@@lance_uppercut. Hi, Lance. Are you in the US? If so, Walgreens has resumed film dropoff, something they ended maybe 14 years ago but recently revived. There is also Dwayne's in Kansas and two big labs in California. Forgot their names. Just search "film development labs" and you'll get some hits. And you could buy your own chemicals and supplies and do it at home. Wishing you very well. Thanks again.

@@room111photography5 I live in the UK at the moment but thanks for the recommendations man! Wishing you the best!

And thanks to you, too, Alexandra. Best wishes.

Old film memory curl...that's some for real stuff. Always have to wrestle with it. Thanks for your comment.

Doug, I deeply appreciate your kind words. I'll try to make a video soon. Always wishing you well.

Dale I think I made this video in 2015. It was factually correct then, but not so much today. You can get great image quality from smaller photosites today than in 2015. But thanks for your kind words. Wishing you well.

Great story, Alex. Thank you so much. Which camera store in SF do you refer? Reminds me of the historic Central Camera in Chicago that Vivienne Meier used to frequent. Last I checked that was still in business too.

Hi, Zoe. Let me answer in two ways: 1. I remove the film from the camera and develop it myself. Then I scan the images into a computer using a flatbed flatbed scanner. Then I upload the images to a drugstore website and pick them up about three hours later. 2. The other method is to remove the film from the camera and send it off to a photo lab where they will develop the film and make prints for you. Hope this helps. Wishing you well.

Greetings, Virgile. It's good to see you again here. If it is the photo of Chloe Sevigny in red it's really horrible. The technical merits of the photo itself aren't bad it's that the crew put no time in her hair and makeup. Ghastly lack of preparation. What do you think of it? One thing on the technical side I would have exposed it at EV 11 or so to blow the outside / ambient light out. Wouldn't have to look at that stupid air conditioner outside. How would you have shot this?

@@room111photography5 I agree. I'm french, living in Paris & I'm so disappointed in french Vogue. Never seen such ugly work. Looks like Chloë is drunk after a party and her child took the picture in the morning. I would have overexposed the outside for a more natural look. 10 or 20 years ago french Vogue showed so high quality work with the best photographers in the industry. I really don't understand how today a whole team: shoot team, and production team let something like that get on the cover. Vogue is meant to be the best in fashion, it is the highest quality we should find. And to work for them is so hard, I really don't understand why they are hiring untalented people, makes me angry. Maybe they don't want the print edition to sells... British Vogue shot the same look with same idea: character in a party, but they did a better job in my opinion, I believed the story at least.

@@VirgileLeBigot Great companies do not allow cronyism and nepotism because they know that merit will lead them to excellence and the former two will ultimately destroy them. Anna Wintour's legacy is already cemented. She will go down in history as the person who destroyed modeling and fashion photography due to cronyism. Mark Rothko was once asked, "How long did it take to paint that?" He replied, "53 years." His meaning was it took a lifetime of experience to make a painting. So.....the February cover of Vogue France.....how long did it take to make that? 36 years.

Forgive me, the camera has been in storage a long time. I remember so little about it. I'm sorry I cannot answer your question.

Greetings, Seamus. You will have a boatload of fun. The most important things to consider is to watch closely the temperature of your chemicals and your development times. If you get those right you're 95% there.

Greetings. Advance until you see the numeral on the back of the film cartridge advance by 1. For example, if you were on frame 6, advance until the numeral 7 appears in the window. Some cameras stop automatically but some do not. This particular camera has been in storage for years, so I do not remember if it stops automatically. Great question. Wishing you well.

Thank you for your answer. My camera was so dirty I didn’t realize there was a screen on the front displaying what exposure you’re on. In retrospect a very easy question to answer myself haha. Thank you

Greetings, Maxime. It's a standard frame / border. They are the most affordable. Other frames cost quite a bit more. Be well. And thank you for your kind words.

Sorry misunderstanding ( I am not native English speaker) My question was about the photographs that you take outside, do you use the darken mode to make the sky blue or it’s just the normal mode ? Because sometimes it can get overexpose

You're not going to believe this, but I was thinking about you this morning. I was thinking of viewers that have been loyal and kind for years, and you immediately came to mind. Thanks for letting others know about my channel. I've looked forward to your comments for many years now. Thanks again for everything.

Greetings, Doug. I think I'm done with the channel for the most part. Nepotism in the fashion photography industry has crossed a threshold. It's dead as far as I'm concerned. Thanks for watching and staying in touch over the years, friend. Wishing you well always.

The Red Ceiling photograph was not taken where Rob filmed his video. William Eggleston lies to you and everyone else about where he took his photograph The Red Ceiling. Eggleston's family members also help him sell his lie that he took his photograph The Red Ceiling where my father was murdered. The Red Ceiling photograph was taken at 508 Macarthur Street in Greenwood Mississippi. Please read my books about Eggleston Murderabilia and lies for sale then you will know the truth and not some made up lies for profit with a man's unsolved murder. Namely my father's unsolved murder.

Thank you kindly! Wishing you well.

@@room111photography5 I'm not so sure yet because I need to study Inez and Vinoodh and Bailey's today's work but I would say now Camilla Akrans, Mario Testino, Luigi & Iango, Rafael Pavarotti and Alexi Lubomirski Patrick Demarchelier will always be 1st for me because he was french like me and his work was so complete, like nobody else. I have to say Steven Meisel too but need to study his most recent work to have a better idea.

Greetings, Stephen. Please keep in mind N=millions and, in my case, n=1. That means the number of each camera in existence is in the millions presumably, and I tested one of each. Scientifically, this is completely invalid. But it's all I could do. I couldn't buy and test many of each to conform to scientific requirements. Thanks. Wishing you well.

@@stephengreico2810 It's been so long since I handled them that I cannot remember them. They are in storage. Sorry I can't give you a definitive answer.

I like your Twiggy avatar, and I'm guessing you're a David Bailey fan? I love his work. Thank you for your very generous and kind words. I wish you health and happiness. Stay tuned. More ASMR on the way....

@@room111photography5 thanks! You're right, I like Bailey a lot. Cannot wait for another video of yours :)