Its funny how there is very little mention of the clear German hand ball just before Webber's equaliser?

Well, all I know as a Scot is this, I was six years old at the time & we have never heard the end of these Morris dancin Germanic Saxon Englanders goin on about this. Lord I pray that these yahoos & trumpets never win anything again, we haven't heard the last of the 66 pish so I can only imagine how intolerable it would be if these bangers won again. Lord give me strength. 😆

From what I’ve watched here,Thomas Muller usually plays as a shadow striker whenever he’s in a Central Attacking Midfielder position but whenever he’s out on the wing,he is usually a raumdeter.That’s another advantage of Thomas muller’s game.His versatility is very crucial to Bayern as his football IQ in each position helps compensate for his lack of pace,strength and technical ability

You actually present little or no evidence that the tournament was fixed. Just supposition and rumour. An opposition player sent off against England (from what I have read in contemporaneous reports of the game, he deserved to go) and a ball that may or may not have crossed the line. (to me it looks, in some footage, to have bounced on the line, but did it curve after hitting the bar?) All pretty flimsy in my opinion. If you really look at world cup winners over the years you will see that many of them have had a share of 'luck'.

The linesman admitted that it was fixed much later. He had suffered at the hands of the Germans during the war, and saw a chance to get even.

Let it pass. Controversial calls happens the hole time. Was it a goal? Has things like this not happened over and over again? But because it’s in the final conspiracies start to emerge. The scored one more. Didn’t they? That they complain about Maradona? He clearly cheated. I’m not a fan of English football. Every time they are eliminated. It makes me smile.

Rigged ? Do bears shit in the woods!🤬

The scandal of 1966 was how England switched the semi-final from Goodison Park to Wembley at the last minute because they were worried at how popular and how much support the Portuguese were getting on Merseyside.

If the game was fixed, then Germanys last minute equilizer would have been disallowed on some obscure pretext leaving England 2-1 winners in regular time. And how on earth can you say Hurst "cheated". He took a shot which he thought had crossed the line and the linesman judged that it had

I wouldn´t have liked Rattin´s looks anytime.

At least, this was no goal, but under the circumstances of that time, not provable. But to get a star for that is ridiculous. During the 4th goal, there were people on the field, which caused irritation. So finally I must say, the englishmen seemed to be pretty unfair to win the title this way. But wtf, its history. When I was young, everybody in germany said, that was exxtrem unfair. But - the englishmen have to live with that dirty star on their shirts. And in fair conditions, they never won a second. And never will.

Repetitive

The ****hole English haven't shut up about it since. I mean they only beat HALF of Germany when you think about it. And yes, the other, Eastern half of Germany, were also there - - and a damned fine team too. Put the two halves of Germany together, and England would've been demolished within 45 minutes,

Well the W C was Robbed - before balls got kicked .

Is this narrated by AI? Jee-off Hurst?!

Fixed. Sincerely, Scotland.

Eusebio was robbed bro as well as pele

Bro actually guessed my favorite

Bro I got Bayern, and I am a professional Bayern hater. (Also known as Dortmund fan)

It was fixed

you also forgot about portugal who had to move to wembly for obscure reasons leaving portugese players tired and lost the match without a doubt rigged and most likely because eusbio was in his prime as well so i think they were scared anyway good video

What about the fact that the semi final against 🇵🇹 was meant to be played in Liverpool, and on the day of the semi final the portugal squad had to travel to London from Liverpool.

I don't believe this. The Brits never lie and cheat.

This video is bitching and moaning and nothing else. England were the best team and deservedly won. As for Rattin, he thought he could be the ref, questioning and sneering at every decision; he'd alrerady been cautioned and deserved to go. And btw: 30 July 1966 was NOT a Sunday!

This is nonsense. The linesmen was a long way from the ball, couldn't see the incident clearly and took a guess while pressurised by a 100000 crowd consisting mostly of England fans. That doesn't make it some kind of conspiracy

A simple vista, no fue gol. Tampoco se ve bien la sombra de la pelota.

I was 7 years old when i watched the game with my family. When the goal was given, my father threw a beer bottle at the TV which caused the CRT to implode, then he got off his chair, ripped the TV off the power point and threw it through the window, shouting this was rigged, exactly like the battle of Britain!. I will never forget it, it was awesome!

Boy! Not only does Millennial "announcer" misprounce "A-R-G-E-N-T-I-N-E" by pronouncing it like a Brit, his ability to read the text is pretty suspect, not to mention that his grammar skills are pretty damn mediocre. What a douche! 😖😖😖😖😖

If this tournament was a fix as some think, why did the ref give a free kick in the final against England in a dangerous position in the very last minute of normal time, for what was a very soft challenge by Jack Charlton even by today's standards?ź🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

I got Bayern even tho I’m a Liverpool fan 22 points btw

Bayern ❤️💯

Even if the goal was disallowed England still would have won 3-2!! Get a grip people 😂😂

Im a liverpool fan i dont mind chelsea i just prefer liverpool

Much is made of that third goal but was that a foul by Jackie Charlton which led to the equaliser? And as the ball was bouncing around the six yard box, did the German number three control the ball with the back of his arm? That being the case the game shouldn't have gone into extra time. Having said that, Hurst's third goal definitely did NOT cross the line. Was it a scandal? So many tournaments have left a sour taste in my mouth. Argentina 1978, Italy 1990 and Korea 2002 has got to be the worst and most blatant. Then there was Lampard's goal that never was against Germany in South Africa. Anyway, I don't think winning a tournament on home soil is much to celebrate. you can only call a nation succesful if it's won away from home. Just my opinion.

That linesman should have a statue 🗽 he deserves it

The 1966 World Cup final was hosted by England, who defeated West Germany and Spain easily. It has been the center of many conspiracy theories over time that have tainted FIFA’s reputation for success with each new day; it would only get worse when Joao Havelange claimed in 1998 throught out Folha de Sao Paulo “In three matches played that year Brazilian national team play without any black players on their roster which led them to lose all contested headers against Europe. The 1966 England versus Portugal semi-final was a magical moment in World Cup history that is often forgotten today. The game had been scheduled to be played at Goodison Park, where the Portuguese national team resides but “at last minute” FIFA (though some say it’s English FA we’ll go with) granted an accommodation for their weary guests - requiring them only two hours travel time from Liverpool instead four five plus hour trip if taking coaches which most likely took nearly as long then getting there when they arrived on British soil late into evening after playing several matches during tournament days past without sleep or rest! Sir Stanley Rouse, the then president of FIFA rejected Portuguese request for arbitration because he thought it would be “the greatest betrayal in sporting history” if football’s world governing body agreed with England and awarded them host nation duties over his home country. The match between England and Portugal was scoreless up until the 30th minute when Bobby Charlton scored his team’s first goal. The 2-1 victory came from another two goals by England in addition to Eusebio scoring a penalty kick late into second half additional time; all after being down 1-0 early on.”

What a load of nonsense. You fail to say that England did not play in the first three world cups so to say they'd never won it without adding that is misleading. England were actually World champions 3 times by winning the Olympic football tournament, which before the world cup started was considered the world football championship. The Argentinians were the dirtiest team in the competition, even worse than Bulgaria, who kicked Pele to death. It has long been proven by modern technology that England's third goal in the final did cross the line but you also seem to forget that England scored a fourth goal so even if the third goal had not counted they still won the match. Watch the whole 120 minutes of the final and you will see England were the better team on the day so nothing lucky about that !!!

Bayern munich i am a liver pool spurs madrid boy tho but bayern love it

Are the english liars and cheats?

You what cheating in the world cup then check out Argentinas win in 78 and the germany v austria game in 82

There are always commercial considerations in these tournaments. England played Portugal at Wembley to ensure the match sold out the biggest stadium, which Germany vs Soviet Union would not. Controversial decisions usually go in favour of the home side, and in favour of the bigger countries. In 1950 in Brazil, a Yugoslav player was injured while entering the field (from the away changing room at the uncompleted Maracana the players had to cross a building site), and not allowed to be treated while the national anthems were played, so he did not get on the field until after Brazil had scored. The bent Welsh referee writes in his book about "communist officials" arguing with him about this, yet four years later he is the linesman who disallows a last-minute equaliser for Puskas (captain of "communist" Hungary) so it is reasonable to suspect the official might be prejudiced. Would Bertie Vogts be allowed to mark Johann Cruyff as he did in 1974, had the match not been in Germany? Multiple cheating in 1978 in Argentina, and Korea in 2002, Garrincha sent off in the semi-final in 1962 yet allowed to play in the final against a small country (& "communist") Czechoslovakia, Mal Donnachie sent off in Spain in 1982, playing against Spain? It is a surprise if there is not cheating.

All world cups that end in 6 are scandals. 2026 WC will end the same

Nothing unfair about Rattin's red card. Nor England's win in the final. The best tournament was the 1970 one but 66 also had its moments.

Chelsea squad!

I got 21 points which is bayern but my team i support is liverpool😢

England should of had the trophy home so many more times of not for cheating! A disgrace this anglosaxon os being racist tiwards his country

57 years later it still can't come home😂😂😂 Argentina got their revenge 20 years later when Maradona eliminated England single-handedly Germany got their revenge by eliminating England in the 1970 quarter final and since then England has never beaten Germany at a world cup. 44 years after Geoff Hurst's ghost goal,Germany got their revenge when Lampard had a similar goal disallowed even though it crossed the line 😂😂😂

Yes, definitely!! The bloody empire had to finally win one's own game! They had to at least nil the kick's validity given controversy within/between the technical staff! 1966 was not won by England or Germany, given the technical controversy of the score. Today they should nil that World Cup's final, as it's only a (managerial) "TECHNICAL ERROR". I wonder if someone like Pierluigi Collina refereed that match! 🧐

My favorite football club is: Valmiera FC (:

How's this controversial when England score another goal? They would gave won 3-2 anyway...