Great video! Could you please make a video/give suggestions on how to approach potential collaborators for intiating a collaboration? I always find that difficult and awkward when you don't know the person, and I end up shying away. Some tips on this would really help. Thanks!
@mrillig3 күн бұрын
Thanks! I will give this some thought for a potential future video. I agree that this is very difficult....
@swamipunniakodi60395 күн бұрын
I am in the process of submitting the article and the video is useful for a better understanding of the cover letter.
@mrillig5 күн бұрын
great, good luck with your article!
@greatumenweke85416 күн бұрын
Thank you so much. Succinct!
@mrillig5 күн бұрын
great! thanks....
@user-ut7sj5sf7k7 күн бұрын
Thanks a million!
@mrillig6 күн бұрын
thanks!!
@nuralamantor27117 күн бұрын
Thank you very much sir
@mrillig6 күн бұрын
thanks!
@Dr.NicholasCunninghamPhdHealth7 күн бұрын
Great info Dr.!!!
@mrillig6 күн бұрын
thanks, glad you like it!
@AsrifYusoff9 күн бұрын
Thank you for this positive video. A refreshing take amidst the narratives out there...
@mrillig9 күн бұрын
thank you!
@Paul-kl2mn9 күн бұрын
Hi Sir, could you please provide advice how to reply to a vague letter about 'no progress' letter to cast a student out but didn't or doesn't provide any info about what or where to improve?
@mrillig9 күн бұрын
sorry I can't really comment on individual cases; but you could ask for more detail and explanation, writing that you are seeking this input to help you improve in the future.
@Paul-kl2mn8 күн бұрын
@@mrillig wise way to go. Thank you
@Paul-kl2mn10 күн бұрын
Hi sir, our peer from a lab has faced the most horrible toxicity. What to do to help? Our friend was the only grad student in the lab and nobody else supervision committee but PI. Apparently later she found the PI also didn't have any students for a long time though this PI has been in tenure for a long time. She experienced very poor management. PI took her results and did not let her publish, proper recognition to work and support to eligible bursaries etc. Then she raised this to a bit higher up to get help of other people for example to add a couple of other PIs to supervision committee. At that point, PI went on leave and dumped her to a random PI. And set a situation where PI and PI''s dept colleagues did not let her receive advice from anyone else internal/external, did not let her transfer, and did not let her use her own substantive work to write the dissertation. They put unreasonable conditions for her to delay and not complete the dessertatikn for years. And to perish. They also forced her to change her dissertation last minute and to by copying PI''s publications that has little to do with her projects. She was never given written advice for her writing. When she provided reasons to why she cannot do that, they then breach her privacy publicly and disclose private information to various parties within dept and higher up. The irony is higher up is mostly filled with department lot. It is so horribly scary and heartbreaking what they have been doing to her. She really needs to get at least part of thesis qualification if not full PhD. She has been trying to go elsewhere but they are treating her like 'die staying or quit'. Do you know how to help her? Big struggle to see a friend dying. Why and how on can they do this to an innocent decent person?
@Paul-kl2mn10 күн бұрын
Thank you sir. You just summed up and gave the most honest picture.
@mrillig9 күн бұрын
thanks!!
@Illiam_Kel38010 күн бұрын
I believe this is in fact a quite natural behavior where the key word behind is inquisitiveness. Unfortunately it has been faded away by modern education systems and life style.
@mrillig9 күн бұрын
absolutely! it is the natural outcome of curiosity about the world.
@user-fs4ro7dz4t11 күн бұрын
This really helps me alot! Sometimes I am just overwhelmed by the info from too many sources
@mrillig11 күн бұрын
Great! thanks, glad it is helpful to you...
@kamalirs290115 күн бұрын
Thank you so very much. This information feels literally like a road map. Appreciate it.
@mrillig13 күн бұрын
thanks; glad you find this useful!
@MujahidAli-dz6ln17 күн бұрын
Thank you for such a comprehensive overwiew! You just got a subscriber😍
@mrillig16 күн бұрын
Thanks, glad you liked it!
@amazedpanda681519 күн бұрын
oop i messed up step 1
@mrillig19 күн бұрын
yep, most people start too late... :)
@phubdem602424 күн бұрын
i wish to write one. thank you for your motivation
@mrillig23 күн бұрын
great; good luck!
@mrillig26 күн бұрын
How to make research labs more creative. A shout-out to the MSc-course that I taught, where this is one of the topics that was discussed. Please let me know in the comments if I forgot something that works, and I hope you find this video useful, irrespective of if you are a PI, postdoc, PhD student, student or staff member.
@pilotracoon80Ай бұрын
Thank you for the video! I have an interview in 2 days and I'll try to implement your advice as well as I can. One question I have thought about is "do you usually (or have plans to) collaborate with other groups from the institute?" I'm an astrophysicist and multimessenger astronomy/astrophysics is very in vogue now.
@mrilligАй бұрын
Thanks! Good luck with your interview!
@emmanuelameyaw9735Ай бұрын
If all your competitors also watched this video...then you will have to count on luck.😊
@mrilligАй бұрын
Thanks! :)
@andremascarenhas2383Ай бұрын
As usual, a pleasure to hear your useful advices. I think another area of research where one can be(come) quite creative is in the writing. For example when you're editing your draft to make it more concise and engaging, re-phrasing/re-structuring text. Stephen Heard has wonderful writings about that. Thanks
@mrilligАй бұрын
Yes, you are right!
@theBatchNormАй бұрын
Thanks! that was really helpful!
@mrilligАй бұрын
Thanks, glad you liked it! :)
@mentalandemotionalhealthy365Ай бұрын
Great insight 🎉❤
@mrilligАй бұрын
thanks!
@SINTLАй бұрын
Now I could know at many places (ideas, research design, scientific articles) I have been creative. Thanks, Rilling.
@mrilligАй бұрын
great!
@87ggggyyyyАй бұрын
wow thats a little niche, but just what i was looking for
@mrilligАй бұрын
Yeah, very niche. Glad it was what you were looking for! :)
@87ggggyyyyАй бұрын
@@mrillig thanks for doing
@imenzribi956Ай бұрын
Thank you professor for sheding light on this issue. I will for sure check your paper. Bravo for the choice of the catchy title. Please keep inspire us (junior scientists) it is really inspiring to have people like you in Academia.
@mrilligАй бұрын
thanks!
@Katerina-kf3hbАй бұрын
We are grateful for all this useful information, Prof. Rillig! Regarding the first contact, I would like to ask you whether we should also attach a research proposal. Thanks in advance!
@mrilligАй бұрын
Thanks. This depends on the nature of the position. I would just include an abstract of your plans, and once contact is established share your proposal.
@mrilligАй бұрын
Thinking about creativity in the research process, most people will perhaps just come up with 'having new ideas for research'. But there is way more....this video explains! Let me know what you think in the comments! :)
@YunpengLUOАй бұрын
Thanks for the nice introduction to the systematic mapping of the literature. Are there any tools/software to help do systematic mapping, e.g., making the tree diagram to link different literature?
@mrilligАй бұрын
Thanks! People just use R to produce the graphics. But there are tools people have used to help in the paper screening, you might want to check out a recent paper by James Orr in Ecology Letters if you are interested. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ele.14463
@YunpengLUOАй бұрын
@@mrillig Many thanks for this recommendation, Prof. Matthias Rillig
@lucybrooks00Ай бұрын
This is very helpful thank you for making these videos. In regards to talking about fit with the institution, what do these slides tend to look like? Are they mainly bullets? And how fleshed out should potential collaborations be?
@mrilligАй бұрын
Thanks. Yes, these can just be bullet points; or if you have a graphical representation of where your research is headed, you can also add this in there (the names of collaborators). I wouldn't put a fleshed out collaborative program in there, but I would think about these if this comes up. Nothing is more lame than putting someone on a slide as a collaborator, and then drawing a blank when that person asks a follow-up. So: make sure this has substance! :)
@jonspalding7004Ай бұрын
Thanks for bringing a positive and helpful contribution to KZfaq academic content. It seems many people who post academic videos on youtube are fueled by anger over bad experiences or try to offer cheat-codes and hacks rather than just provide honest, solid advice for doing good work and succeeding. Highly Recommended!
@mrilligАй бұрын
thank you!
@juanjosfungiАй бұрын
Greetings from Colombia c: wonderful video, I will definitely apply this topic in my research. Thanks!
@mrilligАй бұрын
Great!
@andyzhang3595Ай бұрын
Thanks! Really helpful! I got a question, what do you think of if I got 2 rejections from the first journal? First rejection: When 3 reviewers comment back. Second rejection: When I went through and answered each comment, the editor sent a second round of reviewing process (another 1.5 months), but the editor still rejected it currently. In the editor's email, he still welcomes to resubmit, like resubmission of a thoroughly revised manuscript may be considered. I am confusing, is it good for resubmit it again or change to another journal? What are you going to do this?
@mrilligАй бұрын
It's impossible for me to make useful comments on individual cases. At any point, if reviewer comments seem unreasonable, we just go to another journal. If you want to stay with this journal, you can keep submitting there until it is either accepted or rejected for good. It is unusual to encourage resubmission after rejection twice (in my field), but I guess it can happen...good luck with your paper.
@tanvirshovon3482Ай бұрын
Thanks for this wonderful video on a critical topic.
@mrilligАй бұрын
thanks!!
@Adventure_with_HomenАй бұрын
Hi, your videos are very helpful. I have a query: If someone has to choose between a top 10 QS-ranked university with challenging work outside their PhD field and a 100-200 ranked university with work that fits their expertise, which should they go for? How important is the university's ranking for future postdoctoral opportunities?
@mrilligАй бұрын
Hi, thanks. It depends on what you want to do with your postdoc. Do you want to apply the things you learned during your PhD to a new field, or do you want to go deeper in the field you've already worked on. This is something that you need to answer for yourself. Top-ranked universities can offer better career prospects (it's what I chose back then), but it needs to fit with your plan and your abilities.
@Research524Ай бұрын
Really informative sir. I am applying for postdoc positions in agricultural economics, behavioral economics in Germany. I have a query on funding.. Either I get monthly funding or how sir?? Blocked funding is necessary for postdocs??? kindly clarify me this in this regard.
@mrilligАй бұрын
Thanks. Fellowships and employment contracts are usually paid out on a monthly basis.
@souha5188Ай бұрын
I did publish an indexed article in springer , and I keep receiving e-mails about publishing the article as a book chapter ... should I consider this offer ? Thank you in advance for your response.
@mrilligАй бұрын
No, not really. Just a way to make money that is meaningless academically (at least in my field).
@marianachrispim7213Ай бұрын
I missed the integrative literature review, which is a valuable option
@mrilligАй бұрын
How's that different from a narrative review?
@sarkaljyakhwa4088Ай бұрын
Wondering if this video was there 6 months ago, life would have been so easy. Thanks!
@mrilligАй бұрын
Better late than never! :)
@mrilligАй бұрын
Synthesizing the ever-growing academic literature is an important skill in academia and science in general. Most will know about narrative reviews and meta-analysis; but perhaps systematic mapping is a less well-known option. In this video, I explain the difference among these three approaches, how a systematic mapping is done, and what you can do with the results. Have you heard of this? Have you tried this out? Please let me know in the comments! 😀
@rishikabukhariya9657Ай бұрын
What to do if phd guide is moody and wants perfect results in the initial 4-5 months of phd. ( PS- student is new to the lab and techniques)
@mrilligАй бұрын
Sorry I can't give solid advice on individual cases. But it sounds like this should be discussed; and unreasonable expectations are not conducive to a healthy lab environment.
@mahmoudmazarji2457Ай бұрын
Thank you for spreading positivity!
@mrilligАй бұрын
thanks!
@mantombimaseme66282 ай бұрын
You give great advice in all your videos! I have a post-doc interview next week😄
@mrillig2 ай бұрын
Thanks! and good luck with your interview!
@mantombimaseme66282 ай бұрын
@@mrillig thank you!
@mrillig2 ай бұрын
This video collects some of my thoughts and experiences on the topic of friendship and collaboration. Please let me know what you think. What aspects could I cover in future videos on this topic?
@dhananjaysingh93442 ай бұрын
Very insightful
@mrillig2 ай бұрын
Thank you!!
@user-rp4fs8zu9d2 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing your experience!!
@mrillig2 ай бұрын
Thanks; hope you found it useful.
@omiknow2 ай бұрын
Bless sir
@mrillig2 ай бұрын
thanks!!
@mahmoudmazarji24572 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@mrillig2 ай бұрын
thanks!
@srijnasingh8092 ай бұрын
Thank You
@mrillig2 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@flowers41032 ай бұрын
Do we write opinion paper on an already published article and can we do critique in it like we do in a letter to exitor?? Please reply i will be really thankful
@mrillig2 ай бұрын
Normally there is a different paper type reserved for this, like a commentary. But we've also written opinion-type papers that refer to a published article, especially if we can put a positive spin on it (with constructive criticism).