In the child-restraint case with Trooper Morales (starting at 2:12:40), Judge Brown twisted logic into a pretzel in order to side with the trooper. The statute requires that the child restraint device must be used "while transporting a child." Attorney Todd pointed out that Trooper Morales did not witness the child unbuckled until his initial approach, with the car parked. The operator of a vehicle is not transporting anybody during the moments when his car is parked at the side of a road, having been pulled over by a trooper. Judge Brown read the relevant statue aloud at 2:19:52, but still ruled against the defendant. 316.613 Child restraint requirements.- (1)(a) Every operator of a motor vehicle as defined in this section, ***while transporting a child*** in a motor vehicle operated on the roadways, streets, or highways of this state, shall, if the child is 5 years of age or younger, provide for protection of the child by properly using a crash-tested, federally approved child restraint device. The Judge was just scared to rule against a fired up cop.

🔥🔥

I had paper link for joining my traffic camera hearing first time here can some one tell me how joining with judge on my date hearing please and thank you 🙏🏻

One issue is did you fall to avoid a collision? If not I would ask what damage did my actions result cause. No damage No contract No case. That's what I would do in my Case

It says right on the IRS website theh take Bills of exchange problem is he put routing ans bamkkng numbers

person like Kyle cohen not can't work in court,his absurd

Sadly Carl Miller past away in 2015. But his knowled in Constitutional law for the individual is still valuable on KZfaq.

I can’t tell if the judge was genuinely confused or being intentionally obtuse.

I still subscribed, but let me tell ya, the music and watermark going in and out is INSANELY annoying.

The judge was great. Patient, thoughtful and understanding.

Awful judge, not to make defendant answer clearly relevant questions. Why should he get to decide they weren't relevant? Plaintiff should have studied up on good questions though!

They only sort of touch on what is a Bill of Exchange but the Judges come a cross they don't know and why! Troubling 😮

Courts are wondering how they can make $$$ off this case, they do NOT CARE About the People.

Why is background music playing during the video? It’s not really necessary, and why does the music get louder when somebody is speaking and then quieter when nobody speaking kind of hard to hear this way

LOL, I motioned to dismiss my parking ticket in Seattle (head-in parking in a back-in parking space) because the parking enforcement officer was not present. The judge refused to dismiss - I was given a $10 discount in exchange for waiting 3 hours in the courthouse lobby.

Human Trafficking by a paramility agency .All police powers are to be exercised within Constitutional limits.

This isn't court , this is tax court administration court not a real court in law. You can throw this out completely

This is ABSENT in Contra to the Law County in CA

Got a CASE

I love traffic court. These numb-nuts believe that by accepting a hearing in lieu of no conviction, no points and nominal fines, they will fare better. What a waste of judicial time. You have to anticipate a tougher go at it when you appear at the hearing. I could see if the goal is to extend the period in which to ultimately pay the fines and costs, but it's rollin' the dice. I had a speeding ticket and took it to hearing. There were about 10 others who were, like me, offered impeding traffic, no points, fine of $250. One of the defendants asked what are the chances of beating the ticket if he went to actual hearing. The clerk said honestly, "less then 5%". We all took the offer.

Also, the construction of a Money (to) Order is well within the statute if it meets section 3.1, which when one looks at the statute there is no restrictions on who, where or how a Money (to) Order has to be constructed. The fundamental issue here should be boiled down to the above, then once that is done the boundaries can be argued, I think he wins in all honesty, just for the fact that this female attorney actually called the alleged wrong instrument a “Money Order” on no less than 2 occasions.

The clip is interesting, but I don’t think it’s completed in defence argument, we didn’t get to hear if the instrument in the hands of the defence attorney was in fact the instrument that was sent to the IRS (which if it’s a copy he’s holding then deems it ‘non est factum’ or “this is not the deed”). If the IRS have only produced a ‘copy’ of the instrument to base their argument on then I would say that the defending attorney has missed a real and seriously tangible argument. By reason, if the government (treasury) were to seek a prosecution that a $5.00 bill was not real by presenting a photocopy of the bill in court, but not the actual $5.00 bill itself, then the argument from the defence should be “show me the money” otherwise by the government actually keeping the instrument (or the $5.00 bill) they have very clearly demonstrated that they have accepted it and, that in itself, is fraud.

Draws the easiest judge in the county, still loses miserably. This is why you don't use a public defender for a trial.

Oink oink snorrrrt

Best insults ever at 1:58 and THEN when judge summarizes the insults at 2:04. 😂

Dies anyone know if carl Miller is still living and if he has a law office?

This judge has a great personality and a heart, without just letting everyone off. If I'm ever ticketed in Collier County, this is the judge I hope to draw.

This is very helpful.

What’s is your website PJ?

If you are in court in texas for speeding after the D.A. says something lik e"Mr X was driving Y MPH over the posted speed limit and thats prima face evidence that he was speeding" say objection your honor, move the court to read both 201.904 and 545.351 of the texas transportation code into the record he wont do it. he will just dismiss the case right then and there with no explanation. because he is an FSCKING FRAUD and EXTORTIONIST and you just caught his hand in the cookie jar. I also dont have plates on my car and 502.003 says i dont have to

This judge admits the people for each case individually rather than admitting all at once. Interesting style.

Represent the trust and not a living man and woman sovragation

The problem with medical bills is they come from everywhere and you have no idea what they are for or why you owe the money. You really have no idea if it is a scam or not in some situations.

Spot P Diddy 😂

No one uses "I says" ever won anything in court. Smfh. A guru for the r/tarded.

Wow, that bit in the middle @31:40… Somehow completely enthralling, relaxing, hilarious and painful to watch at the same time. And also like a rollercoaster in a strange way, leaving you wanting for more. I’m feeling so confused right now. 😂😂😂

Moral of the story: take before and after photos of any asset you hand over for someone else to work on.

Never represent or allow your body (vessel) to be used for surety of a government created "ENS LEGIS". Know thyself.

Over 8 years with public corruption by Employer county I been through all this ..

Officer funkey bunkey at his best. A lier

so will this police got punishmen because he is wrong? is the woman got money if she is right?

Can a Will ever trump what's in a Trust?

Mr. Laser Instructor got his ass handed to him....

Is that Doogie Howser?

Your honor sounds gay

Benoit is a master of testimony 🤌🏼

That van driver's money was well spent on that attorney. I wonder what the ruling would have been, if the evidence had been admissible. Without knowing the area, I can think of situations where common sense would seem to justify parking an HVAC van obstructing a bike line. Horrible situation for everyone.

Nothing like lawyers going public with their self dealing to highlight how corrupt the legal system has become.

Background music, so annoying. Didn't watch the video in full because of this.

The music and distracting watermark is an attempt by this channel to claim copyright to this video of a public courtroom. The worst part is that KZfaq will allow them to copyright strike any channel that tries to use parts of this video through legal fair use. Scummy tactic to take video from the public domain and monetize it while adding nothing to it.