Yalta, When Stalin Split the World - a WW2 Special

  Рет қаралды 138,628

World War Two

World War Two

4 ай бұрын

Indy and Sparty take you through the negotiations at Yalta as The Big Three thrash out the shape of the postwar world. As the splits between East and West continue to deepen, who will come out on top?
Join us on Patreon: / timeghosthistory
Or join the TimeGhost Army directly at: timeghost.tv/signup/
Check out our TimeGhost History KZfaq channel: / timeghost
Between 2 Wars: • Between 2 Wars
Follow WW2 Day by Day on Instagram: @ww2_day_by_day
Follow TimeGhost History on Instagram: @timeghosthistory
Like us on Facebook: / timeghosthistory
Hosted by: Indy Neidell & Spartacus Olsson
Director: Astrid Deinhard
Producers: Astrid Deinhard and Spartacus Olsson
Executive Producers: Astrid Deinhard, Indy Neidell, Spartacus Olsson
Creative Producer: Marek Kamiński
Community Management: Ian Sowden
Written by: Indy Neidell & Spartacus Olsson
Research by: Indy Neidell & Spartacus Olsson
Map animations by: Simon J. James
Edited and color grading by: Simon J. James
Artwork by: Mikołaj Uchman
Sound design by: Marek Kamiński
Colorizations by: Mikołaj Uchman
Source literature list: bit.ly/SourcesWW2
Archive footage: Screenocean/Reuters - www.screenocean.com
Image sources:
Source - Image Name/Number
Soundtracks from Epidemic Sound:
Cold Conclusion 2
Conquered Territory
Convinced
Enigma
Night Shift
The Red Line
A TimeGhost chronological documentary produced by OnLion Entertainment GmbH.

Пікірлер: 702
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Stalin was a one of a kind political poker player, constantly increasing the stakes, calling the opponents hand whenever they were bluffing, bluffing the bluff, and relentlessly raking in the chips. Imagine what he could have achieved as a force for good instead of the murderous despot he was, or is that hoping for the impossible? Can you do good while being this dishonest at the negotiating table?
@leandro9311
@leandro9311 4 ай бұрын
Stalin was too sick mentaly by the time of Yalta, he had been for some time already, it was impossible to hope for anything good from Stalin
@noahwiener2491
@noahwiener2491 4 ай бұрын
arguably, you're describing Lyndon Johnson, though whether the good of civil rights and the great society outweighs the bad of the Vietnam war is of course debatable
@dryciderz
@dryciderz 4 ай бұрын
Western powers should have never allied with such an evil dictator
@deshaun9473
@deshaun9473 4 ай бұрын
Hi!! Question for you guys. Didn't the creation of the UN Security Council's Permanent Five, including three of the primary Western powers (USA, Britain and later France) but without a broader inclusion of members from Latin America, Asia and Africa mean that it established a de facto hierarchy among the UN member states, and resulted in maintaining the existing colonial power structure that existed prior to the war? How then, could this be reconciled with the goal of a democratic UN with equality between the members?
@francisdec1615
@francisdec1615 4 ай бұрын
The bastard Churchill accepted what Stalin was doing. Churchill was no hero or freedom fighter. He wasn't even against most of Hitler's ideas either, since he was a misogynist, a racist, a chauvinist and hated the working class. He just hated Germany because it challenged the hegemony of the British Empire. Disgusting.
@DSS-jj2cw
@DSS-jj2cw 4 ай бұрын
I love Indys nonverbal gestures when Sparty is talking.
@agactual2
@agactual2 4 ай бұрын
Indy is big on non-verbal communication.
@tsardean7438
@tsardean7438 4 ай бұрын
It’s his idle animation
@felipeseguraiv2578
@felipeseguraiv2578 4 ай бұрын
Shits epic😂
@tmhood
@tmhood 4 ай бұрын
and vice versa
@blackhathacker82
@blackhathacker82 4 ай бұрын
It's Natural born acting I can tell I know a few tricks about it though its a secret
@tallest4eva
@tallest4eva 4 ай бұрын
Stalin had such a strong position to negotiate from because he had the Red Army occupying Poland already. It wasnt that he outsmarted the West, its that they really were powerless to oppose the USSR in Eastern Europe without triggering another massive war. A war that it would have been seen that they started.
@Warszawski_Modernizm
@Warszawski_Modernizm 4 ай бұрын
the "argument of force"....we the Poles got the stick in Yalta.
@ocudagledam
@ocudagledam 4 ай бұрын
That is fair point, though it's worth noting that Stalin got most of what he wanted on matters outside of Poland and Eastern Europe as well.
@-htl-
@-htl- 4 ай бұрын
Accept when Stalin was on his knees at Leningrad (St Petersburg) and Moscow he had all the help in convoys full of equipment, supplies, food which can not be ignored.
@nate13012
@nate13012 2 ай бұрын
​@@vlad_47Why specify just 1941? The siege of Leningrad lasted till early 1944 and the threat to Moscow lasted till end of 1942. Even afterwards, its populations desperately needed food, clothings etc. and likely averted widespread famine like the soviet famine of 1946 to 1947. You are picking certain stats to twist historical facts.
@nate13012
@nate13012 2 ай бұрын
@@vlad_47 Does the war production include millions of clothings, boots, trucks, food, and other goods? I don't understand why you are only selecting certain stats
@posadistpixy6741
@posadistpixy6741 4 ай бұрын
Anthony Eden and the Suez canal, I'm sure that won't become an issue later...
@n7gamer270
@n7gamer270 4 ай бұрын
hahahahahaha
@BarringtonDrive
@BarringtonDrive 4 ай бұрын
Coughs in French Indochina
@pnutz_2
@pnutz_2 4 ай бұрын
*insert meme about eisenhower living to the 20th millennium here*
@horusfalcon
@horusfalcon 4 ай бұрын
Um... you mean the Suez Crisis? Yeah...
@kearki
@kearki 4 ай бұрын
During their first meeting on January 22 1943, Roosevelt told de Gaulle that he could not recognize him as the sole political leader of France, because he had not been elected by the French people. To which de Gaulle replied that Joan of Arc had derived her legitimacy only from her action, when she had taken up arms against the invader. On the morning of January 24, when Macmillan reported to Roosevelt that de Gaulle had proposed to Giraud to be Foch, while he, de Gaulle, would be Clémenceau, the President exclaimed: “Yesterday he wanted to be Joan of Arc, and now he wants to be Clémenceau…!” Roosevelt then told Hull that de Gaulle had told him: “I am Joan of Arc, I am Clémenceau!”; then he will entrust to the ambassador Bullitt that he said to de Gaulle: “General, you told me the other day that you were Joan of Arc and now you say that you are Clémenceau. Which of the two are you?” To which de Gaulle would have replied: “I am both.” Then, the President will tell that he retorted to de Gaulle: “We must choose; you still can’t be both.” When this story reaches the ears of Vice-Consul Kenneth Glow, it was further amplified: “President Roosevelt confided to de Gaulle that France was in such a critical military situation that it needed a general of Napoleon’s caliber.” But I’m that man," de Gaulle replied. “Financially,” the President continues, “France is in such a state that it would also need a Colbert” - “But I am that man,” de Gaulle said modestly. Finally, the President, concealing his astonishment, declares that France is so politically devastated that it would need a Clémenceau. De Gaulle stands up with dignity and says: ‘But I am that man!’". When the press seized on the story, de Gaulle also became Louis XIV, Foch, Bayard, etc. Before leaving Anfa, General de Gaulle will hear some of the first versions. They won’t make him laugh at all… De Gaulle and Churchill - The Cordial Disagreement” - François KERSAUDY
@jakubb9498
@jakubb9498 4 ай бұрын
That De Gaulle guy looks like a humble and down to earth leader 😅
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 4 ай бұрын
@@jakubb9498 He was neither humble or down to earth, but love him or hate him, he managed to get France to no longer be a defeated nation but one of the 5 Allied powers that got a seat at the UN table. Not a bad accomplishment for a man who basically started with next to nothing in 1940.
@waltertaljaard1488
@waltertaljaard1488 4 ай бұрын
He wasn't any of them. He turned out to be Charlemagne. Laying the foundations for the European Union. Together with Adenauer.
@umjackd
@umjackd 4 ай бұрын
@@waltertaljaard1488 A history series on the establishment of the EU would actually be fascinating.
@Bruno-ec8ft
@Bruno-ec8ft 4 ай бұрын
@@jakubb9498 He is dramatically full of himself. It's hard to read his biography because of that, but it def worked for him.
@khornateberzerker5439
@khornateberzerker5439 4 ай бұрын
I think Stalin's 'manouvering' on the subject of Poland might be a tad... overstated. The fact of the matter was not that Stalin put himself in such a negotiating position as to be immovable by his oratory skill or arguments, but by the simple fact that Poland had, at the time, the full brunt of 2 or 3 Soviet Fronts operating within or near its borders, with over 2 million active Soviet personell. That is without counting any and all garisons, reserves, replacements and so on. I doubt it was the Churchill ran out of arguments. He simply understood that Poland's fate was sealed when the Red Army pushed beyond its borders, leaving it far out of reach of the Western allies and any hope of help.
@SpecialGoat
@SpecialGoat 4 ай бұрын
Just like Greece, you mean?
@khornateberzerker5439
@khornateberzerker5439 4 ай бұрын
@@SpecialGoat The situation is rather similar to the one in Greece, yes. The fact was that, at the time, there were Western boots on Greek soil and the fate of Greece was, de facto, in the hands of the Allies and it was up to them to decide what they would do with it. Despite that, however, the Soviets still did take advantage of the presense of armed bands of partisans and assisted them in the Greek Civil War in order to disrupt Allied influence in the region. The point remains, the fate of Nations in the Yalta Conference was not dictated by ideology or legal arguments, but by the situation on the ground.
@patrickstephenson1264
@patrickstephenson1264 4 ай бұрын
What's so funny is Poland's post-war territory is basically the exact same as it was since 950ad. Poland started as a nobody, became a huge commonwealth, took on Russia, and went back to a small country all within 1000 years.
@JohnSmith-nl4zh
@JohnSmith-nl4zh 4 ай бұрын
Possession is nine-tenths of the law. Add some infantry and armored divisions and it becomes one hundred percent.
@penultimateh766
@penultimateh766 4 ай бұрын
Hey when does a dialect become a language? When it has an army to back it up....
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 4 ай бұрын
@@fortpark-wd9sx Technically Westminster regime.
@Butterratbee
@Butterratbee 3 ай бұрын
Except it isn’t, that saying is hundreds of years old and hasn’t been a thing for hundreds of years Also if anything possession is just proof that you stool something
@Sierra026
@Sierra026 4 ай бұрын
Stalin and Molotov's tactics during the conference reminded me of a quote from Thomas Jackson: "Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible; and when you strike and overcome him, never let up in the pursuit" Both of them were masters of misleading, of veiling, and stalling (pun intended) in order to achieve their goals.
@josephstewart516
@josephstewart516 4 ай бұрын
Well the British empire did it for hundreds of years 😂
@trizvanov
@trizvanov 4 ай бұрын
That's Geopolitics 101, mastered even before the Romans.
@-htl-
@-htl- 4 ай бұрын
Bottom line, Stalin could never be trusted. I am surprised about the agreeing transportations by Churchill and Roosevelt was very naive because they could have known that Stalin was going to that extensively. With one of them echoing today the removal of most Crimean Tartars and the claim of Vlad on Crimea being as false as in each translation of the words.
@tommycochran2838
@tommycochran2838 4 ай бұрын
Sparty's closeing statment is chilling. The words and banter of these three men left effects on our world that we are still coming to terms with to this day.
@justinrobertson5493
@justinrobertson5493 4 ай бұрын
This is the story of history after any major conflict. Conflicts from even a millennia ago still inform today's conflicts.
@jacquolen1952
@jacquolen1952 4 ай бұрын
@@justinrobertson5493-Well put!
@frankiefierro7129
@frankiefierro7129 4 ай бұрын
Kind of reminds me of the final peace after Napoleons defeat didn't bring peace to Europe.
@BleedingUranium
@BleedingUranium 4 ай бұрын
@@justinrobertson5493 The Battle of Actium comes to mind.
@arti8719
@arti8719 4 ай бұрын
This reminds me of one Polish comedy sketch on Jalta conference and why Poland became part of Soviet influence sphere. In short - no one wanted to have Poles on their side, so Churchill and Roosevelt outvoted Stalin 2:1 and made him to take Poland. This group (Kabaret Moralnego Niepokoju) in fact made a whole series of sketches on history of the world and history of Poland.
@Zolnierzu
@Zolnierzu 4 ай бұрын
"It's better for us if Poles destroy Soviet communism than if they were to do that to our capitalism" ~Roosevelt(according to the aforementioned sketch)
@deeznoots6241
@deeznoots6241 4 ай бұрын
@@Zolnierzu30 years after Poland adopts capitalism and now the USA is led by senile men and suffering from endemic corruption, just like the USSR. Guess the sketch was right lol
@konstantinriumin2657
@konstantinriumin2657 4 ай бұрын
@@ZolnierzuGame of hot poletato
@livethefuture2492
@livethefuture2492 4 ай бұрын
Churchill fought hard for Poland, guranteeing Polands Independence was the reason Britain declared war in the first place. But there was little that could be done so long as the Red Army occupied Poland. Churchill knew what was going on, he foresaw the iron curtain and the fate of the eastern european nations, even till the end of the war had some whacky ideas like Operation unthinkable to somehow prevent the soviets from claiming hegemony over all of eastern Europe and as he put it 'to get a square deal for Poland'. But ultimately of course this was unrealistic. short of full scale war there was nothing they could realistically do.
@BleedingUranium
@BleedingUranium 4 ай бұрын
@@livethefuture2492 It's the natural end result of "enemy of my enemy is my friend", unfortunately.
@AndrewStobb
@AndrewStobb 4 ай бұрын
During the negotiations in Vienna following the Napoleonic wars in 1814 and 1815, discussions about the fate of Poland also dominated the whole conference. It's so fascinating that Poland occupies so much import in history.
@pedrocallegari2719
@pedrocallegari2719 4 ай бұрын
the gaulle as john of arc gives me life 😂😂😂
@siljeff2708
@siljeff2708 4 ай бұрын
Really cool seeing Indy and Sparty on screen together
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
If you like them hosting side by side, check out the recent War Goals special if you haven't already! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kLpklrWKsZq1e3k.html
@itinerantpatriot1196
@itinerantpatriot1196 4 ай бұрын
Maybe it's myth but I seem to recall Churchill making a crack about the comparison de Gaulle made between himself and Joan of Arc that went something like: "Yes, but unfortunately I can't have him burned at the stake." I don't recall exactly what he was supposed to have said but it was something along those lines. Like I say, it may be urban legend, but it would b a very Churchillian comment.
@troystaunton254
@troystaunton254 4 ай бұрын
I’ve never heard it. But I’d have more trouble disbelieving it than believing it.
@Warszawski_Modernizm
@Warszawski_Modernizm 4 ай бұрын
His style definetely
@Warszawski_Modernizm
@Warszawski_Modernizm 4 ай бұрын
His style definetely
@kearki
@kearki 4 ай бұрын
@itinerantpatriot1196 After the Anfa conference, Churchill and Roosevelt went to Marrakech. That evening, during the dinner, the American vice-consul Kenneth Pendar inquired about General de Gaulle. "Churchill seemed upset, wrote Pendar, and gave me a typical Churchillian answer: "Oh, let’s not talk about this one. We call her Joan of Arc, and we seek bishops to burn her."
@itinerantpatriot1196
@itinerantpatriot1196 3 ай бұрын
@@kearki Thanks. I knew he made some sort of reference to burning him at the stake but I couldn't recall the exact situation or quote.
@josefabio5809
@josefabio5809 4 ай бұрын
Damn poor de Gaulle, everytime his name was mentioned everyone decided to collectively talk shit about him
@Talyrion
@Talyrion 4 ай бұрын
If it's any consolation, pretty sure he got the last laugh by getting pretty much everything he wanted in the end, having a 12-year long presidential mandate ahead of him (albeit he had to wait for that one) and outliving every had of state present at Yalta.
@knudvoecking
@knudvoecking 4 ай бұрын
I can only repeat time after time how thankful I am for all your efforts to make us 'never forget' about WW2 and all that went on before and after. Will you also do a special episode about the UN itself and the conceptualisation of the post-war economic system (Bretton Woods conference)?
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 4 ай бұрын
I don't think we are in danger of forgetting WW2 soon. People are either fascinated by that war, or they constantly call people they disagree politically with the BAD PEOPLE FROM GERMANY.
@rosgill6
@rosgill6 4 ай бұрын
Indy's supportive gesturing and pointing is on point 🤌
@jliller
@jliller 4 ай бұрын
Veto power for permanent members in the UN is saying "All countries are equal in the UN, but some are more equal than others." A very Soviet solution.
@briceoka5623
@briceoka5623 4 ай бұрын
Many biographies of Stalin describe him as lacking charisma and intelligence but he appears to be very witty and a great tough negotiator. The Soviet eastern territorial gains for just a few months of war against Japan is an insane return.
@27josh01
@27josh01 4 ай бұрын
It did wind up being a good return but keep in mind that the original projections for war with Japan was that it was going to be a fight that would take multiple more years. It just so happened that the combination of the Soviet invasion and atomic bombs sealed the deal for them, but that was not a guarantee.
@1987retroman
@1987retroman 4 ай бұрын
The Sovient's didn't really "gain" any territoty per se. They reclaimed Russian territories pre-war and regained conquered land during the war.
@briceoka5623
@briceoka5623 4 ай бұрын
The USSR did not own southern sakhalin and the kuril islands at the start of WW2. Therefore, it's a gain.@@1987retroman
@1987retroman
@1987retroman 4 ай бұрын
@@briceoka5623 They regain Sakhalin, which the Japanese had taken half of i 1905.
@user-hg1qy9yy3d
@user-hg1qy9yy3d 4 ай бұрын
Oh, Stalin had charisma alright; striking terror in the hearts of freedom loving people was quite effective. I am unaware of any biography that states Stalin lacked intelligence. Bloodthirsty, evil, genocidal killer and psychopath, yes; but quite brilliant.
@galaxyomega2839
@galaxyomega2839 4 ай бұрын
Could you guys do a special on Vyacheslav Molotov, he is a very important person in the USSR and we barely know anything about him, unlike Zhukov and Stalin.
@gilwhitmore9682
@gilwhitmore9682 4 ай бұрын
Spartacus comes off the top rope with the full Sparty slam to finish this episode.
@denistyy
@denistyy 4 ай бұрын
The Yalta Conference was one of the first events in WW2 that I learned about and y’all KILLED IT. As always such an amazing job by the WW2 team 🙌🏽
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! -TimeGhost Ambassador
@stoffls
@stoffls 4 ай бұрын
Stalin surely knew how to play his counterparts. He outsmarted the Western Allies. Yes, Roosevelt was sick but Churchill was a brilliant tactician himself. And whenever you think this channel cannot get better - it does.
@deeznoots6241
@deeznoots6241 4 ай бұрын
Was Churchill a brilliant tactician though? I mean if you look at what he actually did he was kinda just crap
@TheSciuzzo
@TheSciuzzo 4 ай бұрын
Churchill just had good PR, he criticized the brilliant retreat from Somaliland, he made the Bengali famine worse, left the troops in Africa in disarray soon before Rommel arrived and treated Athens as an enemy city.
@andrewlm5677
@andrewlm5677 4 ай бұрын
The Soviets gave the explanation that “having a government in Poland conducive to supporting Soviet occupation of Poland was essential for dealing with Germany”. This goes down smoother than (but largely boils down to): “the Soviets own Poland now but we’ll pretend we value your opinion and care to give you a reasonable explanation you can accept” - deep down, I expect US/UK knew they had no real influence over the fate of the countries ‘liberated’ by the soviets
@ReichLife
@ReichLife 4 ай бұрын
@@deeznoots6241 When compared with those two? He might as well have been. Stalin was brilliant enough to cooperate with Nazis in 1939-1941 period and gave his state and people Operation Barbarossa. Roosevelt? His naive approach towards Stalin and USSR was book example of being delusional. Churchill biggest weakness here was fact he was representing by far weakest party in form of fading away British Empire.
@deeznoots6241
@deeznoots6241 4 ай бұрын
@@ReichLife Churchill played a big part in Britain getting weaker, his disastrous Gallipoli idea led to the formation of a truly independent Anzac identity, his stupidity in creating force Z led directly to the loss of 2 capital ships for zero gain to the Japanese, his brutal treatment of the Greeks led to the Greek civil war and the complete loss of British influence in the Mediterranean post-war, his hostility to Indians and other native peoples of the empire helped fuel anti-British sentiment globally, etc, etc. To be quite frank he only looks good because of the existence of the English channel preventing the Germans from conquering Britain.
@ivanpticar8007
@ivanpticar8007 4 ай бұрын
Say what you will about Stalin, and righfully so given we know today what his reign was like. But having now watched this episode and all others before it....the man was a master diplomat and negotiator. Love the content Indy and crew 😁
@bwarre2884
@bwarre2884 4 ай бұрын
Having a large army and occupying a large parts of Europe gave him plenty leverage.
@leaveme3559
@leaveme3559 4 ай бұрын
​@@bwarre2884compare this to us pulling out of Afghanistan and getting absolutely nothing in return
@jkdking12
@jkdking12 4 ай бұрын
People forget that this was STALIN! The person that did the Great Purge! So, I don't blame Churchill & Roosevelt for walking on eggshells around him. WW2 had already gone on long enough.
@Warszawski_Modernizm
@Warszawski_Modernizm 4 ай бұрын
Its easy to negotiate fate of Poland with 2+ mln troops across her territory along with NKVD....
@Warszawski_Modernizm
@Warszawski_Modernizm 4 ай бұрын
xD "If only Poles"...Poles had shitload of guns in 1945@@davidw.2791
@s182924
@s182924 4 ай бұрын
Greets from Poland !
@Warszawski_Modernizm
@Warszawski_Modernizm 4 ай бұрын
Pozdrowienia z Warszawy
@hannahskipper2764
@hannahskipper2764 4 ай бұрын
Man, what a great sequel to the first Yalta episode. Thank you again for such fantastic work!
@mikemoore4033
@mikemoore4033 4 ай бұрын
This is a strictly tongue in cheek comparison, but Indy’s gestures while Sparty is talking kind of remind me of Steve McQueen’s antics at the beginning of “The Magnificent Seven” when Yul Brynner was saying his lines.
@gunman47
@gunman47 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for another great Special video as always. This will be very interesting where all these will lead to postwar...
@criso6164
@criso6164 4 ай бұрын
Another excellent episode, and with the complementary episode on War Goals these are two of the best videos I've watched for somewhile. As ever thanks to the whole team.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed, cheers for watching.
@robertortiz-wilson1588
@robertortiz-wilson1588 2 ай бұрын
Extremely valuable episode, and presented so well! Thank you for taking the time to make these specials and going over the intimate details of negotiations and decisions. Incredible work!
@shawngilliland243
@shawngilliland243 2 ай бұрын
Sparty's and Indy's sartorial splendor is simply smashing! Thank you for your superbly vivid team presentation of the conference at Yalta.
3 ай бұрын
What a fascinating and far reaching conference. Thank you for the Video
@jamesford3648
@jamesford3648 Ай бұрын
What a FABULOUS Channel I found Here. When I was Stationed at Nuremberg in W.Germany From 1980-1984, I had to do a Thesis on WW2 for my PLC Class & The E-5 Board. You are so SPOT on. I still have my Thesis from that time. I was Offered by the VII Corp at the time to be part of the Military’s Historic Project but I wanted to stay in my Field unit at the Time, (210th FA BDE, Herzo base). Thank you for a GREAT JOB.
@royalmason1539
@royalmason1539 4 ай бұрын
It's odd to say that "Stalin split the world,"when the world was already split between capitalists and communists long before WW2. So split, Hitler thought the west would approve of his invasion of Russia and would negotiate a peace at Russia's expense. Stalin simply understood that this animosity would continue after WW2 and he wasn't going to leave Eastern Europe in capitalist's hands. A perfectly reasonable position for him to take at the time.
@RandomNamejagddjxuossn
@RandomNamejagddjxuossn 2 ай бұрын
Fuck communism
@Celtopia
@Celtopia 3 ай бұрын
Thank you both ,yet again a brilliant and extremely interesting explanation, ...... As per usual.
@mohammedsaysrashid3587
@mohammedsaysrashid3587 4 ай бұрын
It was an informative and amazing introduction..
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed, thank you for watching.
@Onthejazz247
@Onthejazz247 4 ай бұрын
Great episode
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Thank you, and thanks for watching!
@borismatesin
@borismatesin 4 ай бұрын
Shame, missed a perfect chance to open with a sentence "Flying from Malta to Yalta".
@shawngilliland243
@shawngilliland243 2 ай бұрын
That's wonderful; so glad that you shared it with us!
@NigelDeForrest-Pearce-cv6ek
@NigelDeForrest-Pearce-cv6ek 4 ай бұрын
Brilliant!!!!
@shawngilliland243
@shawngilliland243 2 ай бұрын
Love the footage of Churchill wearing that Astrakhan hat!
@damiencaillault2039
@damiencaillault2039 4 ай бұрын
i wish we had a way of knowing what would have come out of the conference if Roosevelt was in better physical shape or if the conference had taken place somewhere that didn't require him to travel so far. At the time of the conference, he is only 2 months away from the coffin. Also i wonder how talented he was at international negotiation. America just came out of 2 decades of isolationism, one can wonder how good his diplomatic army was, and how good was their leader in this field.
@brianjonker510
@brianjonker510 4 ай бұрын
I need to watch this again
@jamesbodnarchuk3322
@jamesbodnarchuk3322 4 ай бұрын
When is the man of steel not suspicious?
@grevberg
@grevberg 4 ай бұрын
Turned out it's a medical condition that cost hundreds of thousands Russian their life.
@jukebox5600
@jukebox5600 4 ай бұрын
I cannot beleive how hectic yalls production schedule must be, keep uo tthe good work folks!! Yall are truly an inspiration to a lowly graduate student.❤❤
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Much appreciated by the whole team, thank you for watching!
@user-ue4fz2lj7c
@user-ue4fz2lj7c 4 ай бұрын
Was at the Livadia Palace last year
@blackhathacker82
@blackhathacker82 4 ай бұрын
Very well spoken pretty nice video
@ralphturner3798
@ralphturner3798 4 ай бұрын
I like how Indy gestulates.
@pianowhizz
@pianowhizz 4 ай бұрын
Funniest quote from Yalta after Roosevelt and Stalin agree to split Korea in half: ‘Don’t tell Churchill… he’ll kill us!’ 35:34 ‘…brink of war to this day’ - I thought Korea is still at war, just in a state of ceasefire since 1953? I.e. technically the in-progress Korean War is still a continuation of WW2 - as it was literally started at Yalta.
@welcometonebalia
@welcometonebalia 4 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
And thank you for watching.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching.
@douglasfur3808
@douglasfur3808 4 ай бұрын
Last night I watched the Canadian National Film Board production Paris 1919. It's sad to hear so many of the issues passed over at Versailles; Poland, Indo-China, Korea, still lingering. It's as if WW2 could be more clearly seen as WW1-2.0.
@bfcmik
@bfcmik 4 ай бұрын
There is an serious argument that both WW1 and WW2 were the same war with 20 years of truce between parts. The War of 1793-1815 is considered a single war despite the interlude following the Treaty of Amiens and a 2nd interlude following Napoleon's exile to Elba in 1814.
@Puch300G
@Puch300G 4 ай бұрын
​@@bfcmikwe will get better picture in 50-100 years from now
@NathanDudani
@NathanDudani 4 ай бұрын
sErIoUs​@@bfcmik
@cobalt2672
@cobalt2672 4 ай бұрын
It's interesting that this meeting will (to a greater or lesser degree) influence the dropping of the first atomic bomb, even though that weapon hasn't been finished - to say nothing of its influence on the world even now. "The strong must rule the weak", indeed...
@criscabrera9098
@criscabrera9098 4 ай бұрын
That’s sad but I don’t expect better from the USSR especially Stalin
@spudskie3907
@spudskie3907 4 ай бұрын
I always laugh at those who say the Western Allies could have fought Germany by bombing without the need for ground forces. I always reply with “So the only Allied ground forces on the European continent would be Stalin’s Red Army”. Those Air Power advocates are usually silent afterwards.
@AK-ep6ik
@AK-ep6ik 4 ай бұрын
Indy's hand signal gestures are distracting, yet amusing!
@Swedishmafia101MemeCorporation
@Swedishmafia101MemeCorporation 4 ай бұрын
I always appreciate the immaculate drip you guys wear
@naveenraj2008eee
@naveenraj2008eee 4 ай бұрын
Hi Indy and Sparty Great explanation. Now I can understand this yalta conference . Stalin got everything he want. And the cold war started. Thanks for the video.
@jayyo2089
@jayyo2089 4 ай бұрын
Hi indy and Spartacus i really love your show (show's)!!
@td23asus
@td23asus 4 ай бұрын
Yalta, When Stalin Split The World reads a lot like a line from the TNG episode Darmok. (Darmok and Jalad, at Tanagra)
@igorwoek502
@igorwoek502 3 ай бұрын
To quote great Jacek Kaczmarski on Yalta: "So the delegations flew away, In Crimea the tsar's castle fell silent. And when the guns thundered in the West, Transports of people went to the East. The free world celebrated its triumph, The fronts suddenly laid deserted - The president's grave is already covered in flowers, And there are transports after transports. The night turns into red dawn - By the will of the voters, Churchill left! And there are transports of living people, And there are camps of the the long death."
@hildenburg5
@hildenburg5 4 ай бұрын
Awe man I won't get my assignments done on time
@greggashgarian8360
@greggashgarian8360 4 ай бұрын
Excellent work. Well done!
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching.
@indianajones4321
@indianajones4321 4 ай бұрын
Indy looking sharp again with the sleeves
@Elongated_Muskrat
@Elongated_Muskrat 4 ай бұрын
Stalin: The Man of Steel, or Man of Steal depending where you are from.
@markmierzejewski9534
@markmierzejewski9534 4 ай бұрын
It was 90 days after the surrender of Germany that the Soviet Union declared war on Japan. By then events have changed also The U.S has successfully tested “ Trinity “ On August 6th the bomb was dropped to show the world the atomic age. It’s no coincidence that on August 9th the same day the Soviet Union declared war on Japan that the United States dropped their second atomic bomb. The second bomb was also a warning to Stalin. That the west had the ability to destroy cities let alone armies with a single bomb. That this was the means to an end.
@zacharymartin8951
@zacharymartin8951 4 ай бұрын
Shaka, when the walls fell Stalin, when the world split
@ShawnHumphrey
@ShawnHumphrey 4 ай бұрын
I'm glad someone else called that out. Brilliant title!
@BleedingUranium
@BleedingUranium 4 ай бұрын
This was my first thought too. :D
@fearofmusic1312
@fearofmusic1312 4 ай бұрын
Stalin and Truman at Lorenzkirch. The River Elbe in Winter.
@MegaHello202
@MegaHello202 3 ай бұрын
It’s crazy that in this conference you can see signs of what becomes the Korean and Vietnam wars
@cedricbaccay633
@cedricbaccay633 4 ай бұрын
I love indy and sparticus’ suits ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Both are very dapper chaps! Thanks for watching.
@kantemirovskaya1lightninga30
@kantemirovskaya1lightninga30 4 ай бұрын
wow-this all comes back to haunt us..
@dabfan6924
@dabfan6924 4 ай бұрын
In fact there are no formal meeting notes or agendas for any of these meetings. Each side took its own notes. After the fall of the USSR their internal notes became available for the first time. According to Harvard Professor Plokhi there are differences in the notes. You have covered the agenda and meetings extremely well. It is interesting that Stalin was unaware that Alger Hiss was a Soviet agent even though he was sitting there in the room with the Big Three. Hiss worked in GRU intelligence, and only KGB was involved in setting up the Conference. This is clear from the Soviet notes according to Plokhi
@dabfan6924
@dabfan6924 3 ай бұрын
@@vlad_47 Because the USSR had two foreign spy groups (NKVD/KGB and GRU) who each held their cards close, the KGB who ran Yalta didn’t know they had a GRU agent in the room with the Big Three. Mr. Hiss returned home from Yalta through Moscow, traveling back with the Embassy people. In Moscow, the GRU gave him a medal for his work. Hiss was kind of a free lancer, so there was no gain to the USSR having him in FDR’s delegation, especially as he argued for the US vs the USSR positions on the membership of various States in the UN. This is documented in the work “Venona: Decoding Soviet Espionage in America” (John Earl Haynes & Harvey Klerk, Yale Nota Bene, 2000). An analysis of Hiss’s role at Yale is included in “Yalta: The Price of Peace” (S.M. Plokhy, Penguin Books, 2011) He was obviously aware of the Cambridge Five since they delivered to him the conference position papers of the US & UK before the Yalta Conference. You might enjoy Plokhy’s book as it really brings Stalin into a complex light. At Tehran, Stalin told FDR and Churchill that “The best friendships are those founded on misunderstandings.” [quoted in S.M. Plokhy]
@dabfan6924
@dabfan6924 3 ай бұрын
@@vlad_47 The Alger Hiss story is very strange. He was a staunch New Dealer & a communist spy. Had his presence at Yalta been more widely known in the US, the Red Scare would have taken on more color. If the KGB had known he was a GRU agent, they might have tried to exploit that at Yalta -although how? Hiss was about to become the first head of the United Nations, and one might suspect that this would go to his already large head. The sympathetic portrait of Hiss painted by Whittaker Chambers in “Witness” is worth reviewing. After all, Alger Hiss was hardly the only dupe of mid-20th century totalitarian dreams. In fact the sad Hollywood story of the “victimization” of poor Alger Hiss is as close to reality as is the “persecution” of poor Donald Trump
@commonwealthrealm
@commonwealthrealm 4 ай бұрын
Yalta destroyed 600+ years of History, population patterns and civilizations in North East Central Europe. Plus forced communism on People who hated the ideology. Poland lost half of its pre-war territory with undestroyed historic cities in the East and got ruined substitutes in the West. Germany lost everything East of the Oder Neisse rivers. Yalta was the worst for both of Central Europe's most powerful countries. Poland for instance was the only Allied country to shrink in 1945 due to the Soviet Union. Despite being the first Victim of both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union with the biggest percentage loss of People compared to any country from 1939.
@_ArsNova
@_ArsNova 4 ай бұрын
The irony of everyone criticizing the Western Allies for "appeasing Hitler" pre-WWII, when they did the exact same thing postwar with Stalin and the USSR. Allowed countless naked landgrabs by the Soviets, displacing millions of Poles and Germans in the process, and surrendered to the whole of Eastern Europe to communism for the next 45 years, for no good reason. They even sold out the legitimate Polish government, the very thing they fought WWII over in the first place.
@livethefuture2492
@livethefuture2492 4 ай бұрын
Yalta didn't do any of that. Yalta was merely the final settlement, but the fate of Poland has been sealed with troops on the ground long before that. Polands fate was sealed long before that...sandwiched between two hostile Powers of Germany and Russia it was inevitable in their position that they would fall to one or the other. The only time they had independence was when both were weak by sheer chance. Namely in 1919, when Germany and Russia both collapsed. And in 1991, when the USSR finally collapsed. You wanna talk about the death of the Great states of Europe? They had already died in ww1. That was why it was called the war to end all wars. Ww1 was the end of 'Old Europe'...and Versailles ensured it.
@mindbomb9341
@mindbomb9341 4 ай бұрын
You two are so impressive. Thanks for all of your hard work. And your "invisible team" too!
@unbindingfloyd
@unbindingfloyd 4 ай бұрын
It’s interesting how similar the USSR leader was compared to the Russian Empire after the Napoleonic Wars over Poland. In the end Troops on the ground are the final truth. Just look at where the Iron curtain came down and look where the eastern and western fronts ended up. Almost identical. The paperwork after war tends to me formally legalizing those front lines in terms of geopolitics.
@franciszeklatinik889
@franciszeklatinik889 4 ай бұрын
We are surely in the war's endgame now
@TheAwnman
@TheAwnman 4 ай бұрын
I know it’s a very minor thing but a trusteeship over Indochina wouldn’t kick the French out of Asia as they would still possess Pondicherry, the status of which alongside Goa is at this point still up in the air as while the INC claims them as part of any independent India, Britain will not define the borders of any independent India not only regarding the European outposts but also regarding the Princely States and a theoretical Muslim nation.
@jacobbrown6250
@jacobbrown6250 18 күн бұрын
Both Yalta 1945 and Congress of Vienna 1814 both had long talks over Poland, which Russia/USSR won on.
@danicalifornia505
@danicalifornia505 4 ай бұрын
5:35 how many of the world leaders knew enough of secondary languages to converse in the other leaders languages?
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 4 ай бұрын
Neither Churchill nor Roosevelt spoke Russian (or Georgian) and Stalin's English was rudimentary at best, so they spoke through translators (except conversations between FDR and Churchill only, of course). FDR and Churchill also spoke fluent French, and FDR and Stalin also spoke German but Churchill did not. Stalin and Churchill had also both studied Latin and ancient Greek in school but I'm not sure how well they could converse in those languages. French was still the main language of diplomacy at that time but there's no evidence Stalin spoke it at all. And Stalin pretended to speak even less English than he actually did (he did this so the other two wouldn't know how much of their conversations he could understand without an interpreter). So AFAIK there was no language that all three of them knew well enough to converse in. De Gaulle also spoke fluent German, btw.
@alexanderstoyanov7464
@alexanderstoyanov7464 4 ай бұрын
One of the conferences cementing Stalin's legacy as a top 3 politician of the 20th century imo
@IanBerg
@IanBerg 4 ай бұрын
FDR talks about executing 50,000 random German officers but also authorizes Operation Paperclip…
@davidjernigan8161
@davidjernigan8161 4 ай бұрын
FDR was just as bad as Woodrow Wilson. Don't forget FDR issued the executive order that interred thousands of his own citizens
@mgway4661
@mgway4661 4 ай бұрын
Not quite random
@modest_spice6083
@modest_spice6083 4 ай бұрын
FDR died in April 1945 before Paperclip even began with Operation Overcast in July.
@criscabrera9098
@criscabrera9098 4 ай бұрын
Yea that sound so unlike FDR we were always shown like gentle and caring president who never wanted bloodshed and was the morale high ground but here he is asking for 50,000 random officers to be killed that caught me so off guard then again after seeing all the death and destruction I can see why he would want that
@modest_spice6083
@modest_spice6083 4 ай бұрын
​@@criscabrera9098You mean SS and Wehrmacht officers who undoubtedly have a hand in the atrocities?
@quedtion_marks_kirby_modding
@quedtion_marks_kirby_modding 4 ай бұрын
I am always surprised by how supportive fdr was of Stalin.
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 4 ай бұрын
He was old and sick and he was probably fed a lot of misleading information by all of the Communist sympathizers and out-and-out agents of the Soviets who were part of his administration. A lot of the left still suffered from the delusion that only right-wingers could be a threat to democracy. A lot of them still do today.
@mgway4661
@mgway4661 4 ай бұрын
We’re in the end game. Begun the Cold War has
@michigangeezer3950
@michigangeezer3950 4 ай бұрын
Did Pogue Admiral Leahy ever make a tactical decision of any kind, or was he just clinging to the President's coattails? (He may be a distant relative and I've just never heard of him doing "admiral stuff" that hurts enemies on the high seas).
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 4 ай бұрын
Pogue Admiral? That's a rank I'm not familiar with. Leahy had a long career of active service before WW2, including combat in the Spanish-American War. He had sea duty many times after that and was Chief of Naval Operations in the 1930s, and it was after that that his role became more political, as was often the case for ex-service chiefs.
@SomeBigFatGuy
@SomeBigFatGuy 4 ай бұрын
​@@brucetucker4847 the only source I've seen mentioning his combat experience was seeing one shell land in the water a mile away. I got shot at with more vigor as a taxicab driver. It sounds like he was a "climber" and not a warrior. I wonder what Halsey thought of him?
@waheisel
@waheisel 3 ай бұрын
What was internationalized (at 28:12)? Diurin?
@criscabrera9098
@criscabrera9098 4 ай бұрын
This is so weird I have never heard of this again we are always told that big three and France had close relationship but FDK is like super super against France and is trying to stick it to them every chance he gets I can’t imagine that Churchill of all people is fighting for France wow thank you this is so incredibly interesting and important to know cheers and greetings from Kuwait
@criscabrera9098
@criscabrera9098 4 ай бұрын
@@fortpark-wd9sx I mean I get it but after the history between the countries and blood shed I can’t imagine how cold he’s being towards hem and how the French are suffering being occupied
@aorum3589
@aorum3589 4 ай бұрын
​@@fortpark-wd9sx France was the first major power to oppose Germany in the war. What's more the french mostly fought alone against the Germans in 1939-1940. At that time the USSR was on Germany's side, the US (under FDR presidency) was clinging to its neutrality, and Great Britain barely got involved. FDR and Staline easily forgot that.
@shawngilliland243
@shawngilliland243 2 ай бұрын
Truman didn't have a very high opinion of the French, either. There were some serious incidents of Free French troops trying to disarm Americans in France. Truman was furious, and said that if that nonsense didn't stop immediately, the US would cease to arm or supply the French.
@andrewnagel6322
@andrewnagel6322 4 ай бұрын
Indy, I didn't know nations had a view port.
@HoopTY303
@HoopTY303 4 ай бұрын
…[exhales deeply] wow… it’s gonna take a minute to unwrap my brain from this. Go ahead and talk amongst yourselves .
@conceptalfa
@conceptalfa 4 ай бұрын
👍👍👍!
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
✌✌
@danicalifornia505
@danicalifornia505 4 ай бұрын
8:59 were these conferences ever used to try and turn other representatives into spies or as seats for spies?
@HEKVT
@HEKVT 4 ай бұрын
Such a shame that a select few can decide the future of people living in nations for generations, they not need even set foot in those place, just decide it over some tea in a resort town in Crimea.
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 4 ай бұрын
That's how the world has worked for 3,000 years or more.
@patrickstephenson1264
@patrickstephenson1264 4 ай бұрын
Imagine centuries from now: Mars: And so our government is entitled to 90% of Earth, while the remaining 10% goes to you, Venus. Venus: Wait a minute, why do I only get 10 percent?! Earth: ...
@robertoler3795
@robertoler3795 2 ай бұрын
well done. wow suits
@dougrunyon2653
@dougrunyon2653 13 күн бұрын
Me too
@andrewlm5677
@andrewlm5677 4 ай бұрын
Hindsight is 20-20 of course but the pretensions that US/UK believed they were negotiating the Poland situation with anything close to powerful enough to counter the Soviet’s occupation of Poland seems very silly. Seems this was a vain attempt to avoid the embarrassment of making promises to the Polish government in exile which they were inevitably going to be powerless to keep.
@user-nr5tp2jo3u
@user-nr5tp2jo3u Ай бұрын
I was great!
@P_RO_
@P_RO_ 4 ай бұрын
Even now, us 'westerners' do not understand Russian political norms which reach far back in history. Much of what is seen as acceptable there is seen as the opposite here. I doubt the Roosevelt or Churchill had a deep understanding of this either, but Stalin understood how things work in the 'west' and took advantage of that. Stalin was something of a 'Hitler' in another form but took (successful) pains to ensure that facet remained hidden to his 'allies'. Once he got what he wanted from us and rebuilt Russia's strength he forgot his previous words and simply did as he wanted to do. We're seeing something similar now.
@robertvelo3550
@robertvelo3550 4 ай бұрын
excellent
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Much appreciated!
@pattygman4675
@pattygman4675 4 ай бұрын
Veto power, what could possibly go wrong with that?
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 4 ай бұрын
That was a reflection of political reality rather than idealism. The # 1 priority of the UN was to prevent another world war even worse than the one the League of Nations failed to prevent. Despite all its failings, it succeeded in that goal. It is vital to keep that in mind.
@oneshotme
@oneshotme 4 ай бұрын
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo 4 ай бұрын
Thank you, really means a lot to us! -TimeGhost Ambassador
@cornbread8246
@cornbread8246 4 ай бұрын
No discussion on Stalin’s spying on Rosevelt and Churchill during the conference? Really no surprise you didn’t.
@hukama6911
@hukama6911 3 ай бұрын
Wait I thought the three arrived in a vw up, a ford fiesta, and a dacia sandero
@67nairb
@67nairb 3 ай бұрын
28:10 what's Dire-Inn
@FacebookHistory-ui7tw
@FacebookHistory-ui7tw 23 күн бұрын
The commencement of Russia's Manchurian Blitzkrieg & Nagasaki coincided leading to Japanese Korea's military conquest (& postwar occupation lines) before Hirohito made his infamous Radio Proclamation. At Yalta, with Okinawa still in planning stages (& before the Trinity implosion) the USA was in possession of only ONE viable U235 Atomic device. FDR simply traded the Kurile archipelago north of the Japanese Home islands, (returning former) Russian territories, for exclusive US military occupation of the Japanese Home Islands after hostilities creased.
@MsZeeZed
@MsZeeZed 4 ай бұрын
Well at least they’re talking …
The War Goals to End WW2 in 1945 - a WW2 Special
41:20
World War Two
Рет қаралды 207 М.
The Death of Franklin Roosevelt - WW2 Documentary Special
18:40
World War Two
Рет қаралды 243 М.
Just try to use a cool gadget 😍
00:33
123 GO! SHORTS
Рет қаралды 83 МЛН
1 класс vs 11 класс  (игрушка)
00:30
БЕРТ
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
ИРИНА КАЙРАТОВНА - АЙДАХАР (БЕКА) [MV]
02:51
ГОСТ ENTERTAINMENT
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Василиса наняла личного массажиста 😂 #shorts
00:22
Денис Кукояка
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
The Last Days of Auschwitz - War Against Humanity 126
24:03
World War Two
Рет қаралды 143 М.
Life Under Adolf Hitler: The First Years Of Nazi Germany
49:03
War Stories
Рет қаралды 51 М.
296B - The Death of Adolf Hitler - WW2 - April 30, 1945
33:54
World War Two
Рет қаралды 319 М.
Nazi Werwolves: Post War Terror - War Against Humanity 135
18:47
World War Two
Рет қаралды 69 М.
Stalin vs Truman: The Origins of the Cold War (Documentary in english)
56:00
imineo Documentaires
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
The Battle of Stalingrad Every Week with Maps
1:05:33
World War Two
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Yalta, the twilight of the giants
55:55
imineo Documentaires
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Just try to use a cool gadget 😍
00:33
123 GO! SHORTS
Рет қаралды 83 МЛН