WORLD IN CONFLICT (2007) | Anti air defence
18:52
WORLD IN CONFLICT (2007) | Infantry defence
9:17
WORLD IN CONFLICT (2007) | Mangusta attack
12:31
Пікірлер
@Hep08
@Hep08 2 сағат бұрын
The M256 gun on the Abrams model is mounted on the right side of the gunshield, not the left like it is in real life. Also, its coax is just a hole in the gunshield instead of being a tube sticking out from it.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 2 сағат бұрын
@@Hep08 Regiments has a more correct model.
@Hep08
@Hep08 Сағат бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 Im inclined to believe you. When I first noticed it my jaw dropped unironically.
@clpfox470
@clpfox470 3 сағат бұрын
On the soviet forces, in a early trailer there is a bmp 3. Im guessing it was cut for the more iconic bmp 2 (plus its armament)
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 3 сағат бұрын
Ahh yes, the NATO trailer in particular.
@clpfox470
@clpfox470 3 сағат бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 yup thats the one.
@kasrakhatir
@kasrakhatir 8 сағат бұрын
This game is a Hawks wet dream 🤣
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 8 сағат бұрын
@@kasrakhatir Haha yeah, Hawk missiles would probably be shooting down loads of aircraft.
@davidpurpleartist8125
@davidpurpleartist8125 22 сағат бұрын
To me the AAV-7 could be handwaved of them being on loan from the USMC to the Army.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 17 сағат бұрын
@@davidpurpleartist8125 For me it would not make sense, considering there were probably a lot more of M-113s in Army stockpiles.
@MrGoogy11
@MrGoogy11 Күн бұрын
Hello, I really liked your video, one of the things I would like you to talk about is that the C-141 and IL-76 fly very low and that the Soviet air carriers carry AK-47s when they should carry the AKS-74N and RPG. 18
@MrGoogy11
@MrGoogy11 Күн бұрын
Hello, I really liked your video, one of the things I would like you to talk about is that the C-141 and IL-76 fly very low and that the Soviet air carriers carry AK-47s when they should carry the AKS-74N and RPG. 18
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 Күн бұрын
Indeed you are correct.
@MrGoogy11
@MrGoogy11 Күн бұрын
4:51 They are 6B5 Ulej and paratroopers have been seen using 6B3 but in a larger conflict they could be seen with 6B5, only the berets could be brought by the platoon commanders
@MrGoogy11
@MrGoogy11 Күн бұрын
4:29 If we talk about the airborne forces they would have to use the TTSKO suit and for the deserts they would have to use afghanka suits
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 Күн бұрын
@@MrGoogy11 I did mention that they should wear the Butane camouflage uniforms/TTsKO. But yeah, for desert environments, Afghanka should be worn.
@MrGoogy11
@MrGoogy11 Күн бұрын
​​@@guy-be-man6908Yes, sorry, it was my mistake, I only knew him as TTSKO and not as Butane
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 Күн бұрын
@@MrGoogy11 Understandable. That camo has quite a few different names.
@user-qp7rp2uo8o
@user-qp7rp2uo8o Күн бұрын
Thanks for the video, comrade) I didn't even know that there were American ATGMs and machine guns in the Soviet fortifications
@raulecreuset667
@raulecreuset667 Күн бұрын
This game was my childhood
@raymondyee2008
@raymondyee2008 2 күн бұрын
Well I didn’t expect that especially when I *loved* playing that game. After all “Red Dawn” was its inspiration back then.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 2 күн бұрын
WOLVERINES!
@TonyBustaroni
@TonyBustaroni 2 күн бұрын
Awesome videos
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 2 күн бұрын
@@TonyBustaroniThank you!
@juleslandry7585
@juleslandry7585 3 күн бұрын
2;38: Actually Helicopters are used by ALAT (Aviation Légère de l'Armée de Terre), which is a branch of Land Army (Armée de Terre), not Air Force. Still a great job, congrats!
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 3 күн бұрын
Ahh, thanks for the heads up. Thanks for liking it as well!
@juleslandry7585
@juleslandry7585 Күн бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 You're welcome my friend ;).
@Bahnfanatiker
@Bahnfanatiker 3 күн бұрын
You missed in the Ekranoplane-Scene: The missiles ar AShM, not Land Attack Missiles Also one mistake wich always bothers me: The amphibious transport for NATO is a Spz Luchs. The Luchs is a Recon tank, it has no capability to carry infantery internally (sure, they could sit on top of it, but I don't think, that they would do it). ALso, I am currently not sure if it is the Luchs A1 or A2. If it is the A2, it shouldn't be considered amphibious
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 2 күн бұрын
Ahhh, you are correct about the Luchs, and the Ekranoplan, but it does seem that the Luchs variant seen in game maybe the A1, so it should be amphibious.
@zentran2690
@zentran2690 3 күн бұрын
I've gone into the files and started editing the textures to be more historically accurate and higher quality adding my own patches and stuff and even added my own face onto one of the units. It's suprisingly easy to access the files and edit them for WIC.
@KillerOrca
@KillerOrca 2 күн бұрын
People have done it for COD, dont see why they couldnt do it here, yeah?
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 2 күн бұрын
Yeah.
@michaelthayer5351
@michaelthayer5351 3 күн бұрын
With regards to the Warrior armor upgrade package, I can kind of see militaries rushing kit that IRL was deployed in 1990-91 onto the Battlefield in the Summer or Autumn of 1989 if there is a Third World War raging, that's somewhat understandable. Also I think in Guards Tank divisions, at least the ones outfitted with T-80s the mobilized units slated to reinforce them were equipped with T-62s. We see that in the Divisions in WARNO, so T-80s and T-62s in the same unit makes a degree of sense. Though I think in the original alpha build they had a T-72 model that was supposed to be the medium tank in game. The abundance of T-80Us is likely because it was the most advanced design the Soviets had at the time that they had actually produced en masse so they prioritized new builds of the T-80U rather than the T-80Bs or BVs when the war started (or converted older T-80s up to the T-80U standard), so the older models slowly became extinct in the German meat grinder while T-80Us became more numerous as they were the model available as replacements. It's similar to what we see in Ukraine with T-90Ms, where we see losses of them almost every other day while T-90As are as rare as white rhinos as most have been upgraded to the T-90M standard and T-90Ms are the only new build tanks Russia currently produces, though there are rumors of T-80 production restarting at OmskTransMash, hopefully we get a T-80UM2 obr. 2025, that'd be sweet.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 3 күн бұрын
Yeah from what I have seen in the extremely early trailers, the T-72 was the medium tank. I think it would have been nice for the T-80 models to randomly change between the Bs and Us.
@justinsantiago9555
@justinsantiago9555 4 күн бұрын
If WIC utilized a division/battlegroup system similar Eugen's Wargame and WARNO, it would have made the campaign and the multiplayer much more interesting gameplay wise (Example, VDV units in the American Theater and Guards Tank division units in Central European missions of the Soviet campaign.
@OperatorMax1993
@OperatorMax1993 3 күн бұрын
I agree on that. Like how for the USA there is the 24th infantry division which includes a National Guard unit from Georgia. Or how the USSR has units joining forces with East Germans (along with the 56th Air Assault consisting of former Soviet Afghan war veterans)
@justinsantiago9555
@justinsantiago9555 Күн бұрын
@@OperatorMax1993 Yeah, using a division/battlegroup system or the "task-forces" system of Microproses's Regiments would allow for an implementation of subfactions as well as unit variety depending on the theater of each campaign. On a sidenote, if I were to make the WIC campaign I would also involve the Canadian Armed Forces for the North American missions. I don't think Canada would just sit by twiddling their thumbs while their closest ally and neighbor was being invaded just south of the economically-vital province of British Colombia. The Canadians would be realistically just as alarmed as their American counterparts. I imagine they would send troops over the border to help drive the Soviets out of Seattle and the rest of Washington State.
@TripleAlfafa
@TripleAlfafa 4 күн бұрын
I wish someone remade this game, ideally with some new factions as well.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
Regiments is also supposedly a partly inspired successor to WIC, and is getting French, Canadian, Czech, and Dutch task forces in an upcoming DLC. It already has the West and East Germans, Polish, British, Americans, and Soviets, plus a Belgian group as well. But yeah, it would be awesome if someone made an actual connected sequel, but unfortunately, with Massive Entertainment doing Goobisoft’s bidding, I don’t think we’ll ever get a sequel. We can only speculate to what happened to Colonel Sawyer and his men, and how WW3 ended…..
@TripleAlfafa
@TripleAlfafa 4 күн бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 Regiments is very much it's own thing but I see it more like a less micro-intensive Wargame. A WiC remake would have to be more like a traditional RTS and would likely have to compromise realism for balance, though a smart dev team would embrace the variety in creating more interesting factions and getting the feel of a third world war just right.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
@TripleAlfafa Tbh you are very correct about Regiments, now that I think about it. If more nations would arrive for a WIC remake, I would love to see the Canadians, bigger representation of Warsaw Pact nations, and probably even Asian combatants like South Korea.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
Hey, the Nordic nations would be cool to have, along with Finland. I always wonder what side Finland took in the war.
@TripleAlfafa
@TripleAlfafa 4 күн бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 Canadians would make most sense as a supplementary army to the USA and NATO, since Ottawa would likely do what US does and be available wherever they are needed. Korea would likely be the hottest Asian front, with Vietnam and Japan working with their respective Koreas and Chinas. Australia would likely also make an appearance if only as a few units as part of a grander US-aligned coalition. The Warsaw Pact would just be to the Soviet Union what NATO would be to the USA, a ridiculously multi-cultural task force. As for Finland, it likely would choose neutrality as long as it could take but if forced to take a side, likely choose the Soviet Union out of pragmatic reasons. As for other notable neutrals, Sweden would likely end up choosing NATO and Yugoslavia would choose Warsaw Pact. Austria and Switzerland would in turn do their damnest to stay out and be rather flexible on who they side with.
@user-qp7rp2uo8o
@user-qp7rp2uo8o 4 күн бұрын
The Soviet army is represented in the game... It's very strange. These are infantry uniforms, which are massively wearing "Butane" camouflage, which, like the bulletproof vests of anti-tank fighters with machine gunners, were intended ONLY for special forces. Airborne soldiers wear ceremonial berets. Not real insignia on the equipment (at least I do not know such). The developers clearly took materials not from the Red Army but from the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation of the 90s. And remembering the comment on the last video, the soldiers of the Soviet army disliked the AK-74 VERY much, so much so that the units changed them to the AKM series at the first opportunity. Also, the MI-24D presented in the game was rarely used in advanced units at the time of 89, it would be more logical to see the MI-24V. And yes, I'm sorry for the grammar, English is not my native language
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
Yeah the Soviets in game do look pretty weird in terms of their appearances. But seriously though your English is actually really really good!
@user-qp7rp2uo8o
@user-qp7rp2uo8o 4 күн бұрын
​@@guy-be-man6908Seriously? Thank you :)
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
I also did want to inform you that the game does say the MI-24 in game is the V variant. So that’s a plus.
@user-qp7rp2uo8o
@user-qp7rp2uo8o 4 күн бұрын
​@@guy-be-man6908Oh, it seems that there are regular problems with the Russian translation of the WiC text, we wrote that this is a modification of the V, and the BMP-2 was called the BTR-RD "Robot"
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
Interesting
@CioThrash666
@CioThrash666 4 күн бұрын
3:45 you mean AKMs, Ak-47s is an incorrect designation either way and were replaced by AKMs in the 50s. Good vid anyway!
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
The weapon model is really low poly so I had a hard time figuring out which one it was, so I went with the AK-47, but yeah, the AKM was the successor. Thanks for the compliments btw!
@Randomusername56782
@Randomusername56782 4 күн бұрын
I mean thats not surprising, the soviets somehow manage a landing in Seattle successfully without the operation immediately falling apart afterwards.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
@@Randomusername56782 Oh my god is that profile pic, the M113 Gavin?
@Randomusername56782
@Randomusername56782 4 күн бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 yes, the finest vehicle platform the US army has ever developed. Of course the example of my pfp was developed by the brilliant national guard engineer… mike sparks.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
@@Randomusername56782 We should have him as Secretary of Defence.
@Randomusername56782
@Randomusername56782 4 күн бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 No, we need him as the president of the united states.
@JonathanLundkvist
@JonathanLundkvist Күн бұрын
The Operation DOES fall apart afterwards. The Expansion pack Soviet Assault makes this clear.
@blackmark7165
@blackmark7165 4 күн бұрын
I love how you can hear unit chatter when you zoomed in on them Like at 0:34 you can hear LVT crew talking about tank (i think i hear he say Leopard 2)
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
@@blackmark7165 It was such a small way that for me, really humanised those units you commanded, made me actually want to keep them alive, and mourn losing them.
@michaelthayer5351
@michaelthayer5351 4 күн бұрын
With regards to the Cayuse vs Kiowa, keep in mind there is a World War on and everyone is pulling everything out of their warehouses that runs and can put lead down range. And in game the Homefront is, somehow, of secondary importance to Europe so it's possible the Kiowas are over there while the Cayuse got pressed back into service stateside. Also for the USSR VDV using the BMP-2 instead of BMD-2 in game this is something that has actually happened in Ukraine where VDV units being used as shock assault infantry have traded in their lightly armored BMDs for the relatively thicker armor of the BMP line. There are also just a lot more BMP-2s than BMD-2s, same for Gvozdikas in place of Nonas, so they might be using those since replacements are easier as they have more mobilized conscripts trained on those systems. I also don't think all the units in the Soviet Invasion Force are VDV, there are probably a fair few regular Rifle or Tank Divisions providing support and bulk. But otherwise yeah pretty spot on.
@TonyBustaroni
@TonyBustaroni 4 күн бұрын
There's definitely Guards Tank divisions as T-80s are present and so are Pion artillery guns
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
@TonyBustaroni Ahhh, I’ve got a second video coming up which will justify the appearance of T-80s, as the few Guards Division elements that got off the containers in lore.
@squartbotai1383
@squartbotai1383 4 күн бұрын
Is this game good?
@lukematney7062
@lukematney7062 4 күн бұрын
Yeah, this is one of the more unique RTS games I've played. Worth giving a shot.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
@@squartbotai1383 Great game! Great soundtrack, campaign, and a lot of the combat gameplay is action packed.
@AB-bg7os
@AB-bg7os 4 күн бұрын
Maybe one of the best
@lukematney7062
@lukematney7062 4 күн бұрын
@@squartbotai1383 and actually thinking back to it, with the Soviet Assault expansion, it has a very compelling story for an RTS game. The US campaign is fun but they definitely put some polish (lol) into the Soviet campaign.
@Heylanda-fb9xb
@Heylanda-fb9xb 5 күн бұрын
You missed some though. USA - The Abrams used by the US in this game is an M1A2 variant instead of the A1. This also mean main gun of this tank is the 125mm instead of the 105mm. - M60 Patton is the main tank in your arsenal despite them already retired from Army service and was trasferred to National Guard Reserve. Though we did see the National Guard joining the Army in this game so this is forgivable to some extent. - M551 Sheridan would've been gone from the service by 1989. Only the small garrison in West Berlin and some base in Germany still use them before being replace. - Charperel being the main AA unit instead of the Avenger. - A10 Airstrike is capable of dropping a bunker buster. That shouldn't be possible. - Humvee as a repair vehicle. NATO - Leopard 2A6 instead of the earlier A2 or A3 in 1989. - Eurofighter as the main airstrike. That's doesn't make sense since NATO intend to use it as a fighter primarily. Soviet Union - T-64 tank as the MBT of the Soviet instead of the T-72. - T-80U being the primary variant in this game despite only 1,000 of them being made by 1989. T80B or T80BV would be more appropriate.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 5 күн бұрын
For NATO, there actually isn’t a Eurofighter, what is seen is actually a French Air Force Mirage 2000. The type entered service in 1984. The leopard 2 variant seen in game is a version before the 2A6, unless you play through Modern Warfare mod where yes, there is a 2A6. From what I’ve seen online, the Avenger began operational capacity around 1989, after deliveries in 1988. Having a Chaparral makes sense I would say. Actually, having either would make sense. Sheridans continued service with the 82nd Airborne until the mid 1990s, seeing final duty in the Gulf War in 91’. But it did seem that they were very rare by 1989, only really being used by the Airborne, some units, and the National Training Center. It is stated in the World in Conflict unit description that the Abrams variant is the A1. However you are absolutely correct for Soviet ones. I do believe you are also right about the M60 Patton as well.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 5 күн бұрын
@@Heylanda-fb9xb You are also correct about the humvee, while it did have the function of a troop transport, I haven’t seen any evidence of it being a repair vehicle.
@squartbotai1383
@squartbotai1383 4 күн бұрын
Is the game good?
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 күн бұрын
Pretty much!
@thewilliam8342
@thewilliam8342 22 күн бұрын
Exactly, without lighting off some burners, your toast ….🤷🏻‍♂️
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 22 күн бұрын
RIP Bomber crew
@MBT60
@MBT60 Ай бұрын
That ticking sort of sound is so annoying yet satisfying
@Sitharos
@Sitharos 2 ай бұрын
This one had me thinking, “Well at least I can get some chow before heading back to HQ for debrief.” 😂🍜🥡🥢
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 2 ай бұрын
All worth while, despite all the gunfire
@Sitharos
@Sitharos 2 ай бұрын
It always made me laugh that the old lady was resisting and I had to either pepper spray her or use the taser. 🤣
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 2 ай бұрын
Hehe, no mercy.
@Incognito4
@Incognito4 3 ай бұрын
Yes
@connormoroney1106
@connormoroney1106 3 ай бұрын
Ah dammit , we died…
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 3 ай бұрын
This is the end of devil 505, say goodbye a##hole, eject, eject, eject!
@ykdoodlefr
@ykdoodlefr 4 ай бұрын
Ah yes, my favourite plane, the Tomcot.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 ай бұрын
Maverick would approve!
@User-ee2ky5tz6l
@User-ee2ky5tz6l 4 ай бұрын
Strike Fighter Game= Nice
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 ай бұрын
Pretty much. I mean it's a lot more easier to actually kick some enemy planes, compared to Falcon BMS or DCS (which are cool), where you have to press like a billion knobs and switches to even take off.
@User-ee2ky5tz6l
@User-ee2ky5tz6l 4 ай бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 True Man🙂
@somethingsomethingelse7706
@somethingsomethingelse7706 4 ай бұрын
Great video loved the series
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 4 ай бұрын
Appreciate it!
@sierra6993
@sierra6993 5 ай бұрын
Is that IL-2 1946 B.A.T. mod?
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 5 ай бұрын
Nope. It's a mobile game called Strike Fighters Modern Combat. Basically an arcadey mobile offshoot of the original Strike Fighters PC combat flight sim series from the early to late 2000s. "Sim lite" being that the game is supposed to be realistic and accurate, but the startup procedure doesn't require a full button pressing minigame within itself, I look at you DCS, grrrr!
@user-oq9zg2hq8t
@user-oq9zg2hq8t 5 ай бұрын
PS4
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 5 ай бұрын
Only on PC
@somethingsomethingelse7706
@somethingsomethingelse7706 5 ай бұрын
Always a good day when the man who be guy uploads
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 5 ай бұрын
Indeed sir
@BiffTummyTumTum
@BiffTummyTumTum 5 ай бұрын
@@guy-be-man6908 Just became your 60th subscriber
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 5 ай бұрын
@BiffTummyTumTum that's a roger
@VernaVonRueden
@VernaVonRueden 5 ай бұрын
"promo sm" 🤔
@VanBurenPhilips
@VanBurenPhilips 5 ай бұрын
Loved this map!
@prannypon111
@prannypon111 6 ай бұрын
before ready or not
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 6 ай бұрын
Yeup. Would be cool to see Ready Or Not get an early 2000s campaign, as that would pay a tribute to SWAT 4.
@jadehaze7939
@jadehaze7939 6 ай бұрын
that early flashbang was for good luck lmao
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 6 ай бұрын
Always for good measure.
@r0mser45
@r0mser45 7 ай бұрын
game?
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 7 ай бұрын
Strike Fighters Modern Combat, more like ACE COMBAT than an actual combat flight sim like Falcon BMS or DCS World.
@r0mser45
@r0mser45 7 ай бұрын
What kind of device did u record on?
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 7 ай бұрын
On my phone, using the Record it! App.
@r0mser45
@r0mser45 7 ай бұрын
​@@guy-be-man6908what version of your phone? I have a iPhone 6 but I wanna make it internal audio but I can't.
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 7 ай бұрын
@@r0mser45 IPhone 11, not sure if IPhone 6 has the Record It! app, but if you are able to download it, click on to the app, and there should be a massive red button that you need to press to record. Click on that button, and it should take you to the start broadcast screen, where there should be an option to have your microphone off or on. If the microphone is off, no background audio or your voice will be recorded, except the audio coming from whatever game you are recording. If the Record it App isn’t there, then you’ll have to use an IPhone 6 compatible recording app on the App Store, and then see if that app has the ability to turn off the microphone, once you enter it, or try and find another one.
@Batman4021
@Batman4021 10 ай бұрын
Huh! F 14 loser
@Sultan-cf5wf
@Sultan-cf5wf 10 ай бұрын
I got a 15 second ad for a 9 second video
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 10 ай бұрын
Grrrrr, better sue KZfaq then
@teyyo9745
@teyyo9745 3 ай бұрын
Ikr it’s so cringe
@clickityquackquack
@clickityquackquack 3 ай бұрын
Me too
@WoodenWedge
@WoodenWedge 10 ай бұрын
i thought it said tom scott
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 10 ай бұрын
Well, Tom Scott could theoretically make a video later on, explaining how to hijack an F-14 from a museum and fly it. 🤷‍♂️
@brandonfromiowa
@brandonfromiowa 10 ай бұрын
bro missed the memo
@MasterHusi0909
@MasterHusi0909 10 ай бұрын
what does tomcot even mean? what does this entail?
@guy-be-man6908
@guy-be-man6908 10 ай бұрын
Some jet stuff
@GoingForth
@GoingForth 10 ай бұрын
Tomcot
@Hjk7_me
@Hjk7_me 10 ай бұрын
The jet is called a f-14 tomcat they are just saying it in a spedy way
@Hjk7_me
@Hjk7_me 10 ай бұрын
Hince tomcot
@MasterHusi0909
@MasterHusi0909 10 ай бұрын
@@Hjk7_me yeah but why the beeping and wing flapping
@pixelnazgul
@pixelnazgul 11 ай бұрын
Arrow
@Ade-mu4zn
@Ade-mu4zn Жыл бұрын
🇲🇨👍💪👌