Find me on Instagram! @stevesbookstagram Follow me on Twitter! @stdonoghue Fascinate me in my Inbox! st.donoghue [at] gmail!
Пікірлер: 48
@lilliannieswender2664 жыл бұрын
I don't agree with your views on Marcus Aurelius, but I do respect your opinion. One good thing about the few freedoms we have left is the chance to agree to disagree. Your edition of The Meditations is truly a work of art.
@lydiajoy18233 ай бұрын
For some reason, I keep coming across interviews with Jerry Seinfeld, and he repeatedly brings up this book and says how important it is. Well, naturally, I thought “what does Steve think about this?” And KZfaq came through. Thanks Steve!
@drawntostories59404 жыл бұрын
If stoicism is understood as being in control of emotions by using your rationality, I don't see how that would exclude caring. Like, you shouldn't be afraid of death, because death is inevitable and being afraid of it would be irrational. You can still care and be stoic about it. When your child breaks his leg, you don't panic (emotions/irrational) but instead think and keep your calm (controlling emotions/rational approach) and take him to a doctor asap. Or you could say it's about seeing things subjectively versus objectively - objective here being a more scientific approach, seeing things as they truly are (in the antiquity, philosophy, or the love of wisdom, was their science). The self-centered stoicism you speak about bewilders me. I don't deny its existence, but it does sound awful. I do agree that Meditations by Marcus Aurelius is a boring read! But at the same time, I think you are being a bit too harsh a judge (okay okay, I'm equally harsh judging Augustine's Confessions, what an awful book, that guy seriously would have needed an editor). After all, Aurelius wrote it to himself and it wasn't intended to be published - it's like giving Diary of Anne Frank a bad rating because the writing is awful and the main character does not always behave well. Finally, I would like to quote Robert Sapolsky, who at the end of his Stanford lectures said: "You don't have to choose between being scientific and being compassionate, you can do both."
@LauraFreyReadinginBed4 жыл бұрын
I'm very behind on this series of videos, but I knew this one wouldn't disappoint. I read this pretty recently, and I just remember thinking to myself, so often, "that's easy for you to say, Marcus Aurelius! "You're here to care"... Sounds like the philosophy of Steve!
@gaildoughty67994 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Steve.
@thiggs933 ай бұрын
I disagree with your analysis of this work. I always saw it as a way to deal with inner turmoil and how to deal with exterior tumult. However, you are sooo good at summarizing books!!!
@Tolstoy11110 ай бұрын
That lyric you quoted at the end is actually Springsteen!
@HelenUtzinge4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Steve.
@StephanieJCohen4 жыл бұрын
You’re here to care is a fantastic philosophy. 😜. And also so very true. I do love these rants.
@sierramaestra49988 ай бұрын
Well there is a reason why this book still around
@nathanfoung23474 жыл бұрын
Would a Dude Bro Lit starter kit be out of order? Mainly for the ensuing rants to be had. Pure entertainment. I really like your final message, perfect for these times. Enlightening.
@saintdonoghue4 жыл бұрын
I should definitely finally do a Dude-Bro Lit Starter Kit! I've been threatening to do that for years now!
@Starscreamlive4 жыл бұрын
@@saintdonoghue I'd get a good kick out of that!
@ThatReadingGuy283 жыл бұрын
@@saintdonoghue gasp! That would be amazing!
@highbury67344 жыл бұрын
Spoken like someone who isn’t in the corporate world, Marcus is worshipped as a change leader in my company. The corporate BS and agile thinking is far worse than anything Marcus put in his diary.
@saintdonoghue4 жыл бұрын
Oh my, I'm so sorry - maybe start writing a book on the side?
@ramblingraconteur16164 жыл бұрын
No one in history is better equipped to face the challenges of the empire than I am . . . and I am not equipped to do it. (For 90 pages?) I try to have empathy for the people who try to read this straight through. The repetition makes it an abyss. Was it Marcus Aurelius who was contemporaneous with Lucian and consequently savages in his dialogues? Do you enjoy Marguerite Yourcenar’s Memoirs of Hadrian?
@JayShayy4 жыл бұрын
Excellent! And another biography to check out. Didn't make it through meditations.
@alexandrahinrichsen67724 жыл бұрын
Thank you, thank you, thank you. Esp the short detour into the minds of lifting dude bros. Someone needed to say it and you did. And I agree that Stoicism is an excercise in selfishness for the privileged. Bravo!
@hedgiecc4 жыл бұрын
I thoroughly enjoyed your amusing contempt for Marcus Aurelius’s philosophy! I have a hardcover bought about 20-25 years ago which I haven’t read at all, despite a few desultory attempts over the years. I’ll stop feeling so guilty about it now.
@robertdavis17834 жыл бұрын
I read the Meditations not too long ago with a philosophically educated friend, and found it mostly bad, from both literary and philosophical levels. I disagree that all philosophy is bad, but in Marcus' case, it does strongly echo that deafening "I'm doing this because I'm rich and powerful" vibe that is almost ever present in modern adherents of "stoicism." Ditto on the general framework of stoicism, since it almost always leads to the rampant self-centered lack of concern for anything beyond your own nose common these days. Moreover, Aurelius seemed to be absolutely terrified of his own death, and his constant "exercises" to the contrary sounded the same to me as someone who is literally on fire telling themselves that they're perfectly fine and shouldn't worry. Plus the limitless army of corporate Aurelius followers whose only interest is in personal wealth and advancement is appalling.
@derekgreen73197 ай бұрын
Read the count of monte Cristo! Lol
@rishabhaniket19526 ай бұрын
Given your track record of hating almost everyone with power it's not surprising you were critical of Marcus Aurelius'a work too. A work revered by scholars for years but too pretentious for the high and mighty Steve. You have a unique talent of finding the negative in everything and blowing it out of proportions. Is being in power his fault?? It was his personal diary not meant for readership and often in our personal accounts we write idealistic goals for ourselves. Why so grumpy and contemptuous??
@elenamakridina81964 жыл бұрын
Delicate? You?
@Leebearify4 жыл бұрын
Holy Kay Rap.. I just saw the Marcus A Book 2 here on Book Tube. I managed the first 3 minutes...you are so right, so very right. Excuse me while I go be sick.
@nualafaolin71294 ай бұрын
Marcus writes over and over about the common good, how what’s good for us is good for the hive, etc. Stoicism is all about caring about others, doing your civic duty to others. But we don’t control other people. We only control ourselves. So by controlling our inner selves and not letting ourselves become identified with our anger for example, we make life for us, and for those around us, better. I get the feeling from your video, you don’t really understand what Stoicism is in essence tbh… but cherrypicking and misrepresenting parts of an ancient belief system to suit your viewpoint… disappointed tbh…
@HannahsBooks4 жыл бұрын
What a stunningly lovely edition. Aurelius and Rand is an amazing comparison. How would you explain why MA has continued to resonate over all these years, with all the cultural differences over time? Just that justification of self-centeredness? “Here to care”-yes! And that idea has been with us since Gilgamesh, hasn’t it?
@saintdonoghue4 жыл бұрын
He continues to resonate because he was a Roman emperor, with power over legions of armored warriors. Not for his wisdom. Not for his insight into the human condition. Because he was a Roman emperor.
@alexhauser50438 ай бұрын
@@saintdonoghue Nonsense. The works of Epictetus are just as widely read as those of Marcus Aurelius, and Epictetus was a crippled freedman. Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus, and (especially) Seneca have been read for two thousand years because countless men have found their precepts and reflections to be of use here, now, and in this world.
@Anon1gh36 ай бұрын
@@alexhauser5043 It's popular and lasted a long time, therefore it's valid? Not the best logic. You could say the same about the Koran or the Bible. Edit: you're a few years late.
@alexhauser50436 ай бұрын
@@Anon1gh3 "Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus, and (especially) Seneca have been read for two thousand years because countless men have found their precepts and reflections to be of use here, now, and in this world." Try actually reading my comment, you illiterate child.
@alexhauser50436 ай бұрын
@@Anon1gh3 "Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus, and (especially) Seneca have been read for two thousand years BECAUSE countless men have found their precepts and reflections to be of use here, now, and in this world." Re-read. Caps for emphasis.
@tripp88334 жыл бұрын
So you’re saying he’s like Jordan Peterson of the Hellenistic age? Lol...
@VisualFeast75574 жыл бұрын
Also Plato and Diogenes - aciant Greece, Niccolò Machiavelli - Renaissance Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche - XIX century, Ayn Rand - the cold war era. They hate or don't like: Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Hegel, Karl Marx, Jean-Paul Sartre, Henri Lefebvre...
@tripp88334 жыл бұрын
@@VisualFeast7557 what
@jamieallan6450Ай бұрын
Yeah i would rather look at marcus aurelius meditations than look at that scruffy little Dog tbh!!!!!!.😆😆🤣🤣