

@@zasanafesenov8119 Yes, but there may be any number of malfunctions resulting in a fall, such as control system failure, individual motor malfunction, etc. - so one or more rotors could stop spinning or spin erratically. Is it safe to deploy the parachute then?

@akk9196 7 ай бұрын

@@TaskSwitcherifythe deployment of the parachute should kill all engines, not a problem

@deejaydiabolic 7 ай бұрын

Sorry but there's NO WAY that this will be available at a consumer level anytime soon. You can't even have people drive normal cars properly but want to put a few thousand of these flying above homes and businesses?! Literally zero infrastructure.

@enworld8852 7 ай бұрын

very sad