I am a victim of medical negligence in administering dopamine during surgery to my husband. Because the whole medical system is not uniform united and doesn't treat the patient as a whole. An orthopaedic only treats bones he is not concerned if the patient has hyper thyroid or cardiac problem. He does the surgery and the dependent signs an agreement that neither the doctor nor the hospital is responsible in case of death during surgery
@premraj2817Ай бұрын
The term negligence is a twister
@venakakrishnaiahgundlapall7298Ай бұрын
it is the result of criminal negligence which makes a difference between negligence by doctors and other professionals . if an electrician commits a small mistake resulting in an a ceiling fan getting damaged , it is just loss of money . but if his negligence causes a major accident resulting in loss of life , prudent man wiĺl view it as criminal negligence
@legalresearch8703Ай бұрын
Doctors cannot become butchers.
@legalresearch8703Ай бұрын
State spends huge money on medical education is not to kill patent in doctors own custody.
@legalresearch8703Ай бұрын
Can 'dopamine' be administered to a patient before conducting surgical operation instead of administering anesthesia?
@venkateshambommakanti8441Ай бұрын
No doctor come forward give 2nd oppion on medical negligence
@praveens4946Ай бұрын
👍👍👍🎉🎉🎉🎉
@dulalkarmaker9795Ай бұрын
I watched your every lecture. It's very helpful for everyone. So, thank you very much. Please, continue your lecture ,when you get time.
@projeshbasu89112 ай бұрын
Thamks
@RuchiSharma-sq6oq2 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot ❤
@RuchiSharma-sq6oq2 ай бұрын
🎉😊😊
@reetasoni54293 ай бұрын
🎉🎉🎉🎉
@pbalamurugan4443 ай бұрын
Justice Nagamuthu is great
@user-lt1wg3eh3i3 ай бұрын
can new evidence be relied upon in the disagreement note by the disciplinary authority after completion of inquiry proceedings which was not adduced during io/po stage? the new evidence was never part and parcel of the charge sheet. you are requested to provide your valuable opinion citing rule and the supreme court order that whether the disciplinary authority can use new evidence after conclusion of io’s report.
@pbalamurugan4443 ай бұрын
Very useful Thank you Justice PNP
@rjayanthkumar3 ай бұрын
WOW...I am proud to be your friend...❤
@jagdishkhurana49405 ай бұрын
Much thanks sir for clearing the minute hidden confusions
@AshokKumar-ml7nf5 ай бұрын
Shyam, namaskar. I am from Odisha and have a problem like this in an FIR one has been accused and after registration elapsing 24 hours can pray bail surrendering before SDJM?
@satyamsathiraju56775 ай бұрын
Disciplinary acted as enq officer and imposed punshment. Will it stand before law. Pl clarify
@Smita-Shinde5 ай бұрын
Brilliant concept. So grateful to Shyam Padman ji for organising such a wonderful session. Loved it being an Advocate and Music learner too..
@rangnathavhad72506 ай бұрын
Sir can I get the article of Honourable judge they mentioned in this video
@bhimanagoudarpatil73576 ай бұрын
Absolutely brilliant lecture and articulation sir.
@bhimanagoudarpatil73576 ай бұрын
Top class lecture by madam. As always Prem sir the king of citations unmatched by ability to recollect any judgement in the Indian judicial history. This phenomenonal memory is only surpassed by one and only legendary justice R F Nariman sir.
@pranavnair26166 ай бұрын
3 nahi hai 30000
@premadv16 ай бұрын
Brilliant articulation opening countless doors to diverse legal facets vis-a-vis gender laws...
@niharikahemaraj19596 ай бұрын
Thank you so much etta!
@wayofsuccessfulstudent27447 ай бұрын
Vishal gogne sir is like a idle for me ......
@rxtechnical98287 ай бұрын
Sir rikvayar by low hai to 45 ka kya prabhav rahega
@rajasekharprabhala50057 ай бұрын
In my humble opinion the Hon'ble High courts in exercise it's powers vested must prescribe timelines for completion of pleadings, framing of issues, completion of trial and arguments in order to achieve the object of Constitutional as well as RP Act on election disputes. 🙏
@peterhenrykj7617 ай бұрын
Well explained. Intelligible even for a layman.
@sunnykuruthukulangara25308 ай бұрын
ഈ ന്യായധിപന്റെ ബെഞ്ചിൽ എനിക്ക് ഒരു കേസുണ്ട് വളരെ നാളായിട്ട് തീർപ്പാകാതെ കിടക്കുന്നു ദയവായി തീർപ്പാക്കുവാൻ അപേക്ഷിക്കുന്നു ദൈവം ധാരാളമായി സാറിനെ അനുഗ്രഹിക്കേണ്ടതിന് പ്രാത്ഥിക്കുന്നു
@bhimanagoudarpatil73578 ай бұрын
Top quality discussion by the panel. I always listen to multiple discussions on the same subject because you get different perspective and insight. Prem sir is a model for any young lawyer due to his mastery over citing of judgements which I have not seen from anyone else in this profession. Justice ramkumar, nagamuthu always at the their best.
@NorthTravancoreMirror8 ай бұрын
197 crpc is a bad law, police atrocities victims will not get justice
@bhimanagoudarpatil73578 ай бұрын
Shyam sir please arrange for a lecture by Prem sir on the topic the art of citing and remembering case laws and judgements. It would be very helpful to all young lawyers.
@drkprasannarani30538 ай бұрын
Very interesting presentation
@tanmayamishra6838 ай бұрын
Excellent
@bhimanagoudarpatil73579 ай бұрын
Top class lecture Prem sir. I still regard you as the master of citations in Indian legal circle. Just like legendary Justice R F Nariman who has a phenomenal and elephantine memory who can recall and speak on any topic on the earth in the same way there is no case law or judgement probably Prem sir is not aware of. Such is the standard set by him. Appreciate your articulation on this landmark judgement and look forward to more such lectures on important subjects in future.
@Lawkannan19839 ай бұрын
Useful lecture series for preparing judicial service exams....🎉Thanks a lot for knowledge sharing
@nakkavenkatanarasimharao31919 ай бұрын
Amazing and holistic enlightment on the topic ! Thanq sir 🎉
@yuggiiyer16409 ай бұрын
"Lordship" is more annoying than "honourable ". I don't know when will these highly pricing, decorating, worshipping words will disappear from courts
@WakilSaheb-dz7mh10 ай бұрын
Sir, pl thro light,If boundaries in erroneous in registered sale, but seller & purchaser made corrections while suit is subjudice,then can the corrected subsequent sale deed is admissible?
@ashoknathtripathi10 ай бұрын
SIR, PLEASE EXPLAIN REAL QUESTION INVOLVED IN THE AMMENDMENT. Provided that in a prosecution for an offence under section 376, section 376A, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code or for attempt to commit any such offence, where the question of consent is an issue, it shall not be permissible to adduce evidence or to put questions in the cross-examination of the victim as to the general immoral character, OR PREVIOUS SEXUAL EXPERIENCE , of such victim with any person for proving such consent or the quality of consent. SECTION 146 EVIDENCE ACT
@user-dc5uz6dc6x10 ай бұрын
Wonderful lecture and contribution by experts.
@dr.v.sundaresan186210 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for this webinar. DR. . SUNDARESAN🎉HYDERABAD
@judgeshrikrishnadagliya675311 ай бұрын
Happy teacher’s day, respected sir. Have learnt a lot from you🙏🏻
@lawpractiseprofession527111 ай бұрын
good lecture
@anilvarghese638511 ай бұрын
Goodsir : Nabeel sir my neighbour in changanacherry
@harishvasudevan618011 ай бұрын
very informative and insightful talk that is very relevant in the present India. This is an eye opener for me in several angles of Constitutionalism. We rarely do have such young lawyers with such clarity.