@@Azureecosse tempered Yes Laminated No. The newer vehicles are starting to for reduced noise inside.

@@Azureecosse I don't care if you read my reply or not. I will reply as you and others may need educated. Even more sad as you say your in the industry. Maybe you need to take some recent training or step a side for the younger generation. That being said, The FRONT windshield has been laminated for decades. The side option more recent. Please tell me what vehicles you supposedly work with so I can avoid you touching mine.

@@Azureecosse no need to fly off the handle. Zoe's reply made sense; yours on the other hand do not.

@@Azureecosse I'm the president of your mom and my comment holds more credibility

Blah!

Thanks

Correction: The RAV4 was at 8:05

@@OldDood thanx~

7:21 Nissan and why is the Honda logo on the steering wheel?

Why no VW Tiguan which is a huge seller globally

Are you looking to crash?

Can you explain the noise attenuation more?

@@twiincentral8780 For the vocabulary challenged...explanation: it's quiet.

我也开cx5位啥我的车噪音那么大，一点也不隔音，

@@jeffr8898 geez no need to be a dcik about it That’s a pretty rare word

They did it after previous years got lower ratings. This test wasn't created recently. its just being updated for modern size suvs. Still pretty good that they didnt wait for publicity to hit them poorly before doing something

Yeah not how it works... This test is constantly improved. So (some) automakers improve incrementally.

I own a Mazda. Great company

This single video actually put the CX-5 on my list. I've never actually looked at Mazda before this video. After test-driving a lot of vehicles, I went with a Volvo XC40 electric. I had some issues with it, so I told the dealer they can have it back. I forgot about Mazda again until I randomly saw a bright red CX-5 at some random car seller. My wife liked the color (can't blame her, it is a nice color) and I remembered the high safety and reliability ratings, including this video. I test-drove the CX-5 and was completely surprised by it. Physical buttons for climate control, every button feels premium, it has great handling, and feels fast enough (even though I currently drive a 400hp EV). I actually had fun driving the CX-5 and loved almost everything about it. It felt like a "sensible premium" car. Good materials, no cheap plastics, but not expensive. It is currently at the top of my list to buy, and i'm at this moment looking to buy a model that exactly matches my wishes (basically, I want all options, bright red, leather, wooden accents, 4WD) Edit: I got one! A 2.5 non-turbo ~200hp petrol AWD with all options except 360 camera

@@LuisRodriguez-ldrrp sure, but CX-5 isn't new. It's due to be replaced soon. Ford era Mazda models are not relevant now.

Sheck out Euro Ncap

Absolutely

@@Harambe_ sir… LMFAO that’s like saying guns kill people. No, people kill people.

@@Harambe_ is sedan considered safer? I heard the opposite, that Suv are considered safer, due to in case of collision it would be more stable, or something. Not an expert though, just read it in some article on web.

@@Gaziz85 suvs are definitely the opposite of safer roll overs are way more common. I’d say the safest are estate cars

yes

Yes, you're right, it's really a surprise

Small in America perhaps but they're massive in other countries - Australia especially. Literally second best selling, Toyota first.

@@purplequi9962 They’re mostly remembered for the Mazda Miata here in the US. It wasn’t until I got a CX-5 did I even know about Mazda making cars. I thought they went defunct lol.

@@purplequi9962 Look up global sales and get back to us. Mazda is a TINY company with TINY sales figures.

@@tim3172 I just said they were massive in other countries, one being Australia where they’re 2nd in sales… that’s purely objective…

@•Kenzie• so where was the Nissan

@@nombre1248 7:24 (Nissan) its only show the 2nd row seat

Good catch!

Thank god I though I was crazy. I mean I am crazy but you know

That's the interior of the HRV. Which got a Poor rating. Now I'm curious if they mixed up the HRV and the Rogue in post.

You're remembering when Volvos were owned by the Swedes. They are now owned by the Chinese.

@@OOICU812 no Chinese pay this car. Made this car have to Sweden

Repent to Jesus Christ “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.” ‭‭1 John‬ ‭1:9‬ ‭NIV‬‬ J

You mean volvo decades ago when it was Swedish?

@@seekhimwithallyourheartand3358 jesus is not God. He is prophet of God

Subsru had Subaru Global Safety Platform like Ancap etc.

What changed is the testing methodology. They made the test stricter, and as such it's harder to get a G rating. Vehicles that used to get G would now get A most likely.

Sacrificing safety in not getting into an accident in the first place, for better performance in an actual crash is incredibly stupid.

I've had a 2020 CX-5 for over 2 years and never experienced any visibility issues. And the BSM - blind spot monitoring - helps immensely.

I have a 2021 and don't have a visibility problem.

There is no visibility problem. It's generally beginner drivers and women that complain about lame stuff like this.

My car is from 2003

The test primarily is to see cabin intrusion, and how structural components and safety equipment (airbags etc) protect the passengers from side impact, specifically. They would be introducing variables to the test if the vehicle flips. And besides IIHS already saw Jeeps flip on testing :D

If own one put a heavy duty stabilize bar,,they are too narrow

Mazda is too big...

that's why they're more expensive than hondas. at least here in Philippines.

Repent to Jesus Christ “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.” ‭‭1 John‬ ‭1:9‬ ‭NIV‬‬ J

@@seekhimwithallyourheartand3358 no

Maybe in safety, I don't know a right minded person who would choose a mazda over a Toyota in terms of reliability.

Yeah - can you imagine a Silverado T-boning say a Miata/MX-5? I would love to know why people choose to buy these monster trucks when they don't need to. If you're in construction etc then fine. But not for the school run!

@@jonathongellibrand3632 it's just a trend. Manufacturers really need to realise that the most green thing that they can do for their range is making their cars smaller and lighter.

@@ceke People don't wanna buy small and light..... they want big and heavy to feel safe like in a tank or have the ability to intimidate by sheer size alone.....

@@320iSTWEdition Sounds like their compensating for something...

@@320iSTWEdition the feel safe argument actually has alot of merit you are more likely to survive a crash in a suv than in a car, because there's more stuff in between you and the accident so more shit to break thus reducing the speed of you decreasing your chance of injury

I agree

Its still pretty safe. In the occasion where your head doesnt miss the airbag, at least.

I agree with your observation. The bag DOES need to be extended back at least another foot or so. I had a look at my Rav4 Prime - it should be relatively easy to retrofit an upgraded airbag.

Agree. CX-5's side airbags covered all the way till the end

Hii

Me too. Love Mazdas

Yeah I think they screwed that footage up. Wrong vehicle footage

Nooooo

been wanting to buy a mazda for long time already

It's actually "becoming" a best seller in Europe,

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

No it's not

Channel with no content.fake stories for dummies,paid bots

Good luck

Me too

It's steel, not iron, and the thickness of that steel is less of a factor than the engineering that goes into it. 1 vs 2 side intrusion beams, for example. High tensile steel vs mild steel. Single shell design vs multi-shell design. Most cars these days are monocoque designs and the passenger cabin is almost always built with heavier steel in a space frame shell design. The body panels are not part of it and are largely irrelevant to secondary protection values.

No parking brakes aren't applied or else the dent goes further

7:18 I also wondered why it showed the interior of the Honda instead of the interior of the Nissan rogue. That’s a little bit fishy.

is it a top saftey pick using the old test or the new standard of testing with the heavier barrier to replicate the giant pickups out their. Cause theirs only a handfull of cars passing the new tests and most of them are tiny compact suvs suprsingly alot of the bigger suvs have issues with center of gravity

If you're that afraid, why bother even leaving the house?

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

Yeah

Just don't buy one, because the engine will eat a couple turbos before 100k miles

@@spicysnowman8886 i thought they were one of the more reliable american brands

@@bradhaines3142 the old ones are, the new ones are Chinese and terrible.

@@bradhaines3142 Because it is actually not american, it is German Opel Mokka, that was produced under Opel brand by GM. GM, rebranded several Opel designs and models in several other regions as Vauxhall, Buick etc. Opel/Vauxhall brand is no longer owned by GM though (French Stellantis bought it)

because its higher center or gravity and ground clearance compared with the rest

Not surprised at all. Jeeps are crap and dangerous don’t buy a jeep. Letting them roll over should have been part of the result.

The Jeeps are rebadged Italian Fiats.

@@TheDalk own my Jeep for 11 years all your baseless claims couldn’t be more misleading.

@@jacobfrech288 I’ve seen the video. You should watch it. And hope you don’t have to make an evasive maneuver when driving your jeep.

yes

Mazda with the oversized grill,yes, very fugly

@@adl6907 I think it's personal preference. It was derived from a design language used by Kodo.

@Axelafy if I’m close to you I want to be inside a Tesla Y

I thought that would be a… Tesla Y

Yeahh, i thought the same.

Mazda always is the best.

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

Heck even my 2007 Volvo C30, which was considered very safe for its time and class of vehicle, would probably recieve a poor rating with side collisions under these tests. Side impacts were never its strong-suit, recieving either marginal or acceptable in the old tests. I do love my "old" C30, but in terms of safety it probably no longer cuts it with larger heavier vehicles on the road. edit: it recieved "good" side impact rating in the old test. However deformation is much worse there than even a lot of the new cars with the new test so RIP I guess I'll die then.

@@__-fm5qv But it can out maneuver most suv's, crash avoidance is important.

@@tedstrogis4823 Very true! I trait I aim to upgrade with suspension mods, bigger brakes and wider tires at some point xD. It is one of the things that stop me going to larger SUV's they're weight also makes it more likely to crash in some cases.

Dead is you are lucky ......

I faced a similar thought process. My current car has two airbags and weighs under a tonne. I'm going to be the worser off in any collision. Will have my new car by the end of the year.

BECAUSE VOLVO IS NOW A CHINESE BRAND 😁

@@tdas7204 I'm afraid that Volvo nowadays is learning from Geely about safety instead of vice versa. It's like a woman (in this case Volvo) that usually wears pants (safety matters) but after marrying a man (Geely) whose religion prohibited women from wearing pants (unsafe "tincan" car manufacturers), that woman stopped wearing pants and wears skirt and thigh-highs (giving false safety) instead of tights (retaining true safety while having Chinese car characteristics)

@footballcoreano or buy a Volvo truck, the true Swedish Volvo

What's so inferior about Mazda

@@ArunKarumathil not only Mazda, every Japanese carmaker doesn't care so much about safety, their crumple zone is too soft that the cabin also got crumpled too. That's why many Japanese cars got the title "tin can" because of their unsafe structure

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

How do u like it a year later?🤮