0:48 “Caruso was right there for the back tap” 😟😟

Did OKC just get their Iggy to win a championship?

This take aged like milk lol.

Bold statement putting this team ahead of the best of the Showtime teams and the best of the Kobe - Shaq teams, not to mention the KOBE - gasol teams.

How to lie with statistics. Also, ridiculous that people completely ignore the fact that Porzingis barely played in this year’s playoffs.

There is a calculation for checking how much worse teams are without certain players because their injured. Just check how much they win games without that certain player or plus minus.

They were dominant.... And plus The Bucks were a mess in the front office, and that is not an excuse... The Knicks overused their starting 5 which led to so many injuries The 76ers were useless without Embiid and Maxey had too carry it... It's still coaching.

loved the vid! very entertaining

Lol haters always underestimating. Nothing ever easy except Miami.

What was the greatest Lakers team ever?

I don’t know. This team has been knocking on the door for a long, long time. How do you calculate and factor in previous soul-crushing defeats? Easiest? Can you calculate team strength? Do power rankings make a difference?

Terrible approach.

you deserve so much more recognition brother. and you'll get it one day. keep up the great vids!

If the Celtics played the 2nd best team in the league this year in 4 straight rounds (OKC with a 7.36 SRS), according to this video the Celtics would have a final score of… +13.56 This would also be ranked 78th and accordingly would be ranked as the easiest championship ever won. But I think we both know if that really happened that that would be one of the hardest roads of all time playing a team of that quality in every round. Therefore this video is debunked and it doesnt mean anything. You would have a more accurate video if you simply just added the SRS scores of their opponents, rather than quadruple-counting the championship team’s own SRS score against them. That doesnt make for an accurate result

Wow. You're calculations are miserable. Number 1, no championship is easy, you're playing the best teams or teams that beat the best teams. Number 2 I love Jordan but their Supersonics win was definitely easier.

I believe the calculations used do not accurately identify the easiest or strongest path to a title from an objective standpoint since the results include a factor based on the strength of the teams that won. Whether a path is easy or difficult should not be dependent on how strong the eventual champion was, but rather on how relatively strong the competition would have been for any team. As a result, based on your calculations, many historically great teams end up at the bottom of the list. In effect, you're punishing teams for being better than everyone else, but if you're the greatest team in history, your path will always be "easy" relative to the competition, especially since top seeds will always play lower seeds on the way to the finals. The 1996 Bulls (72 wins) are #73 and the 1969 Celtics (48 wins) are #16, meaning that the Celtics had a much tougher path; however, the average number of wins for teams played by the Celtics was 54.6 while the teams the Bulls played won 53.25, yet the Celtics are 57 places higher on the list, mostly because of their own record and seeding rather than the competition they played.

Celtics made it look easy. They were dominating the regular season. ANd injury or not, they have blowout wins in all their playoff series. That's just dominance no matter how you spin it.

It's not the Celtics' responsibility to make sure their opponents are healthy. They took the regular season seriously, managed their players' loads, etc.

Get 72% your First 2 Years With NORD VPN: go.nordvpn.net/aff_c?offer_id=15&aff_id=90527

How will you choose to remember this Celtics Title?

it was only easy, because the celtics are that good

Lets get that game 5 update

Nah