Hadir

Hadir

🙋🏻‍♂️

Hadir

saya akn turut berjuang..modhar kafirun

Ni bkn Pejuang laa . Ni semua NGO yg ada kepentingan & agenda . Klo nk jdi Pejuang . Biar keseluruhan perjuangan nya . Ramai yg msh tak npk . Mudah jdi pentaksub

@@lions12. Sekurg2nya dia berani bersuara apa yg slah..org yg ada kepentingan diri ja xnmpk semua tu..

@@lions12. Cuba cakap apa kepentingan & agenda tu?

@@faizal_aryan Apa peranan Ngo2 sebenarnya ? Klo tak agenda & kepentingan . Tu pon tak blh pikir je ?

@@econksksk3782 klo nk bersuara biar keseluruhan . Tu baru la Pejuang . Fight korupsi skli .

*Y A*

Kita sepatut nya hormati menghormati antar agama.jangan menghina agama lain sebelum betbuat pikur2 dulu

PRU 15 kalian orang muda janganlah lagi tertipu janji2 bulan dan bintang yer.Gunakan kuasa undi itu jangan lagi pilih DAP dan PKR dan gabungan PH yang lain.Buang masa 22 bulan menghuruharakan pentadbiran negara,asset2 negara dan TH hilang dan pelbagai lagi kemusnahan termasuk penarikan balik rayuan Batu Putih dalam mahkamah antarabangsa.Cuma jasa PH ialah bawa DSN dan DSZH serta kuncu2 Umno ke mahkamah jer.Yang lain haprak.

Pada dap komunis ke perjuang

Iran Laksanakan 10 Undang-Undang Bongok 1. Perempuan tak dibenar tunjuk rambut 2. Perempuan tak dibenar menyanyi 3. Perempuan tak dibenar menari 4. Perempuan tak dibenar bercerai 5. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk stadium 6. Perempuan tak dibenar tunggang motosikal 7. Perempuan tak dibenar keluar negara seorang diri 8. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk tentera 9. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi saksi 10. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi hakim

Kasi ramai² turun biar mampus puak² tu

@@takiyaazrin7562 jaoh pegi smpai iran????

Sanggup bersama sama.. Bila2 masa saje

@@takiyaazrin7562 tolong buktikan.. jgn main tulis je..

Btl ckp abg ni.bahkan gerakan ni cukup paham isu yg perlu dimainkan kepada umum sebagai "diversion" terhadap isu semasa yg sedang hangat serta menjadi kemarahan umum.contoh: isu kenaikan harga barang kepada isu akidah dan kehormatan islam.tujuan utama; pelemahan dan serangan kepada umat islam dr segala sudut aspek

Bro,banyak cakap banyak salah

@@thamwai5185 Fakta yang ada di depan you.

@@thamwai5185 kacau bapak kau ke ? Dasar penumpang yang tidak sedar diri !!!

sebab dedak camna nk bersatu

Kapir or Kafir..Kafir menurut kefahaman anda semua apa mksdnya..klau kefahaman saya Kafir itu adalah org yg tdk mngenal Tuhan..yg tdk percaya sang pencipta itu Ada..bole bagi pencerahan

Sebab tu kita kena lawan extremist hindu Buddha ni

Kafir.. tertutup terhijab kebenaran

Azmi yusuf sentiasa terbaik..moga Allah melindunginya dan keluarganya.amin. #Allahhukbar

Iran Laksanakan 10 Undang-Undang Bongok 1. Perempuan tak dibenar tunjuk rambut 2. Perempuan tak dibenar menyanyi 3. Perempuan tak dibenar menari 4. Perempuan tak dibenar bercerai 5. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk stadium 6. Perempuan tak dibenar tunggang motosikal 7. Perempuan tak dibenar keluar negara seorang diri 8. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk tentera 9. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi saksi 10. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi hakim

@@takiyaazrin7562 Here comes a coward Islam-hater who can just afford to 'hit-and-run'. So what❓ A coward will always remain a coward. That's fact❗ Note: ‘Fact-proof and evidence’ is all it takes. That’s what ‘truth’ is all about actually.

@@takiyaazrin7562 @ FACT: THE BIBLE AND TAQIYYA Does the Bible completely forbid lying? No, it does not. In Exodus, we find that Pharaoh ordered the killing of all new-born baby boys. He ordered the midwives to carry out such a heinous crime: 15 The king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, whose names were Shiphrah and Puah, 16 “When you are helping the Hebrew women during childbirth on the delivery stool, if you see that the baby is a boy, kill him; but if it is a girl, let her live.” 17 The midwives, however, feared God and did not do what the king of Egypt had told them to do; they let the boys live. 18 Then the king of Egypt summoned the midwives and asked them, “Why have you done this? Why have you let the boys live?” 19 The midwives answered Pharaoh, “Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive.” 20 So God was kind to the midwives and the people increased and became even more numerous. 21 And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families of their own. Exodus 1:15-22 In the above, Pharaoh asks Shiphrah and Puah why they did not carry out his order. And they responded by lying, telling Pharaoh that Hebrew women and Egyptian women are not the same, and that Hebrew women are vigorous and give birth in haste before they arrived (v. 19). In verse 20-21, instead of God rebuking Shiphrah and Puah for lying, YHWH rewards them by having ‘families of their own’. The silence of YHWH for not condemning the two midwives for deceiving Pharaoh shows that lying in certain situations in order to save innocent lives from being killed is allowed. Commentary Making Sense of Bible Difficulties: Clear and Concise Answers from Genesis To Revelation - Norman L. Geisler And Thomas Howe: Solution: There is little question that the midwives disobeyed Pharaoh by not murdering the newborn male children and lied to Pharaoh when they said they arrived too late to carry out his orders. Nonetheless, there is moral justification for what they did. First, the moral dilemma in which the midwives found themselves was unavoidable. Either they obeyed God’s higher law, or they obeyed lesser obligation of submitting to Pharaoh. Rather than commit deliberate infanticide against the children of their own people, the midwives chose to disobey Pharaoh’s orders. God commands us not to murder (Exodus. 20:13). The saving of innocent lives is a higher obligation than obedience to government. When the government commands us to murder innocent victims, we should not obey. God did not hold the midwives responsible-nor does He hold us responsible-for not following a lower obligation in order to obey a higher law (cf. Acts 4; Rev. 13). In the case of the midwives, the higher law was to the preservation of the lives of the newborn male children. Second, the text clearly states that God blessed them ‘because the midwives feared God’ (Exod. 1:21). It was their fear of God that led them to do what was necessary to save these innocent lives. Thus, their false statement to Pharaoh was an essential part of their effort to save lives. Third, their lying is comparable to their having disobeyed Pharaoh in order to save the lives of the innocent newborns. This is a case where the midwives had to choose between lying and being compelled to murder innocent babies. Here again the midwives chose to obey the higher moral law. Obedience to parents is part of the moral law (Cf. Eph. 6:1). But if a parent commanded his or child to kill a neighbour or worship an idol, the child should refuse. Jesus emphasized the need to follow higher moral law when He said, ‘He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me (Matt. 10:37). [1] Notes on Exodus - Dr. Thomas L. Constable The midwives’ fear of God (vv. 17, 21) led them to disobey Pharaoh’s command to practice genocide. They chose to obey God rather than man since Pharaoh’s order contradicted a fundamental divine command (cf. Gen. 1:28; 9:1, 7). All life belongs to God, so He is the only person who has the right to take it or to command when others should take it. The midwives’ fear of God resulted in their having reverence for human life. Their explanation of their actions (v. 19) may have been truthful or it may not have been entirely truthful. “Even though these women lied to Pharaoh (which the Bible, as is often the case, does not stop to specifically condemn at this point), they are praised for their outright refusal to take infant lives.”33 God blessed these women with families of their own (v. 21) in spite of their deceit, if they practiced it, because they feared God. [2] The NIV Application Commentary: 1 & 2 Samuel - Bill T. Arnold: Take, for example, Shiphrah and Puah, the Hebrew midwives of Exodus 1:15-21. The Egyptian pharaoh tried to control Israelite population growth by demanding that the midwives in charge of Hebrew births kill the boys, allowing only the girls to live. But because the midwives were God-fearing women, they refused to obey the King and allowed the boys to live as well. When Pharaoh demanded to know why they did not obey him, they simply lied (1:19): ‘Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive’. In this case, the midwives were blessed for their actions. God rewarded them with families of their own because they feared him more than the Egyptian king and chose to risk lying rather than kill the newborn Hebrew boys. Likewise Rahab certainly told a lie to the king of Jericho to save the two Israelite spies (Josh. 2:4-6), and New Testament authors unanimously praise her actions as works of faith (Heb. 11:31; James 2:25). When we compare these disparate episodes, a certain biblical ethic begins to emerge, which is supported by our text in 1 Samuel 19. Rather than a monlothic prohibition against all lying and deception, the Bible offers general principle, modified with several exceptions. The general principle is most notably stated in the ninth commandment, which contains a statement against lying in a court of law (Ex. 20:16). Elsewhere the Bible generally disdains all falsehood (Prov. 11:3) and portrays Satan as the ‘father of lies’ (John 8:44; Eph. 4:25). But then we have exceptions such as the Hebrew midwives, who chose to embrace the guilt of deception in order to preserve the lives of the newborns. They unselfishly put themselves at risk before the Pharaoh rather than fulfil his gruesome orders. Jonathan and Michal seem to be in the same category as the Hebrew midwives and Rahab. These biblical characters choose the higher good and are willing to accept the consequences of their choices, even if it puts them at personal risk in order to help innocent person. Many Christian scholars through the centuries have agreed. Thomas Aquinas distinguished three classes of lies: Officious lies, or helpful lies of necessity; jocose lies, told in jest; and mischievous lies, or malicious lies told to harm another person or to save face personally. Only the third category constitutes sin in Aquinas’s view. I would agree with Aquinas, but I would also warn that the lie of necessity is only morally justified (even morally required?) under certain circumstances, such as rare situations where it is clear that innocent lives are at stake. In this biblical ethic, lying and deception are wrong and to be avoided. However, the actions of Jonathan and Michal, the Hebrew midwives, and others suggest there are times when believers should choose to accept the guilt of lying in order to accomplish a higher good, as they believe it to be defined by God. Thus, we recognize deception as always bad but sometimes desirable in extenuating circumstances. [3] …more More... To see/read the whole content of this quite a very lengthy article, click on the link below: discover-the-truth.com/2015/01/18/the-bible-and-taqiyya-part-1/

@@takiyaazrin7562 pemimpin Politaik ada yg berkiblatkan Iran.kenal dak dia puak mana

@@mdasyathebatmaticamat6770 o

Allahuakhbar !

Kerana itulah mereka suka lihat melayu berpecah belah..kalau melayu islam bersatu kita kuat

Bro sebelum nk perang,rajin2 pi masjid surau berjamaah dn rajin hadir kuliah.. insyaallah paduu kita boleh perang😁

@@hanafihanafi6831 ko knl dia ka??

@@hanafihanafi6831 btul 🤭

Byk lg org yg hebat. Jgn terpengaruh sgt . Ngo2 ni semua ada agenda & kepentingan . Bkn Pejuang yg sebenar . Sbb tdk berani tegur pemimpin MELAYU ISLAM korup.

@@lions12. Siapa dan ape kuasa dia untuk menegur pemimpin yg korup sedang kn Malaysia sendiri ade badan penguatkuasa ( SPRM) yg di lantik untuk memantau @ menerima aduan kes rasuah ( korup ). Maka jika kamu ade bukti sila tampil , jgn jadi seekor lebah yg merungut di dlm sarang lebahnya sahaja. Aku terpengaruh pada diri dia pun bersebab kerna dia seorang sahaja yg berani tampil kehadapan , serta sifat keperibadian yg di tunjuk kn nya dan Jati dirinya di dlm memikul amanah serta tanggungjawap beliau untk membantu org2 melayu dan Islam. Ko x suka itu hak ko , aku sama skali tidak terpedaya dgn kata2 dan dakyah kolot ko tu.. klo bukan dia siapa lagi... Jgn lah ko sperti seekor kambing yg menanduk gunung , gunung x runtuh tpi tanduknya yg patah...

@Vipers kenapa baling batu sembunyi tangan..kenapa padam.

@@muniahmad6053 vipers tu satu geng ngn ramasamy tu, kapiaq jugak tuu

@@abgishak5007 Cai Ramasamy LA😂😂

Kita perlu kn lebih lg pemimpin mcmni..terbaik tuan..ramai di blkang ni..jgn rsau.insyaAllah Allah dn rasul bersama kita..masing2 ambik peranan masing..kita pasti di segani d hormati juga nt.. insyaAllah..

@@Mohd-nl9xy Iran Laksanakan 10 Undang-Undang Bongok 1. Perempuan tak dibenar tunjuk rambut 2. Perempuan tak dibenar menyanyi 3. Perempuan tak dibenar menari 4. Perempuan tak dibenar bercerai 5. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk stadium 6. Perempuan tak dibenar tunggang motosikal 7. Perempuan tak dibenar keluar negara seorang diri 8. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk tentera 9. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi saksi 10. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi hakim

@@takiyaazrin7562 Here comes a coward Islam-hater who can just afford to 'hit-and-run'. So what❓ A coward will always remain a coward. That's fact❗ Note: ‘Fact-proof and evidence’ is all it takes. That’s what ‘truth’ is all about actually.

@@takiyaazrin7562 @ FACT: THE BIBLE AND TAQIYYA Does the Bible completely forbid lying? No, it does not. In Exodus, we find that Pharaoh ordered the killing of all new-born baby boys. He ordered the midwives to carry out such a heinous crime: 15 The king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, whose names were Shiphrah and Puah, 16 “When you are helping the Hebrew women during childbirth on the delivery stool, if you see that the baby is a boy, kill him; but if it is a girl, let her live.” 17 The midwives, however, feared God and did not do what the king of Egypt had told them to do; they let the boys live. 18 Then the king of Egypt summoned the midwives and asked them, “Why have you done this? Why have you let the boys live?” 19 The midwives answered Pharaoh, “Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive.” 20 So God was kind to the midwives and the people increased and became even more numerous. 21 And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families of their own. Exodus 1:15-22 In the above, Pharaoh asks Shiphrah and Puah why they did not carry out his order. And they responded by lying, telling Pharaoh that Hebrew women and Egyptian women are not the same, and that Hebrew women are vigorous and give birth in haste before they arrived (v. 19). In verse 20-21, instead of God rebuking Shiphrah and Puah for lying, YHWH rewards them by having ‘families of their own’. The silence of YHWH for not condemning the two midwives for deceiving Pharaoh shows that lying in certain situations in order to save innocent lives from being killed is allowed. Commentary Making Sense of Bible Difficulties: Clear and Concise Answers from Genesis To Revelation - Norman L. Geisler And Thomas Howe: Solution: There is little question that the midwives disobeyed Pharaoh by not murdering the newborn male children and lied to Pharaoh when they said they arrived too late to carry out his orders. Nonetheless, there is moral justification for what they did. First, the moral dilemma in which the midwives found themselves was unavoidable. Either they obeyed God’s higher law, or they obeyed lesser obligation of submitting to Pharaoh. Rather than commit deliberate infanticide against the children of their own people, the midwives chose to disobey Pharaoh’s orders. God commands us not to murder (Exodus. 20:13). The saving of innocent lives is a higher obligation than obedience to government. When the government commands us to murder innocent victims, we should not obey. God did not hold the midwives responsible-nor does He hold us responsible-for not following a lower obligation in order to obey a higher law (cf. Acts 4; Rev. 13). In the case of the midwives, the higher law was to the preservation of the lives of the newborn male children. Second, the text clearly states that God blessed them ‘because the midwives feared God’ (Exod. 1:21). It was their fear of God that led them to do what was necessary to save these innocent lives. Thus, their false statement to Pharaoh was an essential part of their effort to save lives. Third, their lying is comparable to their having disobeyed Pharaoh in order to save the lives of the innocent newborns. This is a case where the midwives had to choose between lying and being compelled to murder innocent babies. Here again the midwives chose to obey the higher moral law. Obedience to parents is part of the moral law (Cf. Eph. 6:1). But if a parent commanded his or child to kill a neighbour or worship an idol, the child should refuse. Jesus emphasized the need to follow higher moral law when He said, ‘He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me (Matt. 10:37). [1] Notes on Exodus - Dr. Thomas L. Constable The midwives’ fear of God (vv. 17, 21) led them to disobey Pharaoh’s command to practice genocide. They chose to obey God rather than man since Pharaoh’s order contradicted a fundamental divine command (cf. Gen. 1:28; 9:1, 7). All life belongs to God, so He is the only person who has the right to take it or to command when others should take it. The midwives’ fear of God resulted in their having reverence for human life. Their explanation of their actions (v. 19) may have been truthful or it may not have been entirely truthful. “Even though these women lied to Pharaoh (which the Bible, as is often the case, does not stop to specifically condemn at this point), they are praised for their outright refusal to take infant lives.”33 God blessed these women with families of their own (v. 21) in spite of their deceit, if they practiced it, because they feared God. [2] The NIV Application Commentary: 1 & 2 Samuel - Bill T. Arnold: Take, for example, Shiphrah and Puah, the Hebrew midwives of Exodus 1:15-21. The Egyptian pharaoh tried to control Israelite population growth by demanding that the midwives in charge of Hebrew births kill the boys, allowing only the girls to live. But because the midwives were God-fearing women, they refused to obey the King and allowed the boys to live as well. When Pharaoh demanded to know why they did not obey him, they simply lied (1:19): ‘Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive’. In this case, the midwives were blessed for their actions. God rewarded them with families of their own because they feared him more than the Egyptian king and chose to risk lying rather than kill the newborn Hebrew boys. Likewise Rahab certainly told a lie to the king of Jericho to save the two Israelite spies (Josh. 2:4-6), and New Testament authors unanimously praise her actions as works of faith (Heb. 11:31; James 2:25). When we compare these disparate episodes, a certain biblical ethic begins to emerge, which is supported by our text in 1 Samuel 19. Rather than a monlothic prohibition against all lying and deception, the Bible offers general principle, modified with several exceptions. The general principle is most notably stated in the ninth commandment, which contains a statement against lying in a court of law (Ex. 20:16). Elsewhere the Bible generally disdains all falsehood (Prov. 11:3) and portrays Satan as the ‘father of lies’ (John 8:44; Eph. 4:25). But then we have exceptions such as the Hebrew midwives, who chose to embrace the guilt of deception in order to preserve the lives of the newborns. They unselfishly put themselves at risk before the Pharaoh rather than fulfil his gruesome orders. Jonathan and Michal seem to be in the same category as the Hebrew midwives and Rahab. These biblical characters choose the higher good and are willing to accept the consequences of their choices, even if it puts them at personal risk in order to help innocent person. Many Christian scholars through the centuries have agreed. Thomas Aquinas distinguished three classes of lies: Officious lies, or helpful lies of necessity; jocose lies, told in jest; and mischievous lies, or malicious lies told to harm another person or to save face personally. Only the third category constitutes sin in Aquinas’s view. I would agree with Aquinas, but I would also warn that the lie of necessity is only morally justified (even morally required?) under certain circumstances, such as rare situations where it is clear that innocent lives are at stake. In this biblical ethic, lying and deception are wrong and to be avoided. However, the actions of Jonathan and Michal, the Hebrew midwives, and others suggest there are times when believers should choose to accept the guilt of lying in order to accomplish a higher good, as they believe it to be defined by God. Thus, we recognize deception as always bad but sometimes desirable in extenuating circumstances. [3] …more More... To see/read the whole content of this quite a very lengthy article, click on the link below: discover-the-truth.com/2015/01/18/the-bible-and-taqiyya-part-1/

@@takiyaazrin7562 pemimpin politik yang berkiblatkan Iran pun ada.tolak puak ni pru15

Setuju

Dah banyak makan budi.mekayu tetap pilih PHuak ni

Jangan lupa mark ahli politik yg kaki rasuah skali

Sudah tiba saatnya islam melayu bersatu..masa makin suntuk.. penghinaan islam menjadi².

Iran Laksanakan 10 Undang-Undang Bongok 1. Perempuan tak dibenar tunjuk rambut 2. Perempuan tak dibenar menyanyi 3. Perempuan tak dibenar menari 4. Perempuan tak dibenar bercerai 5. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk stadium 6. Perempuan tak dibenar tunggang motosikal 7. Perempuan tak dibenar keluar negara seorang diri 8. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk tentera 9. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi saksi 10. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi hakim

@@takiyaazrin7562 Here comes a coward Islam-hater who can just afford to 'hit-and-run'. So what❓ A coward will always remain a coward. That's fact❗ Note: ‘Fact-proof and evidence’ is all it takes. That’s what ‘truth’ is all about actually.

@@takiyaazrin7562 @ FACT: THE BIBLE AND TAQIYYA Does the Bible completely forbid lying? No, it does not. In Exodus, we find that Pharaoh ordered the killing of all new-born baby boys. He ordered the midwives to carry out such a heinous crime: 15 The king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, whose names were Shiphrah and Puah, 16 “When you are helping the Hebrew women during childbirth on the delivery stool, if you see that the baby is a boy, kill him; but if it is a girl, let her live.” 17 The midwives, however, feared God and did not do what the king of Egypt had told them to do; they let the boys live. 18 Then the king of Egypt summoned the midwives and asked them, “Why have you done this? Why have you let the boys live?” 19 The midwives answered Pharaoh, “Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive.” 20 So God was kind to the midwives and the people increased and became even more numerous. 21 And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families of their own. Exodus 1:15-22 In the above, Pharaoh asks Shiphrah and Puah why they did not carry out his order. And they responded by lying, telling Pharaoh that Hebrew women and Egyptian women are not the same, and that Hebrew women are vigorous and give birth in haste before they arrived (v. 19). In verse 20-21, instead of God rebuking Shiphrah and Puah for lying, YHWH rewards them by having ‘families of their own’. The silence of YHWH for not condemning the two midwives for deceiving Pharaoh shows that lying in certain situations in order to save innocent lives from being killed is allowed. Commentary Making Sense of Bible Difficulties: Clear and Concise Answers from Genesis To Revelation - Norman L. Geisler And Thomas Howe: Solution: There is little question that the midwives disobeyed Pharaoh by not murdering the newborn male children and lied to Pharaoh when they said they arrived too late to carry out his orders. Nonetheless, there is moral justification for what they did. First, the moral dilemma in which the midwives found themselves was unavoidable. Either they obeyed God’s higher law, or they obeyed lesser obligation of submitting to Pharaoh. Rather than commit deliberate infanticide against the children of their own people, the midwives chose to disobey Pharaoh’s orders. God commands us not to murder (Exodus. 20:13). The saving of innocent lives is a higher obligation than obedience to government. When the government commands us to murder innocent victims, we should not obey. God did not hold the midwives responsible-nor does He hold us responsible-for not following a lower obligation in order to obey a higher law (cf. Acts 4; Rev. 13). In the case of the midwives, the higher law was to the preservation of the lives of the newborn male children. Second, the text clearly states that God blessed them ‘because the midwives feared God’ (Exod. 1:21). It was their fear of God that led them to do what was necessary to save these innocent lives. Thus, their false statement to Pharaoh was an essential part of their effort to save lives. Third, their lying is comparable to their having disobeyed Pharaoh in order to save the lives of the innocent newborns. This is a case where the midwives had to choose between lying and being compelled to murder innocent babies. Here again the midwives chose to obey the higher moral law. Obedience to parents is part of the moral law (Cf. Eph. 6:1). But if a parent commanded his or child to kill a neighbour or worship an idol, the child should refuse. Jesus emphasized the need to follow higher moral law when He said, ‘He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me (Matt. 10:37). [1] Notes on Exodus - Dr. Thomas L. Constable The midwives’ fear of God (vv. 17, 21) led them to disobey Pharaoh’s command to practice genocide. They chose to obey God rather than man since Pharaoh’s order contradicted a fundamental divine command (cf. Gen. 1:28; 9:1, 7). All life belongs to God, so He is the only person who has the right to take it or to command when others should take it. The midwives’ fear of God resulted in their having reverence for human life. Their explanation of their actions (v. 19) may have been truthful or it may not have been entirely truthful. “Even though these women lied to Pharaoh (which the Bible, as is often the case, does not stop to specifically condemn at this point), they are praised for their outright refusal to take infant lives.”33 God blessed these women with families of their own (v. 21) in spite of their deceit, if they practiced it, because they feared God. [2] The NIV Application Commentary: 1 & 2 Samuel - Bill T. Arnold: Take, for example, Shiphrah and Puah, the Hebrew midwives of Exodus 1:15-21. The Egyptian pharaoh tried to control Israelite population growth by demanding that the midwives in charge of Hebrew births kill the boys, allowing only the girls to live. But because the midwives were God-fearing women, they refused to obey the King and allowed the boys to live as well. When Pharaoh demanded to know why they did not obey him, they simply lied (1:19): ‘Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive’. In this case, the midwives were blessed for their actions. God rewarded them with families of their own because they feared him more than the Egyptian king and chose to risk lying rather than kill the newborn Hebrew boys. Likewise Rahab certainly told a lie to the king of Jericho to save the two Israelite spies (Josh. 2:4-6), and New Testament authors unanimously praise her actions as works of faith (Heb. 11:31; James 2:25). When we compare these disparate episodes, a certain biblical ethic begins to emerge, which is supported by our text in 1 Samuel 19. Rather than a monlothic prohibition against all lying and deception, the Bible offers general principle, modified with several exceptions. The general principle is most notably stated in the ninth commandment, which contains a statement against lying in a court of law (Ex. 20:16). Elsewhere the Bible generally disdains all falsehood (Prov. 11:3) and portrays Satan as the ‘father of lies’ (John 8:44; Eph. 4:25). But then we have exceptions such as the Hebrew midwives, who chose to embrace the guilt of deception in order to preserve the lives of the newborns. They unselfishly put themselves at risk before the Pharaoh rather than fulfil his gruesome orders. Jonathan and Michal seem to be in the same category as the Hebrew midwives and Rahab. These biblical characters choose the higher good and are willing to accept the consequences of their choices, even if it puts them at personal risk in order to help innocent person. Many Christian scholars through the centuries have agreed. Thomas Aquinas distinguished three classes of lies: Officious lies, or helpful lies of necessity; jocose lies, told in jest; and mischievous lies, or malicious lies told to harm another person or to save face personally. Only the third category constitutes sin in Aquinas’s view. I would agree with Aquinas, but I would also warn that the lie of necessity is only morally justified (even morally required?) under certain circumstances, such as rare situations where it is clear that innocent lives are at stake. In this biblical ethic, lying and deception are wrong and to be avoided. However, the actions of Jonathan and Michal, the Hebrew midwives, and others suggest there are times when believers should choose to accept the guilt of lying in order to accomplish a higher good, as they believe it to be defined by God. Thus, we recognize deception as always bad but sometimes desirable in extenuating circumstances. [3] …more More... To see/read the whole content of this quite a very lengthy article, click on the link below: discover-the-truth.com/2015/01/18/the-bible-and-taqiyya-part-1/

@@takiyaazrin7562 pemimpin PHolitaik ada berkiblatkan Iran

Kena ramai yg kena bersuara tak cukup seorg kerana lawannya ramai juga

Kena tolak abis abisan YB yg mcm ni, kurang ajar, gila kuasa sbb dah jd YB, rakyat yg salah pilih, kena tukar

Parti dap bakal terkubur

Pru15 tanam dalam dalam PHuak khonching kuat ni

tembak je

Setuju

Mcmana dgn LTTE?pulak

Betul

PH incompetent tak layak memerintah negara

Setuju...melayu kena bersatu..dap dan sekutunya wajib ditolak 100%

*DI PRU 15 NANTI KITA MELAYU ISLAM JANGAN SESEKALI BERI UNDI KEPADA PARTI PARTI YANG BEKERJASAMA, BERPAKAT BERGANDING BAHU DENGAN DAP* *MEREKA MENJADI KUAT KERANA MELAYU BERPECAH BELAH* *MEREKA BERSELINDUNG DISEBALIK IMEJ PAKATAN HARAPAN* *AYUH BANGSA KU MELAYU ISLAM DI MALAYSIA* *KITA BERDIRI TEGUH DI BAWAH PANJI UMNO DI MALAYSIA* *KITA'PADAMKAN HASRAT/ NIAT JAHAT MEREKA TERHADAP BANGSA MELAYU ISLAM DI MALAYSIA*

itu jenis melayu spesis 'buang'

Mereka ni pemimpin DAP.. Melayu sesat pun ada dlm DAP.. Menyedihkan...

Tu namanye barua

Yg barua tu semua... skrg dipuncak kekuasaanlah dari dulu sampai sekarang...siap bagi taraf warganegara, sekolah aliran sendiri, lesen judi 4d & casino dan berbagai.... tetapi mcm biasalah...bertopengkan agama bangsa dan negara🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Sedih la kan..bermatian jilat org kapir tapi hnya dapat dosa dan habis air liur saja..boss mereka dapat gaji ..tp mereka tak dapat apa2..hnya jadi balaci 🤌

Dulu pun kita pernah bersuara, tolak mana-mana pemimpin dan wakil rakyat yang menyokong individu yang menghina islam dan bersikap perkauman, tetapi pada akhirnya kita tetap undi dan sokong dia.

*ANDA cakap anda tak undi DAP* *Bila anda undi PAN PKR,MUDA BERMAKNA ANDA SUDAH PUN UNDI DAP* *DAP BERSELINDUNG DI SEBALIK PH( Pakatan harapan)*

ITU LAH AKIBATNYA NEGARA DENGAN PIMIMPIN MELAYU ISLAM. TENGOK SENDIRI LAH. HANCUR

Setuju tu....👍👍👍👍👍

Tapi banyak melayu yg menyokong

Yg menyokong tu mekayu yg dah dikuda kayu

Iran Laksanakan 10 Undang-Undang Bongok 1. Perempuan tak dibenar tunjuk rambut 2. Perempuan tak dibenar menyanyi 3. Perempuan tak dibenar menari 4. Perempuan tak dibenar bercerai 5. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk stadium 6. Perempuan tak dibenar tunggang motosikal 7. Perempuan tak dibenar keluar negara seorang diri 8. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk tentera 9. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi saksi 10. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi hakim

@@takiyaazrin7562 Here comes a coward Islam-hater who can just afford to 'hit-and-run'. So what❓ A coward will always remain a coward. That's fact❗ Note: ‘Fact-proof and evidence’ is all it takes. That’s what ‘truth’ is all about actually.

@@takiyaazrin7562 @ FACT: THE BIBLE AND TAQIYYA Does the Bible completely forbid lying? No, it does not. In Exodus, we find that Pharaoh ordered the killing of all new-born baby boys. He ordered the midwives to carry out such a heinous crime: 15 The king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, whose names were Shiphrah and Puah, 16 “When you are helping the Hebrew women during childbirth on the delivery stool, if you see that the baby is a boy, kill him; but if it is a girl, let her live.” 17 The midwives, however, feared God and did not do what the king of Egypt had told them to do; they let the boys live. 18 Then the king of Egypt summoned the midwives and asked them, “Why have you done this? Why have you let the boys live?” 19 The midwives answered Pharaoh, “Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive.” 20 So God was kind to the midwives and the people increased and became even more numerous. 21 And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families of their own. Exodus 1:15-22 In the above, Pharaoh asks Shiphrah and Puah why they did not carry out his order. And they responded by lying, telling Pharaoh that Hebrew women and Egyptian women are not the same, and that Hebrew women are vigorous and give birth in haste before they arrived (v. 19). In verse 20-21, instead of God rebuking Shiphrah and Puah for lying, YHWH rewards them by having ‘families of their own’. The silence of YHWH for not condemning the two midwives for deceiving Pharaoh shows that lying in certain situations in order to save innocent lives from being killed is allowed. Commentary Making Sense of Bible Difficulties: Clear and Concise Answers from Genesis To Revelation - Norman L. Geisler And Thomas Howe: Solution: There is little question that the midwives disobeyed Pharaoh by not murdering the newborn male children and lied to Pharaoh when they said they arrived too late to carry out his orders. Nonetheless, there is moral justification for what they did. First, the moral dilemma in which the midwives found themselves was unavoidable. Either they obeyed God’s higher law, or they obeyed lesser obligation of submitting to Pharaoh. Rather than commit deliberate infanticide against the children of their own people, the midwives chose to disobey Pharaoh’s orders. God commands us not to murder (Exodus. 20:13). The saving of innocent lives is a higher obligation than obedience to government. When the government commands us to murder innocent victims, we should not obey. God did not hold the midwives responsible-nor does He hold us responsible-for not following a lower obligation in order to obey a higher law (cf. Acts 4; Rev. 13). In the case of the midwives, the higher law was to the preservation of the lives of the newborn male children. Second, the text clearly states that God blessed them ‘because the midwives feared God’ (Exod. 1:21). It was their fear of God that led them to do what was necessary to save these innocent lives. Thus, their false statement to Pharaoh was an essential part of their effort to save lives. Third, their lying is comparable to their having disobeyed Pharaoh in order to save the lives of the innocent newborns. This is a case where the midwives had to choose between lying and being compelled to murder innocent babies. Here again the midwives chose to obey the higher moral law. Obedience to parents is part of the moral law (Cf. Eph. 6:1). But if a parent commanded his or child to kill a neighbour or worship an idol, the child should refuse. Jesus emphasized the need to follow higher moral law when He said, ‘He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me (Matt. 10:37). [1] Notes on Exodus - Dr. Thomas L. Constable The midwives’ fear of God (vv. 17, 21) led them to disobey Pharaoh’s command to practice genocide. They chose to obey God rather than man since Pharaoh’s order contradicted a fundamental divine command (cf. Gen. 1:28; 9:1, 7). All life belongs to God, so He is the only person who has the right to take it or to command when others should take it. The midwives’ fear of God resulted in their having reverence for human life. Their explanation of their actions (v. 19) may have been truthful or it may not have been entirely truthful. “Even though these women lied to Pharaoh (which the Bible, as is often the case, does not stop to specifically condemn at this point), they are praised for their outright refusal to take infant lives.”33 God blessed these women with families of their own (v. 21) in spite of their deceit, if they practiced it, because they feared God. [2] The NIV Application Commentary: 1 & 2 Samuel - Bill T. Arnold: Take, for example, Shiphrah and Puah, the Hebrew midwives of Exodus 1:15-21. The Egyptian pharaoh tried to control Israelite population growth by demanding that the midwives in charge of Hebrew births kill the boys, allowing only the girls to live. But because the midwives were God-fearing women, they refused to obey the King and allowed the boys to live as well. When Pharaoh demanded to know why they did not obey him, they simply lied (1:19): ‘Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive’. In this case, the midwives were blessed for their actions. God rewarded them with families of their own because they feared him more than the Egyptian king and chose to risk lying rather than kill the newborn Hebrew boys. Likewise Rahab certainly told a lie to the king of Jericho to save the two Israelite spies (Josh. 2:4-6), and New Testament authors unanimously praise her actions as works of faith (Heb. 11:31; James 2:25). When we compare these disparate episodes, a certain biblical ethic begins to emerge, which is supported by our text in 1 Samuel 19. Rather than a monlothic prohibition against all lying and deception, the Bible offers general principle, modified with several exceptions. The general principle is most notably stated in the ninth commandment, which contains a statement against lying in a court of law (Ex. 20:16). Elsewhere the Bible generally disdains all falsehood (Prov. 11:3) and portrays Satan as the ‘father of lies’ (John 8:44; Eph. 4:25). But then we have exceptions such as the Hebrew midwives, who chose to embrace the guilt of deception in order to preserve the lives of the newborns. They unselfishly put themselves at risk before the Pharaoh rather than fulfil his gruesome orders. Jonathan and Michal seem to be in the same category as the Hebrew midwives and Rahab. These biblical characters choose the higher good and are willing to accept the consequences of their choices, even if it puts them at personal risk in order to help innocent person. Many Christian scholars through the centuries have agreed. Thomas Aquinas distinguished three classes of lies: Officious lies, or helpful lies of necessity; jocose lies, told in jest; and mischievous lies, or malicious lies told to harm another person or to save face personally. Only the third category constitutes sin in Aquinas’s view. I would agree with Aquinas, but I would also warn that the lie of necessity is only morally justified (even morally required?) under certain circumstances, such as rare situations where it is clear that innocent lives are at stake. In this biblical ethic, lying and deception are wrong and to be avoided. However, the actions of Jonathan and Michal, the Hebrew midwives, and others suggest there are times when believers should choose to accept the guilt of lying in order to accomplish a higher good, as they believe it to be defined by God. Thus, we recognize deception as always bad but sometimes desirable in extenuating circumstances. [3] …more More... To see/read the whole content of this quite a very lengthy article, click on the link below: discover-the-truth.com/2015/01/18/the-bible-and-taqiyya-part-1/

tapi why diaorang macam x faham.....

2020/2021 Populasi Malaysia Bumiputera: 20.9 Juta (69.7%) Cina: 6.7 Juta (22.5%) India: 2 Juta (6.8%) Lain2 bangsa: 0.3 Juta (1.0%) Bodohlah kita kalau berdiam diri saat agama dan bangsa kita di hina. Kalau Melayu bersatu, hancur binasa lah diorang dalam Malaysia ni. Bangkitlah dari tidur, cukuplah bersabar selama ni wahai bangsa ku.

@@momoy88 Iran Laksanakan 10 Undang-Undang Bongok 1. Perempuan tak dibenar tunjuk rambut 2. Perempuan tak dibenar menyanyi 3. Perempuan tak dibenar menari 4. Perempuan tak dibenar bercerai 5. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk stadium 6. Perempuan tak dibenar tunggang motosikal 7. Perempuan tak dibenar keluar negara seorang diri 8. Perempuan tak dibenar masuk tentera 9. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi saksi 10. Perempuan tak dibenar jadi hakim

@@takiyaazrin7562 Here comes a coward Islam-hater who can just afford to 'hit-and-run'. So what❓ A coward will always remain a coward. That's fact❗ Note: ‘Fact-proof and evidence’ is all it takes. That’s what ‘truth’ is all about actually.

@@takiyaazrin7562 @ FACT: THE BIBLE AND TAQIYYA Does the Bible completely forbid lying? No, it does not. In Exodus, we find that Pharaoh ordered the killing of all new-born baby boys. He ordered the midwives to carry out such a heinous crime: 15 The king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, whose names were Shiphrah and Puah, 16 “When you are helping the Hebrew women during childbirth on the delivery stool, if you see that the baby is a boy, kill him; but if it is a girl, let her live.” 17 The midwives, however, feared God and did not do what the king of Egypt had told them to do; they let the boys live. 18 Then the king of Egypt summoned the midwives and asked them, “Why have you done this? Why have you let the boys live?” 19 The midwives answered Pharaoh, “Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive.” 20 So God was kind to the midwives and the people increased and became even more numerous. 21 And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families of their own. Exodus 1:15-22 In the above, Pharaoh asks Shiphrah and Puah why they did not carry out his order. And they responded by lying, telling Pharaoh that Hebrew women and Egyptian women are not the same, and that Hebrew women are vigorous and give birth in haste before they arrived (v. 19). In verse 20-21, instead of God rebuking Shiphrah and Puah for lying, YHWH rewards them by having ‘families of their own’. The silence of YHWH for not condemning the two midwives for deceiving Pharaoh shows that lying in certain situations in order to save innocent lives from being killed is allowed. Commentary Making Sense of Bible Difficulties: Clear and Concise Answers from Genesis To Revelation - Norman L. Geisler And Thomas Howe: Solution: There is little question that the midwives disobeyed Pharaoh by not murdering the newborn male children and lied to Pharaoh when they said they arrived too late to carry out his orders. Nonetheless, there is moral justification for what they did. First, the moral dilemma in which the midwives found themselves was unavoidable. Either they obeyed God’s higher law, or they obeyed lesser obligation of submitting to Pharaoh. Rather than commit deliberate infanticide against the children of their own people, the midwives chose to disobey Pharaoh’s orders. God commands us not to murder (Exodus. 20:13). The saving of innocent lives is a higher obligation than obedience to government. When the government commands us to murder innocent victims, we should not obey. God did not hold the midwives responsible-nor does He hold us responsible-for not following a lower obligation in order to obey a higher law (cf. Acts 4; Rev. 13). In the case of the midwives, the higher law was to the preservation of the lives of the newborn male children. Second, the text clearly states that God blessed them ‘because the midwives feared God’ (Exod. 1:21). It was their fear of God that led them to do what was necessary to save these innocent lives. Thus, their false statement to Pharaoh was an essential part of their effort to save lives. Third, their lying is comparable to their having disobeyed Pharaoh in order to save the lives of the innocent newborns. This is a case where the midwives had to choose between lying and being compelled to murder innocent babies. Here again the midwives chose to obey the higher moral law. Obedience to parents is part of the moral law (Cf. Eph. 6:1). But if a parent commanded his or child to kill a neighbour or worship an idol, the child should refuse. Jesus emphasized the need to follow higher moral law when He said, ‘He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me (Matt. 10:37). [1] Notes on Exodus - Dr. Thomas L. Constable The midwives’ fear of God (vv. 17, 21) led them to disobey Pharaoh’s command to practice genocide. They chose to obey God rather than man since Pharaoh’s order contradicted a fundamental divine command (cf. Gen. 1:28; 9:1, 7). All life belongs to God, so He is the only person who has the right to take it or to command when others should take it. The midwives’ fear of God resulted in their having reverence for human life. Their explanation of their actions (v. 19) may have been truthful or it may not have been entirely truthful. “Even though these women lied to Pharaoh (which the Bible, as is often the case, does not stop to specifically condemn at this point), they are praised for their outright refusal to take infant lives.”33 God blessed these women with families of their own (v. 21) in spite of their deceit, if they practiced it, because they feared God. [2] The NIV Application Commentary: 1 & 2 Samuel - Bill T. Arnold: Take, for example, Shiphrah and Puah, the Hebrew midwives of Exodus 1:15-21. The Egyptian pharaoh tried to control Israelite population growth by demanding that the midwives in charge of Hebrew births kill the boys, allowing only the girls to live. But because the midwives were God-fearing women, they refused to obey the King and allowed the boys to live as well. When Pharaoh demanded to know why they did not obey him, they simply lied (1:19): ‘Hebrew women are not like Egyptian women; they are vigorous and give birth before the midwives arrive’. In this case, the midwives were blessed for their actions. God rewarded them with families of their own because they feared him more than the Egyptian king and chose to risk lying rather than kill the newborn Hebrew boys. Likewise Rahab certainly told a lie to the king of Jericho to save the two Israelite spies (Josh. 2:4-6), and New Testament authors unanimously praise her actions as works of faith (Heb. 11:31; James 2:25). When we compare these disparate episodes, a certain biblical ethic begins to emerge, which is supported by our text in 1 Samuel 19. Rather than a monlothic prohibition against all lying and deception, the Bible offers general principle, modified with several exceptions. The general principle is most notably stated in the ninth commandment, which contains a statement against lying in a court of law (Ex. 20:16). Elsewhere the Bible generally disdains all falsehood (Prov. 11:3) and portrays Satan as the ‘father of lies’ (John 8:44; Eph. 4:25). But then we have exceptions such as the Hebrew midwives, who chose to embrace the guilt of deception in order to preserve the lives of the newborns. They unselfishly put themselves at risk before the Pharaoh rather than fulfil his gruesome orders. Jonathan and Michal seem to be in the same category as the Hebrew midwives and Rahab. These biblical characters choose the higher good and are willing to accept the consequences of their choices, even if it puts them at personal risk in order to help innocent person. Many Christian scholars through the centuries have agreed. Thomas Aquinas distinguished three classes of lies: Officious lies, or helpful lies of necessity; jocose lies, told in jest; and mischievous lies, or malicious lies told to harm another person or to save face personally. Only the third category constitutes sin in Aquinas’s view. I would agree with Aquinas, but I would also warn that the lie of necessity is only morally justified (even morally required?) under certain circumstances, such as rare situations where it is clear that innocent lives are at stake. In this biblical ethic, lying and deception are wrong and to be avoided. However, the actions of Jonathan and Michal, the Hebrew midwives, and others suggest there are times when believers should choose to accept the guilt of lying in order to accomplish a higher good, as they believe it to be defined by God. Thus, we recognize deception as always bad but sometimes desirable in extenuating circumstances. [3] …more More... To see/read the whole content of this quite a very lengthy article, click on the link below: discover-the-truth.com/2015/01/18/the-bible-and-taqiyya-part-1/

@@takiyaazrin7562 pemimpin Politaik yg mahu macam Iran puak mana

Tya diaorang bangsa bangsat2 ni....tok nenek monyang mereka hanya jadi barua2 British saja...mereka perlu sedar diri... sebab itu apa yg diorang tahu erti perjuangan...

Kita org Melayu bangkit dan ajar puak2 lahanat ni cara beradab dan hormati Melayu.

2020/2021 Populasi Malaysia Bumiputera: 20.9 Juta (69.7%) Cina: 6.7 Juta (22.5%) India: 2 Juta (6.8%) Lain2 bangsa: 0.3 Juta (1.0%) Bodohlah kita kalau berdiam diri saat agama dan bangsa kita di hina. Kalau Melayu bersatu, hancur binasa lah diorang dalam Malaysia ni. Bangkitlah dari tidur, cukuplah bersabar selama ni wahai bangsa ku.

Orang Asli penduduk asal. Melayu rompak balak dan tanah

Memang kurang ajar nan muslim ini..mmng patut dajar..wahai umat islam bertindaklah..!!!.

Jgn ingat pm nz tu baik,cari la pemimpin yg contoh dan beragama islam.Chck dlm al qur'an, siapa tu siapa....ini la satu sifat yg mencairkan umat perlahan demi perlahan sampai masuk lobang biawak.

brani sbb blkg ad america,menteri umno plak cangok…xnk ketatkn undang2,bsau kpale la pendatang2 ni sume

Sebab tu aku pelik kenapa masih ade barua2 melayu jadi pencacai dap ni

Yg buat buat tak nampak meKayu PKR pan ja.

@@muniahmad6053 puak2 amy 15 juzuk kn tu🤣🤣….

@@aretoiyai8039 sewaktu dengannya 😂

Terbukti petani pun boleh berjuang dan lebih kuat. Contoh perang Vietnam Dan amerika. Petani Vietnam kalahkan tentera amerika yg kuat.

Betul lah petani pun pejuang.dari dari pada 2 ekor india dan china ni.bukan2 sape pun....bukan pejuang bangsa pun......tak sedar diri........

Ye betul..petani lebih mulia dr mereka politaik tu

ye btol tu kalo xde petani diorg nk makan ape bngga sgt dgn jawatan kuasa bukan leh kemyangkn perut

Setuju 1000%.. Masa Mat Kilau hidup,bangsa tu belum wujud di Msia..jika ada pun dok dlm estate getah ja ..Etnik Ghurkha @ Sikh lg lama ada di Msia dr Etnik dia..

sembang

@@mruraa4309 bangsa diorg kuli batak british je bang dulu.

Jangan lupa DAP sama juga

@@osmankassim8921 Betul tu,tak boleh bagi muka sikit pun,mudah lupa asal usul pendatang merempat ,tak hormat hak2 org melayu.Ekonomi dlm tangan dia,harap org melayu bersatu. Mana2 pemimpin Melayu yg tak Amanah ,ade habuan balasan utk nya,dunia dan akhirat tak boleh lari tetap kene jugak suatu hari nnti.

Dap yg paling bahaya

Semua politik sama aje...janji terus janji...ckp x berhenti2...dah dpt kesenangan lupa semua janji pada raakyat....

🤣🤣🤣 dorang kenyang. ko je yg xpham. dulu DAP jdi kerajaan ko maki kaw2. skrg kerajaan melayu islam, apa yg dorang buat?😂😂😂

ORANG MELAYU LAH YANG RACIST SEBENARNYA. MEREKA INGAT NEGARA DAN AGAMA SEMUA HAK MEREKA. PODAH

*PKR PAN MUDA RAKAN SEKONGKOL DAP* *AWAS!!!*

Memang betul. Kena sedar diri wahai racist. Kena bersyukur bila ALLAH SWT bagi KO duduk kat Malaysia . Ada hati nak perlekeh Mat kilau .

👍👍

2020/2021 Populasi Malaysia Bumiputera: 20.9 Juta (69.7%) Cina: 6.7 Juta (22.5%) India: 2 Juta (6.8%) Lain2 bangsa: 0.3 Juta (1.0%) Bodohlah kita kalau berdiam diri saat agama dan bangsa kita di hina. Kalau Melayu bersatu, hancur binasa lah diorang dalam Malaysia ni. Bangkitlah dari tidur, cukuplah bersabar selama ni wahai bangsa ku.

Sepatutnya mereka ni tak layak.duduk dalam kerajaan.sbb mereka tak tau siape pejuang bangsa yg mempertahamkan negara.....datang mereka nak putar belitkan sejarah.patut kah mereka2 ini jadi pemimpin........tak layak sebenarnya.....perosak bangsa adalah..

@@momoy88 bumiputera tu mcm APA bang

Jangan terlibat dengan politik. Platform sekarang lebih baik.

Platform pun da mencukupi.. tak pun serap jadi Penasihat Yang Di-Pertuan Agong dan Agama itu lagi baik

BEKAS menteri

ءامين