When I was interviewing him… It hit me a little late, but I wanted to ask him about the meanings of the photos on his wall… It was a missed opportunity for sure

Gilby is nice but boring.

Thx, this is a bit of an Oldie, but a goodie! Much more coming!

No one cares

I’m not quite sure what that means… Perhaps it is a suggestion… However, I try to do an interactive radio show… But I will take a look at your suggestion… Thanks for checking it out…

@@drummertroy Mike has a habit of accidentally muting himself, not at all a suggestion, small joke at Mike's expense. Your interviews are really well done.

@@ThrupleQuashimodo ahh! Gotcha ;). Looking to do something w Mike & Debbie post election in August - stay tuned!

@@drummertroy brilliant. Keep up the good work.

Thx!

I just reviewed the 3B case, which is still up on Middleton's site. She didn't say that the specific incident caused the witness to not want to testify, but rather that "repeated contacts" did, and that the witness was "not in a good place" and might not testify truthfully. It's the Preliminary Examinations 3B District Court January 16, 2024 stream. I think Debbie's recap here was reasonably in line with the truth, taking into account the vagaries of memory.

@defaultuser1447 We must have watched two very different videos. In the beginning of the video, you can see Mrs. Davis sitting at the desk with her arms crossed, pouting. When Judge Middleton first asks Mrs. Davis about the status of the case, the first thing out of her mouth is the bond violation. She makes no mention of releasing the victim from the subpoena. In fact, she never mentions it in the entire hearing. Furthermore, at 1:03:04 Judge Middleton asks Mrs. Davis, why did you let her walk out. Mrs. Davis responded, "Because he was starring at her." She absolutely had an ethical duty to admit to the judge that she told the victim that she was being released from the subpoena, and that's why she was leaving. Then Mrs. Davis said that it was very obvious that the victim did not want to cooperate, and Mrs. Davis tells the judge that the reason is because the 'continued contact.' But this is just an assumption on Mrs. Davis part, and she never offers any evidence of any other contact prior to the hearing that would have led to the victim's hesitation. She is clearly gaslighting the judge into believing that the contact that happened at the court is why the victim isn't testifying. Because Judge Middleton is smart, he suspects something is not right, but hes trying to give Mrs. Davis the benefit of the doubt because he trusts her to be truthful with the court. At 1:06:15, Judge Middleton asks, "At some point, she got up and walked out of your waiting room?" Mrs. Davis, again, fails to tell the truth that the victim was leaving because Mrs. Davis released her. She continues, "At this point, he has contributed to the unavailability and hostility of this witness." and "We dont have her here today to say that." Again, shes not there because Mrs. Davis released her. Mrs. Davis was upset that the victim did not want to go forward with the case, and she manipulated Judge Middleton into punishing the defendant as a result. She let her emotions cloud her judgment, and as a result a man went to jail. Her termination was absolutely justified.

@@MileHighTruckerMan, you made a lot of assumptions in there about things that didn't happen. You have an agenda, so go on your way. I won't bother you anymore.

@defaultuser1447 I noticed you didn't refute a single thing I said. I don't have an agenda. I live in Colorado. I don't know Mrs. Davis or anyone else personally. I'm just a guy who speaks the truth. Simple question for you: Did Mrs. Davis have an ethical duty to tell Judge Middleton that she had released the victim from her subpoena. And if not, why not?

I agree with you entirely! She was either vague, avoiding the ‘specific’ answering to the question then minimising or maximising details, with the clear intention of only giving information that would favour the outcome she wanted & not, though disappointing, would be the ethical outcome, as is the expectation of the law. You don’t always like the result but if that’s the legal process the court expects it to be followed. Clean hands needed from all involved. My boss would say one of my role requirements was to manage his expectations,. She knew what Judge Middletons expectations were & she failed to manage them! I wouldn’t give my vote for either as both have shown evidence of shady tactics. But my expectations are for them to behave this way as too many egos & need to be the winner any way necessary so I suppose they are my expectations! Haha😂 xx

Thx so much!

Thx so much!

Fantastic interviewer you are. Like you’re style 🤙🏼🤟🏼 Thank you for being persistent for what I’d call a long 30 months of asking judge Middleton to be a guest on your radio KZfaq channel. 🤙🏼🤟🏼🤟🏼🎶🎶 rock on!! It’s why I’m here you’re name and channel is out there so many bringing us to watch 2 of many favorites on your channel. 🤟🏼😎

If the defendant in a criminal case cannot afford to hire a lawyer, in the USA they have a right to a court appointed lawyer which the government will pay for. That is the reason a judge asks those kind of questions about work and other financial questions. The judge is trying to find out whether they qualify for this benefit, so he can order it for them if they are. You'll hear Judge Simpson tell people to fill out the paperwork if they want a court appointed lawyer. Some judges don't leave it up to the defendants to recognize the importance and urgency of filling out that paperwork for their own benefit, so they ask the same questions in court and get the ball rolling on getting that person a lawyer for their case.

I am just a citizen, Martin sounds shady. As the prosecutor, he sounds dangerous to the legal system.

@@Grandma_Lori 100% agree with you

1 million❤ percent agree SSSSHADY!!!!

Dave Marvin is a pushover. He makes sweetheart deals that you wouldn't see in other courts. He even once reduced a meth sales charge (a lifetime felony) to use of meth (IIRC a 90 day misdemeanor). He might be a nice guy but he is too much of a pushover for prosecutorial work. Debbie might be a bit better but I think even she would be very lenient. From what I have seen between Dave Marvin and Debbie Davis I think I would vote for Debbie (and I don't usually vote Republican). However, I do not live in St. Joe County.

@mharris5047 If you live in Saint joe county, you only vote for republicans. It's one of those counties that only elect. Republicans so only republicans run. I live in one of them. And I don't know that you can say that Debbie is that lenient considering she had to work under Mr Marvin's management.

Guilty as charged;) 🚗 💨 💨 🚓🚓🚓🚁

I prefer watching cute chicks get arrested and wriggling in handcuffs but you do you and I will do me.

You’ll wanna see both- both guests were more transparent than I’d anticipated but really pleasantly surprised and hopefully we got info & answers not otherwise out there.

Same

Absolutely.

Hopefully Middleton doesn't retire for 10 more years.

​@@jdrankwalter he won't be able to run again because of an age restriction in the state of Michigan. He said it a few times in court. I think he said he might have two more years left on his term.

@@jdrankwalterHe has to retire at the end of his current term.

🎉🎉🎉 agree …

I love Judge Middleton, but him doing that bothered me A LOT! He can't claim he doesn't remember, because his mind is a steel trap. He remembers everyone, their parents, their grandparents, where they lived, what they drive, who they dated in high school decades ago, & what charges they, their family members, or friends may have faced during their lives! He always spoke so highly of Debbie, & she of him. It was a terrible thing for him to do, to give that slimy POS Prosecutor credit for Debbie's sharp eye! #DeborahJDavis4Prosecutor #ElectDeborahJDavisProsecutor

@@KansasCityScientologyAudit ​​⁠It wasn’t Debbie’s sharp eye. This is known information throughout St. Joseph County.