Yes it is still alive :)

Good on ya, I’m gonna give it a crack on moving a 5+ year cherry tree, but will have to do it manually - really not looking forward to the digging, but hopefully it will work out in the end

@@ladypeartree that is common, and I don't understand why :/

100%

Unfortunately no :/

Pretty funny 🙃

That's interesting, I think mine is around four years old now, and I am still very happy. I also had a 2 stroke for near 20 years. I don't know how my electric will handle a decade. If you have a vibration, I expect that means an imbalance. Have ypu checked for debris in the cooling fan behind the cord cartridge?

It's funny how so many can chase some complex and expensive method of getting to the last bit of the corner, and waste half of the space and access to achieve it. 😅

This actually exists, the Qanto from Häfele, and as helmreichen states you lose about half the space for the mechanism. Additionally you get to spend 4000 dollars on a single corner, touch a button for 20 seconds to get access to the bottom shelf, not being abe to have wall cabinets above and a countertop that's visiually seperated.

@@helmreichenterprises8391 There are two types of magic corners now; The one you show loses almost no space (theoretically...they make the second set of baskets too small) but you don't get easy access to the second part. Then there is one where the first part rotates or slides out of the way completely and the second part is a set of drawers. Easy access however you lose a lot of space in the corner, about 20-40 cm. I think there are two solutions, one for each. System one; just buy the mechanism of the second option, so the door slides or rotates out of the way completely, then attach planks or baskets to the mechanism that just fit in the cabinet (no drawers, just like the magic corner you showed)...still easy access and you lose no space at all. System two; the mechanism itself is great, you just lose a bit of space next to the set of drawers. You can attach planks or baskets to the mechanism next to the set of drawers (don't attach to a rail/sliding mechanism), ideally make these planks a bit higher than the drawers for easier access.

@@helmreichenterprises8391 Hi Michael, thanks for your reply which I've only just spotted when reading @realityandnaturepill's. I think my rather complex wondering (!) comes from living in a minuscule cottage kitchen, and now having to accommodate my elderly father who is losing his eyesight and has broken his hip. 🥴 He kind of needs to see things right under his nose or they don't exist for him, so I'm continually searching for innovations that help him to remain independent. He has a hardwood coffee table, with a similar robust pneumatic contraption inside which he finds very helpful so it's what made me wonder if the same principle could be applied in the kitchen.

@@realityandnaturepill Thank you for this information. I took a look at the Qanto - I wasn't thinking of something anywhere near this sophisticated, nor electric, or that rises vertically like a lift, actually. More a simpler manual pneumatic mechanism that rises up and forward. I also hadn't pictured something that would impinge on any cupboards above. I don't really mind about the break in line in the worktop, though I know that would bother some people...

You can control the distance in from the mitre point. Also they have moved toward P14 being the standard so as not to need to reset the cut depth.

I have not yet had to deal with that.

Are you using Windows, Mac, or Linux?

@@helmreichenterprises8391 windows 10 with an i5 11th gen and a 3060ti. As far as I understand unless you are rendering the gpu is not really used. But I model for 3d printing so all of my load is calculating maximum 3d detail into a mesh with no rendering of images or video. The only rendering is to the screen. I don't even retain cameras and lights or any colors when I work. All of the optimizing videos seem to optimize for rendering. Perhaps I just don't know the right terminology to find information on optimizing for mesh manipulation. At this rate I am better putting my money into cpu and ram than graphics card.

You misheard, he said vm he copied and then executed started writing into random blocks inside its own fs, causing host btrfs to write out full block copies. This doesnt happen with inplace fs because he would run out of space the moment he copied that vm.

Nearly the same ;) -more of a COW lol. Copy On Write

Cow on cow 👍

That's not good. :/ I've had a good run out of mine.

This was ages ago, and it was an acheivement at the time. I have got to remove some videos :/

@@helmreichenterprises8391Yes, you do.

@@helmreichenterprises8391 I think the point is, you could have told us what you DID to get this flatness. You must image that from the viewer's POV, they came here to find out how they may achieve good flatness on large parts. They will come away from this video disappointed - as I did lol :D

@@danielhenderson7050 you are 100% correct, 100 years ago when I did this video printers didn't come with heated beds, and everyone was struggling. These days there are four main variables, heated bed, filament type, bed adhesion, and enclosures. Bed adhesion was dealt with by glue, tape etc. but now we have specialised bed materials like PEI, ceramics, etc.. I personally favour Zinc-alum coated steel with cross linked PVA, it doesn't break, is serviceable, and you can make your own. I have since printed over 100 kg of filaments, probably closer to 200kg. When I use ASA I have a favourite which is Spectrum brand, I seem to get the best results with that. My largest printer is now 600x600x600mm volume. Back then

Well this actually is an awesome filesystem. I use it with great confidence. I was actually asking BTRFS to do something impossible. The danger only occurs when you use a COW file (virtual machine drive "VDI") and you you duplicate it, and then run a VM depending on it. Virtualbox performs a new write, as well as BTRFS simultaniously. As I understand BTRFS more I now use it to provide self-healing bit rot protection as well as RAID redundancy.

@@helmreichenterprises8391 Which kernel version were you using at the time? My understanding is this class of failure modes were resolved by prioritizing the metadata tree over the user’s data, FINALLY.

@@Knirin To be honest now, I can't rember what kernel versiopn, or BTRFS version. In any case I still use BTRFS for pretty much everything. I made this video to demonstrate the failure of the operator, and people see it as a failure of the filesystem. I wanted to raise awareness of the concept of a COW virtual drive expanding on top of a COW filesystem, and the potential for file space problems. Funny ;)

I used zfs on Solaris and started using btrfs about 6 years ago when I moved to Linux. (Linux zfs was patchy at the time.) I was skeptical of btrfs at first, mostly because it seemed like an off-brand zfs, but I've never had a single problem.

@@Tom-kt8lu I have only had this knuckle head incident.

Indeed ;)