14 күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
2 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
7 ай бұрын
7 ай бұрын
7 ай бұрын
8 ай бұрын
8 ай бұрын
9 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@helenhelen2623 12 күн бұрын
Hello, do you have more infrared images of various ships? I am doing a study on the classification of ships in infrared mode, which requires a lot of infrared images of various ships. If the image is suitable, I can pay for it. I hope you can reply at your leisure
@helenhelen2623 12 күн бұрын
Hello, do you have more infrared images of various ships? I am doing a study on the classification of ships in infrared mode, which requires a lot of infrared images of various ships. If the image is suitable, I can pay for it. I hope you can reply at your leisure
@VikrantSingh-se2zb 14 күн бұрын
Can it be used in both wild life and real workspace settings over urban home theatre environments ? If so then how does it differentiate between human and animal gaits energy signature ?
@anotherguy9402 15 күн бұрын
Do you guys provide free samples? If so I'll take a head mounted monocular please 🥺
@Veptis 17 күн бұрын
that is a really large front element. Do they even make ingots large enough to cut from?
@jacobbegis4883 17 күн бұрын
Where is Al Pawchino
@alaashawqi 17 күн бұрын
Amazing
@AlexanderGee 17 күн бұрын
Wow super low noise. Makes this video look a bit like a z-depth map
@jatigre1 28 күн бұрын
Fascinating.
@theJasta 29 күн бұрын
Well explaining
@Veptis Ай бұрын
can uncooled microbolometers be used for ground based observations of deep sky objects? I assume that integration time and noise will be an issue - but I have yet to see it done or disproven. Some of the brighter objects should be M42
@Galadonin Ай бұрын
I don't even know if you'll get this notification, but thanks for those shots. I was looking for this kind of footage to compare with the fireworks in the movie Dune 2. The sun there is shining only IR light. And they have fireworks but it's so unnatural. The movie FX are really authentic, so it's a good comparison. Thanks again
@tejeshwvardhan1165 Ай бұрын
why not using peltier?
@MadComputerScientist 2 ай бұрын
Hmmm, while this is very impressive demonstration on its own, one can't help but wonder about how much operational relevance it actually has. Sure the drone was "detected" 4km out. But only as a tiny blurry blob, and with the system staring directly at it. The website states the camera system's FOV is "8.8º-0.6º", so to get solid coverage of the entire horizon at that distance would require... a lot of these! I didn't see a price listed on the site, but I can't imagine that'd be cheap. Furthermore, even with the most advanced AI assistance, it must be incredibly difficult to identify a threat in all the noise of moving background, birds, bugs, turbulence, etc. So even having the drone in-frame wouldn't guarantee detection. The fact the video editor decided to use a circle to highlight the drone in these clips speaks to that. All in all, not really sure what this test proves in regards to dronetection. The Ventus could certainly be useful in conjunction with some sort of hybrid integrated sensor network, but that's not what was discussed above. What'd be fun and would prove a lot more is to zip-tie a paperweight to the bottom of a Mavic and see how close a pilot could get to directly over the observer before the drone was spotted. As the pilot and spotter got more experience and switched off, it'd get progressively more challenging for both as the pilot tried different tricks and the spotter got better at spotting. That'd get some actually relevant numbers.
@EXYZ3 2 ай бұрын
hello. there is a laser (Er:YAG) that emits the wavelength of ≈2940nm, can i see it with a MWIR camera?
@MadComputerScientist 2 ай бұрын
Such a great talk, and it covers so much! Thank you for posting!
@Veptis 2 ай бұрын
Is the sensor saturated by fire this easily? Do you offer a low gain option or attenuation filters to get extended range?
@analog5.56 2 ай бұрын
CGI
@cctvsemeru 2 ай бұрын
how much the price
@SteveSearches 2 ай бұрын
Product page link doesn't work.
@SierraOlympia 2 ай бұрын
Thank you! Updated link to the Vayu HD - sierraolympia.com/product/vayu-hd/
@gentrythomas1 2 ай бұрын
I wish I could afford this thing for some cool projects.
@call_me_danger 2 ай бұрын
What model is this on your website? What is the pricing?
@UniquelyCritical 3 ай бұрын
The vegetation is dark. This isn't NIR or SWIR.
@rngarvalia 3 ай бұрын
What are the pro & cons between rotory and linear split coolers? Which one type of cooler does your camera use
@mustafa.aliraqi.1990 3 ай бұрын
The size of the lens 😳😳😳😳😳❤️
@Veptis 3 ай бұрын
the pan shows quite some dead pixels stuck on hot. Is this expected? And can it be mitigated by FCC?
@SierraOlympia 3 ай бұрын
Dead Pixels do happen from time to time and can easily be adjusted by a FCC. However, if the bad pixel remains we flag it and do what is called a, "Dead Pixel Replacement" test.
@eddywright7543 4 ай бұрын
wonderfully explained!
@WangJiaxin-oh9ge 4 ай бұрын
I'm very interested in this channel. Can you share me the infrared video to me?
@zahiralishah455 4 ай бұрын
🌹👌🌹👍🌹🙏🌹❤🌹
@AlexanderGee 4 ай бұрын
Do the opening to office space next
@SierraOlympia 4 ай бұрын
Will do!
@DrewAk49 5 ай бұрын
Look at virgo with that!
@bobert4522 5 ай бұрын
The things I would do for one of these, but knowing how eye watering expensive it is 🥲
@exciton007 5 ай бұрын
60 km infrared! Amazing!
@michaelheslop5640 5 ай бұрын
This is great content and very informative in a minimal and concise way.
@SierraOlympia 4 ай бұрын
Thank you! We aim to foster more meaningful discussions surrounding our infrared technology and the industry at large.
@exciton007 5 ай бұрын
I wish I could work for such a cool company! Thanks for all the videos!
@SierraOlympia 4 ай бұрын
You're welcome! Feel free to explore our Career page for details on hiring opportunities - sierraolympia.com/careers/
@float32 5 ай бұрын
Incredible resolution!
@SierraOlympia 4 ай бұрын
The Ventus HD6 presents an exceptional 1280 x 960 HD infrared imaging capability, capturing thermal vistas that render the world in stunning detail. Come back often to see more imagery from this incredible compact infrared camera.
@AlexanderGee 5 ай бұрын
Very cool
@Chuvash_21. 5 ай бұрын
Excuse me, but are nebulae, galaxies and planets of the solar system visible through such a telescope with a thermal imager?
@vertigoboy89 5 ай бұрын
Very interesting and well explained. Thank you for sharing
@Veptis 6 ай бұрын
are these systems user serviceable, for example refilling the UHP Helium?
@andrewmcgary7683 6 ай бұрын
Why are you tethered to the table with a blue wrist cable? Shouldn’t the product be tied down, not the salesman?
@Nocturnal_Mind 6 ай бұрын
It's a grounding strap. Makes sure he doesn't fry one of the cameras with static electricity.
@Egodeathpictures 6 ай бұрын
hello yes id like to buy 55 of those
@mrrexy4151 6 ай бұрын
Look at the size of that lense...I can't imagine how much it cost??
@SierraOlympia 6 ай бұрын
It's a common misconception that the size of the lens directly correlates with the cost of a camera. It's important to note that mid-wave systems require additional cooling, contributing to their higher cost compared to long-wave systems, which don't necessitate the same cooling setup. So, while these cameras are indeed expensive, the size of the lens alone doesn't determine their price.
@timclark2305 6 ай бұрын
Many thanks.. Very informative
@SierraOlympia 6 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@luclachapelle3499 6 ай бұрын
Great job !
@SierraOlympia 6 ай бұрын
Thank you! Visit sierraolympia.com/ to see our latest infrared camera systems.
@wilurbean 7 ай бұрын
I think in another comment you mentioned the sensors in the video are semiconductors, eg the ir photons are jumping a band gap to send a signal down the sensor leads. IR photons have wavelengths in the few um range, so is that what's limiting the resolution of the sensors? RGB sensors could be packed 100× more dense, given 0.7um photons in the red part of light vs 7um photons for MIR in a 10×10 array.
@ZevHoover 6 ай бұрын
it is part of the limit, yes. Where as you see modern phone sensors with 1um pixels, you will never see a LWIR sensor with a pitch that small. With that said, most RGB sensors have pixels in the 3-6um range, which could work fine for SWIR and much of MWIR, its just the technology has not quite gotten there yet.
@Veptis 5 ай бұрын
@@ZevHoover it's been several years since Iray has announced a 8μm pixel pictch microbolometer for lwir. But I haven't seen it in a product. You also can't compare microbolometers with with CMOS or even CCD pixels. The gaps between the active collector area is quite notable and the fraction of active area fraction scales by a square. Leonardo DRS has a special umbrella shaped design for their pixels. It's more area efficient than other microbolometers and therefore their tenum (10 μm pixel pictch) models make viable products. My own collection has 35, 25, 17 and 12μm pixel pitch sensors... I haven't yet compared them well enough
@farmermac305 7 ай бұрын
Keep doing what you're doing. Well done. 👏
@SierraOlympia 7 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙌
@globaldeception7414 7 ай бұрын
Wait a minute so you're telling me scientists are making our cameras?
@mrrexy4151 7 ай бұрын
I like your videos, you have always big like from me.