You mean humans have more blood on their hands than any animal on Earth. The problem with you is that you are too dumb to think outside the box.

The Cold Wind of Reality We have no direct evidence for the existence or non-existence of a God. There is, however, a mountain of indirect evidence - but indirect evidence, being subject to arbitration, allows one person to perceive the information differently to another (or even be dismissive of it). Therefore, there can only be the assertion of a "belief" that is built upon indirect evidence for or against the existence of a creator - so the demand for direct evidence is presumptuous fallacy. In short ... we are wasting our time trying to convince anyone of such a thing: especially when the scripture says we live by faith - and both atheists and theists have some semblance of faith. The question is: which faith is correct and how should it be embraced? Atheists have faith in science and mankind to self-govern - whereas theists have faith in the one who laid His life down to rule as a benevolent King. This means we need to take a pragmatic look at the options on the table if we are to move forward with efficacy toward effective resolution. The problem is: both atheists and theists are invested in their worldview - to a dogma of cognitive dissonance. Atheists claim religion has been the driving force behind the evil we see in the world - whereas the theist perceive sin is the driving force. They are both are correct - to a point - but neither are exemplifying their position when they start disparaging each other. To make matters worse - neither are aware the scripture does not sanction religion and neither are aware sin is delusion. The good news is: this can easily be broached if we break down the meaning of the tree of knowledge of good and evil: Tree = Source of information Knowledge of Good = Accurate info Knowledge of Evil = Inaccurate info Partake = Digest and believe Fruit = Ideas, beliefs etc Sin = Delusion (spiritual death) The scripture defines sin as missing the mark because it is the state of mind in which a person seeks to justify wicked behaviour; which then leads to the galvanising of hierarchy. The scripture even confirms this by highlighting the introduction of sin would cause the stronger to rule over the weaker when God said, "Your desire shall be to your husband and he shall rule over you." The dictionary defines religion as: a belief in a superhuman controling power. However, that is merely the semblance of a faith - because religion is an institution that has established hierarchy, using doctrines, that serve the interest of those within the hierarchy (including government). This is how we know the scripture doesn't actually sanction religion. Indeed ... the New Testament testifies to the fact Y'shua (Jesus) took issue with those who create religion. ... so we can all agree - religion is bad. This means we only need to address the cause of delusion (sin) if we are to rectify the situation once and for all. This is where science can, and should, take centre stage to establish correct understanding of reality - and our place in it. Science is the process by which careful observation leads to the conclusion of analysis of information which, after formulating an idea into hypothesis or theory, is tested rigorously by experiment and peer review. This is to say: the scientific method includes the process of disproof to ensure falsifiable theories (beliefs) are not idiosyncratic. For this reason: a theory is considered a "provisional truth" because science is continually self-correcting in its pursuit of understanding as resources improve the quality of data that is assessed. This mechanism allows science to castigate the vulgar and exemplify the intellectual - but science has developed a weakness for asserting indirect evidence as direct evidence to propagate favourable theories that create a ceiling on progress. Science "should" use the scientific method to root out theories that are error: so it should never consider indirect evidence as direct evidence - because indirect evidence is subject to arbitration. Mutation, for example, is direct evidence for adaptation and, at the same time, indirect evidence for transition. This is because we have observed the genome to rearrange information and cause a living organism to look (slightly) different to its parents. This is direct evidence for adaptation - because slight change is observable. Science has never observed the genome to increase information and cause the living organism to become a different type. This is indirect evidence for transition - because drastic change is not observable. The moment science asserted mutation as direct evidence for transition - it became an idiosyncratic belief (delusion) for those who refuse to acknowledge the genome has never been observed to increase. Then the argument begins with atheists citing rock strata as evidence for millions of years (which they back-up with unreliable dating methods) - while the theists cite rock strata as evidence for rapid formation by a flood (which they back-up with hydrological sorting experiments). The point I'm making here is: we have come full circle - because indirect evidence is subject to arbitration. Somewhere within that circle is the Word of God offering a warning to avoid anything that causes delusion - and science, having the noble cause of rooting out delusion, has become the very thing that causes delusion. Perhaps I should conclude this article by offering a warning against embracing the delusional estate and encouraging everyone to embrace the eternal estate. ... but this article has already said enough for both atheist and theist to ponder. My Best Wishes 💖 To Everyone The Three Pillars lnkd.in/e8NKKpb Footnote: this article is dedicated to Richard Dawkins who coined the phrase "The Cold Wind Of Reality".

He didn’t cast disrespect towards CNN. Listen again

He should have said all conservatives. The birther QAnon party is historically always wrong. And they have all the flat earthers. All the Nazis. All the Confederates. All the monarchists. All the creationists. History always proves the right wing wrong and our future will be no exception.

It is completely their own fault.

@@eatfrenchtoast Pass the progressive cool aid. You sure got a nice dose.