Me too. Got quest 2 specifically for Flight Simming. Have both XP12 and MsFS 2020. So really excited for 12.1 and 2024

I am excited for the new graphical textures and scenery streaming capabilities!

Never ever 2D Mode! 😅

It still looks too dark to me. The way everyone has their view setup is top half looking out of the window and bottom half viewing the instrument panel. Honestly I don't care that its realistic or not, at the end of the day nobody wants to look a big black void where their instrument panel should be, it just looks terrible and is not nice to look at. And this bug has been present for almost 2 years now. I'm sure they are happy that their light model is realistic but at the end of the day it's not nice for the end user.

@@klzeccwozi1290 some time ago I purchased visualXP ultimate and was able to decrease some of the darkness. I figure that the lighting was similar to a photograph camera and a camera catches about 3 or exposures while the eye can make about 9 different ones. Sometimes I will turn on a cabin light but often cabin lights are too dim. I like using the hat switch to look around and use the mouse to flip switches instead of the keyboard.

😂

Beat Microsoft 😂😂

LOL. Good one!

I do use both sims. Mostly Msfs. I use Xplane for Zibo and airfoil 172. Msfs for pmdg 737-800, Fenix and FBW, A2A. I’m just saying they beat them to get a radar implemented finally.

They are both great each in their own way. The best thing here, is that this is a great time to be a simmer!!! 😊

They basically copied everything from msfs when Austin was talking trash

@@Msfs2024HD romantic340 has been living under a rock lol

I'm sure you mean the depth of field effect. And yes, I kind of agree with you. BUT: if you fixate on a point, e.g. the cockpit of an aircraft in the outside view, the surroundings automatically blur. This effect now here in X-Plane 12 only reinforces this, it supports the eye, so to speak.

@@christophfeldhaus9538 They're talking about dynamic range. Right now, X-Plane simulates a camera with a low dynamic range, i.e. it can only see a limited range of brightnesses - scenes can have parts that are too dark and too bright. This is actually how our eyes see, except each cell (pixel) of our retinas (our image sensors) can individually change their sensitivity with feedback from the processing our brain does. This allows for a much higher perceived dynamic range, and is what X-Plane's anti-dark-cockpit update tries to emulate.

They copied it from msfs

And what would that be? That they fixed bugs like dark cockpits? That's not stepping up, that's being behind.

It sure is! What a time to be alive :-)

I mention it as I notice some v12 models sporting png liveries, and my automatic response is to run those through the little XGrinder app, so I hope I'm not wasting effort there. LOL

Oohh, one other thing. The Nvidia App, even though it is still technically in beta, I think it does actually manage the potential of the RTX card better than the old Nvidia Control Panel did, as in the sim runs more smoothly overall.

Are you familiar with the Scenery Gateway? You can check there for airport updates in the works and/or file bug reports to the community if you discover issues or have requests.

I had long since got the update for that airport, even SLC from the gateway

XP12 is slightly over a year old. Not sure what the emphasis is here.

@@littlemaster22 all information is given. do your research before questioning? thanks.

@@littlemaster22 No, it is almost 2 years old. The requests are pre Xplane 12.

Good thing no one cares what does lmao

@@joesky9307 MSFS 2024 announcement made XP12 look like something from 80s. At least you got shirley 😂😂

@@activex7327 you sound like someone who should stick ti ace combat lmao move along little guy

@@joesky9307 Why you have to be mad to get Shirley as the highlight for Xplane at FSExpo? Shirley Xplane will succeed. 🤣🤣

Nobody asked you to move mate, stay to your gamified "future".

@@EverydayNormalGeek .. and you can stay on your iphone game with FSX graphics 😂😂

That is what real world pilots do or should do with checklists as well

@@nilsschutte9380 Yes and no. Yes, we read the checklist, but the generally accepted best practice these days is to memorise the flow and then validate it with the checklist. Reason being: the checklist mitigates errors in memory, and your memory mitigates errors in reading whilst under pressure. Thus, doing both yields the safest result. Now, on the most modern aircraft, they can actually sense the state of some of the checklist items and tick them off for you, but I don't fly one of those.

Luckily Shirley had their part rehearsed ;-) I'll also say that our company has only been around since March, and as a CEO/CTO I worked my butt off to provide as much value to customers, splitting the responsibility between showmanship and development. When you try the product, I think you'll agree I made the right call. Next year I plan to have time to memorize the talk. Thanks for learning about our story either way!

@@nilsschutte9380 This is true!!

@@airplane-alex-list It does look like you've built something cool. My comment wasn't meant as an insult at all. Quite the contrary, I want your product to succeeed. Presenting is a skill, just like any other, and it simply merits attention. A CEO of a small org is also basically the chief marketing officer too. I would NOT recommend rote memorisation as an approach. Of course, it's important to know your key points, but to convey genuine emotion, you need to talk about it as if you were describing it to a best friend; and you would never deliver a memorised script to a best friend.

We? You mean You. Can you just post in one comment about the A320? Not 4.

Also, check out the Toliss Airbuses.

@@aavvv_ Toliss Terrible in terms of 3D model and texture quality and very expensive. Compare the quality of Toliss and Fenix, the quality of the 3D model and systems and the price.

​@@serhiimitrokhin6987i agree with uour comment. The 3d model of toliss is really bad. But that guy robsonalvesvilar is a broke boy

@@aavvv_ Toliss a a paywere aircraft. I only can buy the xplane 12.

I only fly the Zibo as well. But for GA I use either Airfoil Labs C172 analog or the REP C172 SP