@@davidfradley12 Thanks for suggestion, but the ZS6BKW does not need a 4:1 balun, it's a different type of antenna.

@@leo2944 Please keep on trying, the contacts will follow!

@@4X4-RADIO Hello, it's off Aliexpress: www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003240525853.html?spm=a2g0n.order_detail.order_detail_item.2.110ff19cDZNfuK HTH, 73! Linas LY2H

@@Linas_LY2H Many Thanks...

@@WaynePatrick Thanks Wayne! It's a CHUWI Minibook with Win11 running on it. I agree regarding PSK, but luckily, the RTTY community is still strong and RTTY contests are very vibrant! Not the everyday casual work , though :(. 73! Linas LY2H

@@ai5dd It seems, like more , actually, all QRPLabs radios are welcome to take part, not only QCX, since the QDX and QMX- series were introduced. Good luck! 73! Linas LY2H

@@Linas_LY2H Thanks Linas, good to know! 72 de AI5DD joe

Sure! I used to tune regularly my QRP rigs into metal water gutters in hotels in French rural areas ( in most modern hotels there is no way to get to the watter gutter from your room window :)). So, anything works, just we need to be inventive! Thanks for sharing your experience! 73! Linas LY2H

@@dandypoint Thanks a lot for your comment, very interesting! I will google now for the possible pictures of the bumper mount, just of curiosity, as I’m not sure bumpers on my car ar suitable anymore for this type of set-up :) Respect for the 90 DXCC on mobile! CU on the air, 73! Linas LY2H

@@Linas_LY2Hmy 1964 Ford had a real bumper! The mobile mount had a strap with hooks to fit the top and bottom of the bumper. There was an adjustment screw to tighten it. There was a part that the strap went through that was held against the bumper and what looks like the piece you have bolted on to it. It was a very common mobile mount in the 1960s. It was very adjustable to fit almost all bumper shapes. It was also common for the CB whips of that day. There was one piece that was held tight against the bumper at a fixed angle depending on the bumper. The two bolts in your piece mounted to it and the angle could be adjusted so the whip was vertical and your two bolts were tightened to hold it in that position. 73, de N4DJ

@@dandypoint Fantastic! Great times, great cars! Thanks for sharing your memories! 73! LY2H

Absolutely, you can use whatever is at hand and most convenient, but just up to he point when you… lose your fancy tensioners or your 3D-printed ones brake. Then, the knowledge of the knots may be a difference between you have the antenna up, or you cancel your outdoorsy activation :) Wish you well! 73! Linas LY2H

Sadly, yes, as it comes for the new parts. Luckily, the second hand market is still vibrant, these things, or an entire radio fit with everything, still might be found starting in small flea-markets, ending in big events like Friedrichshafen Ham Radio Messe (starting next week BTW :)) 73! Linas LY2H

Thanks Marco! Hurry-up, it's almost mid-Summer! Have a good wx , hope to work you P2P, 73! Linas LY2H

Go ahead, use it! The eyelet is usefull but not essential :), the mast is just a perfect travel companion with realy meaningful erection hight of 10m. 73! Linas LY2H.

@@Linas_LY2H Thanks Linas. I am moving in September from UK to Italy and will have a lot more room to actually erect some form of antennas for my 705. 73 de G0LQP

Congratulations on your new purchase! And sorry for the QMX probs :(. There could be any reasons for it , but my own experience is that the SPS blocks are not so easy to kill :). My first intuitive move would be check and re-solder the encoder's legs with really powerfull soldering iron. I had a problem with my QMX right-hand encoder as it was tuning the VFO somewhat strangely ... Resoldering, esPecially of the ground leg, fixed it. I'm now in the QMX+ building process, and I need a 100W soldering iron with fine tip, as ground points are even more difficult to solder than in QMX, as in PLUS the multilayer ground plane is much bigger. Good Luck! 73! Linas LY2H

Hi OM, sure, why not :) But not because of "comparing SDR vs SDR". In my experiments, I compare the performance of radios, independently of technology, employing the parameters that are universal for all, thus, comparable, like sensitivity of the receiver, or ability to cope with strong signals nearby etc. BTW , the radios in the Sherwood's list are ranked exactly by their performance, independently of their technology. And it's only natural to do so , IMO, otherwise , what should I compare the hybrid radios with if following the principal of "comparing sdr vs sdr"? Hybrids to hybrids, as they are neither pure analogs, nor pure sdrs? :) Comparing the performance , independently of technology, IMO, is the only way to get more or less objective picture of the radio and it also helps a customer to make a choice between the technologies. Like, I see nothing wrong in comparing , for example, the performance of digital filters in my FT-710 to a crystal filters in my Elecraft K3. They, obviously, are incomparable by their nature , but they both do the same job- digging out for me these weak signals out of the noise, so I can hear the difference, if any , and I can make a comparison. Analogy in the automotive world, for better understanding, would be a perfectly legal comparison between the mileage on one charge of an EV car and the mileage on one petrol tank of an Internal Combustion car. Thanks for watching, stay tuned for more! 73! Linas LY2H

Great! My first ham radio receiver was exactly a home-built 4-transistor direct conversion 40 m band receiver. It was more than 40 years ago but I'm still missing the sensitivity of it :) Paradoxically, the simple SDR receivers of nowadays also bear the same simplicity and clarity of old days, just in different, digital technology. Wish you lots of fun! 73! Linas LY2H

The QCX plus rigs are all thru hole components (the surface mount stuff is already installed). The mini same BUT very tight and easy to wreck stuff! If you buy a QCX plus and go slow with a magnifier on your head it is OK and the instructions are very detailed and thorough. 73 de VK2AOE.

I agree with you. CW makes life so much simpler! 73! Linas LY2H

Me too! Thanks for a hint for future QMX+ reviews! 73! Linas LY2H

Absolutely! What is best, SSB and digital filtering are high on Hans's priority list! At least, that's what he was writing in one of his recent posts in the group. Let's wish him good health and us be patient! 73! Linas LY2H

@@Linas_LY2H I'm not gonna rush him on this one because he solved the thump which was my main gripe. I spoke with him at four days in May (I am designing my own QRP CW transceiver) and we discussed the firmware at length. Made me less worried about designing an SDR in the future though

@@JonathanKayne Fantastic! Would love to see your SDR design! Linas LY2H.

Good luck! Let your soldering iron be hot! 73! Linas LY2H

Thanks for watching! Please let us know how was your experiment going! 73! LY2H

Thank you very much Robert! I don't use the capacity hat in this video. If you are asking about the capacity hat to the AX-1 antenna in order to use this antenna with IC-705 and other tunerless radios, it's in this video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iatieNeH3J_QmKM.htmlsi=sqYEAaVFWf8jHUEW My answer to a similar question is in the comments section there: "One rule of thumb reads that the capacity hat electrically lengthens the antenna 2 or 3 times its diameter. It's like, the hat 10cm in diameter should lengthen the electrical length of the antenna by 20-30 cm. In my case, 1 needed to electrically lengthen my whip for 40 "electrical" centimeters (from resonance at ~15.3 Mhz, calcualted electrical length of 1/4 quarter wavelength ~ 466cm, to the wanted resonance at 14.1 MhZ, calc 1/4 wI ~ 506 cm. 506-466=40.). So l chose the diameter of the cap ~20cm, which turned to be pretty much in tact. But again, the size/geometry of the hat is not critical, it gives a big room for experimenting. " Hope, this helps. 73! Linas LY2H

@@Linas_LY2H Linas - Thank you very much. Yes, cap hat with AX1. I've watched several of your videos and learn a lot. They are very helpful. Hope to work you sometimes. 73 de K4RLC Bob

Thanks for watching! The QCX-mini is a perfect tool to have your goal achieved! Good luck! 73! Linas LY2H

Thanks for watching! As it comes to the iFTx , I'm afraid, this software does not allow to pair your iPhone with an IC-705 via bluetooth like a headset, nor to arrange a stream via the wi-fi, like in the FT8CN. But: the iFTx allows you to physically put the phone near the radio speaker/mike and have a sound/microphone link in this most simplistic way! I've tried it on many radios, it works, it's fun! :) 73! Linas LY2H

@@Linas_LY2H Linas, you are a HERO! After read the IC-705`s manual and did not understand I came again to this video and finally I was able to synchronize the iPhone with the IC-705! Thank you so much!!!

Wish you lots of DX contacts! 73! Linas LY2H

Hello Angus Macgyver ! You can be inventive and do whatever you want to :). The log within the FT8CN just offers you a way to organize your log. You can mark the contact as "confirmed" manually by just sliding it left (not right, unless you want to delete the contact). This might be practical if you use paper QSLs and want to mark every single new contact confirmed in the FT8CN log. Alternatively, you can export all the contacts to a file, upload all these qsos to a LoTW ( or wherever else), get them confirmed by the service and then import them back into the FT8CN after which these contacts should turn into green "confirmed". In theory :), as I don't use this option, because I export all my logs from different devices into one big file in some other logger and then send in one piece to the LoTW. HTH, 73! Linas LY2H

Wish you luck! Yes, the QMX has got the power-on button built in the Volume encoder :) With each software upgrade, the QMX is getting better and better! The assembly is medium difficult, my own experience is that it takes quite a powerfull soldering iron in order to proper solder the ground points ( this is due to the multi layer PCB, draws lots of heat) and the encoders contacts. Insufficient soldering accounts for, probably, some 90 percent of malfunctionings in home-assembled kits. 73! Linas LY2H

Cool, very innovative! I must try your method on my other masts too! 73! LY2H