That entire game 1 looked incorrect, from the moment he chose to hold imperm and let moye resolve. How do you open that well and end on flamberge pass through only 3 interruptions.

I literally just learned how not to play the deck

for exemple game 1, Island,effect is’and distroy kirin, go search garunix, effect of garunix cl1 et kirin cl2 (like that if he negate effect of kirin you can special summon garunix) resolution, special graunix and pop baronne, cl1 nothing, new chain cl1 garunix, destroy arvata, effect arvata for spe kirin, overload for xyz fir king and affect for destroy all the field, he will use him trap, and after you still have bornfire for search ash and start your combo snake eyes for make OTK, ( we dont know what he have in hand but if he have anything it’s game)

​@@kevin-cy7mzwhy wouldn't you make kirin cl1

@@Chackothewacko you are true, it’s a better way, like that your chain block kirin and succes to special garunix even if he is negate and can destroy one card on the field, it’s better yes thanks! 👍🏼

Yea it did he had garunix in hand

Pretty sure the negate cannot be used again

From what I understand it stops being Baronne the monster the moment it is sent to the Spell and Traps zone, and just becomes Baronne the Spell, so it is considered a different card.

@@Nero-sj6pm baronne say, « once while face-up on the field » even if you put it on the spell zone that still face up, the card need to leave conpletly the field and comeback for have the negate again… it’s what i think and understand… maybe ask one juge?

@@kevin-cy7mz Asking a judge when there is not an official ruling wont mean much, it would only give you the opinion of that particular judge in the matter, but if you want you can check the db.ygorganization page on baronne which even tho doesnt justify the answer, says it can be done, and of course it has OCG rulings and no TCG, but rulings are fairly in line unless there is a significant difference in card text.