Happens that I just bought the Zeiss binos and now looking up for opinions expressed on KZfaq - Fully share the content of your review as I'm pleased in every aspect (especially compared to a set which is about 60 years old!) touching the same points. Although I could afford to spend a higher amount it didn't make sense to me as I'm an occasional user. For me it's the perfect binocular and I can only recommend it because these items last a very long time it's important to be satisfied with. Buying a cheap one and upgrade later, well that's expensive!

I bought the Zeiss 10 x 42. Everything you say is true. The conquest do exactly what you say, they bridge that gap between not much good to wow. I love my set. Absolutely perfect for the views I want and I don't regret having parted with the money. As soon as you view with them indeed that outlay is justified. Excellent product.

I was looking at the Nikon Monarch 5 & 7 now im looking at the Zeiss. Great review many thanks.

Have you ever tied Vanguard or Leupold binocs? If so what did you think of them? Thanks

This was really a terrific video and evaluation. I too am a photographer who wants a good pair of binoculars. I was considering the Monarch 7s and the Conquests, and so you especially answered my questions (and thanks for the comparison video in the middle). About midway through, I came up with the BMW analogy, and I got a kick out of you then saying the same thing. As someone who drives a mid-priced BMW, and shoots with a Nikon 800 and top-of-the line lenses, I think you exactly captured my sense of price vs. quality! Thanks again!

One thing wasn't completely clear to me was how long you have had the Nikons. The latest version of the Monarch 5's have been upgraded to ED objectives. The coatings and phase correction have also been improved.

Try swarovski slc series and let us know do you find any chromatic aberrations and color fringes.

How I give this bynoculsr

Funny how few reviewers focus on focus precision and depth, as well as the ease to find focus using the knob. For me this is more important than the image being of superior quality. I lended a pair of high end swarovskis for some work, i could not really tell the difference in terms of image quality compared to my 200 eur ones. However, when i switched back to my 200 eur ones after the work i quickly realized that the swarovskis almost always had supersharp focus on anything while my 200 eur binos just had much more shallow focus-depth, i had to rotade the knob much more often. This is cruucial in birding when you flush a bird or quickly see a raptor dashing by, that you actually get that 1-3 sec of clarity rather than not being able to find focus during the short observation. This is markedly improved between 500 and 1000 eur binos.

I am also confused between Monarch 7 10x42 and Vanguard ED 2 10x42 which is the best?

Mình muốn mua thì làm thế nào vậy bn

How many meters can you see with this

Loại này chị gía bao nhiêu tiền việt vậy ?

I bought the monarch 7 for $425.00 I just love them.. nice wide field of view and I guess I don’t see well enough to see purple anything in the lenses... but thanks for this great review

Giá thế nào vậy bn

I tried both the Victory SF and the Conquest models. You have to purposely look for the CA in the Conquests. I'm not sure that is a problem when looking at birds. In my small hands (I'm 65 in. tall) the Conquests felt heavier although 2 ounces lighter than the SF. I think it's because the balance point in the SF is more towards the viewer. I don't think the "average" birder will see any difference. But as with any other field, buy the best you can afford. At times this may involve selling your first born.

It is not even eliminated in the EL glases from Swarovski. I own a EL 10X50 .You see chromatic aberration on white fences for example. There will be no big difference except in your wallet. Go for a Conquest. They are excellent.

please show practically the functionality of the binocular!

Cant go wrong with Leica, Zwaroski or Zeiss all superb glass . all these brands are for the pro. Period. The rest are for the masses. What was that walking around your perimeter??? WTH?

Your comparison shows Zeiss is significantly brighter. Is that right? Nikon was quite dark.

I even prefer the Terra's over the Monarchs-7. And yes, I tested them side-by-side for a few days. I just do not like the Monarchs-7, the image quality is not that great, especially the chromatic aberration, so I agree with Jonathan. And build quality of the Monarchs was also a bit disappointing.

给我一个

In terms of how they are used would dictate how they compare to the likes of the SF line up. If you want a reasonable priced hunting Binoculars that have good optics then the Conquests are the way to to go and they are tough a well. There optics are not as good nor as clear as the SF lineup but many who buy them will not even know of such a thing as they have no need for anything better. The SF can do everything Conquest can do in that they are tough which means they can take a tumble but their difference is that they have super clear optics for daytime viewing and night time viewing. They are the perfect all round binocular in that they can do everything but they are expensive.

I think compare between Nikon Monarchs 7s or ED with Zeiss Conquest HD might make more sense. 7s or ED has a better image and a much wider field of view (look at the dark corner at 6:25).

Nikon Monarch HG x Leica Trinovid HD x Cart Zeiss Conquest HD. Everyone on 10x42 - place them 1-2-3 in optical perfomance

我要给我一个

求你了。给我一个吧

给我吧

They are cheaper than a iPhone and will last a lot longer.

Buy Olympus DPS 10 x50 .

He has the mindset of a rock.

Why is the blind guy reviewing binoculars?

5 yr warranty, no thanks

...the plane crash joke was in very poor taste, just imagine how disrespectful that would be if someone made a similar joke right after 9-11 or something

very poor joke about the air disaster over Ukraine. shame about it.

求你了。给我一个吧