Silly ‘designer’ talk.

Peter Thiel is indisputably evil. Without him JD Vance would not be a Senator.

Great examples and resources to create more attractive designs, more engaging marketing landing pages, etc... Our UX mindset is avoiding conflicts all the time, but those are the core of a good the storytelling. I Love it!

Brilliant

from "Fuck you, pay me" to "Fuck you, you fucking Facist"

Him having to google search how to use Facebbook was so valid. To this day I still have to google search everything involving Facebook. It's never intuitive. I didn't even know whatever was on this video even existed. Truly, NO IDEA you could do this.

The utter refusal to pay attention to why half of the voters feel the way they do is, I guess, an attribute of someone who understands user research

This is verbal diarrhea. Behold the woke mind virus.

19:03 Shipping Thinking 🤔

Questions to discuss afterward: Outside our organisation What are contexts where our solutions are used today? What are the contexts and instances where our solutions could be misused? What could be the unintended consequences of our solutions? Are there interests in the world that could drive misuse of our solutions? Inside the organisation How can we understand the risks of our organisation/solutions better? What knowledge and skills does our organisation need to have the right prerequisites for developing safe solutions? What phase/activity would we need to make time for in our processes? Who needs to be on board and what needs to happen for our organisation to prioritise risk understanding?

hahahaha

Three Act story structure is a western and European structure, it is interesting the missing of the more than three acts and different story telling pattern in East Asia story telling for example

Such a great talk with such a dumb title.

Very informative presentation

Crazy!

can someone share How many and what products were succesfull based on Jobs to be done framework?

Fantastic talk, ordering Kim’s book right now

This was a very informative and fun interview. Tack!

I know its difficult to change a bit company as a smaller designer but that's what she is talking about. I don't want to blame her completely. I am just wondering then how Spotify is mostly catering for their investors. The experience of the product for the listeners / main user group is fine. But the artists which produce content of which without they would be f***ed. How can it be they won't get compensated enough money for the stream? 0.003 cent? Smaller creators should be uplifted. Voices of the minorities as she said. But what happens mostly is that already famous stars get more uplift and more streams and shine in the light. That is not right. The algorithms need a rework. The contracts with labels are too harsh. Spotify is now in a place where its just a big advertisement plattform. Artists don't post there to earn money. Its negligable. Necessary for promo but negligable for income. What I want to say. Pay your artists. Pay them fairly. Don't distribute the main portion of streaming funds to the big ones. I say it one more time. Pay your artists fairly.

Härligt att se å höra! Saknar höra den gitarren live uppriggad på feta ljudsystem, hemma får väl duga, det känns väldigt bekant även med nya melodier å förmågor. <3 Tack! P.s. Play it trice!

What wonderful content! Thank you for providing this.

18:50 I call this the Tetris mindset. Your successes vanish, and the only things left over are the failures. Just like the blocks left on the screen in a game of Tetris. However, it was an idea I gave name to after experiences with clients, not with designers. Clients can be pretty brutal man.

16:20 the incorporation of UX design into agile development sprints puts design at odds with itself. How? Why? Design is about learning, and you can't learn much in 2 weeks. You can't research, design, test, redesign, test again, and polish off for development in the span of 2 weeks. The design process is about learning, agile is about delivering value. You cannot deliver value without learning. Shoe horning UX into agile forces designers to deliver value without learning. Consider for a moment just how common it is for user testing to be eliminated from the design process. Imagine now, if QA testing was removed from the development process.

Tack för en bra föreläsning! Dock lite svajigt ljud.

Holly wood rugby

Great ❤

Thank you so much for this video. Great to hear from the man himself. Immense help for a workshop I am conducting

i am litterally shocked that only 20k people watched this and only 300 of them liked it, not even talking about comment counts...

Ande is 🔥

Guy put his heart into that introduction. "I like doing things unusual."

New product is neuromorphic circuits for AI applications.

It does not matter, US is already in huge debt.

Drop the prices for homes, or drop the idea of owning a home.

Shockley had to become a professor because of his lack of administrative skills---similar to Sir C.V. Raman.

Steve comes from the English Stephen. I am sure he has a high IQ.

Products of the future build on the products of the past like the vacuum tube triode came from the incandescent bulb and the solid-state transistor came from the idea of triode of the vacuum tube transistor.

"Fulfilling your duty to make the world a better place."

Bravo. As a baby UX designer, I want this world, the next one with more holistic process, from the wood to the fire camp, where we can dialogue and eat together to prepare the next adventure.

Video 1 som det hänvisas till: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fLh8n5N025fKqmw.html Video 2 som det hänvisas till: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b8yTfpRqqKfOh4E.html

Design is not a discipline itself. It must go with something else. Basically, it is a given talant to put things together.

Add some more details!!

Scare scare scare!!! No one could have an intelligent debate with this guy. He would call the person across from him fascist… evil. Where does a debate go after that.

He embodies the PROBLEM himself. Hitler, Fidel Castro, and Mussolini would have hired this guy in a heartbeat. Mike's intentional design solution is to design a "problem" and define it based on biases resulting from rationalization. Minute 22:12 "We are people who make things for a living. We bring things into existence." Yes, HE does. His "Design" is this: CREATE the problem, CONVINCE people they are victims, and then show them how to kill their purpose and spirit on the sword of victimhood. He is slick and delusional. It is easy to see how people who identify as intelligent buy into his theory.

30:30 you can do that with chatgpt now

'Promosm'

Real life Rick Sanchez

The video that every #russian must see after the #Ukraine win over Nazi #russia

This is such a gem.

He is a real genius , ahead his time , master of electronic at same time great programer , today many of diferrent people make things that he make only by himself

This is a fantastic lecture