Idk what I was doing last night but I woke up with this open in the morning. Interesting stuff!
@h.axb_8 ай бұрын
Hello, Mr. Baksh's students :))
@lazar187611 ай бұрын
hello
@kataruz3534 Жыл бұрын
Hi, really educational video. I was wondering if and how one can move the coordinates lines frame to frame. For a project I have, it would be useful to pick as the Cartesian lines’ origin a given point and keep it as such throughout the time Tracker is following a point mass.
@lakhshanaramesh5965 Жыл бұрын
in the case of the eclipse isn't its tangent the normal
@gaspi-pro2779 Жыл бұрын
YOU ARE GOD
@abowden5079 Жыл бұрын
This involves guestimating and approximation. Maths isn't about guessing and approximating however. If anyone wants the real formula for finding the slope of a line of best fit it is m(slope) = (n * sum(x*y) - sum(x) * sum(y)) / (n * sum(x^2) - (sum(x)^2) Where m = slope, n = number of data points, sum(x) = the sum of all your x values added together, sum(y) = the sum of all your y values added together, sum(x*y) = the sum of all the values you would get after multiplying each x value by its corresponding y value sum(x^2) = square each X value, then add together all of those values sum(x)^2 = add all X values together, and the square that sum. This will give you the EXACT slope of a line of best fit without any guess work or approximation that will give you an incorrect slope based on guesswork. to find your Y intercept to the exact decimal value also you can use formula b = (sum(y) - m*(sum(x))) / n where m = the slope value you just worked out above. And this will give you a mathematically calculated y-intercept value that isn't based on 'guessing'where the line should run and intercept the y axis. Brian you should really mention this as there is no real place for guessing and approximating in the world of math.. There is a formula for everything and everything should use it's appropriate formula ;)
@thomaslegay77562 жыл бұрын
thank you for sharing 🗿👍
@leo-yt8jg2 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much man
@Jorddz2 жыл бұрын
how do you do this with mutiple trials
@bclamore2 жыл бұрын
You would take multiple videos. If you have 1 video, you would repeat from the beginning: adding the points.
@tomsimpson92 жыл бұрын
It’s 6AM and I have a physics test in 3 hours, thanks for this video, it is very helpful.
@sharp_focus2 жыл бұрын
But how can you calculate that line precisely, no guesswork, no approximate stuff. And after that finding the slope. There must be an exact way, the same way a computer would find it, and the computer HAS to have an algorithm. That's what I'd like to know. Thank you!
@bclamore2 жыл бұрын
Yes, the exact slope can be calculated from a given set of points. The algorithm is called linear regression. You can Google it to find the equation. There are probably websites that will calculate the slope and intercept too. And if you have a graphing calculator, that will give you the exact values too.
@abowden5079 Жыл бұрын
@Florin This involves guestimating and approximation. Maths isn't about guessing and approximating however. If anyone wants the real formula for finding the slope of a line of best fit it is m(slope) = (n * sum(x*y) - sum(x) * sum(y)) / (n * sum(x^2) - (sum(x)^2) Where m = slope, n = number of data points, sum(x) = the sum of all your x values added together, sum(y) = the sum of all your y values added together, sum(x*y) = the sum of all the values you would get after multiplying each x value by its corresponding y value sum(x^2) = square each X value, then add together all of those values sum(x)^2 = add all X values together, and the square that sum. This will give you the EXACT slope of a line of best fit without any guess work or approximation that will give you an incorrect slope based on guesswork. to find your Y intercept to the exact decimal value also you can use formula b = (sum(y) - m*(sum(x))) / n where m = the slope value you just worked out above. And this will give you a mathematically calculated y-intercept value that isn't based on 'guessing'where the line should run and intercept the y axis.
@colossalchaos13962 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@adityarajparichha98462 жыл бұрын
Thanks 🙏🏻
@noyanferendeci83772 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this amazing video. I just watched it for my exam. It helped a lot.
@smileydeception19472 жыл бұрын
Thank you soo soo much for this!! You helped me understand a whole hour of a boring lecture in just 5 minutes! Thank you! You've helped me a lot! <3
@princeofcats5482 жыл бұрын
You are hot.
@jilliansen12 жыл бұрын
so I just pick random points wherever I feel like it to determine slope?
@bclamore2 жыл бұрын
Yes, any 2 points should produce the same slope or close to it. Choose 2 points far apart for better accuracy.
@matiassantacruz54872 жыл бұрын
I am in my second week at uni, and I've discovered that all of the pretty much all the uncertainty propagation formulas we are taught in IB are FALSE. So learn them well for the exam, but forget about it after the exams
@bclamore2 жыл бұрын
That's probably true. IB never claimed theirs is the best way to determine uncertainties; their objective is to get the student to 1) appreciate uncertainty and 2) understand that they propagate through calculated quantities.
@ragupathi4082 жыл бұрын
Very useful
@edmundo_emc3 жыл бұрын
CUCEI (Mex) Student here, thank you so much, you save my life
@narongsaknanthagasigorn56813 жыл бұрын
thanks for your clip
@mashanatanzon5573 жыл бұрын
Thank you, helps me with my phyics studying
@HHH921043 жыл бұрын
Junior physics 2/23/21
@WintaMussie3 жыл бұрын
So it bends towards when it at incidence and then away from the normal when it’s leaving at refaction. (And off course some of it gets reflected) THANK YOU SO MUCH, have a blessed day :)
@contresillodenettur98282 жыл бұрын
hey, when it passes from rarer medium to denser its speed slows down thus moves towards the normal line and vice versa
@nevawilliams55533 жыл бұрын
I'm not understanding why at 05:51 the +/- is 5mm... Can anyone help?
@bclamore3 жыл бұрын
4.5mm is rounded up to 5mm. Uncertainty has 1 sig fig. Or it used to... I am not teaching this anymore, and IB may have changed their curriculum.
@nevawilliams55533 жыл бұрын
@@bclamore ah yes, I understand now. Thank you
@wilsonong84823 жыл бұрын
sir, how can you measure the emf without the effect of the internal resistance?
@bclamore3 жыл бұрын
Make a circuit with a known series resistor. Measure the current. You can then calculate the internal resistance. The current * internal resistance = voltage difference between emf and terminal voltage.
@daedae76503 жыл бұрын
tried to solve it first and i got it wrong :D
@badhil44683 жыл бұрын
How to draw the normal line ? Is to supposed to be perpendicular to surface or wrt what??
@bclamore3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@andrewbaker97933 жыл бұрын
i am doing year 11 physics and this really helped to do one of my assessment
@angelmathew14003 жыл бұрын
I know this is a really old video, but thank you so much for taking the time to do this!! This will be really useful for the data processing portion of my Chemistry IA☺️
@KimberlyFaith2603 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Sir! You are a life saver!
@yazanjahmi35063 жыл бұрын
Yea but the average at 6:00 is actually 1561.6 mm and not 1563mm.
@tessamejia75743 жыл бұрын
TY PERFECT VID I NEEDED IT FOR SCIENCE ITS RLlY HARD AHH
@golfdude42103 жыл бұрын
Hi Brian, hope all is well. Quick question for you I’m doing a lab where I throw the ball from one place to another across the room and I’m using tracker. It’s a lab and they want us to estimate the maximum height of the ball traveled above my hand, not the earth. What would be the steps you would have to do to measure this in tracker? How do I find the height of the ball above the hand? It is standing from one side and throwing it in an arcing motion to the other. It’s not in the single position like this video that they want us to measure the height. If you could help me with this I would greatly appreciate it.
@bclamore3 жыл бұрын
When doing the calibration, set the axes' origin to your hand location. The y vs. t data will be a parabola. The max of this curve is the max height above your hand.
@golfdude42103 жыл бұрын
Brian Lamore Thank you!
@olooalfredo3 жыл бұрын
You are ze best. Zenkyu very much :)
@lostinmontag16573 жыл бұрын
IB students apreciate this a hell of a lot, so thanks!
@hankarci2 жыл бұрын
YES
@naziamostaqim7373 Жыл бұрын
Was about to comment this 😊
@jaivasandani6150 Жыл бұрын
Fr bro
@nishalfishal11 ай бұрын
math ia 💀
@doiklee438910 ай бұрын
YES especially EE
@darknights6273 жыл бұрын
This is not the way you find the propagation of errors of a calculated quantity such as the area of a box you did it. Please review this link from Harvard University ipl.physics.harvard.edu/wp-uploads/2013/03/PS3_Error_Propagation_sp13.pdf
@bclamore3 жыл бұрын
What I presented here was the method IB required. IB is aware there are other methods, but their purpose was to get the student to appreciate uncertainty and propagation. You are welcome to contact IB.
@darknights6273 жыл бұрын
@@bclamore Thank you for your reply! What is IB? If you are doing the volume of a cylinder, the radius has power of 2 and height power of 1. So the uncertainty of the radius in the volume is bigger than that of height. Based on your formula they both will have the same weight in the volume uncertainty.
@politebadger50493 жыл бұрын
I'm not even in IB anymore what am I doing??????
@nikjoun99823 жыл бұрын
lucky
@alexv96493 жыл бұрын
go bells
@golfdude42103 жыл бұрын
Hey Brian, great video. Helped me with my physics lab. I have a question? Why does the velocity and acceleration data do not start in the first frame when shown recorded values? Thanks, Mark
@bclamore3 жыл бұрын
Velocity is defined as the difference (change) in position in a time interval. So you need two data points before you can calculate the first velocity point. Similarly for acceleration.
@golfdude42103 жыл бұрын
Brian, thanks very much for your response. Greatly appreciated!
@achyuththouta69574 жыл бұрын
I am getting the A value as -756 instead of -4.9 for the curve Edit- I didn't add the distance. I got -4.9 now
@caperider11604 жыл бұрын
Also, on your measurement of digital voltmeter, I would have liked you to mention what to do when there are lower end figures fluctuating. Some sensitive devices fluctuates at the lower ends a lot. Also the source you are measuring can itself be fluctuating very slightly. So it is necessary to cut off the lower ends of the values and decide how many significant figures are reliable reading.
@bclamore4 жыл бұрын
What you are referring to is an experimental issue. In the academic sense, meters do not fluctuate. As I mentioned in the video these are best case conditions. If you observe anything in your experiment that adds to uncertainty you need to note it and assign additional uncertainty based on your qualitative observations.
@caperider11604 жыл бұрын
I would like to ask a question on your take on the analog voltmeter reading. I would quote the reading as 22.5 plus or minus 0.5V. The needle has definitely passed the 22V mark and it seems to be between the 22V and 23V marks. Am I wrong?
@bclamore4 жыл бұрын
It's difficult to see, but when I use a magnifying lens I can also see the needle is between 22 and 23. So upon closer inspection I would agree with you .
@janenelson70424 жыл бұрын
Great help as I am preparing for another year of possible shut downs. Just a comment. If you double click on the statistics box, and go to appearance, you can increase the font size to 22 or 24, and then you can see it easily. I know because I can't read my students' statistic boxes unless they do that for me. Thank you for this video!!!
@philoso3774 жыл бұрын
Mark 11:00 This may account for heat gain day time. What about heat loss by night? Remains 29 days?
@bclamore4 жыл бұрын
Heat loss at night is ignored here, but that would increase uncertainty.
@caomoletimoloi65654 жыл бұрын
You are a life savior. Thanks a million!!!
@dexbillona71344 жыл бұрын
Im quite confused bcs other videos would tell that uncertainty of measurement would be equal to the resolution or the least count, can u somehow explain it sir? Thnks
@dexbillona71344 жыл бұрын
When it comes to ruler or other measurements uncertainty should equal to resolution but with readings such as glass instruments they would say its half of the resolution. Can u clarify it sir?
@bclamore4 жыл бұрын
Digital instruments use the least count as a measure of uncertainty. Analog instruments (like ruler or glass) use half the smallest gradation.