Brainrot opinion ngl

Why not add the AMRAAM C-5, then? Since the R-77-1 out ranges the AMRAAM A, and I think it is close to the Aim-54.

@@adyenmurry7027 ok mr f4s user that only bombs your way to toptier

@@ViperPilot16 what the difference with aim120a and b?

@@yuanfurbax I don’t use the f4s, grinding 5 country’s to top tier without using ur weird tactics stay mad 🤷🏽‍♂️

so we should add a 1996 US missile and a 2015 USSR missile and just see nothing wrong with that, fuck it i say do it, not even the worst thing gaijin has done to keep the ussr on top, can't stand this bullshit anymore

Maybe cause he likes the r77 and russian aircraft.

@@bibbles2 there’s a difference between liking and glazing he says it’s top two when one the seeker is ass two the range sucks

it's literally the worst fox 3 of the patch

Hopefully they add the C-7, the C-5 is still stuck with a 16km range iirc.

@@Iden_in_the_Rainthe problem with that is the C7 is cracked. The AIM-120C-7 development began in 1998 and included improvements in homing and greater range, while getting a much improved seekerhead chaff and ground resistance wise, _while_ have the HOB capabilities of the C5. It would be unmatched by anything ingame, except maybe the Derby ER, which was a massive upgrade over the original Derby missile. I think the C5 woild be plenty, but it’s up to Gaijin so I guess we wait and see

@@batlax18 except gaijin cares 0% about improvements to homing, they barely care about IRCCM, the R-77-1 and R-77 also have HOB, the range on the C-7 is comparable to the range on the R-77-1 (120km vs 110km), and the R-77-1 has ~55% more seeker range than the C-5. The C-7 is definitely what is needed.

Meh, that things fine

MiG-21-93 or MiG-23-98 would make good premiums. Both had R-77 / R-27 support.

@@esooGrM isn't the mig21-93 the Bison? and already going to Brits next patch

@@remrryn it’s a MiG-21UPG, based on the MiG-21-93 but modified for the Indian Air Force.

@@esooGrM ah gotcha

Because the amraam has a sustainer, once it boosts up to speed it maintains that speed for longer. As soon as the r77 motor cuts it's losing energy throughout the flight.

its caused by the fact that the amraam have the best autopilot, the same thing goe for all the pther missiles, they should be better, but they are not

@@Casual7646 So is it just the most complete missile so far? I thought the R-77’s weakness was its mediocre seekerhead

@@christopherchartier3017IIRC the grid fins on the R-77 cause it to lose energy a lot faster than the traditional fins on the AMRAAM

@@christopherchartier3017yes the correct answer is the grid fins have increased drag the slower it goes as a trade off for better maneuverability

I think everyone would

you're right 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

who wouldn't, it entered service in 2015, while the missile they're gonna use to counter it entered service in 1996 (aim120c5) , i think a blind person can see it would be bullshit

@@zehi04 don't ask these people to use their brains lol

@@zehi04 I mean yeah it would be pretty bs, then again other than the R-37M, it’s russias best fox-3 irl. The R-77M isn’t in service yet. And assuming we’d get later AMRAAMs like the C-7, or God forbid the D-3, Russia’s pretty much SOL for future bvr battles after that missile. The R-37M, should they add it, would probably perform closer to a faster Phoenix than anything, and isn’t as scary as people think

They are peobably holding off till they add for aim 9x and the asraam, which will probably come in alongside the 4.5th gen jets

yeah but the r77-1 actully have a code, thats the difference

@@bencurran3204 most likely after the next 2 updates. we aren't far from being introduced to new IR missiles and Next Gen Jets. i think by next year we will see the F18 in game and such.

@@Casual7646 the code is has is the exact same as the current R77. it hasn't been touched or changed.

@@TazOnYt actually it got changed in the devs update

It'll be next week. Most likely Tuesday or Wednesday. Maybe Thursday.

C would be too OP the aim120 is already the best fox 3 in game, they would have to add many other advanced fox3s and just break the game

@@dannycage8672the C-7 would be too OP without the R-77-1, the C-5 or lower would be fine

@@dannycage8672NASAAMS is an AMRAAM SPAA

They'd have to pay people to do that and make no money off of it. Why would they?

@@gangstercheesefries1112 fair but just imagine having an AWACS announcer like the ace combat sound mod, or having our pilots say the codes for when they shoot missiles or drop bombs "Pickle" "magnum" "Fox-1/2/3" Etc etc How cool would that be

@@guilhermevitorio273 oh no I totally agree with you and think they 100% should for the audio quality of the game and experience but I just have little faith in things like this but I bet it'll happen in two years when we are too focused on bigger issues gaijin is causing to care about it positively lol

Same with the JAS-39 Gripen pilots :/

Pilot skins would be cool

What for, no one is gonna see it, you'd barely see it 😂. I think it should just be a mod like custom skins

Oh, just pretend you’re in the gulf war lol

@@christopherchartier3017 well the U.S. pilot shown is an F-16/15 pilot (with no HMD) while F-14 pilots had different helmets, just google it

Will take quite some time to reach low tier

The most fragile egos is in the forum under the mod position.

What did you get banned for?

Planes dont have specific voicelines.. yet.