Love that detail 😂

...it occurs to me, Scott's plan was actually based on Back to the Future II.

That is excatelly why Doc had a saying "Great Scott", he was thinking of the Ant-Man that he saw in theatres when he went to the future :D

gotchu!

Wasn't it Bob Gale that said that?

@@zeropoint216 Possibly. I know it was one of them (and could quite feasibly have been both).

Yep. They actually wore shirts to the part 3 premier that had BTTF IV circled and crossed out indicating that really was the end.

No sequels or prequels. They destroyed Star wars with that. Leave B2F alone.

No 4th part and I am very happy about that. Next best thing is playing the telltale games, M.J.F. voice cameo included.

It's pops up several times in the movie. Marty is the one who interrupts Clara and Doc's near kiss by the covered Delorian. Doc goes to a dance and is interrupted by Tannen.

They could not make any further Back To The Future movies, partly because Michael J. Fox is dealing with the effects of advanced Parkinson's Disease.

@@sarahfullerton6894 There was a Back to the Future animated series back in the day, I remember it took place after BttF3 and was about Doc, Clara, Jules, and Verne but no Marty.

Interesting! Wonder why no Marty.

@@sarahfullerton6894 It was a show that focused on Doc's many adventures through time using the train after the events of BttF3 but he lives on without Marty, Marty just lives in 1985 and goes on with his life.

I didn't know about an animated series

Damn ngl it took me a second to think about this but you are absolutely right! That’s just mind blowing!

Which then makes one ask why they didn't just syphon the gas out of the one Doc came back in, and leave it in the mine shaft with an empty tank. Then when Marty gets it out in 1955, there will be plenty of gas stations around.

Technically the one in the mine doesn’t manifest until after doc gets hit by lighting. So, the max total at one time would be 3, as old Biff leaves 1955 before Doc gets sent to 1985.

@@PhilBagels It is never explained in any lore what happened to the time machine Doc came back in that was struck by lightning, it is assumed the vehicle itself was destroyed after crashing when it arrived.

By allowing its character to change the past, Back to the Future distances itself from the predestination paradox, which is what the Terminator films are based on. So, for example, 1955 originally passed without Marty arriving from the future. The altered 1955 originally passed without Biff arriving from 2015, and even that originally passed without Doc and Marty coming back to fix it. Marty was even told not to interfere with the handoff of the Almanac, just to make sure that Biff would go back to 2015. Therefore, it is highly likely that Biff had already gone back to 2015 by the time Doc and the DeLorean were stuck by lightning, and it wasn't until that moment that the 1885 DeLorean would have been left in the cave. So we can only be sure of 3 DeLoreans being in 1955 simultaneously.

"It baffles me how many people miss the "Great Scott"/"This is heavy" reversal in part 3" Maybe they just didn't find it that funny.

@@winstonmarlowe5254 then they suck

They are remaking it with a girl.

There's the game, which is considered canon and the story's pretty good too.

you've forgotten the cartoon series

@@kaypirinha1982 we don't talk about that or the game. they do not and have never existed in this or any other timeline

The BTTF Musical is awesome, very faithful except for cutting out the Libyan terrorist storyline and adding in a weird dream sequence. I saw it shortly after the first COVID lockdown ended, and 1955 Doc said to Marty "tell me about the future - I assume no war, no famine... *looks at the audience* no disease?" 🤣

Good id say, absolutely no way they could live up to the originals. They'd pull a star wars

@@Llama_charmer agreed!!

There's also an episode on "The Movies That Made Us" on the making of the movie(s)

Yeah, that was just the general sentiment in the US back in the '50s. Japan became an economic powerhouse partially through the financial aid provided by the US for their post-war recovery. It's one of the reasons Japan is such a strong ally of the US today.

Yeah’ lot’s of cheap crap sold in the US had Made In Japan stamped on it. They made quality stuff too but it was mainly the cheap stuff that was exported to the US. But they were known for their excellent cameras.

it was the equivalent back then to Made in China now

But then the 70s kick in and Japan gets it shit together and a few years later the US looks at them like Doc at the letter 😅

Japan didn't really become a huge exporter until late 70s, early 80s. The Walkman, and Atari were what really led Japan's exports if mini electronics. And, in my view, they're still ahead.

My pleasure!

@@alexhefnerstvmovievault hello, did you talk with someone in telegram about the prize of you're video, but offering an Imac

@@alexhefnerstvmovievault yes at 15:46 it is actually zz top

@Latest Obssesion thank you so much, I didn't know about that it is a scam, may you help me to denounce that account??

@@alexhefnerstvmovievault wow so many times i have left a comment about the person who is using your name to scam people and you just deleted my newest comment letting you know and warning people that someone is using your name to scam people and you just deleted it makes me now think that 3rd options i put in there is true that its you trying to scam people if you dont want warn people yourself and when someone else tried to but you stop them.

None of the reactors seem to notice that link....

That voice is iconic. Recognized it instantly

The gun salesman was in Blazing Saddles. He's the idiot who gets his guys to all start singing Camptown Races, amongst other villain type duties throughout.

Also sounds like one of the dogs(I think) in fox and the hound.

I KNEW his voice was familiar. Love that Robin Hood movie

He was also a voice for one of the bullets/dum dums in Eddie Valiants revolver case in WFRR.

Well all Films in a timeline of 1985 last 72 hours. 3 days. Starts off in the morning he goes to Docs and School. Nighttime goes to meet Doc. Comes back from 1955 to 1985 on the same night. Wakes up. Jen comes round. Doc meets up with them goes to 2015. Came back at night at alternate 1985. Goes back to 1955 during the day. Goes to 1885. Comes back to 1985 during the day in BTTF3 which is the morning after the A1985. All done in 3 full days. In reality it would be close to a month apart as Marty spends almost a full two weeks in 1955 across all 3 movies. And about week in 2015 and a week in 1885. But with the time machine they set the date to the same day in 1985.

@@MikeWilsonBarrett I kind of like how all of this time goes by but they can just go back to the time when they left so it seems like they never left but great info didn’t know some of that.

I was thinking the same, and I hadnt really thought of it in the 30 years prior... thing is, the photo was attached to Marty, who was unfixed in time due to the fact he could time travel, while the subject of the photo, the tombstone wasnt and could change... if that makes sense. You could also say that like with the other films and the first one with the photo of his siblings the changes where catching up in real time and would have to go backwards to catch up with Marty once they reach their future points, so the Tombstone vanishes first since the changes to it eventually arrived in 1955, but the photo itself was still in 1885 so it would take a while for the change in the 'reason' of the photo to arrive from 55 back to 1885, BUT considering Marty then went quickly back to 1985 the changes for the Photo would have to do a u turn again and head back to the future/present where Marty finally stopped... So id say at some point after Marty arrives back in 1985 the Photo simply disappears entirely... i mean the changes are all ripples and ripples take a while to get places. its all very complicated, but when you think about it hard enough its amazing how good the movies are at the temporal stuff.

@@NZBigfoot i'm gonna stay salty about Crispin, though.

hahah ty Donald!

@Latest Obssesion Seen the movie TENET? 😉

At the beginning before he ever got sent back, before it was a thing. he had still made the time machine without marty going back otherwise how would he have gone back in the first place? If that's what you're getting at. Also there was never any need for two or three as marty's kid going to prison could have been sorted through the "natural course of time" by like moving home! Still love em and couldn't say how many times I've seen em, I'm just saying.

@Latest Obssesion I think you mean a closed loop. Any time travel (EDIT: into the past, of course) already creates a time loop. Btu you decscribe that the events always play out the same which is a closed temporal loop. Which is in turn an ontological paradox. What Doc Brow says in part 2 about paradoxes became the most widely accepted misconception I ever came across. An ontological paradox (seemingly) logical contradiction between the two assumptions that people have free will and that time travel was possible. It is resolved by understanding that Doc could not help but involve Marty in the time travel every time... or in other words deny Doc the ability to freely choose not to become friends with Marty. But obviously Gale and Zemeckis show little to no understanding to time travel in the writing. The movies actually discuss the other type of paradoxes: causal paradoxes. These are a (seemingly) contradiction between the assumptions that time was a strict progression of cause to effect, a causal chain of events. Every deduction we make about the world and the universe before man existed is based on this assumption. In the first movie Marty shoves George off the street which alters the causal chain of events. But instead of the fantastical and existential repercussions Gale and Zemeckis wrote into part 2 the universe is rather fine with a timeline that is inconsistent, in which a nonexistent teenager breaks off George and Lorraine before they met. Because the paradox was immediately resolved with the realization that time can be rewritten and throwing causal determinism out the window... or in front of a car. Time travel stories that try to mix and match both usually end up rather... stupid. Or rather the better time travel stories only use either concept. Because in an obviously ever changing timeline ontological paradoxes cannot be explained without reverting back to metaphysical fate. Which seems like the thing you did here. There are of course two more scientific approaches to solve either of the types of paradoxes: Everett's many worlds (applied to time travel instead of quantum physics) and Novikov's self-consistency principle. Both of which are also often used in time travel stories and usually go especially sideways when mixed. Only a few years back writer Jantje Friese created a piece that allows to apply both - without ever using their names, interestingly.

As Einstein once said, when questioned about time paradoxes, "There are no such things as time paradoxes. You are merely fulfilling your destiny"

The film strongly implies, though, that Doc and Marty were friends without time travel "the first time through".

The Clint Eastwood movie was A Fistful of Dollars

What do you mean Doc is really 13?? "Don't get it".....

Lord of the Rings over here waving :)

How to train your Dragon trilogy as well.

I would say Toy Story as well… at least until they went and made a 4th one.

Not shown in the KZfaq edit is Marty's double take when 1885's ZZ Top spins their instruments around like they were famous for (along with their amazing music). It cracks me up every time.

Good thing Alex reviews music, I'm pretty sure he's the only reactor I've seen acknowledge the different band cameos. Except Huey Lewis being the judge in the 1st movie, which was a shame.

so good!

I think the first 3 karate kid movies are just as solid in my opinion it’s not really a trilogy since they made a fourth one but still we don’t count that one 😂

Indiana Jones (forget the 4th), Lord of the Rings, the Original Starwars.. yea you right, not THAT many..

Seamus McFly was an idiot, I'm pretty sure any hunter, past or present, knows to remove the projectile from the carcass before cooking it. It did make for a funny scene though.

Wrong, dumbass! They were friends BEFORE any time Travel.

But we very clearly see Marty's changes to the present. I think in the original timeline, Marty just walks Einstein, and the causal loop only begins when Marty tells Doc about their friendship.

The extended versions are great, but I think its a mistake for anyone to watch them for their first watching of the trilogy. That's a bit of a pet peeve I have with reaction videos. It seems more often than not, when someone reacts to an extended version of an absolutely perfect movie, they usually have small nitpicks that all relate to the added content. LotR is no exception. Like I said, extended/exotic cuts are great, but I feel like the vast majority of the time, they are better kept for subsequent viewings of a movie you already love.

I love this trilogy and I can't say if I love this more than LOTR... I think LOTR wins in the end, but who cares really? It's not a competition. 😄 They are all great movies who still after all these years can give any new movie a run for its money!

And during the video about Biff's past in the alternate 1985, they mention Mad Dog.

I never thought of the train as being called ELB. Just assumed he wanted his initials on the side.

That's like the endless Dark paradox. Nice!

A pass for all of that? That's awesome! We need to go back to the past.

Exactly the same thing I say when people say they wish they lived in a different time period lol

Yeah I have the same thoughts about "born in the wrong time" statements. Wouldn't work out for me so well either.

so sweet!

That he saw in Back to the Future 2

He almost died There is suspicions that the hanging scene may of caused his Parkinson’s

Some believe that may have been what led to Michael developing Parkinson’s disease later on in life

Yeah, that raspy voice he has directly after isn't put on at all, that's from the mishap. Hard to fake that.

@@inarar5334 - correct!

@@LatestObssesion - thank you for clarification!

True but I’m sure being choked almost to death had a very detrimental effect on his brain. If anything it hasten the spread

i love you James, no problem

You can't bring weapons, because what if you used them? Killing someone would change history again

Hell yeah! Welcome to the family!! ❤

Awesome info brotha!

Lol memory unlocked! Oh Saturday mornings

@@alexhefnerstvmovievault Also, as another type of sequel, Zemeckis and Gale helped out with an episodic game from Telltale Games based on the series around 12 years ago. It brings back most of the original cast (with Michael J. Fox unable to reprise Marty, but the replacement, AJ Locascio being so good it's nearly impossible to tell them apart at times. Fox does return for a few smaller roles in the last episode, though) and it's damn good and a worthy installment to the series. Highly recommended.

I feel the exact opposite. The third is my least favorite because I don't care for the western setting

Which one did you like the most?

Me also it's one of my favorite westerns

@@epicknightgames9979, I prefer movies 1 & 3.

@@sarahfullerton6894 agreed. Don't get me wrong I like the second one. But it just didn't grab my attention as much as the first and third.

In a deleted scene from the first movie, Marty is seen in the background cutting and splicing some wires to connect his camcorder to Doc's 1950s TV, after he realizes a device he needed hasn't been invented yet. (The deleted scene is called "Doc's Personal Belongings" and is here on KZfaq) I think it's implied that Marty knows a thing or two about electronics himself so I think that may be how he ended up being friends with Doc.

Yes one of my all time favorite too.

And the comics! All canon and co-written by Bob Gale

The guy they got for Marty's voice was EXCELLENT. Michael J Fox did come in for the final episode to voice an ancestor, I believe. That was the first Telltale series I played, and was very impressed.

@@martydmc12 It's what the commentary said, my dude. Regardless of how they ended up spelling it in the movies, that's the reason they chose that name. 🤷‍♀️

It doesn’t really work if you have to misspell it.

@@ajclements4627 I'm literally quoting the commentary. Take it up with Bob Gale. 🤷‍♀️

@@kriscynical No need to get your shorts all bunched up.

@@ajclements4627 How on earth is my reply "getting my shorts bunched up"? I literally answered you with a shrug. lol

for sureeee

thank you Matt!