And that sweet sweet flash speed. 🔥

I was just about to say... Yeah, that's brilliant! That's gross, too.

...Oh

I thought that too, but then gaslit myself into thinking he knew some more specific ruling that I wasn't aware of that made me wrong lol Really happy to be wrong cause that's a cool interaction

Yup. Insane

Then all this with panharmonicon

I've been slowly sleeving mine, but still need to pick up like half the cards.

Primaris Eliminator is insane in this deck, I wonder why he's not on edhrec

@@akiraciciriello7479 probably too new. Skyclave Relic is really good! Wow!

That's just mean

Use a bounce-land for double the benefit! One landfall, make 4 mana with Yarok or Panharmonicon out!

Yeah. Stupid stickers though

I've never seen that card before. Wow

Use a bounce-land for double the benefit! One landfall, make 4 mana with Yarok out!

1000%. Sporocyst is absolutely insane doubled!

Suh-PUL-kruhl Prai-MOR-dee-uhl. Awesome card

In case this hasn’t been answered, it triggers on opponents creature entering, but yarok still doubles it because the aboleth spawn is a permanent you control triggering when ANY permanent enters

It does. Squad is also an ETB effect, so you will make double the copies and get more card draw

Yup. Insane

Huh. Nice

Wouldn't the both go away because it's stated that "the all OTHER tokens created"?

That's just mean at that point

Which would be fine if you just wanted ETB triggers, but this is only useful if the opponent you are playing against has a lot of non-token creatures with ETB effects. I don't think this would be very good at all to include in a Yarok deck.

I’m not sure this is correct….? I could be wrong but Artisans says “then exile all OTHER tokens”. So, why would we have to exile the tokens we just created?

I hear you, it's just if the trigger is doubled that means you would have to exile both because the two triggers are independent of each other. So that means you would have to resolve each one separately, thus exiling both tokens.@@aaronisbell377

Yup. Yarok doesn't care who controls the thing that enters. Only that you control the thing that is triggered.

In case you haven’t gotten this answered, Jin-gitaxias’ ability triggers when the spell is cast, not on ETB, so the two do not interact directly

It definitely works:) Yarok causing the ability of Abalorh to trigger twice is mainly due to Yarok not caring who controlled the "entering" creature, rather "a triggered ability of a permanent you control to trigger": in this case Abaloth.

@@Blacklodge_Willy My issue isn't with the text on Yarok but the text on the Abeloth Spawn. I'm not sure the Abeloth Spawn is actually triggering on a creature entering the battlefield.

@@Blacklodge_Willy I've done a bit of digging but it seems I am correct. Aboleth Spawn's ability is not triggering off of a creature entering the battlefield. It is triggering off of that creatures ability. That extra layer means that Yarok does not interact with it.

@@TheViridianDusk I've been wondering about this since that card was spoiled. Did you get a confirmation that it only triggers off the trigger?

@@joedoe7572 several "ask a judge" pages have this question and the vast majority of responses from judges seem to agree with what I said.

Yup. Insane

Without Yarok, if you move Necromancy to a different creature in play, like with Crown of the Ages, the original necroed creature still remains in play and will still need to be sacrificed when the Necromancy leaves play. The fact that it's no longer enchanting the creature it had originally resurrected doesn't change that. If you have Yarok, the ability triggers twice , resurrects two creatures, one at a time, and will end up attached to the second one. But the first trigger that rezzed the first creature is still in effect and will still cause you to sac that creature when Necromancy leaves the battlefield. So when the Necro gets disenchanted, you have to sac both creatures. I think.

@@radiac6818 i see my problem. I looked at Last Voyage of the __. From Unfinity. Has a similar ETB. But a speret line when Voyage leaves play, sac the enchanted creature. So in that case it wouldn't care about the 1st creature. Where Necromancy the return and sac effect are together. So in that case Necromancy would still force you to sac the 1st creature if it leaves.

I'm pretty sure it's because not everyone plays the same lands, and since it's an _average_ decklist, the individual lands get outplayed by other cards. If A plays one extra Forest, B plays a swamp, C plays an Island, and D plays a utility land, that land slot may not show up, because it's only in 25% of the decks as that land. Add in various forms of ramp, and that percentage gets much lower. Computers are fast, not smart

@@joedoe7572 Interesting theory. If that is the case it would be a huge mistake! I tried finding some info on how EDHREC accumulates its data but couldn't find much beyond the data sources. However, I doubt EDHREC counts lands this way. If it did, land numbers would be higher on average in mono-coloured decks because people play more basics and there's more overlap of non-basics (just fewer good ones available). And the reverse would be true for five colour decks. It's not a statistical analysis, merely anecdotal evidence, but I just checked most of the one/five colour decks in the top 200 and can't see a pattern like that emerging. Also, speaking of data sources, EDHREC pulls from several deckbuilding websites - all of these track the total number of lands in decks. I'd assume that it would be much easier to compile the averages from that data than to count lands in a different manner. Would be interesting though to get a glimpse behind the curtain how the data aggregation actually works.

muldrotha is good in any sultai deck

If you get tireless provisioner and spingbloom you spent 6 mana to get 8 mana in treasures and 1 great value creature for the next turn. Not bad