Not sure if current Rv‘s have such boosters/engines.
@Nathan-hb3pu14 күн бұрын
Why have decoys why not just have all warheads ?
@dimgl1917 күн бұрын
PENETRAION AIDS. YES.
@williamnot893423 күн бұрын
I don’t think Russia. China. North Korea or any other US Adversary fully understand that the United States has the power of God over their Nations. They should thank their God that the United States is an Altruistic Nation.
@jonathannorris-green146625 күн бұрын
Everyone commenting on this video needs to read nuclear war: a scenario by Annie Jacobson. It’s as fascinating as it is horrifying. She covers a ton of the technical aspects of ICBMs including the use of decoy warheads
@thedolt9215Ай бұрын
Oh great, now somebody can just go out in their garage and create one of these things… Thanks for nothing!
@daikucoffee531629 күн бұрын
Huh?
@vxrdrummerАй бұрын
I always wondered how the decoy had mass enough and propulsion to reenter the atmosphere. I just thought they inflated and travelled a little way due to the inertia from the warhead bus already travelling at speed, and didnt get very far, but that that would have been enough to trick missile defence systems. How wrong I was! This is like a sexy lady flirting with you, stripping off her clothes after she enters your bedroom, and then accelerating towards you for the moment of impact, only turn around and say, 'you wish', whilst your best friend then nails all of her hot friends in front of you, causes a large bang and whole pile of mess in your life.
@GegeDxDАй бұрын
MIRVs have no their own engine. This video confuses me. That's what makes them formidable and hard to intercept. They are small and they also do not emit heat. Similar to glide bombs, but even smaller and much much faster.
@GegeDxDАй бұрын
I thought the MIRVs have no engine.
@dasmin11352 ай бұрын
This was wasting valuable space inside re-entry vehicle.
@markfurman43863 ай бұрын
THIS IS BULL S H I T
@doggonemess14 ай бұрын
Whenever they say "RV" instead of "warhead" I think of it dropping Winnebagos from orbit. XD
@KoishiVibin4 ай бұрын
strategic towing detected...
@mikewolf32646 ай бұрын
The ending is creepy.
@thunderp171910 ай бұрын
Let's talk some practical , recent terroristss hamass fired 5000 low quality missile on modern high tech iron dome. In which 10 to 20 percentage hit the grounds . Now 🇺🇸 with interceptors systems against ICBMs will never able to stop these deadly MIRV..it's not like 5000 MIRV will approach at short time but even 50 of them approaching will unlikely be intercepted ,becoz they're not so.e cheap missiles, they're are high tech manoeuvring small sized objects at 25 mach And even single neuclear hit will be deadline. Something can be done only before it reenter otherwise after re entry it's just blink of an eye before it strikes
@prettycoolguy285010 ай бұрын
Whats the point of the shrouds breaking away on both the decoy and the RV? Why have the shrouds at all?
@henrybader23809 ай бұрын
I assume it's because they can't make the inflatable shroud on the decoy out of the same heat shield material as the RV. So to make them look the same they gave the RV a shroud made of the inflatable material.
@richclarkeshow Жыл бұрын
I didn't realize that each RV had its own motor. I thought they were ballistic! Incredible technology. Terrible, but impressive.
@dziban303 Жыл бұрын
When they hit the atmosphere, the comparatively light decoys start slowing way down compared to the heavy RVs. So the decoys have those motors to keep their deceleration equal to the RVs, prolonging the ruse. But now the enemy can tell which are real and which are decoys! So the real RVs have smaller motors that burn simply to make them look the same as the decoys. But they do not provide significant thrust; it's more like the tracer compound in a bullet. Anyway current RVs don't have any of that now, because we don't use any penaids at all.
@richclarkeshow Жыл бұрын
@@dziban303 oh interesting. I am sure we do use these still but just not "officially". Have to wonder about all these pronounced MIRV rollbacks. Very difficult to verify. It's not like when we decommissioned silos due to non-proliferation treaties and left the visible signs so the Russians could see from space that we complied.
@GegeDxDАй бұрын
Yes, they do not have their own engine
@0MoTheG Жыл бұрын
The way they depicted the "drop" seemed wrong. The entire bus is already dropping. Seems to me that one would launch the RV forward and sideways before the peak.
@martinsvillechivo7892 Жыл бұрын
3:47☢️💥🔥
@ttrestle Жыл бұрын
I always just use lube for a penetration aid
@CgRally5 ай бұрын
💀💀💀
@saranga2.0 Жыл бұрын
Ending music 🥶
@popupmassacre2445 Жыл бұрын
There is no matter to deterrent. It doesn't matter if 80% of the missiles fail. Half a dozen will succeed in striking targets on both sides and everything will crumble. Mutual assured destruction lives on.
@robotorch Жыл бұрын
Ladies, my missile needs no penetration aids. It stands ready for launch at your command!
@johndorian3685 Жыл бұрын
I can’t believe Ukraine had over a hundred of such missiles and volunteered to dismantle them.
@Haunt888 Жыл бұрын
it's not really theirs tho, Soviet left it there when it collapse, Soviet is Russia, even the nuke codes are in Moscow
@johndorian3685 Жыл бұрын
@@Haunt888 I don’t know where you got this stupid idea that Soviet is ruzzia. Soviet Union was a well developed self sustainable economy and the most powerful military in the world. To give you a perspective, the Soviet Union was a mighty red bear that everyone was afraid of, that bear is dead, ruzzia is a bear’s louse in comparison.
@JamesPerkins3 ай бұрын
@@johndorian3685tell that to Russia. Russia thinks it is a superpower.
@jamesbarnard9710Ай бұрын
There is one left... sans warhead, it is in the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum. Bet the Ukranians wish they had it back!
@priatalat Жыл бұрын
We send something into space so it can shoot back at us. We humans are actual monkeys.
@chrisv2994 Жыл бұрын
and just like that. we end our own species. good job humans
@Andrey0348 Жыл бұрын
its been tasted on land? never saw video of one of this heads hit ground... only nuke hit ground i saw is planted or dropped by plain
@massjur Жыл бұрын
Yes I have seen videos of that on youtube.
@daikucoffee5316 Жыл бұрын
Is the purpose of the pyrotechnic motor to counter optical target discrimination or to compensate differences in atmospheric drag between decoys and warheads during reentry?
@__hjg__2123 Жыл бұрын
it "hides" behind the heat of the RV and helps the RV appear exactly like the decoy so they seem indistinguishable from each other.
@KoishiVibin4 ай бұрын
@@__hjg__2123 Works in the old days. Not that great now, we've come a long way in sensor tech.
@troys79542 жыл бұрын
they were able to make high tech nuclear ICBMs, but were forced to make the presentation video on the nintendo 64
@daikucoffee53162 жыл бұрын
Lithium batteries in 1988. Incredible.
@KOTKESHA82 жыл бұрын
Looks like VHS-horror ))
@BackwoodsTruther2 жыл бұрын
3:41
@Here-2-Learn2 жыл бұрын
Funny how long the mall has sat , I loved the flipper flapper, millers outpost and hot dog on a stick. Who would of thought that there would be the metro from San Bernardino running right thru town
@khmerkidz26002 жыл бұрын
2022 who here watching how beautiful redland was back in the day….
@rogerlarson96802 жыл бұрын
The Trident II SLBMs hold 12 nuclear warheads each on the Ohio-class submarines.
@jacobholmes53922 жыл бұрын
They can. But the NEW START Treaty doesn’t allow it. On Average, we have 4 Nuclear Warheads on on Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles. A mix of W88, 475KT warheads, W76-1, 90KT warheads, and the new W76-2, 5KT, low yield nuclear warhead.
@daikucoffee53162 жыл бұрын
@@jacobholmes5392 I suppose the fewer warheads allow for more decoys.
@jacobholmes53922 жыл бұрын
@@daikucoffee5316 It also has other penetration capabilities…
@curtismitchell42742 жыл бұрын
I propose the NET approach to capture all space elements, hostile and non-hostile, part of Trident defense system.
@redwister22 жыл бұрын
Was my first Green Day concert. I was blown away and I’ve seen them 4 more times since! ❤️
@zhongfokzhongfok25232 жыл бұрын
Good design
@timschutte69242 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if that makes me comfortable.
@unassistedsuicide22432 жыл бұрын
As long as hundreds of millions of innocent civilians are killed, I don’t see a problem here
@S4inc2 жыл бұрын
" The only winning move is not to play" (Wargames)....Location location location if your in a large population area or near a military of some kind odds are not good for you..if you do survive the blast then there is fallout prevention and food and water,medical needs for survival ..,Just a few things...
@MoskusMoskiferus16112 жыл бұрын
Blushing Mother Earth
@eliceron.2 жыл бұрын
This is tight seeing Redlands in 2022 and seeing this video
@a2b3c2 жыл бұрын
Rotten species...
@CgRally5 ай бұрын
you must be a hit at parties
@patricklewis27452 жыл бұрын
What's the point of having a decoy if no country has the ability to stop ICBMs?
@daikucoffee53162 жыл бұрын
A few countries have ABM systems. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-ballistic_missile All of these systems have very limited range due to the extremely high speed intercept, they amount more to denial of area systems for a bubble of a few hundred kilometers.
@henripentant11202 жыл бұрын
All a show. This is a 60s concept. Russia has lately scored a very visible point in the realm of penetration but suffered a net loss in parity. Both sides anticipated this and had plenty of time to react, so the question is whether this dynamic serves deproliferation or some third way outcome.
@foreshadow67282 жыл бұрын
I prefer seeing end of this video IRL than being unable to watch this and other videos on youtube.
@foreshadow67282 жыл бұрын
I still.
@thetruth76332 жыл бұрын
I just checked my RV but I have nothing like this in the car
@davidmthekidd2 жыл бұрын
Classic 89s Cold war music hahaha.
@rael54693 жыл бұрын
I would imagine that this film was the highest Top Secret of it's day. Imagine.....the secret to defeating our incoming re-entry vehicles.
@Chironex_Fleckeri Жыл бұрын
The implication is that the deterrent umbrella is significantly different- or has systems which are distinct. Perhaps the SLBM is truly *the* determining object in any nation's deterrent. The UK and France only field these if I'm correct. The importance is keeping our subs quiet and undetected and ready to deliver upon a valid order. I couldn't imagine a job more important while simultaneously being frightening beyond comprehension. Is there some sort of "post-launch clarity"? What will their reactions be knowing what their job has accomplished? What can stop MIRVs at 20 times the speed of sound. It's many miles per second. Godspeed to those who are serving as our deterrent. Heres to hoping we will never find out what they can do
@rael5469 Жыл бұрын
@@Chironex_Fleckeri " Perhaps the SLBM is truly the determining object in any nation's deterrent. " Oh.....there is no doubt about it. The enemy can attack our land based systems but they know.....for sure....that the SLBMs are going to get them.
@rael5469 Жыл бұрын
@@Chironex_Fleckeri "The UK and France only field these if I'm correct. " SLBMs ? No, the U.S. and Russia also have them. From what I read 5 nations have SLBMs.
@rael5469 Жыл бұрын
@@Chironex_Fleckeri "Is there some sort of "post-launch clarity"? What will their reactions be knowing what their job has accomplished?" That's a VERY good question. When I was in the Air Force we launched all of our aircraft off the base once during an exercise. I was young.....I turned to our supervisor and asked him, "Hey Sarge, what do we do now? All the planes are gone." His answer to me was to chuckle and say, "Airman, now we die. Because enemy missiles will be about 15 minutes away from impact on our base." That was very sobering. I guess the conventional answer would be that we would prepare the base to receive returning bombers should they or us survive.
@eddietat958 ай бұрын
@@rael5469 There are 7 nations so far that have SLBMs - the 5 UN Security Council powers as well as India and North Korea. Very recently, Japan and South Korea are developing non-nuclear SLBMs.
@neutralino19053 жыл бұрын
MIRVs are a major reason why MAD continues to be relevant. By considerably outpacing missile defense and interception systems, every country stays vulnerable to nukes, discouraging any of them from launching first. Good. And for those complaining about this technology being "stolen"...heh, just know that technology and weapons don't care who uses or invented them.