Thanks For the video solution. I was struggling with my Institute DPP😅
@pavellambracht5823 Жыл бұрын
you guys doing an incredible job for both teachers and students! Thank you!!!
@peterstewart1491 Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Felix-vu9tz Жыл бұрын
Would have been much more informative if you decided to choose an arbitrary theta instead of relying on a very specific "its an equilateral triangle thus they're all equal" trick which doesn't occur in most questions of this nature. But a good tutorial nonetheless
@WaterCanoe Жыл бұрын
huh
@slackpat3k299 Жыл бұрын
Bro needs to clear out his throat 😭
@doppiam7094 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, you absolutely saved my life! Muffin.
@mr.swaney8300 Жыл бұрын
The process shown here is good! But I think a different example might be good, because the resultant is nearly the same as the total distance since the angles are so similar. In fact, because of rounding, the calculated displacement might look like it is the same as or is actually more than the distance (which would be impossible).
@bentheman415 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@EveryGameMaster Жыл бұрын
It helps me a lot
@EveryGameMaster Жыл бұрын
Thank u so much mam
@fatimaalmansoori7471 Жыл бұрын
Thank you a lot ❤❤
@briannarivera7592 Жыл бұрын
Oh my goodness. Currently trying to do the math for the Hopper Lab (its all over online) and I was SO confused until I watched this video. Literally taken me over a week to do this because i was so lost- my professor doesn't explain things well. This helped a ton!
@T0MB_G00N2 жыл бұрын
Thank You!
@NeoiconMintNet2 жыл бұрын
10 times 1 equals 10 and only 10, because you are using one number system : decimal. can NOT have two different decimal numbers have one value. x=y when x-y=0 x=1.0... y=0.9... the difference is not 0; a difference in value.
@audracrist84512 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comment. This video shows/proves that 0.999... is equal to 9/9, which reduces to 1. The pattern with repeating decimals that consistently have one digit repeating (e.g., 0.22222...) is that they are equal to the number being repeated over 9. This extra example of 0.22222... is equivalent to 2/9. More information on how/why 0.999999... = 1 can be found through the following links: - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999... - www.purplemath.com/modules/howcan1.htm
@NeoiconMintNet2 жыл бұрын
@@audracrist8451 multiplying 0.9... by 10, by adding a 9 in front of the decimal point is an error, not a proof.
@stargazer5802 жыл бұрын
I don’t think you understand how much this helped me… thank you so much🙏🙏🙏
@nibhadevi43592 жыл бұрын
Hi
@yollydaliva60602 жыл бұрын
thank you for the clear idea
@clintsusarno87952 жыл бұрын
I think your D2x is wrong. The correct answer for D2x = -47.9 or -48
@robertgoodman83502 жыл бұрын
I agree. I get 47.9, which should be rounded to 48, not 47. Thanks for pointing that out.
@twinkle67182 жыл бұрын
Woww, It helps me a lot.
@BettorsChat2 жыл бұрын
You have any updated info?
@FDRmathPLC2 жыл бұрын
What updated info are you looking for?
@avelll3skoed2262 жыл бұрын
boom
@lucasjota27672 жыл бұрын
Man you just saved my life
@yasirarafat84322 жыл бұрын
Nice
@karabenart63682 жыл бұрын
Where do you get F= 0.5N? The data table shows 0.2N.
@Coolblueocean20012 жыл бұрын
Visual fractions are so much fun...
@aidenkofoed23522 жыл бұрын
garbage u didnt explain the weird ass equation that ur using at all
@hasshi23603 жыл бұрын
Not sure how the conclusion is 141 m at 4:03 -2500 / -19.6 = 127.55 127.55 + 95 is not 141 m So correct me if I'm wrong, but uh... I don't think this video is correct For anybody else using this for hw or an assignment: the answer is correct, the process is wrong the velocity used should not be 50 m/s, it should be 30.1 m/s (which is the vertical velocity - found using 50 * sin(37 degrees)
@fatmamahmoud55253 жыл бұрын
thank you, that helped. keep going <3
@mikhaelsoliman81003 жыл бұрын
How is there no acceleration along the "vt" vector? It's not aligned horizontally, so a component of g will be acting along that direction
@susanolszewski24243 жыл бұрын
Mikhael, This is a tricky one. But, let's start with projectile motion - we break the motion into x and y components that are independent of each other. "g" will not affect motion in the x direction, only the y. For this problem, to make the math easier, we created a coordinate system in 3 directions - the vt, 1/2 gt^2, and r directions. So, g is only affecting the motion in the 1/2 gt^2 direction. All three are independent of each other.
@suhanagrover6063 жыл бұрын
Why is there -60??
@susanolszewski24243 жыл бұрын
We're finding average velocity, which is displacement over time. Displacement is a vector, so directions count. Typically we assign left, down and west as a negative displacement and right, up and east as positive. So, the first displacement to the left is a negative number: -60 m. Then we algebraically add that to the right displacement which is + 60. We get zero, so the avg velocity is zero. Another way of looking at it, is the person went 60 m left, and then 60 m right - winding up in the same place the person started. So final position minus initial position is zero - displacement is zero, so zero average velocity when you divide 0 by time.
@sapphirethesavage57343 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! very helpful :)
@poyraznafile27093 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't ıt be 3.3x10^-8 so that answer be 8.2x10^-9 ?
@johnennis68373 жыл бұрын
Poyraz, sorry for the late answer, but you're absolutely correct, and the presentation was actually fixed last week. Thank you. John