Unix, Linux and the command line
36:35
2020 The Movie
23:19
2 жыл бұрын
Ebenn's PhD journey
8:20
2 жыл бұрын
Hardknott Pass
8:50
2 жыл бұрын
Mark the first sixty years
16:24
4 жыл бұрын
Evacuees 2007
3:03
4 жыл бұрын
Gambia 2020
6:05
4 жыл бұрын
Ziggy Marley at House of Common 2019
9:43
Bordeaux 2019
18:35
4 жыл бұрын
Super Ape
13:46
5 жыл бұрын
Gambia Dec 2018
26:20
5 жыл бұрын
Last ever school run (in dub)
8:58
6 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@lightningmcdweeb
@lightningmcdweeb 16 күн бұрын
Are you the mark pallen on the panel here winning from imperial College? Genius
@Stan49
@Stan49 26 күн бұрын
Am intrested in this line of research
@phillipphillippson8456
@phillipphillippson8456 Ай бұрын
Has anyone got the episode from 1997 where New Hall Cambridge goes up against Nottingham???
@jonnyshadbolt899
@jonnyshadbolt899 3 ай бұрын
nothing better than imperial totty
@troo_story
@troo_story 3 ай бұрын
Unwatchable due to piss-poor quality.
@smeeruk
@smeeruk 5 ай бұрын
Used to do this semi-regularly in a slightly knackered 1973 T2 VW Camper to visit family on the coast. Love this road, but be warned to avoid it at the slightest sign of frost or heavy rain if you're not familiar with it.
@oliviabjork
@oliviabjork 5 ай бұрын
“WE’RE NOT THAT OBSCURE” for PEARL JAM 😂😂😂😂
@MrPotsy81
@MrPotsy81 10 ай бұрын
Oops, Timothy Dalton did not play Henry II's son, he played the young king of France....
@MultiVince95
@MultiVince95 11 ай бұрын
Wednesday 1st May 1996
@MultiVince95
@MultiVince95 11 ай бұрын
Wednesday 13th March 1996
@castelodeossos3947
@castelodeossos3947 11 ай бұрын
Appalling quality but who cares?
@dgstellario4433
@dgstellario4433 8 ай бұрын
Generally we watch UC for answering questions with the contestants - and for that purpose the quality is just fine :-)
@penaflorida.
@penaflorida. 11 ай бұрын
I accidentally drive this road 4 days ago.. We survived it by some noise started rattling in my car now.. Probably overdo it 😢
@leonacurrie3471
@leonacurrie3471 11 ай бұрын
That was so stressful just watching it . Will never drive this road
@peterstrous2092
@peterstrous2092 Жыл бұрын
On reductionism and holism: a hypothesis needs to make sense from ALL observations and from ALL possible perspectives and hence a hypothesis needs to make sense from BOTH reductionist perspectives and holistic perspectives. The problem we humans have is that reductionism constantly sucks us into assumptions after which the holistic perspective does not make sense anymore and we reject it. Our human thinking is biased, that is how our thinking works.
@salimpatel6309
@salimpatel6309 Жыл бұрын
My grandma can drive better than that!
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
Recorded On Wednesday 13th March 1996
@pierreproudhon9008
@pierreproudhon9008 Жыл бұрын
most bizarre but ingenious thing ever in the internet
@pallenm
@pallenm Жыл бұрын
If you like this take a look at rapguidetoevolution.co.uk/
@evanjones2539
@evanjones2539 Жыл бұрын
Looks like a day at the office to me.... But with added tarmac..
@m.y.mabdulgadir831
@m.y.mabdulgadir831 Жыл бұрын
Great
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
3:11 No Conferring!
@jimmyfaulkner1855
@jimmyfaulkner1855 Жыл бұрын
Great video! Is modern day scientism as expressed by Hawking when he said “philosophy is dead” in anyway connected to logical positivism? Are there similarities or only differences?
@via_vaishali
@via_vaishali Жыл бұрын
Hello... I have to make an assignment worksheet on Ideas and evidence - suggesting new ideas and explanations for phenomena. While I was collecting information and data about the topic. I came across this video. You explained here wonderfully. But still, I am not getting any new ideas for the assignment, that's why I commented maybe you could help me with any article that can give me some inspiration for the assignment. It's really important Sir.
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
2:44 No Conferring!
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
2:35 9:12 9:36 No Conferring!
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
2:00 12:41 13:27 No Conferring!
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
2:08 No Conferring!
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
3:19 No Conferring!
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
Recorded On Wednesday 17th April 1996
@joyjoJ4ever
@joyjoJ4ever Жыл бұрын
Do you have the 1994 - 1995 final
@pallenm
@pallenm Жыл бұрын
No I am afraid not
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 Жыл бұрын
@@pallenm You Lose 5 Points
@darrenparis8314
@darrenparis8314 Жыл бұрын
To not make any claim which is not verifiable is nearly a complete piece of a philosophy for living. Great presentation!
@ObjectiveZoomer
@ObjectiveZoomer Жыл бұрын
Philosophers of science are to scientists what conservationists and poachers are to an endangered species. Without philosophers who defend science, the poachers, ie the mystics, the religious, the subjectivists will destroy science. If most people accept that science is as valid as African voodoo, science will fall and we will all go into the dark ages
@lashau7056
@lashau7056 2 жыл бұрын
My lecturer is there, its interesting to see him as a student
@moshefabrikant1
@moshefabrikant1 2 жыл бұрын
מהי הפילוסופיה של המדע, והאם היא בהתחלה אמורה לתת לנו נוסחא איך לעשות את המדע או פשוט מציגה לנו את הסתכלות השונה של החוקרים/האנשים על דברים
@sohumramouthar9722
@sohumramouthar9722 2 жыл бұрын
I learnt more from this than I did from 7 lectures in University!! Thank You.
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 2 жыл бұрын
Recorded On Wednesday 24th April 1996
@matthall3077
@matthall3077 2 жыл бұрын
Recorded On Wednesday 1st May 1996
@benquinneyiii7941
@benquinneyiii7941 2 жыл бұрын
How do you know all A are B?
@MohamedElouarda-qk6ws
@MohamedElouarda-qk6ws Ай бұрын
"If all A were B". Thats to demonstrates a correct reasoning. If we supposed that all A were B. If we started with such an observation. Lets suppose what have such a situation. Then...and if x is an a. If we find ourselves in such situation. Then...If all A are B, and X is an A ..what would be the next affirmation we could deduct with certitude
@mrinalsubash8358
@mrinalsubash8358 2 жыл бұрын
What do you think are the challenges faced while peredicting antibiotic resistance on bacterial genome sequences?
@rayyhantaman6377
@rayyhantaman6377 2 жыл бұрын
what a good video
@Xavier0458
@Xavier0458 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your talk! I'm a first year postgrad science student and this was a very helpful introduction to these higher-order ideas.
@who_what
@who_what 2 жыл бұрын
thank you for the explanation Dr. Pallen
@kimosullivan5863
@kimosullivan5863 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks I really enjoyed the simplicity and pragmatism of this video! A great overview that invites many doors to be opened! So much for my early night tonight :)
@pierreproudhon9008
@pierreproudhon9008 2 жыл бұрын
Enchanting
@philsmith888
@philsmith888 2 жыл бұрын
It is sad to me how science in the past few years has been made into a tool to wield political power. This is easy since the vast majority of the populace have any education or training in the sciences (and particularly in the philosophy of science). Thanks for this short presentation of the subject.
@spsidhu38
@spsidhu38 2 жыл бұрын
Sir can u plzz tell me a bacteria whose genome annotation is not done ..... I want it for my project work
@victoriacarter6467
@victoriacarter6467 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Thank you for sharing.
@ewaf88
@ewaf88 2 жыл бұрын
My goodness Jeremy looks young and they used the original music
@pallenm
@pallenm 2 жыл бұрын
My feeling is that wow how old he looks now. Depends what your default Jeremy looks like.
@humeanrgmnt7367
@humeanrgmnt7367 2 жыл бұрын
One can't discover knowledge through inductive reasoning. Science isn't knowledge.
@tiechen1543
@tiechen1543 2 жыл бұрын
hahaha, I just found out that the great lecture I am going to give to my Chinese students is exactly what this guy lectured about.
@cloudgalaxy9231
@cloudgalaxy9231 3 жыл бұрын
The ending of this is kind of... well, garbage in my opinion. Most science is wrong, bye. Like chill out. How are you making this video if not for science? Didn't you just talk about how science constantly tries to prove itself wrong? You didn't even have the whole psychology discussion. Are those sciences actually science? What are the problems with science that can or can't be fixed? Geez. I imagine I could say that same thing a million times over for philosophy. Every paper you read is wrong. Does that mean that it's useless? It's only if you accept a scientific finding in an unscientific way (the field never verifies it)-- then it's useless. I love philosophy, but I dislike the animosity towards empiricism. Sure, they get the funding, departments, and chairs while we don't-- and they often question only the surface level assumptions instead of the deep rooted dogma of induction, etc. But there's still no need for the shade.