Man that's not fair, I can't just pick one of these, they're all amazing!

Nice video & good news! But the animation of 'co-solvents disecting biomass' at 4:04 - 4:20 is completely wrong. (No offence, but it's not even close). The animation shows water molecules (H2O) disolving a piece of salt (Na+ Cl-). It currently looks very inprofessional I am sorry to say. If you want to fix it I could help you though (just reply)! I am currently researching exactly this topic, converting (woody) biomass into bioethanol using a biorefinery).

Keep up the great work, Good_News!

They are all good but the artificial skin and the aerial technology given to the remote tribe are my favorites.

The first one! I used to work for UPMC … and have a child who’s had recurring ear infections.

It isn't as hooking as shock and sensation and doesn't push the views of the people on top

because it isnt profitable enough for them

70k views in 9 days says it all. Negativity drives engagement drives advertising drives profits. Bad news gets clicks. Whether due to fear, sadness, anger. Happy headlines MIGHT get a read, negative ones get reads, comments, all that engagement shit the algorithms track to decide what to feed you. If course it’s a little self perpetuating, too. Commercial news rooms decided decades ago that negative headlines attracted more readers; people see something that angers or scares them, they tend to want to know more so they buy a paper. So they started pushing only bad news and that system carried over into the digital age. Which, obviously, meant bad news sold more than good; if all people have to eat is cabbages they’re gonna eat cabbage, and that creates false feedback and allows people to draw the wrong conclusion: “people prefer cabbage” rather than “people will eat what’s available even if it’s cabbage for every meal”.

Because shocking information attracts more people.

Its wierd tho, cause I prefer good news way more then the same old negative ones

Sadly in todays world a lot of our friends will say “why’d you send this to me” and “ok?” and they wouldn’t really glance twice at this or care that much it’s so cooked

@@HadesRL That’s partially why I’m not on social media either. It just makes me sad. Good thing this channel doesn’t.

Y'all are literally commenting on social media 😂 did you think this was.... Not?

Mate KZfaq is a social media

​@@kayleighgroenendal8473😂😂😂 fer reals. ROFL

I think you might have missed the point though. Aviation is a much bigger problem then cars rn so biofuel for cars will come swiftly after, but bio jetfuel is first.

The amount of biofuels needed to displace fossil fuels for land transport, is way too large, and impossible to source sustainably. Also, electrification is much more efficient, and cheaper as well.

You're gonna need more earths to create that much biofuel

or you know... public transport like seen in netherlands

Public transport sucks in the netherlands

My thoughts exactly seems odd that Morocco land will power UK. I wonder if the resources required for the cables could be better used connecting closer populations.

I hope they thought of desert animals too.

Exactly. It's like "eco-colonization", taking resources from a poor country so that the wealthier countries can benefit from cheaper electricity prices. I'm also concerned about the thousands miles of underground cable that will require a ton of digging, and the amount of lithium mining needed for the solar panels. It's so shortsighted.

​@@draxyboy well Morocco gets a pretty significant chunk of the profit's, it's their land after all lmao it's beneficial for both countries

@@Mideezhanti Oh boy you think Morocco is poor? Also this isn't that at all Morocco gets a cut of the profit, the power line most likely wont be underground (its impractical and expensive) and whats your idea to solve this issue. The only thing that is short sighted is your comment...

I'll bet that they'll charge up the arse to use the energy from there too

I mean, the only reason UK energy bills and cost of living are skyrocketing is because the British energy market is privatised.

@lordghastly9537 there will be many reasons, none of us will know the truth realy, my guess just a small room full of very rich will, all we can do is guess, rather than sayin it would explain I should have said it could be one of the reasons as thers always many nothing is black or white and we been the public actualy know for fact not very much I belive

Welcome! 🙏

Thank you so much!

Truth >>>>> lies

Working on it!

"It means planning consents for the UK end of the cables will bypass Torridge district council in Devon and instead be determined by the Government. Financial backers include the Abu Dhabi National Energy Company, along with French giant TotalEnergies and British supplier Octopus Energy." I'm uncertain we'll see the benefits as opposed to energy providers.