Five

@@ainalarsson1728 they're two because Zerg is two imba.

@@FelipeNaranja downvotes spawn from larva in pairs, maybe

@@missbelled6700 made them with a reactor

wrr

I‘m waiting for the replay that is someone losing to 2 hidden bases

lmao "tries to grab the water," that made me laugh so hard

@@CyRxJustin This 😂😂😂😂😂

indeed, he did say that

Brandon0 did he though?

The most accurate math I've ever seen him do on these videos.

that's some fast math omg! :O

In terms of cost efficiency this particular replay more-so showed the cost efficiency of Mines and PFs. Mines and PFs killed Ultra BL Lurker at that bottom right base. This was not the game to show that Zerg late game is too cost efficient. Lurkers were most efficient when he a-moved Marines/Marauder into them with no scan and 0 Tanks xD.

It is not Ultralisk or Broodlords that make Zerg late game unbeatable...

I've for sure had games where I'm about to lose 20 drones to a drop that I see, but I'm like "nah, macro is always priority #1, gotta inject". So I inject 3 bases, then I see my natural is 16/14 mining so I spend time taking 2 drones off to put them on my 5th to be more efficient. I got 9 more larvae and had 2 drones mine more efficiently, but lost 20 drones. Then I lose the game and my initial angry thought is that my APM is 200, opponent's is 300, nothing I could've done, I'm too slow, blah blah. Then I watch replay and realize if I used my brain and focused on what's most important at the time instead of trying to multitask everything it'd be an easier game to play xD

Like, in the game or in life in general?

@@IgnatRemizov Real life, definitely

If he had made more OC periodically. The mules would have made it so he would have more army supply then Zerg in the late game.

a gold mine of willful milk drinkers. and pices of shit (this is a joke, i hope to email in one day)

Either people who really want to get better and realy don't know how, or people with a certain masochistic incling.

There are ppl who send stupid replays too Harstem, but this one was a good one. The Terran didn’t do that bad exept in the mid game floating 3k so I really don’t like u’re agressive rection to the video.

Quentimonstre SC2 i didn’t mean to sound too aggressive I just don’t understand blaming the loss on a whole faction, im pretty new to the game as well, ive seen a couple of these videos and it just seems a little arrogant

But it can't fly. It's horrible

There are only type 2

he is masters league though, not diamond.

but your defenetly right on everythign else xD

The Toothless Vegan, Serral himself said Zerg late game is IMBA. I feel like that settles the debate. There’s really no answer to vipers and infestors, just spam fungal, parasitic bomb, and abduct and gg.

What you're describing seems to be play styles. A person may not know what to do Against One race but not

@@zeitgeist8870 Zerg late game was IMBA before the last patch that nerfed infesters and brood lords. It's fixed now.

Atticus Beachy, yes endless infested marines was crazy imbalanced as well, but that was so laughable that I wouldn’t even bother mentioning it, it was a long time ago as well. Serral’s comment came after that patch and centered around the viper/high Templar interaction favoring vipers significantly. Removing free infested terrans from the game was more about removing a cruel joke from the game than making Zerg late game perfectly balanced. The recent patch to increase high Templar feed back range is a weak attempt to fix the IMBA of Zerg late game. Full disclosure, I am a 6k Zerg player who laughs while Protoss fight for their life in the late game and reliably fail.

Atticus Beachy, also, if you care to look at the current game statistics, the vast majority of high ranked PvZ games that go to the late game end with a Zerg victory. When Protoss win it’s in the early and mid game. This is not an opinion this is current game statistics.

You truly underestimate just how many stupid or dumb or ignorant people there are in this world. By my calculations from the past 50 years I estimate 90+% are in the above categories.

"How can someone... watch their own replay..." I believe you have stumbled across the root of the problem. Most people don't watch their own replay because of that whole "I would have remembered any big mistakes and I played pretty well, I'm a (insert league)-tier player, after all." Even past that, I'd say most people dislike admitting that they still make stupid mistakes still, and that's all that watching a replay of one's own is, so they avoid it.

braucht Polizei Online sicher Modus Lösungen bei Recht Griechenland

Breaks my soul when I see them Thor’s marching out

No, they don't. You can use Marines to counter the corruptors. They aren't in the fight unless you're going air anyway. The liberators are a good zone control utility but they aren't necessary to win those engagements. Tanks and mm micro will do just fine. Get the corruptors chasing your liberators into marine range while tanks pin down their ground force. You can also just ghost at endgame and start sniping the inevitable broodlords. Hell just set up lib zones and build turrets underneath. The tanks should have mm and lib zone support making any ground push extremely punishing. Meanwhile you just drop marines in every base they have back home, lurkers aren't terribly mobile either. One of the big failures this player made was killing hatcheries but never workers. I don't understand the obsession with hatchery snipes because that never impacted the enemy army production at all. MM drops should almost ALWAYS snipe workers first, they do it so fast, it's much harder to recover from 20 dead workers than 2 dead hatcheries. Especially when you consider that's only 800 damage for 20 workers and 3,000 damage for the 2 hatcheries. So you do your 800 and leave. They have to burn 20 larva on workers, then comes your main push and suddenly they can't possibly defend every base, you pick off a hatchery far more efficiently at that point. Imagine a Zerg coming in and sniping 2 barracks, losing all the attack units in the process, then being confused when there wasn't much of an impact on your army or economy.

@@Dontinquire Wow dude! Thanks for the amazing answer. I was expecting a simple "yes" or "no". :)

It's hard to say which is "right". The only way to get better at microing these units is to play with them, not skip making them. On the other hand yes you'll do better with an army you can control.

ye wright

@@user-nc3gu3wm4e it's a joke, right?

@@robinm.9755 It's a joke, wright?

@@robinm.9755 prolly should reread your first message mah dude.

yeaaah i got the refference too! love that show

If only there was a big, tanky robot, and a starship of sorts....

Here's my take as an absolutely not-high-level player: Early on, killing workers is better because you probably don't have the burst damage to kill the base, and because it takes quite a while for them to rebuild their workers from one or two bases. The lost mining time comes from how long it takes to rebuild workers. Later on, if they can rebuild the workers quickly and all their bases are full anyway, then if you can kill the base, they lose mining time equal to how long it takes to rebuild their base. This is much longer than it takes to fill the base back up with workers in the late game.

Ok that sounds logic But with the scvs repairing it seems too triple the time you need to off the base

Just put a pylon on every base, GGEZ

@@missbelled6700 absolute massive galaxy brain plays

@@missbelled6700 haha, i do that too as protoss. So EZ, all that is needed (and something to hold their nydus all in or proxy base all in ofc).

Games look worse from an outside perspective compared to when you're playing them. If you're around 4800 and submitted a loss into Harstem it would look equally as bad.

Right? I play Zerg. So when I lose to Terrans this is what I'm losing too, haha. Very humbling.

I am in a similar situation, but I only played like 7 or 8 unrankeds in my whole time playing ranked (just started a few days ago). Either my adepts kill their whole match while a few stalkers come and blink is done, or I lost...only happened twice to lose and I quit in first 3 mins i think 😂😂

@@BingChilingEnjoyer honestly if you've just started, I'd just point you to ViBE's bronze to gm series. the entire focus of it is centered around getting your macro game sorted out, and once in plat-diamond he goes into more detail in regard to proper responses, and build order refinement. Bronze-plat videos is almost exclusively fundamentals, all-in/cheese reaction(when they come up). I'm not much of a fan of the build he chooses for protoss, but it works for the lower leagues. for the purposes of learning he just sticks to a-moveable armies that require no real interaction from you. you don't necessarily need to follow the build itself, but have a plan about how you want to proceed from the opening 3 or 4 minutes, and apply the concepts you learn from the series as needed. as long as you're following the plan, and macroing properly, you'll generally be fine.

@@imzesok I try to copy Harstem from some of his protoss matches, but with what I thought to be a personal touch. For example, a more agressive early. I think he generally sends adept for scouting and then retreats. Instead, I use adept to poke the enemy (i think it 2 shots zerglings and marines) and sending shade around to trick them while kiting around. It's probably indeed a very low league thing, since 2 adepts killed 20 lings in 1 match, and generally I can prevent them from taking 3rd (somrtimes even 2nd) and I end up with 4-5 bases. But I suck on the macro part (watched 2 or 3 replays)

@@BingChilingEnjoyer TBH, it's generally better to pick off a few workers, and get out. if you can deny/delay a base cool, otherwise you end up spending too much time microing, and end up floating a bunch of money for no reason. Just remember: Harstem has a good reason for everything he does with his builds when it's happening. with the adepts it's way more important to get the scouting information than killing anything. for now I wouldn't worry too much about it. just focus on getting up to 70-80 workers, and building army units expanding as bases start mining out. try to max by 9-12 minutes. wouldn't worry about winning for now. once you hit the milestones and are scouting regularly, the wins will happen naturally as you figure out what counters what. your macro cycle is just building workers, pylons, production buildings, and just generally spending your money. that should be your focus until you're like mid plat.

Harstem has said he will not scrutinize there person who did not send the replay in. I assume if both players in a friendly game sent it in, he would analyze both sides

I completely agree - both didn't play like GMs but it felt like T did so much more, despite not executing it perfectly.

@@benjaminchen8857 That's fine, I am just saying the end goal cannot be met :) knowing if Imba or not, answer will always be u suck lol