2 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@allanwilson8161 9 күн бұрын
Sales so bad with over 500 units sold ?
@thomassharp2719 Ай бұрын
Hughes Airwest F-27 prop-jet.
@christainmarks106 Ай бұрын
DC-10 was first to Market and tad bit more affordable. Thats it… thats the only good thing about that passenger killing POS. Lockheed Martin’s L-10-11 was superior in everything else. Better more reliable engines( TY rolls-Royce)..better passenger experience. Loved by the pilots. Even aesthetically looked better than the DC 10.
@Tinoaviation Ай бұрын
jep, and the dc-10 dint have the best start 🥶
@bernardanderson3758 Ай бұрын
Great memories of the L-1011
@johannesbols57 2 ай бұрын
I hope to see regular uploads from your channel.
@JakelsAwake 2 ай бұрын
fun video 👍🛫 also is that the gta airport or if i believe replica of klax if you want followers and more views try shorts and tell people to watch the long form
@jarrodnolan7326 3 ай бұрын
A splendid video. The little-mentioned SA227-CC often forgotten - only 5 were built, originally constructed at SA277-DC Metro 23's but modified (in reverse!) to be fitted with the slightly worse -11 engines of the Metro III. This due to either having trouble sourcing enough -12 engines as fitted to 23's or having leftover -11's still on hand.
@gilbertotrevisan6538 5 ай бұрын
Besides it's fantastic engines, the plane itself are a piece of sh....The wings cracked right under the landing gears, the avionics and electric systems were a nightmare to work, there was some places where only a pigmeo could fit to do maintenance...to mention a few things...
@ivanlussich8146 5 ай бұрын
I am from Uruguay, 85. I flew in HS 748 in the sixties. They were used by Argentine Airlines (AR) on the "air bridge" MVD/ BUE/ MVD. Good aircraft indeed. I also flew in the Japanese NAMCO YS-11 (Austral Airlines-AU), same route. A solid, dependable airliner.
@mebeasensei 5 ай бұрын
What about the Japanese YS-11? Very similar?
@Tinoaviation 5 ай бұрын
It is not mentioned due to it having nothing to do with the 748. Tho they do look similar, they dint take anything from the 748 - thanks for watching!
@gilbertotrevisan6538 5 ай бұрын
Yep, they're very similar in the looks, sort of a bigger version of the Avro and a fantastic airplane, a little bit underpowered for it's weight and size nonetheless...
@pascalcoole2725 5 ай бұрын
The F27 handled like a dump truck, but it was rugged and reliable.. just like the DC-3
@michaelosgood9876 5 ай бұрын
You left out Mt Cook Airlines in NZ who operated these for 28 years & loved this aircraft. No other 50 seat plane of the 748 era was as rugged or do the job as well as this aircraft. You say little known-- any plane buff knows the 748, my bro...
@thedkgamer8369 5 ай бұрын
Cool video!
@topofthegreen 6 ай бұрын
this plane has no autopilot.😊
@user-im5jh4vz1c 6 ай бұрын
Ил красавцы
@bernardanderson3758 6 ай бұрын
Love the Metro
@KamilMB 6 ай бұрын
C'mon! Saying, that Il-62 and VC-10 are copies is like saying that 737 and A320 are. In both cases it is just a matter od external design. Aeroflot, Cubana, Interflug and OK-Jet airlines also had fatal accidents of IL-62 in this plane hey-days. So not just our Polish LOT.
@arnoldpalthe3915 6 ай бұрын
Don't forget this: The F-27 Friendship was developed by Fokker in the Netherlands and built under licence by Fairchild. I should know, my uncle flew the plane on its maiden flight and took it all around the world for promotional purposes.
@pascalcoole2725 5 ай бұрын
I wonder why this was not really mentioned, there where way more Fokker F27 than Fairchild build. Beside, I might be wrong but i think the Fairchild was called F-227
@stevenwolff6866 6 ай бұрын
If you're going to make a video at least be accurate with the visuals. You showed an L1049G Super Constellation throughout. Not once did you show an actual L1649 Starliner. The narrative was accurate however
@anthonyvallillo422 6 ай бұрын
Probably no Starliners left flying to get good quality video of....
@mbaxevan 6 ай бұрын
Interesting video, but why the annoying background music, it so distracting. Lower or mute it.
@charlesivey100 6 ай бұрын
The Lockheed Constellation and the Starliner imo, had classic style. At any angle, these airplanes were pleasing to look at, whether flying or standing still.
@xSoNiCcRaCkErSx 6 ай бұрын
I'm a bit confused at the numbers mentioned at 3:08 - as far as I can find Airbus did not produce 18,000 320 Neos, but only ~3100 and the 737 Max is only ~1400.
@thefunnyd0ck200 6 ай бұрын
crazy daisy video best ever chubbabi moneno
@robertl606 6 ай бұрын
Good video. I have worked on these aircraft. A friend had 3 of these believe it or not. He and I were the last people to ever taxi an L1649A under its own power. Good memories.
@joelbrown4507 6 ай бұрын
Great job on the video but I always want to know the aircrafts range and cruising speed
@realvanman1 6 ай бұрын
He kept saying turboprop, but those looked like radials?
@robertl606 6 ай бұрын
He is right. There was a plan to build them with turboprops. They even flew one. There are pictures of it out there. It's a shame they did not go with the turboprop engines. There would have been amazing aircraft that would have been in service much longer.
@WAL_DC-6B 6 ай бұрын
@@robertl606 At about 1:20 the narrator says, "Wright R-3350 turbo-prop engines" (perhaps he meant to say turbo-compound engines). The 3350 was an 18-cylinder, radial piston engine that used three power recover turbines which used exhaust gases to provide extra power to the engine's crankshaft via hydraulic couplings from the turbines. There indeed was a model of the Super Constellation that was powered by Pratt & Whitney T-34 turbo-prop engines. This was the Lockheed model 1249. Four were built for the U.S. Navy as the R7V-2 (two were later allocated to the USAF as the YC-121F). Curiously, the T-34 powered "Connies" didn't have the turbo-prop engines installed to improve the performance of the aircraft but just to merely test the engines themselves.
@stuartlee6622 5 ай бұрын
He's wrong, while they considered turboprops, he meant
@aj-2savage896 6 ай бұрын
That jackwagon who sabotaged and terminated Lufthansa's Starliner restoration-to-flight project should be in the aviation Hall of Shame.
@Flyairtindi 7 ай бұрын
Great video. How many are still flying today ;) ?
@luckeyhaskins1734 8 ай бұрын
The “Stepchild” to its pilots. Not a favorite but served its purpose and made money.
@reneegudjon3204 8 ай бұрын
This is a workhorse at least the Fokker and proofed it's worth in Iceland for decades in various conditions
@nasirghani4891 8 ай бұрын
Nose wheel steering and braking was quite tricky due to pneumatic system. First flew it in 1978.
@pascalcoole2725 5 ай бұрын
Uhu pff-pff-pff-pff-pff cheeeee pff-pff-pff-pff-pff cheeeee Check the air pressure before taxi and before landing.
@paulkile9998 9 ай бұрын
😢 0🎉😂:4🎉7
@paulkile9998 9 ай бұрын
😢 0🎉😂:4🎉7
@paulkile9998 9 ай бұрын
😢 0🎉😂:4🎉7
@paulkile9998 9 ай бұрын
😢 0🎉😂:4🎉7
@slimeplayz8752 9 ай бұрын
W Video!
@JakelsAwake 3 ай бұрын
indeed
@obiemichaels9675 9 ай бұрын
Fairchild…..? I worked on the f27 at Ansett and they were Fokker not Fairchild
@kiska5947 6 ай бұрын
I flew the Fairchild F-27 on to the gravel and rock strips in Saudi Arabia 1976-78. It was rugged and took a beating - our prop blades looked like serrated knives with all the stone chips dressed out. You mentioned quiet - the Dart Powered Chicken was NOT quiet.
@jayfrank1913 9 ай бұрын
Yay! A new aircraft video. Keep it up, Tino.
@tompatterson3163 9 ай бұрын
'Promosm' ☺️
@HellSolo 9 ай бұрын
Great video, I love the specs and professionalism mate.
@Tinoaviation 9 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! Much more to come so look out for that!
@filly883 9 ай бұрын
twends, hithtory, pithothis
@filly883 9 ай бұрын
pwanes
@JakelsAwake 9 ай бұрын
Very good tino
@jayfrank1913 9 ай бұрын
Good video! Keep on posting, Tino. Your content is improving. This is a departure (pun intended) from your aircraft-specific videos which I enjoy as well!
@Tinoaviation 9 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! I have a question for you tho. Would you like more Aircraft videos, or more of this? Thanks!
@jayfrank1913 9 ай бұрын
@Tinoaviation I still would like some aircraft videos, like the de Haviland Beaver and Otter (unless you have already done these and I missed them). But these are fun too!
@Tinoaviation 9 ай бұрын
@@jayfrank1913 Alrighty, ill have a look at that! But next up (script and voiceover already made...) : The Most Iconic Aircraft Liveries: A Visual History
@slimeplayz8752 10 ай бұрын
Wood to Carbon Fibre that quickly? Crazy to think about what can happen in 100 more years.
@MrAffrank 10 ай бұрын
You can't even spell Swearingen. Do something else until you can speak English.
@jetway7 10 ай бұрын
Video cool. Lots of useful info. I would say to maybe make the video more dramatic coz that would be kinda funny XD. Transitions are very nice along with the footage.
@slimeplayz8752 10 ай бұрын
Though this plane was named after a swear word lol. Learnt alot. A big sub earned.
@jayfrank1913 10 ай бұрын
Great video! The title made me think it was about an aircraft that used bad language. I think you meant "Swearingen."
@jarrodnolan7326 3 ай бұрын
Usually it's just the pilots using the bad language!